Skip to contentSkip to conversation

treewide: Add missing breaks in switch/case

PATCH In review Joe Perches 7 participants 19 messages Jul 10, 2011 – Jul 26, 2011

Subsystems (7)
Networking Network drivers USB Sound +3 more subsystems
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

cover treewide: Add missing breaks in switch/case

Found by grep. Uncompiled/untested.

Joe Perches (5):
gpio-tps65910.c: Add missing breaks in switch/case
tps65910-irq: Add missing breaks in switch/case
ath5k: Add missing breaks in switch/case
fusb300_udc: Add missing breaks in switch/case
dbri: Add missing breaks in switch/case

 drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c          |    2 ++
 drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.c            |    2 ++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c |    3 +++
 drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c      |    3 +++
 sound/sparc/dbri.c                    |    5 +++++
 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.6.131.g99019
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/5 gpio-tps65910.c: Add missing breaks in switch/case

---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c +2 -0
index 4171033..b9c1c29 100644
@@ -81,8 +81,10 @@ void tps65910_gpio_init(struct tps65910 *tps65910, int gpio_base)
 	switch(tps65910_chip_id(tps65910)) {
 	case TPS65910:
 		tps65910->gpio.ngpio	= 6;
+		break;
 	case TPS65911:
 		tps65910->gpio.ngpio	= 9;
+		break;
 	default:
 		return;
 	}
Signature · 1 line
1.7.6.131.g99019
#2 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 1/5] gpio-tps65910.c: Add missing breaks in switch/case

Axel published a patch that fixed this issue which is already in mainline.

g.

Quoted 24 lines · Joe Perches

---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c |    2 ++

 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c +0 -0
index 4171033..b9c1c29 100644
@@ -81,8 +81,10 @@ void tps65910_gpio_init(struct tps65910 *tps65910, int gpio_base)
        switch(tps65910_chip_id(tps65910)) {

       case TPS65910:
               tps65910->gpio.ngpio    = 6;
+               break;
       case TPS65911:
               tps65910->gpio.ngpio    = 9;
+               break;
       default:
               return;
       }
--
1.7.6.131.g99019

Signature · 2 lines
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
#3 lore raw

PATCH 2/5 tps65910-irq: Add missing breaks in switch/case

In reply to Joe Perches
---
 drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.c +2 -0
index 2bfad5c..a56be93 100644
@@ -178,8 +178,10 @@ int tps65910_irq_init(struct tps65910 *tps65910, int irq,
 	switch (tps65910_chip_id(tps65910)) {
 	case TPS65910:
 		tps65910->irq_num = TPS65910_NUM_IRQ;
+		break;
 	case TPS65911:
 		tps65910->irq_num = TPS65911_NUM_IRQ;
+		break;
 	}
 
 	/* Register with genirq */
Signature · 1 line
1.7.6.131.g99019
#4 lore raw

PATCH 3/5 ath5k: Add missing breaks in switch/case

In reply to Joe Perches
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c +3 -0
index 62172d5..f82383b 100644
@@ -107,10 +107,13 @@ ath5k_hw_setup_2word_tx_desc(struct ath5k_hw *ah, struct ath5k_desc *desc,
 		case AR5K_PKT_TYPE_BEACON:
 		case AR5K_PKT_TYPE_PROBE_RESP:
 			frame_type = AR5K_AR5210_TX_DESC_FRAME_TYPE_NO_DELAY;
+			break;
 		case AR5K_PKT_TYPE_PIFS:
 			frame_type = AR5K_AR5210_TX_DESC_FRAME_TYPE_PIFS;
+			break;
 		default:
 			frame_type = type;
+			break;
 		}
 
 		tx_ctl->tx_control_0 |=
Signature · 1 line
1.7.6.131.g99019
Acked-by on v1 3/5
#5 lore raw

Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 3/5] ath5k: Add missing breaks in switch/case

Quoted 1 line · Joe Perches
Quoted 10 lines
---
  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c |    3 +++
  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c +0 -0
index 62172d5..f82383b 100644
@@ -107,10 +107,13 @@ ath5k_hw_setup_2word_tx_desc(struct ath5k_hw *ah, struct ath5k_desc *desc,
  		case AR5K_PKT_TYPE_BEACON:

drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c ath5k_hw_setup_2word_tx_desc(struct ath5k_hw *ah, struct ath5k_desc *desc, · line 117

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c +3 -0
  		case AR5K_PKT_TYPE_PROBE_RESP:
  			frame_type = AR5K_AR5210_TX_DESC_FRAME_TYPE_NO_DELAY;
+			break;
  		case AR5K_PKT_TYPE_PIFS:
  			frame_type = AR5K_AR5210_TX_DESC_FRAME_TYPE_PIFS;
+			break;
  		default:
  			frame_type = type;
+			break;
  		}

The intention here is to replace frame types from enum ath5k_pkt_type with their AR5210-specific counterparts. So the intention is definitely to have breaks here.

Unfortunately, AR5210 cards are extremely rare these days. I have one, but it only works with old motherboards. It would take me half a day to dust off that system, compile the kernel and check the patch. But I assume your patch is fine. At least it's very unlikely to break anything.

Signature · 2 lines
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
maintainer Acked-by on v1 3/5
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/5] ath5k: Add missing breaks in switch/case

In reply to Joe Perches

2011/7/10 Joe Perches <[email protected]>:

Quoted 22 lines

---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c |    3 +++

 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c +0 -0
index 62172d5..f82383b 100644
@@ -107,10 +107,13 @@ ath5k_hw_setup_2word_tx_desc(struct ath5k_hw *ah, struct ath5k_desc *desc,

               case AR5K_PKT_TYPE_BEACON:
               case AR5K_PKT_TYPE_PROBE_RESP:
                       frame_type = AR5K_AR5210_TX_DESC_FRAME_TYPE_NO_DELAY;
+                       break;
               case AR5K_PKT_TYPE_PIFS:
                       frame_type = AR5K_AR5210_TX_DESC_FRAME_TYPE_PIFS;
+                       break;
               default:
                       frame_type = type;
+                       break;
               }

Quoted 1 line

               tx_ctl->tx_control_0 |=

Signature · 3 lines
GPG ID: 0xD21DB2DB
As you read this post global entropy rises. Have Fun ;-)
Nick
#7 lore raw

PATCH 4/5 fusb300_udc: Add missing breaks in switch/case

In reply to Joe Perches
---
 drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +3 -0
index 06353e7..453bc0f 100644
@@ -688,10 +688,13 @@ static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep,
 	switch (length % 4) {
 	case 1:
 		golden_value = *tmp;
+		break;
 	case 2:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8;
+		break;
 	case 3:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8 | *(tmp + 2) << 16;
+		break;
 	default:
 		break;
 
Signature · 1 line
1.7.6.131.g99019
#9 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 4/5] fusb300_udc: Add missing breaks in switch/case

In reply to Joe Perches
Quoted 13 lines · * Joe Perches | 2011-07-10 02:28:27 [-0700]:

---
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c | 3 +++

1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +0 -0
index 06353e7..453bc0f 100644
@@ -688,10 +688,13 @@ static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep,
 	switch (length % 4) {
 	case 1:
 		golden_value = *tmp;

drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep, · line 700

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +3 -0
+		break;
 	case 2:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8;
+		break;
 	case 3:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8 | *(tmp + 2) << 16;
+		break;
 	default:
 		break;
 

That is in an #if 0 block. Maybe we should remove the #if 0? Yuan-Hsin?

Sebastian

#10 lore raw

RE: [PATCH 4/5] fusb300_udc: Add missing breaks in switch/case

-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 4:09 PM
To: Wendy Yuan-Hsin Chen(陳元馨)
Cc: Felipe Balbi; Greg Kroah-Hartman; [email protected]; [email protected]; Joe Perches
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] fusb300_udc: Add missing breaks in switch/case

Quoted 14 lines · * Joe Perches | 2011-07-10 02:28:27 [-0700]:

---
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c | 3 +++

1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +0 -0
index 06353e7..453bc0f 100644
@@ -688,10 +688,13 @@ static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep,
 	switch (length % 4) {
 	case 1:
 		golden_value = *tmp;

drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep, · line 700

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +3 -0
+		break;
 	case 2:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8;
+		break;
 	case 3:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8 | *(tmp + 2) << 16;
+		break;
 	default:
 		break;
 

That is in an #if 0 block. Maybe we should remove the #if 0? Yuan-Hsin?

