Skip to contentSkip to conversation

rds cq event handler issue

DISCUSSION Steve Wise 2 participants 3 messages Mar 6, 2012 2 messages not in the archive

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Steve Wise

author
#0 lore raw

Hey Venkat,

I think I see a bug in the RDS RDMA module where RDS is not adhering to the RDMA locking context. From the kernel tree Documentation/infiniband/core_locking.txt:

---
The context in which completion event and asynchronous event callbacks run is not defined. Depending on the low-level driver, it may be process context, softirq context, or interrupt context. Upper level protocol consumers may not sleep in a callback.
---

So RDMA ULPs cannot assume any certain context for their callback functions. Yet I get a BUG_ON() when running RDS with iw_cxgb3 where RDS is bugging in rds_rdma_free_op():

---

                /* Mark page dirty if it was possibly modified, which
                 * is the case for a RDMA_READ which copies from remote
                 * to local memory */
                if (!ro->op_write) {
                        BUG_ON(irqs_disabled());
                        set_page_dirty(page);
                }

---

And rds_rdma_free_op() can be called in the cq callback path. Here's a stack trace when it bugged:

---

Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff886ca0fc>] :rds:rds_message_purge+0x54/0x79
[<ffffffff886ca162>] :rds:rds_message_put+0x41/0x4c
[<ffffffff886f616b>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_unmap_rm+0xe2/0xf2
[<ffffffff886f63c4>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_cq_comp_handler+0x193/0x2e5
[<ffffffff88698a56>] :iw_cxgb3:iwch_ev_dispatch+0x1df/0x2b1
[<ffffffff8869f0b2>] :iw_cxgb3:cxio_hal_ev_handler+0x6b/0xb4
[<ffffffff882746cd>] :cxgb3:process_rx+0x3d/0xa0
[<ffffffff8827b28c>] :cxgb3:process_responses+0x120c/0x1350

---

iwch_ev_dispatch() explicitly disables irqs to ensure proper serialization:

---

        spin_lock_irqsave(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag);
        (*chp->ibcq.comp_handler)(&chp->ibcq, chp->ibcq.cq_context);
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag);

---

I'm not sure if that BUG_ON() in rds_rdma_free_op() is valid or not. If it is valid, then RDS needs to run this logic in a safe context, not in the context of the CQ callback. It BUG_ON() is not valid, we can remove it :).

Can you comment?

Thanks,

Steve.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 4F5651E5.1020005-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org

#2 lore raw
Quoted 45 lines · Steve Wise

Hey Venkat,

I think I see a bug in the RDS RDMA module where RDS is not adhering to the RDMA locking context. From the kernel tree Documentation/infiniband/core_locking.txt:

---
The context in which completion event and asynchronous event callbacks run is not defined. Depending on the low-level driver, it may be process context, softirq context, or interrupt context. Upper level protocol consumers may not sleep in a callback.
---

So RDMA ULPs cannot assume any certain context for their callback functions. Yet I get a BUG_ON() when running RDS with iw_cxgb3 where RDS is bugging in rds_rdma_free_op():

---

                /* Mark page dirty if it was possibly modified, which
                 * is the case for a RDMA_READ which copies from remote
                 * to local memory */
                if (!ro->op_write) {
                        BUG_ON(irqs_disabled());
                        set_page_dirty(page);
                }

---

And rds_rdma_free_op() can be called in the cq callback path. Here's a stack trace when it bugged:

---

Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff886ca0fc>] :rds:rds_message_purge+0x54/0x79
[<ffffffff886ca162>] :rds:rds_message_put+0x41/0x4c
[<ffffffff886f616b>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_unmap_rm+0xe2/0xf2
[<ffffffff886f63c4>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_cq_comp_handler+0x193/0x2e5
[<ffffffff88698a56>] :iw_cxgb3:iwch_ev_dispatch+0x1df/0x2b1
[<ffffffff8869f0b2>] :iw_cxgb3:cxio_hal_ev_handler+0x6b/0xb4
[<ffffffff882746cd>] :cxgb3:process_rx+0x3d/0xa0
[<ffffffff8827b28c>] :cxgb3:process_responses+0x120c/0x1350

