mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents
PATCH 1/1 mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents
When using symlinks with mkfs.gfs2 it reports what the symlink points to instead of the contents of the device, like so:
# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: symbolic link to `../dm-3'
This patch resolves symlinks before checking the device contents to make the output more informative:
# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: GFS2 Filesystem (blocksize 4096, lockproto lock_nolock)
--- gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c +8 -1
@@ -531,6 +531,7 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])int error;int rgsize_specified =0 ;unsigned char uuid[16 ]; +char *absname;memset (sdp,0 ,sizeof (struct gfs2_sbd )); sdp->bsize =-1 ;
@@ -560,11 +561,17 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); } + absname =canonicalize_file_name (sdp->device_name); +if (absname ==NULL ) { +perror (_ ("Could not find the absolute path of the device" )); +exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); + }if (!sdp->override) {printf (_ ("This will destroy any data on %s.\n" ), sdp->device_name); -check_dev_content (sdp->device_name); +check_dev_content (absname);are_you_sure (); } +free (absname);if (sdp->bsize ==-1 ) {if (S_ISREG (sdp->dinfo.stat.st_mode))
Signature · 1 line
1.7.7.6
PATCH 1/1 mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents
----- Original Message -----
| + absname = canonicalize_file_name(sdp->device_name);
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the patch. I just wanted to point out that in the past we've used realpath rather than canonicalize_file_name. For example, see this patch we did a long time ago to gfs2_tool:
It would be nice if our use was consistent. I'm not sure if there's an advantage of one over the other. If canonicalize_file_name is now preferred upstream over realpath, we should probably replace all occurrences of that.
On the other hand, if realpath is now preferred upstream, we should adjust this patch to use it instead. AFAIK, they are the same, and I don't have a personal preference; whatever is most favoured by the upstream community. :)
Otherwise, the patch looks good.
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems
PATCH 1/1 mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents
Hi,
Quoted 15 lines · Bob Peterson
----- Original Message -----
| + absname =canonicalize_file_name(sdp->device_name);Hi Andy,
Thanks for the patch. I just wanted to point out that in the past we've used realpath rather than
canonicalize_file_name. For example, see this patch we did a long time ago togfs2_tool:It would be nice if our use was consistent. I'm not sure if there's an advantage of one over the other. If
canonicalize_file_nameis now preferred upstream over realpath, we should probably replace all occurrences of that.
Quoted 5 lines
On the other hand, if realpath is now preferred upstream, we should adjust this patch to use it instead. AFAIK, they are the same, and I don't have a personal preference; whatever is most favoured by the upstream community. :)
Otherwise, the patch looks good.
I don?t remember what other mkfs.* tools do, but if I would prefer to see something like:
# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test WARNING: /dev/vg/test appears to be a symlink to /dev/real/device This will destroy any data on /dev/real/device It appears to contain: RANDOM_FS_OF_DOOM (blocksize......)
Fabio
PATCH 1/1 mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents
In reply to Bob PetersonHi Bob,
Quoted 10 lines · Bob Peterson
----- Original Message -----
| + absname =canonicalize_file_name(sdp->device_name);Hi Andy,
Thanks for the patch. I just wanted to point out that in the past we've used realpath rather than
canonicalize_file_name. For example, see this patch we did a long time ago togfs2_tool:
Hmm those uses of realpath seem to have disappeared since.
Quoted 7 lines
It would be nice if our use was consistent. I'm not sure if there's an advantage of one over the other. If
canonicalize_file_nameis now preferred upstream over realpath, we should probably replace all occurrences of that.On the other hand, if realpath is now preferred upstream, we should adjust this patch to use it instead. AFAIK, they are the same, and I don't have a personal preference; whatever is most favoured by the upstream community. :)
I couldn't find any strong arguments in preference of either function and we're already using _GNU_SOURCE extensions so there's no added portability issue. In the current state of gfs2-utils.git we're only using realpath twice, in gfs2_quota, so I don't think there's a strong consistency argument either. I'll push this one as-is in the morning unless someone can provide a convincing reason to use realpath :)
Quoted 1 line
Otherwise, the patch looks good.
Thanks for the review,
Andy
PATCH 1/1 mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents
In reply to Andrew PriceHi,
Looks good. ACK,
Steve.
Quoted 50 lines · Andrew Price
When using symlinks with mkfs.gfs2 it reports what the symlink points to instead of the contents of the device, like so:
# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: symbolic link to `../dm-3'This patch resolves symlinks before checking the device contents to make the output more informative:
# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: GFS2 Filesystem (blocksize 4096, lockproto lock_nolock)Signed-off-by Andrew Price <[email protected]>--- gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c +8
-1@@ -531,6 +531,7 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])int error;int rgsize_specified =0 ;unsigned char uuid[16 ]; +char *absname;memset (sdp,0 ,sizeof (struct gfs2_sbd )); sdp->bsize =-1 ;@@ -560,11 +561,17 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); } + absname =canonicalize_file_name (sdp->device_name); +if (absname ==NULL ) { +perror (_ ("Could not find the absolute path of the device" )); +exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); + }if (!sdp->override) {printf (_ ("This will destroy any data on %s.\n" ), sdp->device_name); -check_dev_content (sdp->device_name); +check_dev_content (absname);are_you_sure (); } +free (absname);if (sdp->bsize ==-1 ) {if (S_ISREG (sdp->dinfo.stat.st_mode))
PATCH 1/1 mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents
Hi Steve,
Quoted 3 lines · Steven Whitehouse
Hi,
Looks good. ACK,
This one was obsoleted by the v2 patch I posted on the 21st. If you prefer this one though I can push it instead.
