bonding: fix error handling if slave is busy
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 bonding: fix error handling if slave is busy
The bonding device can cause kernel panic in the enslave error handling.
If slave device already has a receive handler registered, then the error unwind does not clear the new entry out of the slave list. This ends up leaving a reference to freed memory in the bond device slave linked list.
The following is a simple example:
# modprobe dummy # ip li add dummy0-1 link dummy0 type macvlan # modprobe bonding # echo +dummy0 >/sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves # ip -s li show dev bond0
This returns with -EBUSY, but the bonding device has bogus entry in the slave list, and will panic on next operation that gets statistics from bond0.
The fix is to detach the slave (which removes it from the list) in the unwind path.
---
Patch is against net-next but should be applied to net (3.2), and stable (3.1 and 3.0).
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +3 -0
@@ -1853,6 +1853,9 @@ err_dest_symlinks:bond_destroy_slave_symlinks (bond_dev, slave_dev); err_close: +write_lock_bh (&bond->lock); +bond_detach_slave (bond, new_slave); +write_unlock_bh (&bond->lock);dev_close (slave_dev); err_unset_master:
Quoted 31 lines · Stephen Hemminger
The bonding device can cause kernel panic in the enslave error handling.
If slave device already has a receive handler registered, then the error unwind does not clear the new entry out of the slave list. This ends up leaving a reference to freed memory in the bond device slave linked list.
The following is a simple example:
# modprobe dummy # ip li add dummy0-1 link dummy0 type macvlan # modprobe bonding # echo +dummy0>/sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves # ip -s li show dev bond0This returns with
-EBUSY, but the bonding device has bogus entry in the slave list, and will panic on next operation that gets statistics from bond0.The fix is to detach the slave (which removes it from the list) in the unwind path.
Signed-off-by Stephen Hemminger<[email protected]>---
Patch is against net-next but should be applied to net (3.2), and stable (3.1 and 3.0).
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c err_dest_symlinks: · line 1861
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +3
-0@@ -1853,6 +1853,9 @@ err_dest_symlinks:bond_destroy_slave_symlinks (bond_dev, slave_dev); err_close: +write_lock_bh (&bond->lock); +bond_detach_slave (bond, new_slave); +write_unlock_bh (&bond->lock);dev_close (slave_dev); err_unset_master:
NAK.
There are three 'goto err_close' before the call to bond_attach_slave. For those three goto, your path will call bond_detach_slave without a previous call to bond_attach_slave.
This would at least decrement bond->slave_cnt, without having incremented it before.
Do I miss something ?
Nicolas.
PATCH 1/1 bonding: fix error handling if slave is busy (v2)
If slave device already has a receive handler registered, then the error unwind of bonding device enslave function is broken.
The following will leave a pointer to freed memory in the slave device list, causing a later kernel panic.
# modprobe dummy # ip li add dummy0-1 link dummy0 type macvlan # modprobe bonding # echo +dummy0 >/sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
The fix is to detach the slave (which removes it from the list) in the unwind path.
---
v2 - need to keep original err_close for other unwind
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +7 -2
@@ -1822,7 +1822,7 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond"but new slave device does not support netpoll.\n" , bond_dev->name); res = -EBUSY ; - goto err_close; + goto err_detach; } }#endif
@@ -1831,7 +1831,7 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond res =bond_create_slave_symlinks (bond_dev, slave_dev);if (res) - goto err_close; + goto err_detach; res =netdev_rx_handler_register (slave_dev, bond_handle_frame, new_slave);
@@ -1852,6 +1852,11 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond err_dest_symlinks:bond_destroy_slave_symlinks (bond_dev, slave_dev); +err_detach: +write_lock_bh (&bond->lock); +bond_detach_slave (bond, new_slave); +write_unlock_bh (&bond->lock); + err_close:dev_close (slave_dev);
Re: [PATCH] bonding: fix error handling if slave is busy (v2)
Quoted 10 lines · Stephen Hemminger
If slave device already has a receive handler registered, then the error unwind of bonding device enslave function is broken.
The following will leave a pointer to freed memory in the slave device list, causing a later kernel panic.
