ARM: pxa: fix missing linux/gpio.h include
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 ARM: pxa: fix missing linux/gpio.h include
Fixes the following compile error:
arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c: In function 'pxa3xx_cpu_pm_suspend':
arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c:156: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_get_value' make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.o] Error 1
---
I didn't closely follow all recent patches around PXA, so it might be that this has already been cared for. Haojian?
arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c +1 -0
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@#include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/irq.h> #include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/gpio.h> #include <linux/syscore_ops.h> #include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h>
Signature · 1 line
1.7.7.1
Eric Miao
AppliedPATCH 1/1 ARM: pxa: fix missing linux/gpio.h include
Quoted 9 lines · Daniel Mack
Fixes the following compile error:
?arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c: In function '
pxa3xx_cpu_pm_suspend':
?arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c:156: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_get_value' ?make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.o] Error 1Signed-off-by Daniel Mack <[email protected]>Cc Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]>Cc Eric Miao <[email protected]>
Applied.
Quoted 24 lines
---
?I didn't closely follow all recent patches around PXA, so it might be that ?this has already been cared for. Haojian?
?arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c | ? ?1 +
?1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c +0
-0@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@?#include <
linux/platform_device.h>
?#include <linux/irq.h>
?#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/gpio.h>
?#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
?#include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h>--
1.7.7.1
Haojian Zhuang
maintainerPATCH 1/1 ARM: pxa: fix missing linux/gpio.h include
In reply to Daniel MackQuoted 29 lines · Daniel Mack
Fixes the following compile error:
?arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c: In function '
pxa3xx_cpu_pm_suspend':
?arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c:156: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_get_value' ?make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.o] Error 1Signed-off-by Daniel Mack <[email protected]>Cc Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]>Cc Eric Miao <[email protected]>---
?I didn't closely follow all recent patches around PXA, so it might be that ?this has already been cared for. Haojian?
?arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c | ? ?1 +
?1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c +0
-0@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@?#include <
linux/platform_device.h>
?#include <linux/irq.h>
?#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/gpio.h>
?#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
?#include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h>
Quoted 9 lines
--
1.7.7.1_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Hi Daniel,
At first, gpio_get_value() isn't used in arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c.
Which git tree and which branch are you using now? I tried my git tree, arnd/for-next, rmk/for-next. Everything is ok. I can't find any build issue.
Thanks
Haojian
PATCH 1/1 ARM: pxa: fix missing linux/gpio.h include
Quoted 42 lines · Haojian Zhuang
Quoted 29 lines · Daniel Mack
Fixes the following compile error:
?arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c: In function '
pxa3xx_cpu_pm_suspend':
?arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c:156: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_get_value' ?make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.o] Error 1Signed-off-by Daniel Mack <[email protected]>Cc Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]>Cc Eric Miao <[email protected]>---
?I didn't closely follow all recent patches around PXA, so it might be that ?this has already been cared for. Haojian?
?arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c | ? ?1 +
?1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c +0
-0@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@?#include <
linux/platform_device.h>
?#include <linux/irq.h>
?#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/gpio.h>
?#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
?#include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h>Quoted 9 lines
--
1.7.7.1_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernelHi Daniel,
Quoted 5 lines
At first,
gpio_get_value()isn't used inarch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c.Which git tree and which branch are you using now? I tried my git tree, arnd/for-next, rmk/for-next. Everything is ok. I can't find any build issue.
Ouch! I didn't even give it a second thought to this obvious one-liner patch.
PATCH 1/1 ARM: pxa: fix missing linux/gpio.h include
Quoted 44 lines · Eric Miao
Quoted 42 lines · Haojian Zhuang
Quoted 33 lines · Daniel Mack
Fixes the following compile error:
arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c: In function 'pxa3xx_cpu_pm_suspend':
arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c:156: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_get_value' make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.o] Error 1Signed-off-by Daniel Mack <[email protected]>Cc Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]>Cc Eric Miao <[email protected]>---
I didn't closely follow all recent patches around PXA, so it might be that this has already been cared for. Haojian?
arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c +1
-1@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@#include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/irq.h> #include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/gpio.h> #include <linux/syscore_ops.h> #include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h> --1.7.7.1
Quoted 5 lines
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernelHi Daniel,
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
At first,
gpio_get_value()isn't used inarch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c.Which git tree and which branch are you using now? I tried my git tree, arnd/for-next, rmk/for-next. Everything is ok. I can't find any build issue.
Ouch! I didn't even give it a second thought to this obvious one-liner patch.
Gash. Not my day. We have a stupid workaround in that file that is buried in a very old patch. Due to recent changes in mainline, this doesn't build anymore, but that is something I have to keep privately.
Thanks for the heads-up, and sorry. You can drop this patch.
Daniel