Portage-related updates
v2 cover Portage-related updates
Replies to this e-mail will contain a set of Portage-related updates, many of these have been presented earlier (think layman support, emerge-webrsync, running Portage from cron, ...) but needed additional improvements (or even rewrites), hence the v2.
In short, the patch set contains:
1 Introduce portage_dontaudit_use_fds 2 Use portage_dontaudit_use_fds from load_policy_t 3 Introduce rc_exec_t for /sbin/rc (instead of initrc_exec_t) for Gentoo 4 Allow gcc-config to call /sbin/rc (no transition) 5 Allow Gentoo's integrated run_init_t to call /sbin/rc (no transition) 6 Allow sysadm_t to call /sbin/rc (no transition) 7 Make portage_fetch_t a full application domain (instead of application type) 8 Introduce portage_search_conf_dirs and portage_read_tmp_files 9 Enhance gpg_t with portage_search_conf_dirs and portage_read_tmp_files 10 Allow cron to execute portage commands (incl. transition) 11 Allow portage to call GnuPG
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
PATCH v2 1/11 Introduce portage_dontaudit_use_fds
Support the interface to not audit portage_t:fd use (file descriptors, leaked or not)
--- policy/modules/admin/portage.if | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
policy/modules/admin/portage.if +19 -0
@@ -293,3 +293,22 @@ interface(`portage_dontaudit_rw_tmp_files',` dontaudit $1 portage_tmp_t:file rw_file_perms; ') + +######################################## +## <summary> +## Do not audit attempts to use +## portage file descriptors. +## </summary> +## <param name="domain"> +## <summary> +## Domain to not audit. +## </summary> +## </param> +# +interface(`portage_dontaudit_use_fds',` + gen_require(` + type portage_t; + ') + + dontaudit $1 portage_t:fds use; +')
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
PATCH 1/11 Introduce portage_dontaudit_use_fds
Quoted 2 lines · Sven Vermeulen
Support the interface to not audit portage_t:fd use (file descriptors, leaked or not)
Merged.
Quoted 32 lines
Signed-off-by Sven Vermeulen <[email protected]>--- policy/modules/admin/portage.if | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)policy/modules/admin/portage.if +19
-0@@ -293,3 +293,22 @@ interface(`portage_dontaudit_rw_tmp_files',` dontaudit $1 portage_tmp_t:file rw_file_perms; ') + +######################################## +## <summary> +## Do not audit attempts to use +## portage file descriptors. +## </summary> +## <param name="domain"> +## <summary> +## Domain to not audit. +## </summary> +## </param> +# +interface(`portage_dontaudit_use_fds',` + gen_require(` + type portage_t; + ') + + dontaudit $1 portage_t:fds use; +')
Signature · 3 lines
Chris PeBenito Tresys Technology, LLC www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com
PATCH v2 2/11 Do not audit the use of portage' filedescriptors from load_policy_t
In reply to Sven VermeulenDuring build and eventual activation of the base policy, the load_policy_t domain attempts to use a portage file descriptor. However, this serves no purpose (the loading is done correctly and everything is logged appropriately).
Hence, we dontaudit this use.
--- policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.te | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.te +4 -0
@@ -199,6 +199,10 @@ ifdef(`hide_broken_symptoms',` ') ') +optional_policy(` + portage_dontaudit_use_fds(load_policy_t) +') + ######################################## # # Newrole local policy
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
PATCH 2/11 Do not audit the use of portage' filedescriptors from load_policy_t
Quoted 6 lines · Sven Vermeulen
During build and eventual activation of the base policy, the
load_policy_tdomain attempts to use a portage file descriptor. However, this serves no purpose (the loading is done correctly and everything is logged appropriately).Hence, we dontaudit this use.
Merged.
Quoted 20 lines
Signed-off-by Sven Vermeulen <[email protected]>--- policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.te | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.te +4
-0@@ -199,6 +199,10 @@ ifdef(`hide_broken_symptoms',` ') ') +optional_policy(` + portage_dontaudit_use_fds(load_policy_t) +') + ######################################## # # Newrole local policy
Signature · 3 lines
Chris PeBenito Tresys Technology, LLC www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com
PATCH v2 3/11 Introduce rc_exec_t as secundary entry file for initrc_t
In reply to Sven VermeulenWithin Gentoo, the init system (openrc) uses a single binary (/sbin/rc) for all its functions, be it executing init scripts, managing runlevels, checking state, etc. This binary is not allowed to be labeled initrc_exec_t as that would trigger domain transitions where this isn't necessary (or even allowed).