Andy
Quoted 56 lines
Steve.
Quoted 50 lines · Andrew Price
When using symlinks with mkfs.gfs2 it reports what the symlink points to instead of the contents of the device, like so:
# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: symbolic link to `../dm-3'This patch resolves symlinks before checking the device contents to make the output more informative:
# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: GFS2 Filesystem (blocksize 4096, lockproto lock_nolock)Signed-off-by Andrew Price <[email protected]>--- gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c +8
-1@@ -531,6 +531,7 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])int error;int rgsize_specified =0 ;unsigned char uuid[16 ]; +char *absname;memset (sdp,0 ,sizeof (struct gfs2_sbd )); sdp->bsize =-1 ;@@ -560,11 +561,17 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); } + absname =canonicalize_file_name (sdp->device_name); +if (absname ==NULL ) { +perror (_ ("Could not find the absolute path of the device" )); +exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); + }if (!sdp->override) {printf (_ ("This will destroy any data on %s.\n" ), sdp->device_name); -check_dev_content (sdp->device_name); +check_dev_content (absname);are_you_sure (); } +free (absname);if (sdp->bsize ==-1 ) {if (S_ISREG (sdp->dinfo.stat.st_mode))
PATCH 1/1 mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents
Hi,
Yes, v2 is ok too. I think I missed that in my first pass over my email today. To do this properly, we should be opening the path that we are passed, and then doing the remaining operations with just the fd. We could do that with "file" if we used the -f - option and passed the fd as standard input to the process.
That way we also remove any possible race conditions too, but this is good enough for now,
Steve.
Quoted 70 lines · Andrew Price
Hi Steve,
Quoted 3 lines · Steven Whitehouse
Hi,
Looks good. ACK,
This one was obsoleted by the v2 patch I posted on the 21st. If you prefer this one though I can push it instead.
Andy
Quoted 56 lines
Steve.
Quoted 50 lines · Andrew Price
When using symlinks with mkfs.gfs2 it reports what the symlink points to instead of the contents of the device, like so:
# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: symbolic link to `../dm-3'This patch resolves symlinks before checking the device contents to make the output more informative:
# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: GFS2 Filesystem (blocksize 4096, lockproto lock_nolock)Signed-off-by Andrew Price <[email protected]>--- gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c +8
-1@@ -531,6 +531,7 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])int error;int rgsize_specified =0 ;unsigned char uuid[16 ]; +char *absname;memset (sdp,0 ,sizeof (struct gfs2_sbd )); sdp->bsize =-1 ;@@ -560,11 +561,17 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); } + absname =canonicalize_file_name (sdp->device_name); +if (absname ==NULL ) { +perror (_ ("Could not find the absolute path of the device" )); +exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); + }if (!sdp->override) {printf (_ ("This will destroy any data on %s.\n" ), sdp->device_name); -check_dev_content (sdp->device_name); +check_dev_content (absname);are_you_sure (); } +free (absname);if (sdp->bsize ==-1 ) {if (S_ISREG (sdp->dinfo.stat.st_mode))
PATCH 1/1 mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents
Quoted 7 lines · Steven Whitehouse
Hi,
Yes, v2 is ok too. I think I missed that in my first pass over my email today. To do this properly, we should be opening the path that we are passed, and then doing the remaining operations with just the fd. We could do that with "file" if we used the -f - option and passed the fd as standard input to the process.
The only way I can think of passing the fd to file -f - would be the C equivalent of:
printf "/proc/$pid/fd/$fd" | file -f -
Which would mean adding another pipe() and fork(). So we might as well just shorten it to:
file "/proc/$pid/fd/$fd"
Would this solve the race condition problem? Or am I misunderstanding how you intended it to be done?
Andy
Quoted 79 lines
That way we also remove any possible race conditions too, but this is good enough for now,
Steve.
Quoted 70 lines · Andrew Price
Hi Steve,
Quoted 3 lines · Steven Whitehouse
Hi,
Looks good. ACK,
This one was obsoleted by the v2 patch I posted on the 21st. If you prefer this one though I can push it instead.
Andy
Quoted 56 lines
Steve.
