mfd: Remove config AB8500_I2C_CORE Kconfig entry
PATCH 1/1 mfd: Remove config AB8500_I2C_CORE Kconfig entry
config AB8500_I2C_CORE is not used after commit d28f1db "mfd: Remove confusing ab8500-i2c file and merge into ab8500-core". Thus remove it.
--- drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 10 ---------- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
drivers/mfd/Kconfig +0 -10
@@ -703,16 +703,6 @@ config AB8500_CORE the irq_chip parts for handling the Mixed Signal chip events. This chip embeds various other multimedia funtionalities as well. -config AB8500_I2C_CORE - bool "AB8500 register access via PRCMU I2C" - depends on AB8500_CORE && MFD_DB8500_PRCMU - default y - help - This enables register access to the AB8500 chip via PRCMU I2C. - The AB8500 chip can be accessed via SPI or I2C. On DB8500 hardware - the I2C bus is connected to the Power Reset - and Mangagement Unit, PRCMU. - config AB8500_DEBUG bool "Enable debug info via debugfs" depends on AB8500_CORE && DEBUG_FS
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
Quoted 5 lines · Axel Lin
config
AB8500_I2C_COREis not used after commit d28f1db "mfd: Remove confusing ab8500-i2c file and merge into ab8500-core". Thus remove it.Signed-off-by Axel Lin<[email protected]>
I have this patch embedded into a patch-set I'm going to send to ARM-SoC for inclusion into -rc1 this afternoon. Would you mind leaving this one?
Signature · 5 lines
Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
2012/5/29 Lee Jones <[email protected]>:
Quoted 11 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 6 lines
config
AB8500_I2C_COREis not used after commit d28f1db "mfd: Remove confusing ab8500-i2c file and merge into ab8500-core". Thus remove it.Signed-off-by Axel Lin<[email protected]>I have this patch embedded into a patch-set I'm going to send to ARM-SoC for inclusion into -rc1 this afternoon. Would you mind leaving this one?
I don't mind.
But AFAIK, commit d28f1db is in mfd tree.
Any reason you want to send the patch to ARM-SoC instead of mfd tree.
Regards,
Axel
Quoted 10 lines · Axel Lin
2012/5/29 Lee Jones<[email protected]>:
Quoted 9 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 6 lines
config
AB8500_I2C_COREis not used after commit d28f1db "mfd: Remove confusing ab8500-i2c file and merge into ab8500-core". Thus remove it.Signed-off-by Axel Lin<[email protected]>
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I have this patch embedded into a patch-set I'm going to send to ARM-SoC for inclusion into -rc1 this afternoon. Would you mind leaving this one?
I don't mind.
But AFAIK, commit d28f1db is in mfd tree.
Any reason you want to send the patch to ARM-SoC instead of mfd tree.
I don't actually have a preference as to which tree it goes into, so long as it's sent to Mainline on or before -rc1. This patch isn't too important, but the others in the patch-set are and I'd like to keep them together if possible. Unless of course Sam or Mark have any issues with that. In which case I will bow down to them and do as they wish.
Kind regards,
Lee
Signature · 5 lines
Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Hi Lee,
Quoted 14 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 13 lines · Axel Lin
2012/5/29 Lee Jones<[email protected]>:
Quoted 11 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 6 lines
config
AB8500_I2C_COREis not used after commit d28f1db "mfd: Remove confusing ab8500-i2c file and merge into ab8500-core". Thus remove it.Signed-off-by Axel Lin<[email protected]>I have this patch embedded into a patch-set I'm going to send to ARM-SoC for inclusion into -rc1 this afternoon. Would you mind leaving this one?
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I don't mind.
But AFAIK, commit d28f1db is in mfd tree.
Any reason you want to send the patch to ARM-SoC instead of mfd tree.I don't actually have a preference as to which tree it goes into, so long as it's sent to Mainline on or before -rc1.
I sent a pull request to Linus yesterday, including this commit.
Cheers,
Samuel.
Signature · 2 lines
Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/
Hi Sam,
Quoted 15 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 14 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 13 lines
2012/5/29 Lee Jones<[email protected]>:
Quoted 11 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 6 lines
config
AB8500_I2C_COREis not used after commit d28f1db "mfd: Remove confusing ab8500-i2c file and merge into ab8500-core". Thus remove it.Signed-off-by Axel Lin<[email protected]>I have this patch embedded into a patch-set I'm going to send to ARM-SoC for inclusion into -rc1 this afternoon. Would you mind leaving this one?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I don't mind.
But AFAIK, commit d28f1db is in mfd tree.
Any reason you want to send the patch to ARM-SoC instead of mfd tree.I don't actually have a preference as to which tree it goes into, so long as it's sent to Mainline on or before -rc1.
I sent a pull request to Linus yesterday, including this commit.
This is something different and wasn't part of the pull-request.
Kind regards,
Lee
Signature · 5 lines
Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Hi Lee,
Quoted 21 lines · Lee Jones
Hi Sam,
Quoted 19 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 18 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 16 lines
2012/5/29 Lee Jones<[email protected]>:
Quoted 11 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 6 lines
config
AB8500_I2C_COREis not used after commit d28f1db "mfd: Remove confusing ab8500-i2c file and merge into ab8500-core". Thus remove it.Signed-off-by Axel Lin<[email protected]>I have this patch embedded into a patch-set I'm going to send to ARM-SoC for inclusion into -rc1 this afternoon. Would you mind leaving this one?
