jbd2: clear BH_Delay & BH_Unwritten in journal_unmap_buffer
PATCH 1/1 jbd2: clear BH_Delay & BH_Unwritten in journal_unmap_buffer
journal_unmap_buffer()'s zap_buffer: code clears a lot of buffer head state ala discard_buffer(), but does not touch _Delay or _Unwritten as discard_buffer() does.
This can be problematic in some areas of the ext4 code which assume that if they have found a buffer marked unwritten or delay, then it's a live one. Perhaps those spots should check whether it is mapped as well, but if jbd2 is going to tear down a buffer, let's really tear it down completely.
Without this I get some fsx failures on sub-page-block filesystems up until v3.2, at which point 4e96b2dbbf1d7e81f22047a50f862555a6cb87cb and 189e868fa8fdca702eb9db9d8afc46b5cb9144c9 make the failures go away, because buried within that large change is some more flag clearing. I still think it's worth doing in jbd2, since ->invalidatepage leads here directly, and it's the right place to clear away these flags.
---
fs/jbd2/transaction.c +2 -0
@@ -1949,6 +1949,8 @@ zap_buffer_unlocked:clear_buffer_mapped (bh);clear_buffer_req (bh);clear_buffer_new (bh); +clear_buffer_delay (bh); +clear_buffer_unwritten (bh); bh->b_bdev =NULL ;return may_free; }
Quoted 10 lines · Eric Sandeen
journal_unmap_buffer()'s
zap_buffer: code clears a lot of buffer head state aladiscard_buffer(), but does not touch_Delayor_Unwrittenasdiscard_buffer()does.This can be problematic in some areas of the ext4 code which assume that if they have found a buffer marked unwritten or delay, then it's a live one. Perhaps those spots should check whether it is mapped as well, but if jbd2 is going to tear down a buffer, let's really tear it down completely.
Quoted 7 lines
Without this I get some fsx failures on sub-page-block filesystems up until v3.2, at which point
4e96b2dbbf1d7e81f22047a50f862555a6cb87cband189e868fa8fdca702eb9db9d8afc46b5cb9144c9make the failures go away, because buried within that large change is some more flag clearing. I still think it's worth doing in jbd2, since ->invalidatepage leads here directly, and it's the right place to clear away these flags.
Addresses CVE-2011-4086 BTW.
Quoted 23 lines
Signed-off-by Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>---
fs/jbd2/transaction.c +2
-1@@ -1949,6 +1949,8 @@ zap_buffer_unlocked:clear_buffer_mapped (bh);clear_buffer_req (bh);clear_buffer_new (bh); +clear_buffer_delay (bh); +clear_buffer_unwritten (bh); bh->b_bdev =NULL ;return may_free; } --To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 18 lines · Eric Sandeen
journal_unmap_buffer()'s
zap_buffer: code clears a lot of buffer head state aladiscard_buffer(), but does not touch_Delayor_Unwrittenasdiscard_buffer()does.This can be problematic in some areas of the ext4 code which assume that if they have found a buffer marked unwritten or delay, then it's a live one. Perhaps those spots should check whether it is mapped as well, but if jbd2 is going to tear down a buffer, let's really tear it down completely.
Without this I get some fsx failures on sub-page-block filesystems up until v3.2, at which point
4e96b2dbbf1d7e81f22047a50f862555a6cb87cband189e868fa8fdca702eb9db9d8afc46b5cb9144c9make the failures go away, because buried within that large change is some more flag clearing. I still think it's worth doing in jbd2, since ->invalidatepage leads here directly, and it's the right place to clear away these flags.
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
Thanks, applied.
- Ted