block: make auto block plug flush threshold per-disk based
PATCH 1/1 block: make auto block plug flush threshold per-disk based
Subject: block: make auto block plug flush threshold per-disk based
We do auto block plug flush to reduce latency, the threshold is 16 requests. This works well if the task is accessing one or two drives. The problem is if the task is accessing a raid 0 device and the raid disk number is big, say 8 or 16, 16/8 = 2 or 16/16=1, we will have heavy lock contention.
This patch makes the threshold per-disk based. The latency should be still ok accessing one or two drives. The setup with application accessing a lot of drives in the meantime uaually is big machine, avoiding lock contention is more important, because any contention will actually increase latency.
--- block/blk-core.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
block/blk-core.c +2 -1
@@ -1277,7 +1277,8 @@list_for_each_entry_reverse (rq, &plug->list, queuelist) {int el_ret; - (*request_count)++; +if (rq->q == q) + (*request_count)++;if (rq->q != q || !blk_rq_merge_ok (rq, bio))continue ;
Quoted 11 lines · Shaohua Li
We do auto block plug flush to reduce latency, the threshold is 16 requests. This works well if the task is accessing one or two drives. The problem is if the task is accessing a raid 0 device and the raid disk number is big, say 8 or 16, 16/8 = 2 or 16/16=1, we will have heavy lock contention.
This patch makes the threshold per-disk based. The latency should be still ok accessing one or two drives. The setup with application accessing a lot of drives in the meantime uaually is big machine, avoiding lock contention is more important, because any contention will actually increase latency.
Thanks, applied. It should have been per-queue all along, so this makes a lot of sense.
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe
Jeff Moyer
Acked-byQuoted 7 lines · Jens Axboe
Quoted 6 lines · Shaohua Li
We do auto block plug flush to reduce latency, the threshold is 16 requests. This works well if the task is accessing one or two drives. The problem is if the task is accessing a raid 0 device and the raid disk number is big, say 8 or 16, 16/8 = 2 or 16/16=1, we will have heavy lock contention.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
This patch makes the threshold per-disk based. The latency should be still ok accessing one or two drives. The setup with application accessing a lot of drives in the meantime uaually is big machine, avoiding lock contention is more important, because any contention will actually increase latency.
Thanks, applied. It should have been per-queue all along, so this makes a lot of sense.
Yeah, I had noticed this before when looking over the code. Makes sense.