Skip to contentSkip to conversation

enhance lib/oe/unpack.py for ".tar.lzma" files

PATCH In review Dick Hollenbeck 2 participants 2 messages Jul 26, 2011

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 enhance lib/oe/unpack.py for ".tar.lzma" files

The boys a mingw started packaging binutils as .tar.lzma files. This is the only trick I found to unpack them. It works. (I am trying to revitalize canadian-sdk at newer component versions.)

lib/oe/unpack.py +2 -0
index 8e8bf36..d7e34a7 100644
@@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ def unpack_file(file, destdir, parameters, env=None):
             cmd = 'xz -dc %s > %s' % (file, os.path.basename(root))
         elif file.endswith('.tar.lz'):
             cmd = 'lzip -dc %s | tar x --no-same-owner -f -' % file
+        elif file.endswith('.tar.lzma'):
+            cmd = 'tar --lzma --no-same-owner -xf %s' % file
         elif file.endswith('.lz'):
             root, ext = os.path.splitext(file)
             cmd = 'lzip -dc %s > %s' % (file, os.path.basename(root))
#1 lore raw

Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2011, 12:59 -0500 schrieb Dick Hollenbeck:

Quoted 3 lines

The boys a mingw started packaging binutils as .tar.lzma files. This is the only trick I found to unpack them. It works. (I am trying to revitalize canadian-sdk at newer component versions.)

Please follow the commit policy [1][2]. At least your Signed-off-by line is missing and the commit summary does not follow the pattern(?).

Please resend your patch as »v2« [3] and update the state of your patch in the patch queue [4].

Otherwise your patch looks fine. Is it guaranteed that tar supports lzma?

Thanks,

Paul

[1] http://openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy
[2] http://openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_log_example
[3] http://openembedded.org/index.php/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded
[4] http://openembedded.org/index.php/Patchwork