It's ok to remove the #if 0. But the warning will occur while compling.

Sebastian

Yuan-Hsin

********************* Confidentiality Notice ************************ This electronic message and any attachments may contain confidential and legally privileged information or information which is otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient,please do not disclose the contents, either in whole or in part, to anyone,and immediately delete the message and any attachments from your computer system and destroy all hard copies.
Thank you for your cooperation.
***********************************************************************

#11 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 4/5] fusb300_udc: Add missing breaks in switch/case

Quoted 22 lines · * Wendy Yuan-Hsin Chen(??????) | 2011-07-14 16:36:39 [+0800]:
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +2 -0
index 06353e7..453bc0f 100644
@@ -688,10 +688,13 @@ static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep,
 	switch (length % 4) {
 	case 1:
 		golden_value = *tmp;
+		break;
 	case 2:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8;
+		break;
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep, · line 700

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +1 -0
 	case 3:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8 | *(tmp + 2) << 16;
+		break;
 	default:
 		break;
 

That is in an #if 0 block. Maybe we should remove the #if 0? Yuan-Hsin?

Quoted 1 line

It's ok to remove the #if 0. But the warning will occur while compling.

By removing the #if 0 block I meant to remove the unused functions fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo() and fusb300_dbg_fifo(). There should be no warning then.
Are you okey with this? Are those function required?

Quoted 1 line

Yuan-Hsin

Sebastian

#12 lore raw

RE: [PATCH 4/5] fusb300_udc: Add missing breaks in switch/case

-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 6:36 PM
To: Wendy Yuan-Hsin Chen(陳元馨)
Cc: Felipe Balbi; Greg Kroah-Hartman; [email protected]; [email protected]; Joe Perches
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] fusb300_udc: Add missing breaks in switch/case

Quoted 22 lines · * Wendy Yuan-Hsin Chen(??????) | 2011-07-14 16:36:39 [+0800]:
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +2 -0
index 06353e7..453bc0f 100644
@@ -688,10 +688,13 @@ static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep,
 	switch (length % 4) {
 	case 1:
 		golden_value = *tmp;
+		break;
 	case 2:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8;
+		break;
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep, · line 700

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +1 -0
 	case 3:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8 | *(tmp + 2) << 16;
+		break;
 	default:
 		break;
 

That is in an #if 0 block. Maybe we should remove the #if 0? Yuan-Hsin?

Quoted 1 line

It's ok to remove the #if 0. But the warning will occur while compling.

By removing the #if 0 block I meant to remove the unused functions fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo() and fusb300_dbg_fifo(). There should be no warning then. Are you okey with this? Are those function required?

These funtions are used for debugging. I think it's ok to remove them. Thanks.

Yuan-Hsin

********************* Confidentiality Notice ************************ This electronic message and any attachments may contain confidential and legally privileged information or information which is otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient,please do not disclose the contents, either in whole or in part, to anyone,and immediately delete the message and any attachments from your computer system and destroy all hard copies.
Thank you for your cooperation.
***********************************************************************

#13 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 4/5] fusb300_udc: Add missing breaks in switch/case

Hi,

Quoted 22 lines · Wendy Yuan-Hsin Chen(陳元馨)
Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +0 -0
index 06353e7..453bc0f 100644
@@ -688,10 +688,13 @@ static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep,
 	switch (length % 4) {
 	case 1:
 		golden_value = *tmp;

drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep, · line 700

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +3 -0
+		break;
 	case 2:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8;
+		break;
 	case 3:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8 | *(tmp + 2) << 16;
+		break;
 	default:
 		break;
 

That is in an #if 0 block. Maybe we should remove the #if 0? Yuan-Hsin?

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line

It's ok to remove the #if 0. But the warning will occur while compling.

By removing the #if 0 block I meant to remove the unused functions fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo() and fusb300_dbg_fifo(). There should be no warning then. Are you okey with this? Are those function required?

These funtions are used for debugging. I think it's ok to remove them. Thanks.

maybe make a debugfs interface instead ?

