UDEV-145??
Does anyone know why we might be keeping this older version around? I know that in the past there were kernel <-> udev issues. Are most usages now using current kernels and udev?
Please let me know, I will remove it unless I hear otherwise.
Thanks
Signature · 5 lines
Sau! Saul Wold Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel Yocto Project / Poky Build System
Quoted 4 lines · Saul Wold
Does anyone know why we might be keeping this older version around? I know that in the past there were kernel <-> udev issues. Are most usages now using current kernels and udev?
I was wondering the same thing. I have a WIP patch series to drop the old version and the old inc file.
Further I'd like to try and get meta-oe using at least most of the oe-core udev, I've not looked at the differences there yet.
Joshua
Signature · 3 lines
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology CentreQuoted 6 lines · Joshua Lock
Quoted 4 lines · Saul Wold
Does anyone know why we might be keeping this older version around? I know that in the past there were kernel <-> udev issues. Are most usages now using current kernels and udev?
Quoted 6 lines
I was wondering the same thing. I have a WIP patch series to drop the old version and the old inc file.
Further I'd like to try and get meta-oe using at least most of the oe-core udev, I've not looked at the differences there yet.
I read this e-mail after I started working on this. My current WIP patchset is at:
https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/compare/ae4118a1f78f113c3d687c3aa6a86007cf977cae...master
I am going to finish this getting 175 on oe-core but those patches seems good for merging to me.
Signature · 3 lines
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Op 20 dec. 2011, om 14:35 heeft Otavio Salvador het volgende geschreven:
Quoted 10 lines · Joshua Lock
Quoted 4 lines · Saul Wold
Does anyone know why we might be keeping this older version around? I know that in the past there were kernel <-> udev issues. Are most usages now using current kernels and udev?
I was wondering the same thing. I have a WIP patch series to drop the old version and the old inc file.
Quoted 8 lines
Further I'd like to try and get meta-oe using at least most of the oe-core udev, I've not looked at the differences there yet.
I read this e-mail after I started working on this. My current WIP patchset is at:
https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/compare/ae4118a1f78f113c3d687c3aa6a86007cf977cae...master
I am going to finish this getting 175 on oe-core but those patches seems good for merging to me.
Keep in mind that udev 175 looks a lot different than earlier versions, e.g. no udev-acl anymore, locations have moved, etc. So the custom OE initscripts will need a fair amount of changes for people still using sysvinit.
Quoted 10 lines · Koen Kooi
Op 20 dec. 2011, om 14:35 heeft Otavio Salvador het volgende geschreven:
...I read this e-mail after I started working on this. My current WIP patchset is at:
Quoted 2 lines
https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/compare/ae4118a1f78f113c3d687c3aa6a86007cf977cae...master
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
I am going to finish this getting 175 on oe-core but those patches seems
good for merging to me.
Keep in mind that udev 175 looks a lot different than earlier versions, e.g. no udev-acl anymore, locations have moved, etc. So the custom OE initscripts will need a fair amount of changes for people still using sysvinit.
I will on 173 first, in this case.
Signature · 3 lines
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br