A suggested solution is to use a separate type declaration for /sbin/rc (rc_exec_t) which transitions where necessary.
This patch includes support for the /sbin/rc rc_exec_t type and declares the init_rc_exec() interface which allows domains to execute the binary without transitioning.
--- policy/modules/system/init.fc | 2 +- policy/modules/system/init.if | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- policy/modules/system/init.te | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
policy/modules/system/init.fc +1 -1
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ ifdef(`distro_gentoo', ` /sbin/upstart -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:init_exec_t,s0) ifdef(`distro_gentoo', ` -/sbin/rc -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:initrc_exec_t,s0) +/sbin/rc -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:rc_exec_t,s0) /sbin/runscript -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:initrc_exec_t,s0) /sbin/runscript\.sh -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:initrc_exec_t,s0) /sbin/runsvcscript\.sh -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:initrc_exec_t,s0)
policy/modules/system/init.if +22 -1
@@ -455,6 +455,26 @@ interface(`init_exec',` ######################################## ## <summary> +## Execute the rc program in the caller domain. +## </summary> +## <param name="domain"> +## <summary> +## Domain allowed access. +## </summary> +## </param> +## <rolecap/> +# +interface(`init_rc_exec',` + gen_require(` + type rc_exec_t; + ') + + corecmd_search_bin($1) + can_exec($1, rc_exec_t) +') + +######################################## +## <summary> ## Get the process group of init. ## </summary> ## <param name="domain">
@@ -800,11 +820,12 @@ interface(`init_spec_domtrans_script',` # interface(`init_domtrans_script',` gen_require(` - type initrc_t, initrc_exec_t; + type initrc_t, initrc_exec_t, rc_exec_t; ') files_list_etc($1) domtrans_pattern($1, initrc_exec_t, initrc_t) + domtrans_pattern($1, rc_exec_t, initrc_t) ifdef(`enable_mcs',` range_transition $1 initrc_exec_t:process s0;
policy/modules/system/init.te +4 -0
@@ -56,8 +56,10 @@ mls_trusted_object(initctl_t) type initrc_t, init_script_domain_type, init_run_all_scripts_domain; type initrc_exec_t, init_script_file_type; +type rc_exec_t; domain_type(initrc_t) domain_entry_file(initrc_t, initrc_exec_t) +domain_entry_file(initrc_t, rc_exec_t) role system_r types initrc_t; # should be part of the true block # of the below init_upstart tunable
@@ -381,6 +383,8 @@ auth_delete_pam_pid(initrc_t) auth_delete_pam_console_data(initrc_t) auth_use_nsswitch(initrc_t) +init_rc_exec(initrc_t) + libs_rw_ld_so_cache(initrc_t) libs_exec_lib_files(initrc_t) libs_exec_ld_so(initrc_t)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
PATCH 3/11 Introduce rc_exec_t as secundary entry file for initrc_t
Quoted 11 lines · Sven Vermeulen
Within Gentoo, the init system (openrc) uses a single binary (
/sbin/rc) for all its functions, be it executing init scripts, managing runlevels, checking state, etc. This binary is not allowed to be labeledinitrc_exec_tas that would trigger domain transitions where this isn't necessary (or even allowed).A suggested solution is to use a separate type declaration for
/sbin/rc(rc_exec_t) which transitions where necessary.This patch includes support for the
/sbin/rcrc_exec_ttype and declares theinit_rc_exec()interface which allows domains to execute the binary without transitioning.
I think the overall implementation is fine, except everything in this patch should be in distro_gentoo blocks, except for the init_rc_exec() implementation.