Signature · 1 line
balbi
#14 lore raw

RE: [PATCH 4/5] fusb300_udc: Add missing breaks in switch/case

Hi,

Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +0 -0
index 06353e7..453bc0f 100644
@@ -688,10 +688,13 @@ static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep,
 	switch (length % 4) {
 	case 1:
 		golden_value = *tmp;

drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep, · line 700

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +3 -0
+		break;
 	case 2:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8;
+		break;
 	case 3:
 		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8 | *(tmp + 2) << 16;
+		break;
 	default:
 		break;
 

That is in an #if 0 block. Maybe we should remove the #if 0? Yuan-Hsin?

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line

It's ok to remove the #if 0. But the warning will occur while compling.

By removing the #if 0 block I meant to remove the unused functions fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo() and fusb300_dbg_fifo(). There should be no warning then. Are you okey with this? Are those function required?

These funtions are used for debugging. I think it's ok to remove them. Thanks.

maybe make a debugfs interface instead ?

These functions were used to debug unstable hw fifo while developing fusb300. It's much more stable now. So these functions can be removed. Thanks for your advice.

Yuan-Hsin

********************* Confidentiality Notice ************************ This electronic message and any attachments may contain confidential and legally privileged information or information which is otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient,please do not disclose the contents, either in whole or in part, to anyone,and immediately delete the message and any attachments from your computer system and destroy all hard copies.
Thank you for your cooperation.
***********************************************************************

#15 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 usb/fusb300: remove #if 0 block

The code in this block is unused and the Author is fine with removing:

|These functions were used to debug unstable hw fifo while developing
|fusb300.  It's much more stable now.
|So these functions can be removed.
---
 drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c |  101 --------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/gadget/fusb300_udc.c +0 -101
index 24a9243..4ec888f 100644
@@ -609,107 +609,6 @@ void fusb300_rdcxf(struct fusb300 *fusb300,
 	}
 }
 
-#if 0
-static void fusb300_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep,
-				u8 entry, u16 length)
-{
-	u32 reg;
-	u32 i = 0;
-	u32 j = 0;
-
-	reg = ioread32(ep->fusb300->reg + FUSB300_OFFSET_GTM);
-	reg &= ~(FUSB300_GTM_TST_EP_ENTRY(0xF) |
-		FUSB300_GTM_TST_EP_NUM(0xF) | FUSB300_GTM_TST_FIFO_DEG);
-	reg |= (FUSB300_GTM_TST_EP_ENTRY(entry) |
-		FUSB300_GTM_TST_EP_NUM(ep->epnum) | FUSB300_GTM_TST_FIFO_DEG);
-	iowrite32(reg, ep->fusb300->reg + FUSB300_OFFSET_GTM);
-
-	for (i = 0; i < (length >> 2); i++) {
-		if (i * 4 == 1024)
-			break;
-		reg = ioread32(ep->fusb300->reg +
-			FUSB300_OFFSET_BUFDBG_START + i * 4);
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG"  0x%-8x", reg);
-		j++;
-		if ((j % 4)  == 0)
-			printk(KERN_DEBUG "\n");
-	}
-
-	if (length % 4) {
-		reg = ioread32(ep->fusb300->reg +
-			FUSB300_OFFSET_BUFDBG_START + i * 4);
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG "  0x%x\n", reg);
-	}
-
-	if ((j % 4)  != 0)
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG "\n");
-
-	fusb300_disable_bit(ep->fusb300, FUSB300_OFFSET_GTM,
-		FUSB300_GTM_TST_FIFO_DEG);
-}
-
-static void fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep,
-				u8 entry, u16 length, u8 *golden)
-{
-	u32 reg;
-	u32 i = 0;
-	u32 golden_value;
-	u8 *tmp;
-
-	tmp = golden;
-
-	printk(KERN_DEBUG "fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo (entry %d) : start\n", entry);
-
-	reg = ioread32(ep->fusb300->reg + FUSB300_OFFSET_GTM);
-	reg &= ~(FUSB300_GTM_TST_EP_ENTRY(0xF) |
-		FUSB300_GTM_TST_EP_NUM(0xF) | FUSB300_GTM_TST_FIFO_DEG);
-	reg |= (FUSB300_GTM_TST_EP_ENTRY(entry) |
-		FUSB300_GTM_TST_EP_NUM(ep->epnum) | FUSB300_GTM_TST_FIFO_DEG);
-	iowrite32(reg, ep->fusb300->reg + FUSB300_OFFSET_GTM);
-
-	for (i = 0; i < (length >> 2); i++) {
-		if (i * 4 == 1024)
-			break;
-		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8 |
-				*(tmp + 2) << 16 | *(tmp + 3) << 24;
-
-		reg = ioread32(ep->fusb300->reg +
-			FUSB300_OFFSET_BUFDBG_START + i*4);
-
-		if (reg != golden_value) {
-			printk(KERN_DEBUG "0x%x  :  ", (u32)(ep->fusb300->reg +
-				FUSB300_OFFSET_BUFDBG_START + i*4));
-			printk(KERN_DEBUG "    golden = 0x%x, reg = 0x%x\n",
-				golden_value, reg);
-		}
-		tmp += 4;
-	}
-
-	switch (length % 4) {
-	case 1:
-		golden_value = *tmp;
-	case 2:
-		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8;
-	case 3:
-		golden_value = *tmp | *(tmp + 1) << 8 | *(tmp + 2) << 16;
-	default:
-		break;
-
-	reg = ioread32(ep->fusb300->reg + FUSB300_OFFSET_BUFDBG_START + i*4);
-	if (reg != golden_value) {
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG "0x%x:", (u32)(ep->fusb300->reg +
-			FUSB300_OFFSET_BUFDBG_START + i*4));
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG "  golden = 0x%x, reg = 0x%x\n",
-			golden_value, reg);
-	}
-	}
-
-	printk(KERN_DEBUG "fusb300_cmp_dbg_fifo : end\n");
-	fusb300_disable_bit(ep->fusb300, FUSB300_OFFSET_GTM,
-		FUSB300_GTM_TST_FIFO_DEG);
-}
-#endif
-
 static void fusb300_rdfifo(struct fusb300_ep *ep,
 			  struct fusb300_request *req,
 			  u32 length)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.4
Applied
#16 lore raw

