Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Integrator patches

PATCH New Linus Walleij 2 participants 3 messages Jul 23, 2011

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

cover Integrator patches

Reposting the entire series since I changed the Subject: on [3/9] and [4/9] and removed one TAB character in [6/9]. Easiest way to avoid the mess...

Linus Walleij (9):
MAINTAINERS: integrator+versatile boards
integratorap: make the compile work again
integratorap: support relocation
integratorap: support the hush shell
integratorap: support some rudimentary commands
integratorap: fixup SDRAM memory size detection
integratorap: remove hardcoded 32MB memory cmdline
integratorcp: make the board compile
integrator: convert to new build system

 MAINTAINERS                                 |   11 +-
 MAKEALL                                     |   22 ---
 Makefile                                    |   27 ----
 arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/cpu.c                  |    5 -
 board/armltd/integrator/integrator.c        |   15 +-
 board/armltd/integrator/lowlevel_init.S     |    2 +-
 board/armltd/integrator/split_by_variant.sh |  220 ---------------------------
 boards.cfg                                  |    8 +
 include/configs/integratorap.h              |   21 +++-
 include/configs/integratorcp.h              |    8 +
 10 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 290 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100755 board/armltd/integrator/split_by_variant.sh
Signature · 1 line
1.7.6
#1 lore raw

cover Integrator patches

Hi Linus,

Le 23/07/2011 15:37, Linus Walleij a ?crit :

Quoted 3 lines

Reposting the entire series since I changed the Subject: on [3/9] and [4/9] and removed one TAB character in [6/9]. Easiest way to avoid the mess...

... mess which still exists due to the fact that there's no history in the patch set, making it harder to cross-check what's changed between v3, v2 and v1 for each patch. :(

I'll need some time to go through the mailing list and patchwork to check the patch set history.

Amicalement,

Signature · 1 line
Albert.
#2 lore raw

cover Integrator patches

Quoted 7 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Quoted 3 lines

Reposting the entire series since I changed the Subject: on [3/9] and [4/9] and removed one TAB character in [6/9]. Easiest way to avoid the mess...

... mess which still exists due to the fact that there's no history in the patch set, making it harder to cross-check what's changed between v3, v2 and v1 for each patch. :(

It does, the paragraph just above your statement is the history, i.e. everything that changes from the initial versions of patch [3/9], [4/9] and [6/9]. I didn't change anything else, apart from putting v3 after the [PATCH N/M] Subject, the rest is just reposts of the earlier versions.

If you don't care about some patches being renamed with Subject: integrator to Subject: integratorap: you can use all the old versions apart from the single one that is in the v3 series and changes the TAB character so this:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/105595/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/104349/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/104346/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/104347/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/104348/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/106467/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/104661/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/105593/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/106013/

Has the same semantic content and is just v1, v2 pathes except for that one patch, 106467.

Thanks,
Linus Walleij