---

iwch_ev_dispatch() explicitly disables irqs to ensure proper serialization:

---

        spin_lock_irqsave(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag);
        (*chp->ibcq.comp_handler)(&chp->ibcq, chp->ibcq.cq_context);
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag);

---

Quoted 8 lines

I'm not sure if that BUG_ON() in rds_rdma_free_op() is valid or not. If it is valid, then RDS needs to run this logic in a safe context, not in the context of the CQ callback. It BUG_ON() is not valid, we can remove it :).

Can you comment?

Thanks,

Steve.

Hi Steve,

Our internal latest code has a WARN_ON instead:
---------------------

                /* Mark page dirty if it was possibly modified, which
                 * is the case for a RDMA_READ which copies from remote
                 * to local memory */
                if (!ro->op_write) {
                        WARN_ON_ONCE(page_mapping(page) && 
irqs_disabled());
                        set_page_dirty(page);
                }

---------------------

Venkat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

author
#4 lore raw
Quoted 65 lines · Venkat Venkatsubra
Quoted 45 lines · Steve Wise

Hey Venkat,

I think I see a bug in the RDS RDMA module where RDS is not adhering to the RDMA locking context. From the kernel tree Documentation/infiniband/core_locking.txt:

---
The context in which completion event and asynchronous event callbacks run is not defined. Depending on the low-level driver, it may be process context, softirq context, or interrupt context. Upper level protocol consumers may not sleep in a callback.
---

So RDMA ULPs cannot assume any certain context for their callback functions. Yet I get a BUG_ON() when running RDS with iw_cxgb3 where RDS is bugging in rds_rdma_free_op():

---

                /* Mark page dirty if it was possibly modified, which
                 * is the case for a RDMA_READ which copies from remote
                 * to local memory */
                if (!ro->op_write) {
                        BUG_ON(irqs_disabled());
                        set_page_dirty(page);
                }

---

And rds_rdma_free_op() can be called in the cq callback path. Here's a stack trace when it bugged:

---

Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff886ca0fc>] :rds:rds_message_purge+0x54/0x79
[<ffffffff886ca162>] :rds:rds_message_put+0x41/0x4c
[<ffffffff886f616b>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_unmap_rm+0xe2/0xf2
[<ffffffff886f63c4>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_cq_comp_handler+0x193/0x2e5
[<ffffffff88698a56>] :iw_cxgb3:iwch_ev_dispatch+0x1df/0x2b1
[<ffffffff8869f0b2>] :iw_cxgb3:cxio_hal_ev_handler+0x6b/0xb4
[<ffffffff882746cd>] :cxgb3:process_rx+0x3d/0xa0
[<ffffffff8827b28c>] :cxgb3:process_responses+0x120c/0x1350

---

iwch_ev_dispatch() explicitly disables irqs to ensure proper serialization:

---

        spin_lock_irqsave(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag);
        (*chp->ibcq.comp_handler)(&chp->ibcq, chp->ibcq.cq_context);
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag);

---

Quoted 8 lines

I'm not sure if that BUG_ON() in rds_rdma_free_op() is valid or not. If it is valid, then RDS needs to run this logic in a safe context, not in the context of the CQ callback. It BUG_ON() is not valid, we can remove it :).

Can you comment?

Thanks,

Steve.

Hi Steve,

Our internal latest code has a WARN_ON instead:
---------------------

                /* Mark page dirty if it was possibly modified, which
                 * is the case for a RDMA_READ which copies from remote
                 * to local memory */
                if (!ro->op_write) {
                        WARN_ON_ONCE(page_mapping(page) && irqs_disabled());
                        set_page_dirty(page);
                }
Quoted 3 lines

---------------------

Venkat

That helps with the crashing. :) Does set_page_dirty() require irqs enabled? If so, RDS needs to change such that it doesn't do this work in the CQ event handler callback context.

Steve.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html