Re: [PATCH] usb/fusb300: remove #if 0 block

Quoted 7 lines · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

The code in this block is unused and the Author is fine with removing:

|These functions were used to debug unstable hw fifo while developing
|fusb300.  It's much more stable now.
|So these functions can be removed.

applied, thanks

Signature · 1 line
balbi
#17 lore raw

PATCH 5/5 dbri: Add missing breaks in switch/case

In reply to Joe Perches
---
 sound/sparc/dbri.c |    5 +++++
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
sound/sparc/dbri.c +5 -0
index 73f9cba..ca978b1 100644
@@ -578,14 +578,19 @@ static __u32 reverse_bytes(__u32 b, int len)
 	switch (len) {
 	case 32:
 		b = ((b & 0xffff0000) >> 16) | ((b & 0x0000ffff) << 16);
+		break;
 	case 16:
 		b = ((b & 0xff00ff00) >> 8) | ((b & 0x00ff00ff) << 8);
+		break;
 	case 8:
 		b = ((b & 0xf0f0f0f0) >> 4) | ((b & 0x0f0f0f0f) << 4);
+		break;
 	case 4:
 		b = ((b & 0xcccccccc) >> 2) | ((b & 0x33333333) << 2);
+		break;
 	case 2:
 		b = ((b & 0xaaaaaaaa) >> 1) | ((b & 0x55555555) << 1);
+		break;
 	case 1:
 	case 0:
 		break;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.6.131.g99019
#18 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 5/5] dbri: Add missing breaks in switch/case

On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 02:28 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:

defective patch, please ignore.

sound/sparc/dbri.c static __u32 reverse_bytes(__u32 b, int len) · line 581

Quoted 9 lines
sound/sparc/dbri.c +1 -0
index 73f9cba..ca978b1 100644
@@ -578,14 +578,19 @@ static __u32 reverse_bytes(__u32 b, int len)
 	switch (len) {
 	case 32:
 		b = ((b & 0xffff0000) >> 16) | ((b & 0x0000ffff) << 16);
+		break;

Maybe add a comment for fall through use instead.