enhance lib/oe/unpack.py for ".tar.lzma" files
PATCH 1/1 enhance lib/oe/unpack.py for ".tar.lzma" files
The boys a mingw started packaging binutils as .tar.lzma files. This is the only trick I found to unpack them. It works. (I am trying to revitalize canadian-sdk at newer component versions.)
lib/oe/unpack.py +2 -0
@@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ def unpack_file(file, destdir, parameters, env=None): cmd = 'xz -dc %s > %s' % (file, os.path.basename(root)) elif file.endswith('.tar.lz'): cmd = 'lzip -dc %s | tar x --no-same-owner -f -' % file + elif file.endswith('.tar.lzma'): + cmd = 'tar --lzma --no-same-owner -xf %s' % file elif file.endswith('.lz'): root, ext = os.path.splitext(file) cmd = 'lzip -dc %s > %s' % (file, os.path.basename(root))
Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2011, 12:59 -0500 schrieb Dick Hollenbeck:
Quoted 3 lines
The boys a mingw started packaging binutils as .tar.lzma files. This is the only trick I found to unpack them. It works. (I am trying to revitalize canadian-sdk at newer component versions.)
Please follow the commit policy [1][2]. At least your Signed-off-by line is missing and the commit summary does not follow the pattern(?).
Please resend your patch as »v2« [3] and update the state of your patch in the patch queue [4].
Otherwise your patch looks fine. Is it guaranteed that tar supports lzma?
Thanks,
Paul
[1] http://openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy
[2] http://openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_log_example
[3] http://openembedded.org/index.php/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded
[4] http://openembedded.org/index.php/Patchwork