# modprobe dummy # ip li add dummy0-1 link dummy0 type macvlan # modprobe bonding # echo +dummy0>/sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
Quoted 4 lines
The fix is to detach the slave (which removes it from the list) in the unwind path.
Signed-off-by Stephen Hemminger<[email protected]>
Thanks Stephen.
Quoted 38 lines
---
v2 - need to keep originalerr_closefor other unwinddrivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +7
-2@@ -1822,7 +1822,7 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond"but new slave device does not support netpoll.\n" , bond_dev->name); res = -EBUSY ; - goto err_close; + goto err_detach; } }#endif @@ -1831,7 +1831,7 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond res =bond_create_slave_symlinks (bond_dev, slave_dev);if (res) - goto err_close; + goto err_detach; res =netdev_rx_handler_register (slave_dev, bond_handle_frame, new_slave);@@ -1852,6 +1852,11 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond err_dest_symlinks:bond_destroy_slave_symlinks (bond_dev, slave_dev); +err_detach: +write_lock_bh (&bond->lock); +bond_detach_slave (bond, new_slave); +write_unlock_bh (&bond->lock); + err_close:dev_close (slave_dev);
Re: [PATCH] bonding: fix error handling if slave is busy (v2)
Quoted 11 lines · On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 01:09:50 +0100 Nicolas de Pesloüan…
Quoted 10 lines · Stephen Hemminger
If slave device already has a receive handler registered, then the error unwind of bonding device enslave function is broken.
The following will leave a pointer to freed memory in the slave device list, causing a later kernel panic.
# modprobe dummy # ip li add dummy0-1 link dummy0 type macvlan # modprobe bonding # echo +dummy0>/sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
The fix is to detach the slave (which removes it from the list) in the unwind path.
Signed-off-by Stephen Hemminger<[email protected]>Thanks Stephen.
Reviewed-by Nicolas de Pesloüan <[email protected]>
The locking in bond driver is a tangled web.
Would be cleaner to get rid of bond->lock altogether. Slave add/delete should be protected by RTNL, and the lookup should be converted to RCU. The problem is that bonding driver implements own form of circular list to handle round-robin etc.
Re: [PATCH] bonding: fix error handling if slave is busy (v2)
Quoted 21 lines · Stephen Hemminger
Quoted 18 lines · On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 01:09:50 +0100 Nicolas de…
Quoted 10 lines · Stephen Hemminger
If slave device already has a receive handler registered, then the error unwind of bonding device enslave function is broken.
The following will leave a pointer to freed memory in the slave device list, causing a later kernel panic.
# modprobe dummy # ip li add dummy0-1 link dummy0 type macvlan # modprobe bonding # echo +dummy0>/sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slavesQuoted 4 lines
The fix is to detach the slave (which removes it from the list) in the unwind path.
Signed-off-by Stephen Hemminger<[email protected]>Thanks Stephen.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Reviewed-by Nicolas de Pesloüan<[email protected]>The locking in bond driver is a tangled web.
Would be cleaner to get rid of
bond->lockaltogether. Slave add/delete should be protected by RTNL, and the lookup should be converted to RCU. The problem is that bonding driver implements own form of circular list to handle round-robin etc.
Bonding has become an incredibly complex thing, due to the large number of corner cases it needs to handle. And the locking system in probably part of the problem.
Unfortunately, I'm far from a Linux locking specialist, so I cannot comment on this... I just noticed that searching for RTNL in Documentations yields no result... :-(
Nicolas.
Re: [PATCH] bonding: fix error handling if slave is busy (v2)
In reply to Nicolas de PesloüanFrom: Nicolas de Pesloüan <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 01:09:50 +0100
Quoted 11 lines · Stephen Hemminger
Quoted 10 lines
If slave device already has a receive handler registered, then the error unwind of bonding device enslave function is broken.
The following will leave a pointer to freed memory in the slave device list, causing a later kernel panic.
# modprobe dummy # ip li add dummy0-1 link dummy0 type macvlan # modprobe bonding # echo +dummy0>/sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
The fix is to detach the slave (which removes it from the list) in the unwind path.
Signed-off-by Stephen Hemminger<[email protected]>Thanks Stephen.
Reviewed-by Nicolas de Pesloüan <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks.