orion5x and footbridge compile fixes for 3.1
Arnd,
Please pull for 3.1-rc. Footbridge and orion5x builds are currently broken in 3.1 mainly due to my changes in this commit:
commit cc22b4c18540e5e8bf55c7d124044f9317527d3c
Author: Rob Herring <[email protected]> Date: Tue Jun 28 21:22:40 2011 -0500
ARM: set vga memory base at run-time
The following changes since commit fcb8ce5cfe30ca9ca5c9a79cdfe26d1993e65e0c:
Linux 3.1-rc3 (2011-08-22 11:42:53 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.jdl.com/software/linux-3.0.git fixes
Bryan Wu (2):
ARM: mach-orion5x: add missing header file <linux/vga.h>
ARM: mach-footbridge: add missing header file <video/vga.h>
Paul Gortmaker (1):
arm: fix compile failure in orion5x/dns323-setup.c
arch/arm/mach-footbridge/dc21285.c | 1 + arch/arm/mach-orion5x/dns323-setup.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-orion5x/pci.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Rob
Quoted 14 lines · Rob Herring
Arnd,
Please pull for 3.1-rc. Footbridge and orion5x builds are currently broken in 3.1 mainly due to my changes in this commit:
commit
cc22b4c18540e5e8bf55c7d124044f9317527d3cAuthor: Rob Herring <[email protected]> Date: Tue Jun 28 21:22:40 2011 -0500ARM: set vga memory base at run-time
The following changes since commit
fcb8ce5cfe30ca9ca5c9a79cdfe26d1993e65e0c:
Quoted 8 lines
Linux 3.1-rc3 (2011-08-22 11:42:53 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.jdl.com/software/linux-3.0.gitfixesBryan Wu (2):
ARM: mach-orion5x: add missing header file <linux/vga.h>
ARM: mach-footbridge: add missing header file <video/vga.h>
I had similar commits to the two above in the module.h tree (in linux-next) since I thought the missing vga.h was fallout from the implicit presence of module.h everywhere.
I'll drop all three from linux-next now that they are scheduled for pulling into 3.1-rcN.
Thanks,
Paul.
Quoted 10 lines
Paul Gortmaker (1):
arm: fix compile failure inorion5x/dns323-setup.carch/arm/mach-footbridge/dc21285.c | 1 + arch/arm/mach-orion5x/dns323-setup.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-orion5x/pci.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)Rob
Quoted 12 lines · Rob Herring
Please pull for 3.1-rc. Footbridge and orion5x builds are currently broken in 3.1 mainly due to my changes in this commit:
commit
cc22b4c18540e5e8bf55c7d124044f9317527d3cAuthor: Rob Herring <[email protected]> Date: Tue Jun 28 21:22:40 2011 -0500ARM: set vga memory base at run-time
The following changes since commit
fcb8ce5cfe30ca9ca5c9a79cdfe26d1993e65e0c:
Pulled, thanks!
BTW, are you planning to get your own git tree in the future or do you keep using Jon's git.jdl.com server?
It should be no problem for you to get hosting on git.kernel.org, there is a FAQ somewhere. With the current situation, it's now clear from the changelog why I am pulling patches from Jon's server with your Signed-off-by.
Arnd
Arnd,
Quoted 11 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 10 lines · Rob Herring
Please pull for 3.1-rc. Footbridge and orion5x builds are currently broken in 3.1 mainly due to my changes in this commit:
commit
cc22b4c18540e5e8bf55c7d124044f9317527d3cAuthor: Rob Herring <[email protected]> Date: Tue Jun 28 21:22:40 2011 -0500ARM: set vga memory base at run-time
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
The following changes since commit
fcb8ce5cfe30ca9ca5c9a79cdfe26d1993e65e0c:Pulled, thanks!
BTW, are you planning to get your own git tree in the future or do you keep using Jon's git.jdl.com server?
It is mine basically, just on Jon's domain. But yes, it's on the IT guys todo list... Jon was just the quickest path.
Quoted 5 lines
It should be no problem for you to get hosting on git.kernel.org, there is a FAQ somewhere. With the current situation, it's now clear from the changelog why I am pulling patches from Jon's server with your Signed-off-by.
Why would 3 Marvell patches from me be strange... :)
It wasn't really clear to me whether you were going to pick them off the list and were aware of all 3 patches, so I just decided to make it easy for you.
Rob
Quoted 8 lines · Rob Herring
Quoted 4 lines
It should be no problem for you to get hosting on git.kernel.org, there is a FAQ somewhere. With the current situation, it's now clear from the changelog why I am pulling patches from Jon's server with your Signed-off-by.
Why would 3 Marvell patches from me be strange... :)
It wasn't really clear to me whether you were going to pick them off the list and were aware of all 3 patches, so I just decided to make it easy for you.
It's all good and for three patches there is no worry at all. I was mainly wondering about the long-term plans the larger series that you are submitting.
Arnd