Devkit8000: Switch over to enable_gpmc_cs_config
PATCH 1/1 Devkit8000: Switch over to enable_gpmc_cs_config
Use enable_gpmc_cs_config instead of local writing timing configuration for GPMC.
--- board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c +12 -7
@@ -48,6 +48,16 @@DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR ; +static u32 gpmc_net_config[GPMC_MAX_REG ] = { +NET_GPMC_CONFIG1 , +NET_GPMC_CONFIG2 , +NET_GPMC_CONFIG3 , +NET_GPMC_CONFIG4 , +NET_GPMC_CONFIG5 , +NET_GPMC_CONFIG6 , +NET_GPMC_CONFIG7 , +}; +/* * Routine: board_init * Description: Early hardware init.
@@ -82,13 +92,8 @@ int misc_init_r(void)#ifdef CONFIG_DRIVER_DM9000 /* Configure GPMC registers for DM9000 */ -writel (NET_GPMC_CONFIG1 , &gpmc_cfg->cs[6 ].config1); -writel (NET_GPMC_CONFIG2 , &gpmc_cfg->cs[6 ].config2); -writel (NET_GPMC_CONFIG3 , &gpmc_cfg->cs[6 ].config3); -writel (NET_GPMC_CONFIG4 , &gpmc_cfg->cs[6 ].config4); -writel (NET_GPMC_CONFIG5 , &gpmc_cfg->cs[6 ].config5); -writel (NET_GPMC_CONFIG6 , &gpmc_cfg->cs[6 ].config6); -writel (NET_GPMC_CONFIG7 , &gpmc_cfg->cs[6 ].config7); +enable_gpmc_cs_config (gpmc_net_config, &gpmc_cfg->cs[6 ], +CONFIG_DM9000_BASE ,GPMC_SIZE_16M );/* Use OMAP DIE_ID as MAC address */ if (!eth_getenv_enetaddr ("ethaddr" , enetaddr)) {
Signature · 1 line
1.7.8
PATCH 1/1 Devkit8000: Switch over to enable_gpmc_cs_config
Quoted 15 lines · Thomas Weber
Use
enable_gpmc_cs_configinstead of local writing timing configuration for GPMC.Signed-off-by Thomas Weber <[email protected]>---
?board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c | ? 19 ++++++++++++------- ?1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c +0
-0@@ -48,6 +48,16 @@ ?DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c line 59
Quoted 10 lines
board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c +9
-0+static u32 gpmc_net_config[GPMC_MAX_REG ] = { + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG1, + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG2, + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG3, + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG4, + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG5, + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG6, + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG7, +};
Value 7 is computed in enable_gpmc_cs_config() so it should be a 0 in the struct (or just a comment for clarity, I've seen both I think).
Signature · 1 line
Tom
PATCH 1/1 Devkit8000: Switch over to enable_gpmc_cs_config
Hello Tom,
Quoted 17 lines · Tom Rini
Quoted 16 lines · Thomas Weber
Use
enable_gpmc_cs_configinstead of local writing timing configuration for GPMC.Signed-off-by Thomas Weber <[email protected]>--- board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c +0
-0@@ -48,6 +48,16 @@DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR ;
Quoted 13 lines
board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c line 59
Quoted 9 lines
board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c +9
-0+static u32 gpmc_net_config[GPMC_MAX_REG ] = { +NET_GPMC_CONFIG1 , +NET_GPMC_CONFIG2 , +NET_GPMC_CONFIG3 , +NET_GPMC_CONFIG4 , +NET_GPMC_CONFIG5 , +NET_GPMC_CONFIG6 , +NET_GPMC_CONFIG7 , +};Value 7 is computed in
enable_gpmc_cs_config()so it should be a 0 in the struct (or just a comment for clarity, I've seen both I think).
The calculated value in enable_gpmc_cs_config() is same as NET_GPMC_CONFIG7. The gpmc_net_config[6] is ignored and not used in enable_gpmc_cs_config(). If you want a 0 at this position I will send a second version with a 0 for NET_GPMC_CONFIG7.
Thomas
PATCH 1/1 Devkit8000: Switch over to enable_gpmc_cs_config
Quoted 34 lines · Thomas Weber
Hello Tom,
Quoted 17 lines · Tom Rini
Quoted 16 lines · Thomas Weber
Use
enable_gpmc_cs_configinstead of local writing timing configuration for GPMC.Signed-off-by Thomas Weber <[email protected]>---
?board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c | ? 19 ++++++++++++------- ?1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c +0
-0@@ -48,6 +48,16 @@ ?DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;Quoted 13 lines
board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c line 59
Quoted 9 lines
board/timll/devkit8000/devkit8000.c +9
-0+static u32 gpmc_net_config[GPMC_MAX_REG ] = { + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG1, + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG2, + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG3, + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG4, + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG5, + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG6, + ? ? ? NET_GPMC_CONFIG7, +};Value 7 is computed in
enable_gpmc_cs_config()so it should be a 0 in the struct (or just a comment for clarity, I've seen both I think).
Quoted 4 lines
The calculated value in
enable_gpmc_cs_config()is same asNET_GPMC_CONFIG7. The gpmc_net_config[6] is ignored and not used inenable_gpmc_cs_config(). If you want a 0 at this position I will send a second version with a 0 forNET_GPMC_CONFIG7.
Yes, please send a v2, thanks
Signature · 1 line
Tom