ep93xx: fix build of vision_ep93xx.c
PATCH 1/1 ep93xx: fix build of vision_ep93xx.c
Fix build breakage due to the following commits:
Commit bd5f12a24766c1f299def0a78b008d4746f528f2
ARM: 7042/3: mach-ep93xx: break out GPIO driver specifics
Commit 257af9f9725aa8a863b306659208a031135d59e7
ARM: 7041/1: gpio-ep93xx: hookup the to_irq callback in the driver
The vision_ep9307 machine uses the ep93xx build-in gpios and needs to include <mach/gpio-ep93xx.h> to pickup the defines.
The gpio_to_irq() call is now a callback to the gpio-ep93xx.c driver and cannot be used as a constant initializer for the .irq member of struct i2c_board_info.
---
arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/vision_ep9307.c +3 -1
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@#include <mach/hardware.h> #include <mach/fb.h> #include <mach/ep93xx_spi.h> +#include <mach/gpio-ep93xx.h> #include <asm/mach-types.h> #include <asm/mach/map.h>
@@ -153,7 +154,6 @@ static struct i2c_board_info vision_i2c_info[] __initdata = { }, { I2C_BOARD_INFO("pca9539", 0x74), .platform_data = &pca953x_74_gpio_data, - .irq =gpio_to_irq (EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_F (7 )), }, {I2C_BOARD_INFO ("pca9539" ,0x75 ), .platform_data = &pca953x_75_gpio_data,
@@ -348,6 +348,8 @@ static void __init vision_init_machine(void) "pca9539:74"))pr_warn ("cannot request interrupt gpio for pca9539:74\n" ); + vision_i2c_info[1 ].irq =gpio_to_irq (EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_F (7 )); +ep93xx_register_i2c (&vision_i2c_gpio_data, vision_i2c_info,ARRAY_SIZE (vision_i2c_info)); ep93xx_register_spi(&vision_spi_master, vision_spi_board_info,
PATCH 1/1 ep93xx: fix build of vision_ep93xx.c
Quoted 11 lines · H Hartley Sweeten
Fix build breakage due to the following commits:
Commit
bd5f12a24766c1f299def0a78b008d4746f528f2
ARM: 7042/3: mach-ep93xx: break out GPIO driver specificsCommit
257af9f9725aa8a863b306659208a031135d59e7
ARM: 7041/1: gpio-ep93xx: hookup theto_irqcallback in the driverThe
vision_ep9307machine uses the ep93xx build-in gpios and needs to include <mach/gpio-ep93xx.h> to pickup the defines.
Quoted 6 lines
The
gpio_to_irq()call is now a callback to thegpio-ep93xx.cdriver and cannot be used as a constant initializer for the .irq member of structi2c_board_info.Signed-off-by Hartley Sweeten <[email protected]>Cc Ryan Mallon <[email protected]>
Hi Hartley,
Sorry for the delay. This looks correct to me.
Quoted 37 lines
---
arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/vision_ep9307.c +3
-1@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@#include <mach/hardware.h> #include <mach/fb.h> #include <mach/ep93xx_spi.h> +#include <mach/gpio-ep93xx.h> #include <asm/mach-types.h> #include <asm/mach/map.h> @@ -153,7 +154,6 @@ static struct i2c_board_info vision_i2c_info[] __initdata = { }, { I2C_BOARD_INFO("pca9539", 0x74), .platform_data = &pca953x_74_gpio_data, - .irq =gpio_to_irq (EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_F (7 )), }, {I2C_BOARD_INFO ("pca9539" ,0x75 ), .platform_data = &pca953x_75_gpio_data,@@ -348,6 +348,8 @@ static void __init vision_init_machine(void) "pca9539:74"))pr_warn ("cannot request interrupt gpio for pca9539:74\n" ); + vision_i2c_info[1 ].irq =gpio_to_irq (EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_F (7 )); +ep93xx_register_i2c (&vision_i2c_gpio_data, vision_i2c_info,ARRAY_SIZE (vision_i2c_info)); ep93xx_register_spi(&vision_spi_master, vision_spi_board_info,_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
PATCH 1/1 ep93xx: fix build of vision_ep93xx.c
Quoted 20 lines · Ryan Mallon
Quoted 11 lines · H Hartley Sweeten
Fix build breakage due to the following commits:
Commit
bd5f12a24766c1f299def0a78b008d4746f528f2
ARM: 7042/3: mach-ep93xx: break out GPIO driver specificsCommit
257af9f9725aa8a863b306659208a031135d59e7
ARM: 7041/1: gpio-ep93xx: hookup theto_irqcallback in the driverThe
vision_ep9307machine uses the ep93xx build-in gpios and needs to include <mach/gpio-ep93xx.h> to pickup the defines.Quoted 6 lines
The
gpio_to_irq()call is now a callback to thegpio-ep93xx.cdriver and cannot be used as a constant initializer for the .irq member of structi2c_board_info.Signed-off-by Hartley Sweeten <[email protected]>Cc Ryan Mallon <[email protected]>
Quoted 5 lines
Hi Hartley,
Sorry for the delay. This looks correct to me.
Acked-by Ryan Mallon <[email protected]>
Thanks.
Should this go through Russell's patch system or the arm-soc tree? If it's the arm-soc tree do you know to get a patch to them?
Regards,
Hartley