u-boot-arm/master branch complete wrt merge window?
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
So apologies in advance to the sender, and please re-send me requests for any patch that should be in u-boot-arm/master at this point but is not.
Amicalement,
Signature · 1 line
Albert.
Hello Albert,
Quoted 11 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
So apologies in advance to the sender, and please re-send me requests for any patch that should be in u-boot-arm/master at this point but is not.
I miss the following patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/98531/
bye,
Heiko
Signature · 2 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Le 12/08/2011 15:59, Heiko Schocher a ?crit :
Quoted 15 lines
Hello Albert,
Quoted 11 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
So apologies in advance to the sender, and please re-send me requests for any patch that should be in u-boot-arm/master at this point but is not.
Quoted 6 lines
I miss the following patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/98531/
bye,
Heiko
Done, thanks for the reminder.
Amicalement,
Signature · 1 line
Albert.
Hi Albert,
OMAP3 SPL - would be great:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/102112/focus=105261
Matter was discussed in this thread:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/103578
Haven't heard anything after sending in V9.
Regards
Simon
Quoted 13 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
So apologies in advance to the sender, and please re-send me requests for any patch that should be in u-boot-arm/master at this point but is not.
Amicalement,
Hi Simon,
Le 12/08/2011 16:02, Simon Schwarz a ?crit :
Quoted 5 lines
Hi Albert,
OMAP3 SPL - would be great:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/102112/focus=105261
Quoted 7 lines
Matter was discussed in this thread:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/103578Haven't heard anything after sending in V9.
Regards
Simon
Hmm, that's OMAP3, so I filed it away as going through Sandeep's tree.
Sandeep?
Amicalement,
Signature · 1 line
Albert.
Hi Albert,
Quoted 8 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
1. http://marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=131307370323792&w=2
2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/
3. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/
In addition, I have this series for consideration:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/105329
But this one was submitted after the merge window closed and is not that critical.
best regards,
Aneesh
Hi Aneesh,
Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a ?crit :
Quoted 8 lines
Hi Albert,
Quoted 5 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
Formally, of these four patches initially submitted on aug 1st, after the merge window close,
arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards
omap: enable caches at system start-up
armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations
armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate
... the second is not a fix and shall be applied on next, then moved to master after the september release.
Quoted 2 lines
2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/
3. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/
Those are fixes, so they'll go in.
Quoted 4 lines
In addition, I have this series for consideration:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/105329
But this one was submitted after the merge window closed and is not that critical.
Is
omap4: make SDRAM init work for ES1.0 silicon
to be considered a fix, and can it be applied alone? If yes to both questions, then I might take it in for master. The rest would go to next.
Quoted 2 lines
best regards,
Aneesh
Thanks again!
Amicalement,
Signature · 1 line
Albert.
Le 12/08/2011 20:09, Albert ARIBAUD a ?crit :
Quoted 28 lines
Hi Aneesh,
Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a ?crit :
Quoted 8 lines
Hi Albert,
Quoted 5 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
Formally, of these four patches initially submitted on aug 1st, after the merge window close,
arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards
omap: enable caches at system start-up
armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations
armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate
Quoted 7 lines
... the second is not a fix and shall be applied on next, then moved to master after the september release.
Quoted 2 lines
2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/
3. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/Those are fixes, so they'll go in.
... but OMAP, so maybe through Sandeep's tree?
Amicalement,
Signature · 1 line
Albert.
V
Hi Sandeep,
Quoted 35 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Le 12/08/2011 20:09, Albert ARIBAUD a ?crit :
Quoted 34 lines
Hi Aneesh,
Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a ?crit :
Quoted 10 lines
Hi Albert,
Quoted 6 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
Formally, of these four patches initially submitted on aug 1st, after the merge window close,
? ?arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards ? ?omap: enable caches at system start-up
? ?armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations ? ?armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate... the second is not a fix and shall be applied on next, then moved to master after the september release.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/
3. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/Those are fixes, so they'll go in.