Quoted 89 lines
Signed-off-by Sven Vermeulen <[email protected]>--- policy/modules/system/init.fc | 2 +- policy/modules/system/init.if | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- policy/modules/system/init.te | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)policy/modules/system/init.fc +1
-1@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ ifdef(`distro_gentoo', ` /sbin/upstart -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:init_exec_t,s0) ifdef(`distro_gentoo', ` -/sbin/rc -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:initrc_exec_t,s0) +/sbin/rc -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:rc_exec_t,s0) /sbin/runscript -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:initrc_exec_t,s0) /sbin/runscript\.sh -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:initrc_exec_t,s0) /sbin/runsvcscript\.sh -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:initrc_exec_t,s0)policy/modules/system/init.if +22
-1@@ -455,6 +455,26 @@ interface(`init_exec',` ######################################## ## <summary> +## Execute the rc program in the caller domain. +## </summary> +## <param name="domain"> +## <summary> +## Domain allowed access. +## </summary> +## </param> +## <rolecap/> +# +interface(`init_rc_exec',` + gen_require(` + type rc_exec_t; + ') + + corecmd_search_bin($1) + can_exec($1, rc_exec_t) +') + +######################################## +## <summary> ## Get the process group of init. ## </summary> ## <param name="domain">@@ -800,11 +820,12 @@ interface(`init_spec_domtrans_script',` # interface(`init_domtrans_script',` gen_require(` - type initrc_t, initrc_exec_t; + type initrc_t, initrc_exec_t, rc_exec_t; ') files_list_etc($1) domtrans_pattern($1, initrc_exec_t, initrc_t) + domtrans_pattern($1, rc_exec_t, initrc_t) ifdef(`enable_mcs',` range_transition $1 initrc_exec_t:process s0;policy/modules/system/init.te +4
-0@@ -56,8 +56,10 @@ mls_trusted_object(initctl_t) type initrc_t, init_script_domain_type, init_run_all_scripts_domain; type initrc_exec_t, init_script_file_type; +type rc_exec_t; domain_type(initrc_t) domain_entry_file(initrc_t, initrc_exec_t) +domain_entry_file(initrc_t, rc_exec_t) role system_r types initrc_t; # should be part of the true block # of the below init_upstart tunable@@ -381,6 +383,8 @@ auth_delete_pam_pid(initrc_t) auth_delete_pam_console_data(initrc_t) auth_use_nsswitch(initrc_t) +init_rc_exec(initrc_t) + libs_rw_ld_so_cache(initrc_t) libs_exec_lib_files(initrc_t) libs_exec_ld_so(initrc_t)
Signature · 3 lines
Chris PeBenito Tresys Technology, LLC www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com
PATCH v2 3/11 Introduce rc_exec_t as secundary entry file for initrc_t
Quoted 3 lines · Christopher J. PeBenito
I think the overall implementation is fine, except everything in this patch should be in
distro_gentooblocks, except for theinit_rc_exec()implementation.
Ok, I assume the exception also holds for the pure type definition (type rc_exec_t)? Since the init_rc_exec() interface requires it, I assume that I cannot just put that behind an ifdef(`distro_gentoo') one, right?
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
PATCH 3/11 Introduce rc_exec_t as secundary entry file for initrc_t
Quoted 10 lines · Sven Vermeulen
Quoted 3 lines · Christopher J. PeBenito
I think the overall implementation is fine, except everything in this patch should be in
distro_gentooblocks, except for theinit_rc_exec()implementation.Ok, I assume the exception also holds for the pure type definition (type
rc_exec_t)? Since theinit_rc_exec()interface requires it, I assume that I cannot just put that behind an ifdef(`distro_gentoo') one, right?
Thats fine.
Signature · 3 lines
Chris PeBenito Tresys Technology, LLC www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com
PATCH 3/11 Introduce rc_exec_t as secundary entry file for initrc_t
Quoted 7 lines · Christopher J. PeBenito
Quoted 6 lines · Sven Vermeulen
Quoted 3 lines · Christopher J. PeBenito
I think the overall implementation is fine, except everything in this patch should be in
distro_gentooblocks, except for theinit_rc_exec()implementation.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Ok, I assume the exception also holds for the pure type definition (type
rc_exec_t)? Since theinit_rc_exec()interface requires it, I assume that I cannot just put that behind an ifdef(`distro_gentoo') one, right?Thats fine.
Actually, you can put the definition in the distro_gentoo. We already have examples of interfaces that reference types that are optionally declared.
Signature · 3 lines
Chris PeBenito Tresys Technology, LLC www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com
PATCH v2 4/11 Allow gcc-config to execute /sbin/rc without transitioning
In reply to Sven VermeulenThe gcc-config application uses some functions (from /etc/init.d/functions.sh) which are simple wrappers on top of /sbin/rc. Since this script is sourced and the functions executed from within gcc_config_t, we allow gcc-config to execute /sbin/rc without transitioning.
--- policy/modules/admin/portage.te | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
policy/modules/admin/portage.te +1 -0
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ files_search_pids(gcc_config_t) # the directory it is being run from files_list_all(gcc_config_t) +init_rc_exec(gcc_config_t) # seems to be ok without this init_dontaudit_read_script_status_files(gcc_config_t)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
PATCH v2 5/11 Gentoo's integrated run_init support re-executes /sbin/rc
In reply to Sven VermeulenWhen an init script is launched, Gentoo's integrated run_init support will re-execute /sbin/rc (an all-in-one binary) for various functions. The run_init_t domain here should not be allowed to transition yet, so we allow it to execute /sbin/rc without transitioning.
--- policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.te | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.te +1 -0
@@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ ifndef(`direct_sysadm_daemon',` ifdef(`distro_gentoo',` # Gentoo integrated run_init: init_script_file_entry_type(run_init_t) + init_rc_exec(run_init_t) ') ')
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
PATCH v2 6/11 Allow the sysadm domain to execute /sbin/rc without transitioning
In reply to Sven VermeulenThe /sbin/rc binary is used by the system administrator to manage runlevels (add/delete), check runlevel state, etc. all which do not require a transition to occur. Hence the /sbin/rc (now labeled rc_exec_t) is allowed to be executed without transitioning.
--- policy/modules/roles/sysadm.te | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
policy/modules/roles/sysadm.te +1 -0
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ ubac_file_exempt(sysadm_t) ubac_fd_exempt(sysadm_t) init_exec(sysadm_t) +init_rc_exec(sysadm_t) # Add/remove user home directories userdom_manage_user_home_dirs(sysadm_t)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
PATCH v2 7/11 Introduce portage_fetch_t as an application domain
In reply to Sven VermeulenEnhance portage_fetch_t from an application type to a domain. Introduce the proper portage_fetch_exec_t and add the necessary privileges to the domain definition to allow portage_fetch_t to be used by Portage management utilities like layman and emerge-webrsync.
--- policy/modules/admin/portage.fc | 5 +++++ policy/modules/admin/portage.te | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
policy/modules/admin/portage.fc +5 -0
@@ -3,12 +3,14 @@ /etc/portage(/.*)? gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_conf_t,s0) /usr/bin/gcc-config -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:gcc_config_exec_t,s0) +/usr/bin/layman -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_fetch_exec_t,s0) /usr/bin/sandbox -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_exec_t,s0) /usr/lib(64)?/portage/bin/ebuild -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_exec_t,s0) /usr/lib(64)?/portage/bin/emerge -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_exec_t,s0) /usr/lib(64)?/portage/bin/quickpkg -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_exec_t,s0) /usr/lib(64)?/portage/bin/ebuild\.sh -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_exec_t,s0) +/usr/lib(64)?/portage/bin/emerge-webrsync -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_fetch_exec_t,s0) /usr/lib(64)?/portage/bin/regenworld -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_exec_t,s0) /usr/lib(64)?/portage/bin/sandbox -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_exec_t,s0)
