OMAP3+: boards: Fix the __initconst build error for devicetree/test branch
Subsystems (3)
RFC 1/1 OMAP3+: boards: Fix the __initconst build error for devicetree/test branch
Hi Grant,
The current devicetree/test branch is broken due to the introduction of the __initconst for dt_compat table.
My original basic fix is the following one, but Felipe figured out the root cause. So it can be fixed by adding an extra const to make the whole table const:
- const char **dt_compat; /* array of device tree
+ const char * const *dt_compat; /* array of device tree
That fix will require fixing all the current users of dt_compat with something like that:
-static const char *omap3_beagle_dt_match[] __initconst = { +static const char * const omap3_beagle_dt_match[] __initconst = {
A couple of of_XXX APIs will have to updated as well, that's why I was wondering if you wanted to go that way.
Any thought?
Regards,
Benoit
---
Quoted 1 line
From
fcee9dbfeb44dc5c5b79f002e63be6e00d8f82b6Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benoit Cousson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 11:30:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP3+: boards: Fix the __initconst build error
The __initconst introduced some build errors with the following compiler version:
arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Sourcery G++ Lite 2010.09-50) 4.5.1
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c:566:20: error:omap3_beagle_dt_match causes a section type conflict
Replace them by __initdata.
--- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c +1 -1
@@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ static void __init igep_init(void) } } -static const char *igep2_dt_compat[]__initconst = { +static const char *igep2_dt_compat[]__initdata = {"ISEE,igep-v2" ,NULL };
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c +1 -1
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static void __init omap3_beagle_init(void)beagle_opp_init (); } -static const char *omap3_beagle_dt_match[]__initconst = { +static const char *omap3_beagle_dt_match[]__initdata = {"ti,omap3-beagle" ,NULL };
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c +1 -1
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static void __init omap4_panda_map_io(void)omap44xx_map_common_io (); } -static const char *omap4_panda_match[]__initconst = { +static const char *omap4_panda_match[]__initdata = {"ti,omap4-panda" ,NULL , };
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c +1 -1
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static void __init overo_init(void) "OVERO_GPIO_USBH_CPEN\n"); } -static const char *omap3_overo_dt_match[]__initconst = { +static const char *omap3_overo_dt_match[]__initdata = {"gumstix,omap3-overo" ,NULL };
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
HI,
Quoted 17 lines · Benoit
Hi Grant,
The current devicetree/test branch is broken due to the introduction of the
__initconstfordt_compattable.My original basic fix is the following one, but Felipe figured out the root cause. So it can be fixed by adding an extra const to make the whole table const:
(quoted diff) +1
-1- const char **dt_compat; /* array of device tree + const char * const *dt_compat; /* array of device treeThat fix will require fixing all the current users of
dt_compatwith something like that:(quoted diff) +1
-1-static const char *omap3_beagle_dt_match[] __initconst = { +static const char * const omap3_beagle_dt_match[] __initconst = {
Quoted 4 lines
A couple of
of_XXXAPIs will have to updated as well, that's why I was wondering if you wanted to go that way.Any thought?
the funny thing is that this was not happening with CodeSourcery 2011.03 when I sent the patch.
Maybe it's either a compiler bug on one of the toolchains or newer GCCs are smart enough to create another section ??
But then again, 2011.03 isn't compiling sleep34xx.S:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S: Assembler messages:arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S:150: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode smc #1' arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S:418: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode smc #1' arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S:429: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode smc #1' arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S:454: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode smc #0' arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S:460: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode smc #0' arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S:465: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode smc #0' make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.o] Error 1
so it might be better to keep 2010.09 working.
Signature · 1 line
balbi