ceph: fix three bugs, two in ceph_vxattrcb_file_layout()
PATCH 1/1 ceph: fix three bugs, two in ceph_vxattrcb_file_layout()
In ceph_vxattrcb_file_layout(), there is a check to determine whether a preferred PG should be formatted into the output buffer. That check assumes that a preferred PG number of 0 indicates "no preference," but that is wrong. No preference is indicated by a negative (specifically, -1) PG number.
In addition, if that condition yields true, the preferred value is formatted into a sized buffer, but the size consumed by the earlier snprintf() call is not accounted for, opening up the possibilty of a buffer overrun.
Finally, in ceph_vxattrcb_dir_rctime() where the nanoseconds part of the time displayed did not include leading 0's, which led to erroneous (sub-second portion of) time values being shown.
This fixes these three issues:
http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/2155 http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/2156 http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/2157
--- fs/ceph/xattr.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
fs/ceph/xattr.c +0 -0
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static size_t ceph_vxattrcb_dir_rbytes(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, char *val, static size_t ceph_vxattrcb_dir_rctime(struct ceph_inode_info *ci,
char *val,
size_t size)
{
- return snprintf(val, size, "%ld.%ld", (long)ci->i_rctime.tv_sec,
+ return snprintf(val, size, "%ld.09%ld", (long)ci->i_rctime.tv_sec,
(long)ci->i_rctime.tv_nsec);
}
@@ -118,10 +118,15 @@ static size_t ceph_vxattrcb_file_layout(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, char *val,
(unsigned long long)ceph_file_layout_su(ci->i_layout),
(unsigned long long)ceph_file_layout_stripe_count(ci->i_layout), (unsigned long long)ceph_file_layout_object_size(ci->i_layout));
- if (ceph_file_layout_pg_preferred(ci->i_layout))
- ret += snprintf(val + ret, size, "preferred_osd=%lld\n",
+
+ if (ceph_file_layout_pg_preferred(ci->i_layout) >= 0) {
+ val += ret;
+ size -= ret;
+ ret += snprintf(val, size, "preferred_osd=%lld\n",
(unsigned long long)ceph_file_layout_pg_preferred(
ci->i_layout));
+ }
+
return ret;
}
Signature · 1 line
1.7.5.4
Quoted 69 lines · Alex Elder
In
ceph_vxattrcb_file_layout(), there is a check to determine whether a preferred PG should be formatted into the output buffer. That check assumes that a preferred PG number of 0 indicates "no preference," but that is wrong. No preference is indicated by a negative (specifically, -1) PG number.In addition, if that condition yields true, the preferred value is formatted into a sized buffer, but the size consumed by the earlier
snprintf()call is not accounted for, opening up the possibilty of a buffer overrun.Finally, in
ceph_vxattrcb_dir_rctime()where the nanoseconds part of the time displayed did not include leading 0's, which led to erroneous (sub-second portion of) time values being shown.This fixes these three issues:
http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/2155 http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/2156 http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/2157Signed-off-by Alex Elder <[email protected]>--- fs/ceph/xattr.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)fs/ceph/xattr.c +8
-3@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static size_t ceph_vxattrcb_dir_rbytes(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, char *val, static size_t ceph_vxattrcb_dir_rctime(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, char *val,size_t size) { -return snprintf (val, size,"%ld.%ld" , (long )ci->i_rctime.tv_sec, +return snprintf (val, size,"%ld.09%ld" , (long )ci->i_rctime.tv_sec, (long )ci->i_rctime.tv_nsec); }@@ -118,10 +118,15 @@ static size_t ceph_vxattrcb_file_layout(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, char *val, (unsigned long long )ceph_file_layout_su (ci->i_layout), (unsigned long long )ceph_file_layout_stripe_count (ci->i_layout), (unsigned long long)ceph_file_layout_object_size(ci->i_layout)); -if (ceph_file_layout_pg_preferred (ci->i_layout)) - ret +=snprintf (val + ret, size,"preferred_osd=%lld\n" , + +if (ceph_file_layout_pg_preferred (ci->i_layout) >=0 ) { + val += ret; + size -= ret; + ret +=snprintf (val, size,"preferred_osd=%lld\n" , (unsigned long long )ceph_file_layout_pg_preferred ( ci->i_layout)); + } +return ret;
}Signature · 6 lines
1.7.5.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html