@@ -22,6 +24,9 @@ /var/log/emerge\.log.* -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_log_t,s0) /var/log/emerge-fetch.log -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_log_t,s0) /var/log/portage(/.*)? gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_log_t,s0) +/var/lib/layman(/.*)? gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_ebuild_t,s0) /var/lib/portage(/.*)? gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_cache_t,s0) +/var/tmp/binpkgs(/.*)? gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_tmp_t,s0) +/var/tmp/emerge-webrsync(/.*)? gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_tmp_t,s0) /var/tmp/portage(/.*)? gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_tmp_t,s0) /var/tmp/portage-pkg(/.*)? gen_context(system_u:object_r:portage_tmp_t,s0)
policy/modules/admin/portage.te +18 -2
@@ -34,7 +34,8 @@ corecmd_shell_entry_type(portage_sandbox_t) # portage package fetching domain type portage_fetch_t; -application_type(portage_fetch_t) +type portage_fetch_exec_t; +application_domain(portage_fetch_t, portage_fetch_exec_t) corecmd_shell_entry_type(portage_fetch_t) rsync_entry_type(portage_fetch_t)
@@ -219,8 +220,10 @@ allow portage_fetch_t self:capability { dac_override fowner fsetid }; allow portage_fetch_t self:process signal; allow portage_fetch_t self:unix_stream_socket create_socket_perms; allow portage_fetch_t self:tcp_socket create_stream_socket_perms; +allow portage_fetch_t self:fifo_file rw_fifo_file_perms; allow portage_fetch_t portage_conf_t:dir list_dir_perms; + read_files_pattern(portage_fetch_t, portage_conf_t, portage_conf_t) manage_dirs_pattern(portage_fetch_t, portage_ebuild_t, portage_ebuild_t)
@@ -240,9 +243,14 @@ kernel_read_system_state(portage_fetch_t) kernel_read_kernel_sysctls(portage_fetch_t) corecmd_exec_bin(portage_fetch_t) +corecmd_exec_shell(portage_fetch_t) corenet_all_recvfrom_unlabeled(portage_fetch_t) corenet_all_recvfrom_netlabel(portage_fetch_t) +corenet_sendrecv_http_client_packets(portage_fetch_t) +corenet_sendrecv_http_cache_client_packets(portage_fetch_t) +corenet_sendrecv_git_client_packets(portage_fetch_t) +corenet_sendrecv_rsync_client_packets(portage_fetch_t) corenet_tcp_sendrecv_generic_if(portage_fetch_t) corenet_tcp_sendrecv_generic_node(portage_fetch_t) corenet_tcp_sendrecv_all_ports(portage_fetch_t)
@@ -251,6 +259,7 @@ corenet_tcp_sendrecv_all_ports(portage_fetch_t) corenet_tcp_connect_all_reserved_ports(portage_fetch_t) corenet_tcp_connect_generic_port(portage_fetch_t) corenet_tcp_connect_http_cache_port(portage_fetch_t) +corenet_tcp_connect_git_port(portage_fetch_t) dev_dontaudit_read_rand(portage_fetch_t)
@@ -258,11 +267,15 @@ domain_use_interactive_fds(portage_fetch_t) files_read_etc_files(portage_fetch_t) files_read_etc_runtime_files(portage_fetch_t) -files_search_var(portage_fetch_t) +files_read_usr_files(portage_fetch_t) +files_search_var_lib(portage_fetch_t) files_dontaudit_search_pids(portage_fetch_t) +logging_list_logs(portage_fetch_t) + term_search_ptys(portage_fetch_t) + miscfiles_read_localization(portage_fetch_t) sysnet_read_config(portage_fetch_t)
@@ -271,6 +284,9 @@ sysnet_dns_name_resolve(portage_fetch_t) userdom_use_user_terminals(portage_fetch_t) userdom_dontaudit_read_user_home_content_files(portage_fetch_t) + +rsync_exec(portage_fetch_t) + ifdef(`hide_broken_symptoms',` dontaudit portage_fetch_t portage_cache_t:file read; ')
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
PATCH v2 8/11 Introduce search_conf_dirs and read_tmp_files interfaces for Portage
In reply to Sven VermeulenWe add support for searching through portage' configuration file locations (which will be used in subsequent patches) for tools that provide additional features on top of Portage and which integrate with it. For instance, gpg (validating snapshots).
