Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ep93xx fixes for 3.5

GIT PULL Ryan Mallon 3 participants 4 messages May 11, 2012 – May 12, 2012

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

The following changes since commit 0034102808e0dbbf3a2394b82b1bb40b5778de9e:

Linux 3.4-rc2 (2012-04-07 18:30:41 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

git://github.com/RyanMallon/linux-ep93xx.git tags/ep93xx-fixes-for-3.5

for you to fetch changes up to 2b3c83efc9a653af6a24799eeb1a2900ba0439e6:

dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels (2012-04-20 08:37:19 +1000)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Rafal Prylowski (2):
arm: ep93xx: Don't try to release not acquired GPIO lines dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels

 arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c |    2 +-
 drivers/dma/ep93xx_dma.c    |  117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
#1 lore raw

Hi,

Quoted 8 lines · Ryan Mallon

The following changes since commit 0034102808e0dbbf3a2394b82b1bb40b5778de9e:

?Linux 3.4-rc2 (2012-04-07 18:30:41 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

?git://github.com/RyanMallon/linux-ep93xx.git tags/ep93xx-fixes-for-3.5

Quoted 8 lines

for you to fetch changes up to 2b3c83efc9a653af6a24799eeb1a2900ba0439e6:

?dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels (2012-04-20 08:37:19 +1000)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Rafal Prylowski (2):
? ? ?arm: ep93xx: Don't try to release not acquired GPIO lines ? ? ?dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels

Technically, this is a feature, not a fix. I also didn't see an ack from the DMA maintainer on it since it would normally go in through his tree.

Vinod, you OK with this coming through arm-soc? Looks fairly uncontroversial so it shouldn't be a big deal but I don't know if it might collide with anything else you have queued up.

-Olof

Acked-by
#2 lore raw
Quoted 20 lines · Olof Johansson

Hi,

Quoted 8 lines · Ryan Mallon

The following changes since commit 0034102808e0dbbf3a2394b82b1bb40b5778de9e:

Linux 3.4-rc2 (2012-04-07 18:30:41 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

git://github.com/RyanMallon/linux-ep93xx.git tags/ep93xx-fixes-for-3.5

Quoted 8 lines

for you to fetch changes up to 2b3c83efc9a653af6a24799eeb1a2900ba0439e6:

dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels (2012-04-20 08:37:19 +1000)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Rafal Prylowski (2):
arm: ep93xx: Don't try to release not acquired GPIO lines dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels

Quoted 7 lines

Technically, this is a feature, not a fix. I also didn't see an ack from the DMA maintainer on it since it would normally go in through his tree.

Vinod, you OK with this coming through arm-soc? Looks fairly uncontroversial so it shouldn't be a big deal but I don't know if it might collide with anything else you have queued up.

Looks okay to me.
For: dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels

Signature · 1 line
~Vinod
#3 lore raw
Quoted 25 lines · Vinod Koul
Quoted 24 lines · Olof Johansson

Hi,

Quoted 8 lines · Ryan Mallon

The following changes since commit 0034102808e0dbbf3a2394b82b1bb40b5778de9e:

?Linux 3.4-rc2 (2012-04-07 18:30:41 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

?git://github.com/RyanMallon/linux-ep93xx.git tags/ep93xx-fixes-for-3.5

Quoted 8 lines

for you to fetch changes up to 2b3c83efc9a653af6a24799eeb1a2900ba0439e6:

?dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels (2012-04-20 08:37:19 +1000)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Rafal Prylowski (2):
? ? ?arm: ep93xx: Don't try to release not acquired GPIO lines ? ? ?dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels

Technically, this is a feature, not a fix. I also didn't see an ack from the DMA maintainer on it since it would normally go in through his tree.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Vinod, you OK with this coming through arm-soc? Looks fairly uncontroversial so it shouldn't be a big deal but I don't know if it might collide with anything else you have queued up.

Looks okay to me.
For: dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels

Thanks!

Ryan, since the branch has one board fix and one driver feature, I pulled it into our next/drivers branch instead of fixes. Either way, it's queued for the merge window now.

-Olof