make reinitialization of ARM core components possible
cover make reinitialization of ARM core components possible
When ARM core resumes from low-power mode where losing power, for my
example: CA-9 MP resumes from Dormant/Shutdown, we have to reinitialize components like L2 Cache, GIC and SCU to bring system back to work.
The patch set basically removes __init annotation from a butch of initialization functions, so that platform resume procedure can call into them again to set those components up.
It's based on rmk's for-next branch, and tested on i.MX6Q.
Shawn Guo (3):
ARM: cache-l2x0: make the reinitialization possible
ARM: GIC: add gic_reinit() function to help ARM resume
ARM: smp_scu: remove __init annotation from scu_enable()
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h | 10 +++++++++- arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 1 + arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
PATCH 1/3 ARM: cache-l2x0: make the reinitialization possible
If ARM core gets powered off during suspend, L2 cache controller has to be reinitialized by resume procedure.
The patch removes __init annotation from a few initialization functions to make the reinitialization possible. For example, platform resume function can call l2x0_of_init() to get L2 cache back to work.
It also adds the empty function for l2x0_init() and l2x0_of_init(), so that we can keep '#ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0' check in header.
--- arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h | 10 +++++++++- arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h +9 -1
@@ -89,8 +89,16 @@#define L2X0_ADDR_FILTER_EN 1#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ -extern void __init l2x0_init (void __iomem *base,__u32 aux_val,__u32 aux_mask); +#ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0 +extern void l2x0_init (void __iomem *base,__u32 aux_val,__u32 aux_mask);extern int l2x0_of_init (__u32 aux_val,__u32 aux_mask); +#else +static void l2x0_init (void __iomem *base,__u32 aux_val,__u32 aux_mask) {} +static inline int l2x0_of_init (__u32 aux_val,__u32 aux_mask) +{ +return -ENOSYS ; +} +#endif #endif #endif
arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c +13 -10
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void l2x0_disable(void)spin_unlock_irqrestore (&l2x0_lock, flags); } -void __init l2x0_init (void __iomem *base,__u32 aux_val,__u32 aux_mask) +void l2x0_init (void __iomem *base,__u32 aux_val,__u32 aux_mask) {__u32 aux;__u32 cache_id;
@@ -350,13 +350,13 @@ void __init l2x0_init(void __iomem *base, __u32 aux_val, __u32 aux_mask) outer_cache.disable = l2x0_disable; outer_cache.set_debug = l2x0_set_debug; -printk (KERN_INFO "%s cache controller enabled\n" , type); -printk (KERN_INFO "l2x0: %d ways, CACHE_ID 0x%08x, AUX_CTRL 0x%08x, Cache size: %d B\n" , +pr_info_once ("%s cache controller enabled\n" , type); +pr_info_once ("l2x0: %d ways, CACHE_ID 0x%08x, AUX_CTRL 0x%08x, Cache size: %d B\n" , ways, cache_id, aux, l2x0_size); }#ifdef CONFIG_OF -static void __init l2x0_of_setup (const struct device_node *np, +static void l2x0_of_setup (const struct device_node *np,__u32 *aux_val,__u32 *aux_mask) {u32 data[2 ] = {0 ,0 };
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static void __init l2x0_of_setup(const struct device_node *np, *aux_mask &= ~mask; } -static void __init pl310_of_setup (const struct device_node *np, +static void pl310_of_setup (const struct device_node *np,__u32 *aux_val,__u32 *aux_mask) {u32 data[3 ] = {0 ,0 ,0 };
@@ -424,14 +424,14 @@ static void __init pl310_of_setup(const struct device_node *np, } } -static const struct of_device_id l2x0_ids[]__initconst = { +static const struct of_device_id l2x0_ids[] = { { .compatible ="arm,pl310-cache" , .data = pl310_of_setup }, { .compatible ="arm,l220-cache" , .data = l2x0_of_setup }, { .compatible ="arm,l210-cache" , .data = l2x0_of_setup }, {} }; -int __init l2x0_of_init (__u32 aux_val,__u32 aux_mask) +int l2x0_of_init (__u32 aux_val,__u32 aux_mask) {struct device_node *np; void (*l2_setup)(const struct device_node *np,
@@ -440,9 +440,12 @@ int __init l2x0_of_init(__u32 aux_val, __u32 aux_mask) np =of_find_matching_node (NULL , l2x0_ids);if (!np)return -ENODEV ; - l2x0_base =of_iomap (np,0 ); -if (!l2x0_base) -return -ENOMEM ; + +if (!l2x0_base) { + l2x0_base =of_iomap (np,0 ); +if (!l2x0_base) +return -ENOMEM ; + }/* L2 configuration can only be changed if the cache is disabled */ if (!(readl_relaxed (l2x0_base +L2X0_CTRL ) &1 )) {
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
PATCH 1/3 ARM: cache-l2x0: make the reinitialization possible
2011/8/30 Shawn Guo <[email protected]>:
Quoted 7 lines
If ARM core gets powered off during suspend, L2 cache controller has to be reinitialized by resume procedure.
The patch removes
__initannotation from a few initialization functions to make the reinitialization possible. ?For example, platform resume function can calll2x0_of_init()to get L2 cache back to work.
i think it is good. and i have sent a similar patch before:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg137372.html
[PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: L2X0: move l2x0_init out of .init section
people haven't give any feedback yet.
Quoted 5 lines
It also adds the empty function for
l2x0_init()andl2x0_of_init(), so that we can keep '#ifdefCONFIG_CACHE_L2X0' check in header.Signed-off-by Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
-barry
PATCH 1/3 ARM: cache-l2x0: make the reinitialization possible
Quoted 9 lines · Barry Song
2011/8/30 Shawn Guo <[email protected]>:
Quoted 7 lines
If ARM core gets powered off during suspend, L2 cache controller has to be reinitialized by resume procedure.
The patch removes
__initannotation from a few initialization functions to make the reinitialization possible. ?For example, platform resume function can calll2x0_of_init()to get L2 cache back to work.
Quoted 5 lines
i think it is good. and i have sent a similar patch before:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg137372.html
[PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: L2X0: movel2x0_initout of .init section
Since prima2 supports DT, you may also want to call l2x0_of_init() instead of l2x0_init(). l2x0_of_init() will parse configuration from DT and sets up tag RAM control for you.
Signature · 2 lines
Regards, Shawn
PATCH 1/3 ARM: cache-l2x0: make the reinitialization possible
2011/8/30 Shawn Guo <[email protected]>:
Quoted 10 lines · Barry Song
Quoted 9 lines
2011/8/30 Shawn Guo <[email protected]>:
Quoted 7 lines
If ARM core gets powered off during suspend, L2 cache controller has to be reinitialized by resume procedure.
The patch removes
__initannotation from a few initialization functions to make the reinitialization possible. ?For example, platform resume function can calll2x0_of_init()to get L2 cache back to work.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
i think it is good. and i have sent a similar patch before:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg137372.html
[PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: L2X0: movel2x0_initout of .init sectionSince prima2 supports DT, you may also want to call
l2x0_of_init()instead ofl2x0_init(). ?l2x0_of_init() will parse configuration from DT and sets up tag RAM control for you.
i know that. and rob's patch did some suppport to prima2 and we were in the loop of that patch and i have acked it if you read the mail. i sent the patch againest the Linus's tree.
Quoted 11 lines
--
Regards,
Shawn_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
PATCH 1/3 ARM: cache-l2x0: make the reinitialization possible
2011/8/31 Barry Song <[email protected]>:
Quoted 16 lines
2011/8/30 Shawn Guo <[email protected]>:
Quoted 15 lines · Barry Song
Quoted 14 lines
2011/8/30 Shawn Guo <[email protected]>:
Quoted 7 lines
If ARM core gets powered off during suspend, L2 cache controller has to be reinitialized by resume procedure.
The patch removes
__initannotation from a few initialization functions to make the reinitialization possible. ?For example, platform resume function can calll2x0_of_init()to get L2 cache back to work.i think it is good. and i have sent a similar patch before:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg137372.html
[PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: L2X0: movel2x0_initout of .init section
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Since prima2 supports DT, you may also want to call
l2x0_of_init()instead ofl2x0_init(). ?l2x0_of_init() will parse configuration from DT and sets up tag RAM control for you.i know that. and rob's patch did some suppport to prima2 and we were in the loop of that patch and i have acked it if you read the mail. i sent the patch againest the Linus's tree.
you might find two earlier threads about l2x0 re-init as well:
Colin Cross:
[PATCH] ARM: mm: cache-l2x0: Add support for re-enabling l2x0
Barry Song:
[RFC] ARM: l2x0: suspend/resume entries
let's wait for some feedback from Russell.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
--
Regards,
Shawn
-barry
PATCH 2/3 ARM: GIC: add gic_reinit() function to help ARM resume
In reply to Shawn GuoIf ARM core gets powered off during suspend, GIC controller has to be reinitialized by resume procedure. This patch adds a helper function for resume procedure to reinitialize GIC.
--- arch/arm/common/gic.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/common/gic.c +13 -2
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)irq_set_chained_handler (irq, gic_handle_cascade_irq); } -static void __init gic_dist_init (struct gic_chip_data *gic, +static void gic_dist_init (struct gic_chip_data *gic,unsigned int irq_start) {unsigned int gic_irqs, irq_limit, i;
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,writel_relaxed (1 , base +GIC_DIST_CTRL ); } -static void __cpuinit gic_cpu_init (struct gic_chip_data *gic) +static void gic_cpu_init (struct gic_chip_data *gic) {void __iomem *dist_base = gic->dist_base;void __iomem *base = gic->cpu_base;
@@ -349,6 +349,17 @@ static void __cpuinit gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)writel_relaxed (1 , base +GIC_CPU_CTRL ); } +void gic_reinit (unsigned int gic_nr,unsigned int irq_start) +{ +struct gic_chip_data *gic; + +BUG_ON (gic_nr >=MAX_GIC_NR ); + + gic = &gic_data[gic_nr]; +gic_dist_init (gic, irq_start); +gic_cpu_init (gic); +} +void __init gic_init (unsigned int gic_nr,unsigned int irq_start,void __iomem *dist_base,void __iomem *cpu_base) {
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h +1 -0
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ extern void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr;extern struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn;void gic_init (unsigned int ,unsigned int ,void __iomem *,void __iomem *); +void gic_reinit (unsigned int gic_nr,unsigned int irq_start);void gic_secondary_init (unsigned int );void gic_cascade_irq (unsigned int gic_nr,unsigned int irq);void gic_raise_softirq (const struct cpumask *mask,unsigned int irq);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
PATCH 2/3 ARM: GIC: add gic_reinit() function to help ARM resume
Shawn,
Quoted 3 lines · Shawn Guo
If ARM core gets powered off during suspend, GIC controller has to be reinitialized by resume procedure. This patch adds a helper function for resume procedure to reinitialize GIC.
Is re-initializing rather than save/restore registers the right thing to do here? Won't you lose things like edge or level triggered settings? It's always been fuzzy to what should be done with interrupt masks in suspend. Is every driver expected to disable and re-enable their interrupts or this should be maintained thru a suspend cycle?
Quoted 21 lines
Signed-off-by Shawn Guo <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/common/gic.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)arch/arm/common/gic.c +1
-1@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)irq_set_chained_handler (irq, gic_handle_cascade_irq); } -static void __init gic_dist_init (struct gic_chip_data *gic, +static void gic_dist_init (struct gic_chip_data *gic,unsigned int irq_start) {unsigned int gic_irqs, irq_limit, i;
arch/arm/common/gic.c static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic, · line 329
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/common/gic.c +1
-1@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,writel_relaxed (1 , base +GIC_DIST_CTRL ); } -static void __cpuinit gic_cpu_init (struct gic_chip_data *gic) +static void gic_cpu_init (struct gic_chip_data *gic)
I don't think you need to change this. With hotplug, this section will be kept.
Rob
Quoted 33 lines
arch/arm/common/gic.c +11
-0{void __iomem *dist_base = gic->dist_base;void __iomem *base = gic->cpu_base;@@ -349,6 +349,17 @@ static void __cpuinit gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)writel_relaxed (1 , base +GIC_CPU_CTRL ); } +void gic_reinit (unsigned int gic_nr,unsigned int irq_start) +{ +struct gic_chip_data *gic; + +BUG_ON (gic_nr >=MAX_GIC_NR ); + + gic = &gic_data[gic_nr]; +gic_dist_init (gic, irq_start); +gic_cpu_init (gic); +} +void __init gic_init (unsigned int gic_nr,unsigned int irq_start,void __iomem *dist_base,void __iomem *cpu_base) {arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h +1
-0@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ extern void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr;extern struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn;void gic_init (unsigned int ,unsigned int ,void __iomem *,void __iomem *); +void gic_reinit (unsigned int gic_nr,unsigned int irq_start);void gic_secondary_init (unsigned int );void gic_cascade_irq (unsigned int gic_nr,unsigned int irq);void gic_raise_softirq (const struct cpumask *mask,unsigned int irq);
PATCH 2/3 ARM: GIC: add gic_reinit() function to help ARM resume
Quoted 7 lines · Rob Herring
Shawn,
Quoted 3 lines · Shawn Guo
If ARM core gets powered off during suspend, GIC controller has to be reinitialized by resume procedure. This patch adds a helper function for resume procedure to reinitialize GIC.
Quoted 6 lines
Is re-initializing rather than save/restore registers the right thing to do here? Won't you lose things like edge or level triggered settings? It's always been fuzzy to what should be done with interrupt masks in suspend. Is every driver expected to disable and re-enable their interrupts or this should be maintained thru a suspend cycle?
Good point. As one of the series, I easily went for the re-initializing approach here, plus it is pretty easy to go. With your reminding, I agree that for interrupt controller save/restore registers might be the right thing to do.
Quoted 24 lines
Quoted 24 lines
Signed-off-by Shawn Guo <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/common/gic.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)arch/arm/common/gic.c +1
-1@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)irq_set_chained_handler (irq, gic_handle_cascade_irq); } -static void __init gic_dist_init (struct gic_chip_data *gic, +static void gic_dist_init (struct gic_chip_data *gic,unsigned int irq_start) {unsigned int gic_irqs, irq_limit, i;@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,writel_relaxed (1 , base +GIC_DIST_CTRL ); }
Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/common/gic.c static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic, · line 329
Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/common/gic.c +1
-1-static void __cpuinit gic_cpu_init (struct gic_chip_data *gic) +static void gic_cpu_init (struct gic_chip_data *gic)I don't think you need to change this. With hotplug, this section will be kept.
You are right. I missed that it's a __cpuinit.
Regards,
Shawn
PATCH 2/3 ARM: GIC: add gic_reinit() function to help ARM resume
Quoted 14 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 7 lines · Rob Herring
Shawn,
Quoted 3 lines · Shawn Guo
If ARM core gets powered off during suspend, GIC controller has to be reinitialized by resume procedure. This patch adds a helper function for resume procedure to reinitialize GIC.
Quoted 6 lines
Is re-initializing rather than save/restore registers the right thing to do here? Won't you lose things like edge or level triggered settings? It's always been fuzzy to what should be done with interrupt masks in suspend. Is every driver expected to disable and re-enable their interrupts or this should be maintained thru a suspend cycle?
Quoted 5 lines
Good point. As one of the series, I easily went for the re-initializing approach here, plus it is pretty easy to go. With your reminding, I agree that for interrupt controller save/restore registers might be the right thing to do.
Rob,
As we share the same goal between Highbank and i.MX6Q on this, I'm wondering if you already have something for save/restore registers approach. Otherwise, I may give a try on that. But I want to avoid duplicated effort.
Signature · 2 lines
Regards, Shawn
PATCH 3/3 ARM: smp_scu: remove __init annotation from scu_enable()
In reply to Shawn GuoWhen Cortex-A9 MPCore resumes from Dormant or Shutdown modes, SCU needs to be re-enabled. This patch removes __init annotation from function scu_enable(), so that platform resume procedure can call it to re-enable SCU.
--- arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c +1 -1
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ unsigned int __init scu_get_core_count(void __iomem *scu_base)/* * Enable the SCU */ -void __init scu_enable (void __iomem *scu_base) +void scu_enable (void __iomem *scu_base) {u32 scu_ctrl;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1