RAID corruption with kernel 3.2?
Has anyone seen RAID-5 or -6 corruption with kernel 3.2 on systems previously stable? If so, please let me know your hardware configuration... we're trying to track down a problem, and RAID *might* be part of it...
-hpa
Signature · 2 lines
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
Quoted 7 lines · H. Peter Anvin
Has anyone seen RAID-5 or -6 corruption with kernel 3.2 on systems previously stable? If so, please let me know your hardware configuration... we're trying to track down a problem, and RAID *might* be part of it...
-hpa
Quoted 8 lines
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Details? My >3.2 RAID6 still works fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 3 lines · Mathias Burén
Details? My>3.2 RAID6 still works fine.
What is your hardware configuration? Especially your CPU?
The current suspicion -- but we don't know yet -- is that this is a problem on Sandy Bridge and some Penryn CPUs which have the XSAVE instruction, but we might very well be completely wrong on that.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 6 lines · H. Peter Anvin
Quoted 4 lines · Mathias Burén
Details? My>3.2 RAID6 still works fine.
Quoted 7 lines
What is your hardware configuration? Especially your CPU?
The current suspicion -- but we don't know yet -- is that this is a problem on Sandy Bridge and some Penryn CPUs which have the XSAVE instruction, but we might very well be completely wrong on that.
-hpa
The CPU is an old Intel Atom, so nothing special. 3.2.5 with CK patches.
Mathias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello,
Quoted 9 lines · H. Peter Anvin
Quoted 3 lines · Mathias Burén
Details? My>3.2 RAID6 still works fine.
What is your hardware configuration? Especially your CPU?
The current suspicion -- but we don't know yet -- is that this is a problem on Sandy Bridge and some Penryn CPUs which have the XSAVE instruction, but we might very well be completely wrong on that.
I have NOT seen any corruptions. Have a dual CPU (8 cores) system with the following CPU:
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 23 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5460 @ 3.16GHz stepping : 10 microcode : 0xa07 cpu MHz : 1999.000 cache size : 6144 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 4 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 xsave lahf_lm dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority bogomips : 6317.90 clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
Has the following softraids:
cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md3 : active raid1 sdf2[1] sdc2[0]
70613632 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md1 : active raid1 sdd2[1] sda2[0]
70613632 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md2 : active raid1 sdb2[0] sde2[1]
70613632 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md4 : active raid6 sdn1[7] sdm1[6] sdk1[4] sdl1[5] sdh1[1] sdj1[3] sdi1[2] sdg1[0]
1754480640 blocks level 6, 2048k chunk, algorithm 2 [8/8] [UUUUUUUU]
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sdd1[3] sdf1[5] sde1[4] sdc1[2] sda1[0]
521984 blocks [6/6] [UUUUUU]
The devices under md4 are hardware raid1 on two external SAS boxes. Kernel currently is 3.2.1 with some security fixes. This system distributes daily more then 5 TiB (9 million files) and so far no one has reported any problems to me. I have several other systems with the same CPU (lower clock) and software Raid6 but with local attached disks. They also have no problems. Kernels there are 3.2.5.
Regards,
Holger
Quoted 29 lines · Holger Kiehl
Quoted 5 lines
The current suspicion -- but we don't know yet -- is that this is a problem on Sandy Bridge and some Penryn CPUs which have the XSAVE instruction, but we might very well be completely wrong on that.
I have NOT seen any corruptions. Have a dual CPU (8 cores) system with the following CPU:
cat
/proc/cpuinfoprocessor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 23 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5460 @ 3.16GHz stepping : 10 microcode : 0xa07 cpu MHz : 1999.000 cache size : 6144 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 4 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
Quoted 10 lines
pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm
constant_tscarch_perfmonpebs btsrep_goodnopl aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitords_cplvmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dcasse4_1xsavelahf_lmdtstpr_shadowvnmi flexpriority
bogomips : 6317.90
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment: 64
address sizes : 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
Okay, so that's Penryn, it has XSAVE but not XSAVEOPT. Very interesting data point, I appreciate the info!
-hpa
Signature · 2 lines
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.