the arch/arm/arm920t/at91rm9200 is subject to be deleted soon! If you have any device that require this patch then please change that device to use arch/arm/arm920t/at91 immediately. You may have a look for at91rm9200ek or eb_cpux9k2 boards to see how this works.

Quoted 1 line

[1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/93639/

regards

Andreas Bie?mann

Igor Grinberg

author

2011-06-07 07:55 UTC #2 lore raw

Quoted 6 lines · Andreas Bie?mann

Dear Igor Grinberg,
Am 07.06.2011 08:09, schrieb Igor Grinberg:
Quoted 3 lines
Hi Reinhard,

Quoted 7 lines

Quoted 3 lines
What about this [1] patch?
Are there any issues with it? Will you take it?
the arch/arm/arm920t/at91rm9200 is subject to be deleted soon! If you have any device that require this patch then please change that device to use arch/arm/arm920t/at91 immediately. You may have a look for at91rm9200ek or eb_cpux9k2 boards to see how this works.

Finally, I get some answer... Thanks!
No I don't have the hardware.
This patch was a part of something else, we tried to achieve (get rid of machine_is..). If you say, it will be removed completely, then don't bother about this patch, go ahead and kill it.

Signature · 2 lines

Regards,
Igor.

Reinhard Meyer

2011-06-07 08:10 UTC #3 lore raw

Dear Igor Grinberg,

Quoted 16 lines · Andreas Bie?mann

Quoted 7 lines
Dear Igor Grinberg,
Am 07.06.2011 08:09, schrieb Igor Grinberg:
Quoted 3 lines
Hi Reinhard,
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
What about this [1] patch?
Are there any issues with it? Will you take it?
the arch/arm/arm920t/at91rm9200 is subject to be deleted soon! If you have any device that require this patch then please change that device to use arch/arm/arm920t/at91 immediately. You may have a look for at91rm9200ek or eb_cpux9k2 boards to see how this works.

Quoted 5 lines

Finally, I get some answer... Thanks!
No I don't have the hardware.
This patch was a part of something else, we tried to achieve (get rid of machine_is..). If you say, it will be removed completely, then don't bother about this patch, go ahead and kill it.

Actually I had planned to apply it, but if that makes no sense any more, we can skip the effort.

For the "cleanup/rework" of RM9200 I have to rely on Andreas ;)

Best Regards,

Reinhard

Jens Scharsig

2011-06-07 07:39 UTC #4 lore raw

In reply to Igor Grinberg

Quoted 11 lines

Hi Reinhard,
What about this [1] patch?
Are there any issues with it? Will you take it?
[1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/93639/

Dear Igor Grinberg,

please read doc/README.at91-soc. The goal of atmel rework is join all trees to reduce duplicate code. So, do not change anything in arm920t/at91rm9200. Please convert your board to use arm920t/at91 soc.

See at91rm9200ek or eb_cpux9k2 for an example.

Best regards

Jens Scharsig