nfs4-acl-tools : nfs4_setfacl' failed with unexpected messages if the format of the input file is incorrect.
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 nfs4-acl-tools : nfs4_setfacl' failed with unexpected messages if the format of the input file is incorrect.
On RHEL5.5 and above releases,
read ACL entries to set from file leads to a segmentation fault on pp64, more over the same problem does not show up for x86_64 architecture.
here is what i tried.
mounted a file system over nfs4.
#rpm -qa | grep nfs4
nfs4-acl-tools-0.3.3-5.el6.ppc64
'nfs4_setfacl' failed with unexpected message:
#nfs4_setfacl -S file4 file1
*** glibc detected *** nfs4_setfacl: double free or corruption (out):0x08007760 ***
expected out should be like
Scanning ACE string 'abcd' failed.
Failed while inserting ACE(s).
From b8333732964780394518be74ab0b7c61a7e4be4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: faizan <faizan.husain@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:06:47 +0530
Subject: [PATCH][BUILD]] FIX - 'nfs4_setfacl' failed with unexpected messages iff the format of the input file is incorrect.
--- libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c +0 -1
@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ parse_alloc_fields(char *buf, char *fields[NUMFIELDS])return 0 ; out_free: -free_fields (fields);return -ENOMEM ; }
--
1.7.1
Regards
Faizan
faizan husain wrote:
On RHEL5.5 and above releases,
read ACL entries to set from file leads to a segmentation fault on pp64, more over the same problem does not show up for x86_64 architecture.
...
diff --git a/libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c b/libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c index 9d877fb..1cc220e 100644 --- a/libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c +++ b/libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c @@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ parse_alloc_fields(char *buf, char *fields[NUMFIELDS])
return 0;
out_free:
- free_fields(fields);
return -ENOMEM;}
If this fix is correct, shouldn't the name of the label be changed? Better yet eliminate the gotos and label.
However, I don't think the fix is correct. I suspect you need a test for strsep() returning NULL.
Quoted 21 lines · Jim Rees
faizan husain wrote:
On RHEL5.5 and above releases,
read ACL entries to set from file leads to a segmentation fault on pp64, more over the same problem does not show up forx86_64architecture....
diff --git a/libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c b/libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c index 9d877fb..1cc220e 100644 --- a/libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c +++ b/libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c @@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ parse_alloc_fields(char *buf, char *fields[NUMFIELDS])return 0; out_free: - free_fields(fields); return -ENOMEM; }
Quoted 5 lines
If this fix is correct, shouldn't the name of the label be changed? Better yet eliminate the gotos and label.
However, I don't think the fix is correct. I suspect you need a test for
strsep()returning NULL.
I have tried strsep() returning NULL but without any success,
have figured out why double free error was coming leading to segmentation fault.
problem was this part of code in parse_alloc_fields() function:
if (count != 3)
goto out_free;
at this point memory is not allocated for fields leading to double free of memory once inside parse_alloc_fields() and again inside nfs4_ace_from_string().
instead we can change the code:
if (count != 3)
return -EINVAL; /*Invalid argument*/
This look to me as more foolproof solution.
what do you say?
--- libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c +1 -1
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ parse_alloc_fields(char *buf, char *fields[NUMFIELDS]) count++; }if (count !=3 ) - goto out_free; +return -EINVAL ;for (i =0 ; i <NUMFIELDS ; i++) { field =strsep (&buf,":" );
--
1.7.1
Thanks
Faizan
faizan husain wrote:
problem was this part of code in parse_alloc_fields() function:
if (count != 3)
goto out_free;
at this point memory is not allocated for fields leading to double free of memory once inside parse_alloc_fields() and again inside nfs4_ace_from_string().
instead we can change the code:
if (count != 3)
return -EINVAL; /*Invalid argument*/
This look to me as more foolproof solution.
what do you say?
That looks correct. It should return EINVAL here, and there is no need to free. But I don't see why it fixes your segfault. fields[] should be all NULL at this point, so free_fields shouldn't do anything.
The test in free_fields() is redundant, since free(NULL) doesn't do anything. But it could be made more foolproof by zeroing the array so you can't get a double free:
voidfree_fields(char *fields[NUMFIELDS])
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < NUMFIELDS; i++) {
free(fields[i]);
fields[i] = NULL;
}
}Quoted 26 lines · Jim Rees
faizan husain wrote:
problem was this part of code in
parse_alloc_fields()function:
if (count != 3)goto out_free;at this point memory is not allocated for fields leading to double free of memory once inside
parse_alloc_fields()and again insidenfs4_ace_from_string().instead we can change the code:
if (count != 3)
return-EINVAL; /*Invalid argument*/This look to me as more foolproof solution.
what do you say?That looks correct. It should return EINVAL here, and there is no need to free. But I don't see why it fixes your segfault. fields[] should be all NULL at this point, so
free_fieldsshouldn't do anything.The test in
free_fields()is redundant, since free(NULL) doesn't do anything. But it could be made more foolproof by zeroing the array so you can't get a double free:void
free_fields(char *fields[NUMFIELDS])
Quoted 8 lines
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i< NUMFIELDS; i++) {
free(fields[i]);
fields[i] = NULL;
}
}yeah that could be done to make it more foolproof. here is the final patch:
From 6cd5263027e3fa5cf18756aa9db108dcdb2367d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: faizan <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:55:28 +0530
Subject: [PATCH][BUILD]] FIX - 'nfs4_setfacl' failed with unexpected messages if the format of the input file is incorrect.
--- libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c | 9 +++++---- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
libnfs4acl/nfs4_ace_from_string.c +5 -4
@@ -86,9 +86,10 @@ free_fields(char *fields[NUMFIELDS]) {int i; -for (i =0 ; i <NUMFIELDS ; i++) -if (fields[i] !=NULL ) -free (fields[i]); +for (i =0 ; i <NUMFIELDS ; i++) { +free (fields[i]); + fields[i] =NULL ; + } }int
@@ -107,7 +108,7 @@ parse_alloc_fields(char *buf, char *fields[NUMFIELDS]) count++; }if (count !=3 ) - goto out_free; +return -EINVAL ;for (i =0 ; i <NUMFIELDS ; i++) { field =strsep (&buf,":" );
--
1.7.1
Thanks
Faizan