--- policy/modules/admin/portage.if | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
policy/modules/admin/portage.if +39 -0
@@ -258,6 +258,25 @@ interface(`portage_run_gcc_config',` ######################################## ## <summary> +## Allow a domain search privileges through portage configuration +## file directories +## </summary> +## <param name="domain"> +## <summary> +## Domain to allow search privileges +## </summary> +## </param> +# +interface(`portage_search_conf_dirs',` + gen_require(` + type portage_conf_t; + ') + + allow $1 portage_conf_t:dir search_dir_perms; +') + +######################################## +## <summary> ## Do not audit attempts to search the ## portage temporary directories. ## </summary>
@@ -277,6 +296,26 @@ interface(`portage_dontaudit_search_tmp',` ######################################## ## <summary> +## Allow a domain to read portage_tmp_t files +## </summary> +## <param name="domain"> +## <summary> +## Domain to allow read privileges +## </summary> +## </param> +# +interface(`portage_read_tmp_files',` + gen_require(` + type portage_tmp_t; + ') + + allow $1 portage_tmp_t:dir list_dir_perms; + allow $1 portage_tmp_t:file read_file_perms; +') + + +######################################## +## <summary> ## Do not audit attempts to read and write ## the portage temporary files. ## </summary>
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
PATCH v2 9/11 Support GnuPG integration in Portage
In reply to Sven VermeulenTo support GnuPG integration in Portage (such as validating the signature of snapshots), we need to add portage_search_conf_dirs rights (have GnuPG find its keys in /etc/portage/gnupg) and portage_read_tmp_files (where the snapshot will be stored and later extracted).
--- policy/modules/apps/gpg.te | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
policy/modules/apps/gpg.te +5 -0
@@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ optional_policy(` ') optional_policy(` + portage_search_conf_dirs(gpg_t) + portage_read_tmp_files(gpg_t) +') + +optional_policy(` xserver_use_xdm_fds(gpg_t) xserver_rw_xdm_pipes(gpg_t) ')
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
PATCH v2 10/11 Allow cron to execute portage commands
In reply to Sven VermeulenMany users use portage from within cron (for instance to update the portage tree or even automatically update their system). As such, we allow to run portage from the system_cronjob_t domain.
--- policy/modules/services/cron.te | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
policy/modules/services/cron.te +4 -0
@@ -472,6 +472,10 @@ optional_policy(` ') optional_policy(` + portage_run(system_cronjob_t, system_r) +') + +optional_policy(` postfix_read_config(system_cronjob_t) ')
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
PATCH 10/11 Allow cron to execute portage commands
Quoted 14 lines · Sven Vermeulen
Many users use portage from within cron (for instance to update the portage tree or even automatically update their system). As such, we allow to run portage from the
system_cronjob_tdomain.Signed-off-by Sven Vermeulen <[email protected]>--- policy/modules/services/cron.te | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)policy/modules/services/cron.te +0
-0
policy/modules/services/cron.te optional_policy(` · line 480
Quoted 9 lines
policy/modules/services/cron.te +4
-0@@ -472,6 +472,10 @@ optional_policy(` ') optional_policy(` + portage_run(system_cronjob_t, system_r) +') + +optional_policy(` postfix_read_config(system_cronjob_t) ')
This should be cron_system_entry() in portage.te.
Signature · 3 lines
Chris PeBenito Tresys Technology, LLC www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com
PATCH v2 11/11 Allow portage to call GnuPG
In reply to Sven VermeulenAllow the portage domain to transition to the gpg_t domain (used for instance when validating signed manifests)
--- policy/modules/admin/portage.te | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
policy/modules/admin/portage.te +4 -0
@@ -192,6 +192,10 @@ optional_policy(` ') optional_policy(` + gpg_domtrans(portage_t) +') + +optional_policy(` modutils_domtrans_depmod(portage_t) modutils_domtrans_update_mods(portage_t) #dontaudit update_modules_t portage_tmp_t:dir search_dir_perms;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.4
PATCH 11/11 Allow portage to call GnuPG
Quoted 13 lines · Sven Vermeulen
Allow the portage domain to transition to the
gpg_tdomain (used for instance when validating signed manifests)Signed-off-by Sven Vermeulen <[email protected]>--- policy/modules/admin/portage.te | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)policy/modules/admin/portage.te +0
-0
policy/modules/admin/portage.te optional_policy(` · line 201
Quoted 10 lines
policy/modules/admin/portage.te +4
-0@@ -192,6 +192,10 @@ optional_policy(` ') optional_policy(` + gpg_domtrans(portage_t) +') + +optional_policy(` modutils_domtrans_depmod(portage_t) modutils_domtrans_update_mods(portage_t) #dontaudit update_modules_t portage_tmp_t:dir search_dir_perms;
Is this really necessary? Gpg_t is oriented towards users; gpg_exec() doesn't work?
Signature · 3 lines
Chris PeBenito Tresys Technology, LLC www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com