... but OMAP, so maybe through Sandeep's tree?
Hope you are considering the above for pull + the SDRAM fix in:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/105329
omap4: make SDRAM init work for ES1.0 silicon
best regards,
Aneesh
Quoted 1 line · Aneesh
Hi Sandeep,
I don't know about everyone, but I like being put in the To: list when being called out to respond (or Cc: list when expected to notice), so I've added him.
Quoted 58 lines
Quoted 35 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Le 12/08/2011 20:09, Albert ARIBAUD a ?crit :
Quoted 34 lines
Hi Aneesh,
Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a ?crit :
Quoted 10 lines
Hi Albert,
Quoted 6 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
Formally, of these four patches initially submitted on aug 1st, after the merge window close,
? ?arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards ? ?omap: enable caches at system start-up
? ?armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations ? ?armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate... the second is not a fix and shall be applied on next, then moved to master after the september release.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/
3. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/Those are fixes, so they'll go in.
... but OMAP, so maybe through Sandeep's tree?
Hope you are considering the above for pull + the SDRAM fix in:
?http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/105329
omap4: make SDRAM init work for ES1.0 silicon
best regards,
Aneesh
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
V
Hi Albert,
Quoted 25 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Aneesh,
Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a ?crit :
Quoted 10 lines
Hi Albert,
Quoted 6 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
Formally, of these four patches initially submitted on aug 1st, after the merge window close,
Quoted 7 lines
?arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards ?omap: enable caches at system start-up
?armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations ?armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate... the second is not a fix and shall be applied on next, then moved to master after the september release.
That'll end up in a regression for OMAP. Caches were enabled in OMAP without any issues. This series was done to save trouble for other boards. In the process OMAP will end up losing the cache support temporarily unless patch 2/4 is taken.
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 3 lines
2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/
3. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/Those are fixes, so they'll go in.
Quoted 4 lines
In addition, I have this series for consideration:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/105329
But this one was submitted after the merge window closed and is not that critical.
Quoted 7 lines
Is
?omap4: make SDRAM init work for ES1.0 silicon
to be considered a fix, and can it be applied alone? If yes to both questions, then I might take it in for master. The rest would go to next.
Yes, that's a bug fix and can be applied alone.
best regards,
Aneesh
Hi Albert,
Quoted 34 lines · Aneesh
Hi Albert,
Quoted 30 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Aneesh,
Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a ?crit :
Quoted 10 lines
Hi Albert,
Quoted 6 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
Maybe, that was me. I had sent you a mail yesterday requesting to pull the following:
Formally, of these four patches initially submitted on aug 1st, after the merge window close,
arm: do not force d-cache enable on all boards
omap: enable caches at system start-up
armv7: stronger barrier for cache-maintenance operations
armv7: cache: remove flush on un-aligned invalidate
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
... the second is not a fix and shall be applied on next, then moved to master after the september release.
That'll end up in a regression for OMAP. Caches were enabled in OMAP without any issues. This series was done to save trouble for other boards. In the process OMAP will end up losing the cache support temporarily unless patch 2/4 is taken.
I have submitted a V4 for the first patch in this series that fixes a typo. I have also created a bundle in patchworks hoping that it may help you to pull the patches correctly.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/user/bundle/2072/
I have added patch 2/4 in this bundle(omap: enable caches at system start-up). Let me know if you would like to have it removed.
best regards,
Aneesh
Albert,
Quoted 5 lines · Albert ARIBAUD
Hi all,
I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone in from the merge window, and also bugfixes.
Quoted 8 lines
However, I seem to remember a mail asking me to consider some patches I'd missed, but I could not find this mail in any of my folders to save my life. :(
So apologies in advance to the sender, and please re-send me requests for any patch that should be in u-boot-arm/master at this point but is not.
Amicalement,
Will you apply patch for Calxeda Highbank platform support?
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108564/
Regards,
Rob