I don't mind.
But AFAIK, commit d28f1db is in mfd tree.
Any reason you want to send the patch to ARM-SoC instead of mfd tree.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I don't actually have a preference as to which tree it goes into, so long as it's sent to Mainline on or before -rc1.
I sent a pull request to Linus yesterday, including this commit.
This is something different and wasn't part of the pull-request.
d28f1d was part of the pull request.
Cheers,
Samuel.
Signature · 2 lines
Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/
Quoted 24 lines · Samuel Ortiz
Hi Lee,
Quoted 21 lines · Lee Jones
Hi Sam,
Quoted 19 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 18 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 16 lines
2012/5/29 Lee Jones<[email protected]>:
Quoted 11 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 6 lines
config
AB8500_I2C_COREis not used after commit d28f1db "mfd: Remove confusing ab8500-i2c file and merge into ab8500-core". Thus remove it.Signed-off-by Axel Lin<[email protected]>I have this patch embedded into a patch-set I'm going to send to ARM-SoC for inclusion into -rc1 this afternoon. Would you mind leaving this one?
I don't mind.
But AFAIK, commit d28f1db is in mfd tree.
Any reason you want to send the patch to ARM-SoC instead of mfd tree.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I don't actually have a preference as to which tree it goes into, so long as it's sent to Mainline on or before -rc1.
I sent a pull request to Linus yesterday, including this commit.
This is something different and wasn't part of the pull-request.
d28f1d was part of the pull request.
Right. But this is not the same thing. The patch I (and Axel) wrote removes remnant cruft from d28f1d. I didn't see that on moving AB8500_I2C_CORE to AB8500_CORE I left a Kconfig entry behind which is no longer used by anything. This patch removes that cruft.
Kind regards,
Lee
Signature · 5 lines
Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Hi Lee,
Quoted 29 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 28 lines · Samuel Ortiz
Hi Lee,
Quoted 25 lines · Lee Jones
Hi Sam,
Quoted 22 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 14 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 13 lines
2012/5/29 Lee Jones<[email protected]>:
Quoted 11 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 6 lines
config
AB8500_I2C_COREis not used after commit d28f1db "mfd: Remove confusing ab8500-i2c file and merge into ab8500-core". Thus remove it.Signed-off-by Axel Lin<[email protected]>I have this patch embedded into a patch-set I'm going to send to ARM-SoC for inclusion into -rc1 this afternoon. Would you mind leaving this one?
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I don't mind.
But AFAIK, commit d28f1db is in mfd tree.
Any reason you want to send the patch to ARM-SoC instead of mfd tree.I don't actually have a preference as to which tree it goes into, so long as it's sent to Mainline on or before -rc1.
I sent a pull request to Linus yesterday, including this commit.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
This is something different and wasn't part of the pull-request.
d28f1d was part of the pull request.
Right. But this is not the same thing. The patch I (and Axel) wrote removes remnant cruft from d28f1d. I didn't see that on moving
AB8500_I2C_COREtoAB8500_COREI left aKconfigentry behind which is no longer used by anything. This patch removes that cruft.
Yes, I saw the patch. I though you were saying that d28f1d was not part of the pull request and that you were going to push it through arm-soc. Anyway, I think the Kconfig cleanup patch should go through my tree unless you already sent it for arm-soc inclusion.
Cheers,
Samuel.
Signature · 2 lines
Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/
Quoted 35 lines · Samuel Ortiz
Hi Lee,
Quoted 32 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 30 lines · Samuel Ortiz
Hi Lee,
Quoted 21 lines · Lee Jones
Hi Sam,
Quoted 19 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 18 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 16 lines
2012/5/29 Lee Jones<[email protected]>:
Quoted 11 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 6 lines
config
AB8500_I2C_COREis not used after commit d28f1db "mfd: Remove confusing ab8500-i2c file and merge into ab8500-core". Thus remove it.Signed-off-by Axel Lin<[email protected]>I have this patch embedded into a patch-set I'm going to send to ARM-SoC for inclusion into -rc1 this afternoon. Would you mind leaving this one?
I don't mind.
But AFAIK, commit d28f1db is in mfd tree.
Any reason you want to send the patch to ARM-SoC instead of mfd tree.Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I don't actually have a preference as to which tree it goes into, so long as it's sent to Mainline on or before -rc1.
I sent a pull request to Linus yesterday, including this commit.
This is something different and wasn't part of the pull-request.
d28f1d was part of the pull request.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Right. But this is not the same thing. The patch I (and Axel) wrote removes remnant cruft from d28f1d. I didn't see that on moving
AB8500_I2C_COREtoAB8500_COREI left aKconfigentry behind which is no longer used by anything. This patch removes that cruft.Yes, I saw the patch. I though you were saying that d28f1d was not part of the pull request and that you were going to push it through arm-soc. Anyway, I think the
Kconfigcleanup patch should go through my tree unless you already sent it for arm-soc inclusion.
I haven't. I sent the entire patch-set to Arnd for first review today. After he's okay:ed it, I'll send it to the MLs sometime tomorrow. I will ensure you are CC'ed. I don't have any issues with the patch going through your tree.
Thanks Sam.
Kind regards,
Lee
Signature · 5 lines
Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog