rds cq event handler issue
Subsystems (3)
Hey Venkat,
I think I see a bug in the RDS RDMA module where RDS is not adhering to the RDMA locking context. From the kernel tree Documentation/infiniband/core_locking.txt:
---
The context in which completion event and asynchronous event callbacks run is not defined. Depending on the low-level driver, it may be process context, softirq context, or interrupt context. Upper level protocol consumers may not sleep in a callback.
---
So RDMA ULPs cannot assume any certain context for their callback functions. Yet I get a BUG_ON() when running RDS with iw_cxgb3 where RDS is bugging in rds_rdma_free_op():
---
/* Mark page dirty if it was possibly modified, which
* is the case for a RDMA_READ which copies from remote
* to local memory */
if (!ro->op_write) {
BUG_ON(irqs_disabled());
set_page_dirty(page);
}---
And rds_rdma_free_op() can be called in the cq callback path. Here's a stack trace when it bugged:
---
Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff886ca0fc>] :rds:rds_message_purge+0x54/0x79 [<ffffffff886ca162>] :rds:rds_message_put+0x41/0x4c [<ffffffff886f616b>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_unmap_rm+0xe2/0xf2 [<ffffffff886f63c4>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_cq_comp_handler+0x193/0x2e5 [<ffffffff88698a56>] :iw_cxgb3:iwch_ev_dispatch+0x1df/0x2b1 [<ffffffff8869f0b2>] :iw_cxgb3:cxio_hal_ev_handler+0x6b/0xb4 [<ffffffff882746cd>] :cxgb3:process_rx+0x3d/0xa0 [<ffffffff8827b28c>] :cxgb3:process_responses+0x120c/0x1350
---
iwch_ev_dispatch() explicitly disables irqs to ensure proper serialization:
---
spin_lock_irqsave(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag);
(*chp->ibcq.comp_handler)(&chp->ibcq, chp->ibcq.cq_context);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag);---
I'm not sure if that BUG_ON() in rds_rdma_free_op() is valid or not. If it is valid, then RDS needs to run this logic in a safe context, not in the context of the CQ callback. It BUG_ON() is not valid, we can remove it :).
Can you comment?
Thanks,
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 4F5651E5.1020005-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org
Quoted 45 lines · Steve Wise
Hey Venkat,
I think I see a bug in the RDS RDMA module where RDS is not adhering to the RDMA locking context. From the kernel tree
Documentation/infiniband/core_locking.txt:---
The context in which completion event and asynchronous event callbacks run is not defined. Depending on the low-level driver, it may be process context, softirq context, or interrupt context. Upper level protocol consumers may not sleep in a callback.
---So RDMA ULPs cannot assume any certain context for their callback functions. Yet I get a
BUG_ON()when running RDS withiw_cxgb3where RDS is bugging inrds_rdma_free_op():---
/* Mark page dirty if it was possibly modified, which * is the case for a RDMA_READ which copies from remote * to local memory */ if (!ro->op_write) { BUG_ON(irqs_disabled()); set_page_dirty(page); }---
And
rds_rdma_free_op()can be called in the cq callback path. Here's a stack trace when it bugged:---
Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff886ca0fc>] :rds:rds_message_purge+0x54/0x79 [<ffffffff886ca162>] :rds:rds_message_put+0x41/0x4c [<ffffffff886f616b>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_unmap_rm+0xe2/0xf2 [<ffffffff886f63c4>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_cq_comp_handler+0x193/0x2e5 [<ffffffff88698a56>] :iw_cxgb3:iwch_ev_dispatch+0x1df/0x2b1 [<ffffffff8869f0b2>] :iw_cxgb3:cxio_hal_ev_handler+0x6b/0xb4 [<ffffffff882746cd>] :cxgb3:process_rx+0x3d/0xa0 [<ffffffff8827b28c>] :cxgb3:process_responses+0x120c/0x1350---
iwch_ev_dispatch()explicitly disables irqs to ensure proper serialization:---
spin_lock_irqsave(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag); (*chp->ibcq.comp_handler)(&chp->ibcq, chp->ibcq.cq_context); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag);---
Quoted 8 lines
I'm not sure if that
BUG_ON()inrds_rdma_free_op()is valid or not. If it is valid, then RDS needs to run this logic in a safe context, not in the context of the CQ callback. ItBUG_ON()is not valid, we can remove it :).Can you comment?
Thanks,
Steve.
Hi Steve,
Our internal latest code has a WARN_ON instead:
---------------------
/* Mark page dirty if it was possibly modified, which
* is the case for a RDMA_READ which copies from remote
* to local memory */
if (!ro->op_write) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(page_mapping(page) &&
irqs_disabled());
set_page_dirty(page);
}---------------------
Venkat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 65 lines · Venkat Venkatsubra
Quoted 45 lines · Steve Wise
Hey Venkat,
I think I see a bug in the RDS RDMA module where RDS is not adhering to the RDMA locking context. From the kernel tree
Documentation/infiniband/core_locking.txt:---
The context in which completion event and asynchronous event callbacks run is not defined. Depending on the low-level driver, it may be process context, softirq context, or interrupt context. Upper level protocol consumers may not sleep in a callback.
---So RDMA ULPs cannot assume any certain context for their callback functions. Yet I get a
BUG_ON()when running RDS withiw_cxgb3where RDS is bugging inrds_rdma_free_op():---
/* Mark page dirty if it was possibly modified, which * is the case for a RDMA_READ which copies from remote * to local memory */ if (!ro->op_write) { BUG_ON(irqs_disabled()); set_page_dirty(page); }---
And
rds_rdma_free_op()can be called in the cq callback path. Here's a stack trace when it bugged:---
Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff886ca0fc>] :rds:rds_message_purge+0x54/0x79 [<ffffffff886ca162>] :rds:rds_message_put+0x41/0x4c [<ffffffff886f616b>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_unmap_rm+0xe2/0xf2 [<ffffffff886f63c4>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_cq_comp_handler+0x193/0x2e5 [<ffffffff88698a56>] :iw_cxgb3:iwch_ev_dispatch+0x1df/0x2b1 [<ffffffff8869f0b2>] :iw_cxgb3:cxio_hal_ev_handler+0x6b/0xb4 [<ffffffff882746cd>] :cxgb3:process_rx+0x3d/0xa0 [<ffffffff8827b28c>] :cxgb3:process_responses+0x120c/0x1350---
iwch_ev_dispatch()explicitly disables irqs to ensure proper serialization:---
spin_lock_irqsave(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag); (*chp->ibcq.comp_handler)(&chp->ibcq, chp->ibcq.cq_context); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag);---
Quoted 8 lines
I'm not sure if that
BUG_ON()inrds_rdma_free_op()is valid or not. If it is valid, then RDS needs to run this logic in a safe context, not in the context of the CQ callback. ItBUG_ON()is not valid, we can remove it :).Can you comment?
Thanks,
Steve.
Hi Steve,
Our internal latest code has a
WARN_ONinstead:
---------------------/* Mark page dirty if it was possibly modified, which * is the case for a RDMA_READ which copies from remote * to local memory */ if (!ro->op_write) { WARN_ON_ONCE(page_mapping(page) && irqs_disabled()); set_page_dirty(page); }
Quoted 3 lines
---------------------
Venkat
That helps with the crashing. :) Does set_page_dirty() require irqs enabled? If so, RDS needs to change such that it doesn't do this work in the CQ event handler callback context.
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html