The design document for ccache-native
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 43 lines · wenzong fan
-------- Original Message --------
Quoted 28 lines · Saul Wold
Quoted 27 lines · wenzong fan
Hi Folks,
Please help me to review the design document for ccache-native, and I also have two questions about it, any answers or suggestions are appreciated.
* Feature name: ccache-native
Priority: P3; M2
Owner: Wenzong Fan
Summary: Integrate ccache-native to yocto* Description:
Bitbake supports the 'CCACHE Mechanism', but 'ccache' hasn't been included by poky/yocto, just add it as a native tool.* Usage:
Build ccache as a native tool by default and enable it for speeding target packages build.* Implementation:
1) Copy bb file from OE upstream to:
meta/recipes-devtools/ccache/2) Update bb file to get the latest ccache_3.1.5 and split the single bb file to:
'ccache_3.1.5.bb', 'ccache.inc'Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
3) Enable ccache in the native tools building.
You will need to have it be a dependency pretty early on in the build. Additionally, this is a bit a new part to this task, we want to have the default
CCACHE_DIRfor the build default to a directory in TMPDIR instead of the user's home directory. This will mean setting an environment variable somewhere early also.There is a little more detail on:
Quoted 9 lines
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_1.1_Schedule
Specifically, "c) Set CCACHE on a per recipe basis. need to figure out whether ccache data can be shared and under what circumstances."
so something like adding:
export
CCACHE_DIR= "${TMPDIR}/ccache/${TARGET_SYS}/${PN}"
I think that set CCACHE_DIR on per recipe basis would degrade hit efficiency, the following ccache data can be shared if they they use the same CCACHE_DIR, but if we set CACHE_DIR on a per recipe basis, then they can't be shared:
1) Most pkg's configure will run "gcc foo.c" for checking the C compiler, these compiling are the same between different pkgs at most time.
2) Some recipes' compiling are similar, for example: gcc-cross, gcc-corss-initial and gcc-cross-intermediate.
I think that:
export CCACHE_DIR = "${TMPDIR}/ccache/${TARGET_SYS}/"
would be better.
// Robert
Quoted 10 lines
to bitbake.conf with a bit more thought into working out the right components to add to the variable.
Cheers,
Richard
Quoted 64 lines · Robert Yang
Quoted 43 lines · wenzong fan
-------- Original Message --------
Quoted 28 lines · Saul Wold
Quoted 27 lines · wenzong fan
Hi Folks,
Please help me to review the design document for ccache-native, and I also have two questions about it, any answers or suggestions are appreciated.
* Feature name: ccache-native
Priority: P3; M2
Owner: Wenzong Fan
Summary: Integrate ccache-native to yocto* Description:
Bitbake supports the 'CCACHE Mechanism', but 'ccache' hasn't been included by poky/yocto, just add it as a native tool.* Usage:
Build ccache as a native tool by default and enable it for speeding target packages build.* Implementation:
1) Copy bb file from OE upstream to:
meta/recipes-devtools/ccache/2) Update bb file to get the latest ccache_3.1.5 and split the single bb file to:
'ccache_3.1.5.bb', 'ccache.inc'Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
3) Enable ccache in the native tools building.
You will need to have it be a dependency pretty early on in the build. Additionally, this is a bit a new part to this task, we want to have the default
CCACHE_DIRfor the build default to a directory in TMPDIR instead of the user's home directory. This will mean setting an environment variable somewhere early also.There is a little more detail on:
Quoted 9 lines
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_1.1_Schedule
Specifically, "c) Set CCACHE on a per recipe basis. need to figure out whether ccache data can be shared and under what circumstances."
so something like adding:
export
CCACHE_DIR= "${TMPDIR}/ccache/${TARGET_SYS}/${PN}"I think that set
CCACHE_DIRon per recipe basis would degrade hit efficiency,
the following ccache data can be shared if they they use the sameCCACHE_DIR,
but if we setCACHE_DIRon a per recipe basis, then they can't be shared:1) Most pkg's configure will run "gcc
foo.c" for checking the C compiler, these compiling are the same between different pkgs at most time.
Quoted 8 lines
2) Some recipes' compiling are similar, for example: gcc-cross, gcc-corss-initial and gcc-cross-intermediate.
I think that:
export
CCACHE_DIR= "${TMPDIR}/ccache/${TARGET_SYS}/"would be better.
I fear that the use of ccache is inherently risky with OE. Given the (relatively common) case where the user blows away their TMPDIR in order to get a full, clean rebuild after an update to the toolchain is make, it is possible that ccache will erroneously re-use an object created by the earlier version of the toolchain.
While imperfect, I would suggest that we would do better if we would somehow embed the PV (or something like that) for the toolchain into the CCACHE_DIR, thus ensuring that we don't risk the re-use of old objects when the toolchain is updated.
(Frankly, given my experiences with it, I'd prefer we just disable ccache entirely with OE.)
-Mike (mwester)
Quoted 19 lines
// Robert
Quoted 10 lines
to bitbake.conf with a bit more thought into working out the right components to add to the variable.
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Quoted 10 lines · Mike Westerhof
I fear that the use of ccache is inherently risky with OE. Given the (relatively common) case where the user blows away their TMPDIR in order to get a full, clean rebuild after an update to the toolchain is make, it is possible that ccache will erroneously re-use an object created by the earlier version of the toolchain.
While imperfect, I would suggest that we would do better if we would somehow embed the PV (or something like that) for the toolchain into the
CCACHE_DIR, thus ensuring that we don't risk the re-use of old objects when the toolchain is updated.
ccache does already include the mtime and file size of the compiler in the hash that it uses to determine whether two compilations are "the same". I'm not sure that mangling the compiler version into ${PV} is going to buy much.
Quoted 2 lines
(Frankly, given my experiences with it, I'd prefer we just disable ccache entirely with OE.)
I agree that it should probably be disabled by default. I've also had some slightly bad experiences with ccache although I don't think I have ever encountered the failure mode you mentioned above.
p.
Quoted 68 lines · Mike Westerhof
Quoted 67 lines · Robert Yang
Quoted 43 lines · wenzong fan
-------- Original Message --------
Quoted 28 lines · Saul Wold
Quoted 27 lines · wenzong fan
Hi Folks,
Please help me to review the design document for ccache-native, and I also have two questions about it, any answers or suggestions are appreciated.
* Feature name: ccache-native
Priority: P3; M2
Owner: Wenzong Fan
Summary: Integrate ccache-native to yocto* Description:
Bitbake supports the 'CCACHE Mechanism', but 'ccache' hasn't been included by poky/yocto, just add it as a native tool.* Usage:
Build ccache as a native tool by default and enable it for speeding target packages build.* Implementation:
1) Copy bb file from OE upstream to:
meta/recipes-devtools/ccache/2) Update bb file to get the latest ccache_3.1.5 and split the single bb file to:
'ccache_3.1.5.bb', 'ccache.inc'Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
3) Enable ccache in the native tools building.
You will need to have it be a dependency pretty early on in the build. Additionally, this is a bit a new part to this task, we want to have the default
CCACHE_DIRfor the build default to a directory in TMPDIR instead of the user's home directory. This will mean setting an environment variable somewhere early also.There is a little more detail on:
Quoted 9 lines
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_1.1_Schedule
Specifically, "c) Set CCACHE on a per recipe basis. need to figure out whether ccache data can be shared and under what circumstances."
so something like adding:
export
CCACHE_DIR= "${TMPDIR}/ccache/${TARGET_SYS}/${PN}"I think that set
CCACHE_DIRon per recipe basis would degrade hit efficiency,
the following ccache data can be shared if they they use the sameCCACHE_DIR,
but if we setCACHE_DIRon a per recipe basis, then they can't be shared:1) Most pkg's configure will run "gcc
foo.c" for checking the C compiler, these compiling are the same between different pkgs at most time.2) Some recipes' compiling are similar, for example: gcc-cross, gcc-corss-initial and gcc-cross-intermediate.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I think that:
export
CCACHE_DIR= "${TMPDIR}/ccache/${TARGET_SYS}/"would be better.
I fear that the use of ccache is inherently risky with OE. Given the (relatively common) case where the user blows away their TMPDIR in order
(Replying to my own message, because I didn't have enough coffee to be clear in the original!) I'm agreeing with the suggestion that it be in TMPDIR, and offering the suggestion that if we don't put it there, we need to qualify it with the toolchain version. (Now I'm going to get another cup of coffee -- sorry for any confusion!)
-Mike (mwester)
Quoted 41 lines
to get a full, clean rebuild after an update to the toolchain is make, it is possible that ccache will erroneously re-use an object created by the earlier version of the toolchain.
While imperfect, I would suggest that we would do better if we would somehow embed the PV (or something like that) for the toolchain into the
CCACHE_DIR, thus ensuring that we don't risk the re-use of old objects when the toolchain is updated.(Frankly, given my experiences with it, I'd prefer we just disable ccache entirely with OE.)
-Mike (mwester)
Quoted 13 lines
// Robert
Quoted 10 lines
to bitbake.conf with a bit more thought into working out the right components to add to the variable.
Cheers,
Richard
Quoted 6 lines
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core