Quoted 50 lines · Andrew Price
When using symlinks with mkfs.gfs2 it reports what the symlink points to instead of the contents of the device, like so:
# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: symbolic link to `../dm-3'This patch resolves symlinks before checking the device contents to make the output more informative:
# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: GFS2 Filesystem (blocksize 4096, lockproto lock_nolock)Signed-off-by Andrew Price <[email protected]>--- gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c +8
-1@@ -531,6 +531,7 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])int error;int rgsize_specified =0 ;unsigned char uuid[16 ]; +char *absname;memset (sdp,0 ,sizeof (struct gfs2_sbd )); sdp->bsize =-1 ;@@ -560,11 +561,17 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); } + absname =canonicalize_file_name (sdp->device_name); +if (absname ==NULL ) { +perror (_ ("Could not find the absolute path of the device" )); +exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); + }if (!sdp->override) {printf (_ ("This will destroy any data on %s.\n" ), sdp->device_name); -check_dev_content (sdp->device_name); +check_dev_content (absname);are_you_sure (); } +free (absname);if (sdp->bsize ==-1 ) {if (S_ISREG (sdp->dinfo.stat.st_mode))
PATCH 1/1 mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents
Quoted 14 lines · Andrew Price
Quoted 7 lines · Steven Whitehouse
Hi,
Yes, v2 is ok too. I think I missed that in my first pass over my email today. To do this properly, we should be opening the path that we are passed, and then doing the remaining operations with just the fd. We could do that with "file" if we used the -f - option and passed the fd as standard input to the process.
The only way I can think of passing the fd to file -f - would be the C equivalent of:
printf "/proc/$pid/fd/$fd" | file -f -
Quoted 7 lines
Which would mean adding another
pipe()andfork(). So we might as well just shorten it to:file "/proc/$pid/fd/$fd"Would this solve the race condition problem? Or am I misunderstanding how you intended it to be done?
I didn't get a reply to this. Does the above method seem sensible or would we need to read the start of the file/device ourselves and pipe it into 'file -' to avoid opening the file twice?
Andy
Quoted 84 lines
Quoted 82 lines
That way we also remove any possible race conditions too, but this is good enough for now,
Steve.
Quoted 73 lines · Andrew Price
Hi Steve,
Quoted 3 lines · Steven Whitehouse
Hi,
Looks good. ACK,
This one was obsoleted by the v2 patch I posted on the 21st. If you prefer this one though I can push it instead.
Andy
Quoted 59 lines
Steve.
Quoted 53 lines · Andrew Price
When using symlinks with mkfs.gfs2 it reports what the symlink points to instead of the contents of the device, like so:
# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: symbolic link to `../dm-3'This patch resolves symlinks before checking the device contents to make
the output more informative:# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: GFS2 Filesystem (blocksize 4096, lockproto lock_nolock)Signed-off-by Andrew Price <[email protected]>--- gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c +8
-1@@ -531,6 +531,7 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])int error;int rgsize_specified =0 ;unsigned char uuid[16 ]; +char *absname;memset (sdp,0 ,sizeof (struct gfs2_sbd )); sdp->bsize =-1 ;@@ -560,11 +561,17 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); } + absname =canonicalize_file_name (sdp->device_name); +if (absname ==NULL ) { +perror (_ ("Could not find the absolute path of the device" )); +exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); + }if (!sdp->override) {printf (_ ("This will destroy any data on %s.\n" ), sdp->device_name); -check_dev_content (sdp->device_name); +check_dev_content (absname);are_you_sure (); } +free (absname);if (sdp->bsize ==-1 ) {if (S_ISREG(sdp->dinfo.stat.st_mode))
PATCH 1/1 mkfs.gfs2: Follow symlinks before checking device contents
Hi,
Quoted 20 lines · Andrew Price
Quoted 19 lines · Andrew Price
Quoted 7 lines · Steven Whitehouse
Hi,
Yes, v2 is ok too. I think I missed that in my first pass over my email today. To do this properly, we should be opening the path that we are passed, and then doing the remaining operations with just the fd. We could do that with "file" if we used the -f - option and passed the fd as standard input to the process.
The only way I can think of passing the fd to file -f - would be the C equivalent of:
printf "/proc/$pid/fd/$fd" | file -f -Which would mean adding another
pipe()andfork(). So we might as well just shorten it to:file "/proc/$pid/fd/$fd"
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Would this solve the race condition problem? Or am I misunderstanding how you intended it to be done?
I didn't get a reply to this. Does the above method seem sensible or would we need to read the start of the file/device ourselves and pipe it into 'file -' to avoid opening the file twice?
Andy
Yes, that should work too. The intent is to avoid any issues with the name changing from when mkfs opens the device to when the device is checked, so any method based on using the open fd, rather than parsing the path a second time is ok,
Steve.
Quoted 86 lines
Quoted 84 lines
Quoted 82 lines
That way we also remove any possible race conditions too, but this is good enough for now,
Steve.
Quoted 73 lines · Andrew Price
Hi Steve,
Quoted 3 lines · Steven Whitehouse
Hi,
Looks good. ACK,
This one was obsoleted by the v2 patch I posted on the 21st. If you prefer this one though I can push it instead.
Andy
Quoted 59 lines
Steve.
Quoted 53 lines · Andrew Price
When using symlinks with mkfs.gfs2 it reports what the symlink points to instead of the contents of the device, like so:
# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: symbolic link to `../dm-3'This patch resolves symlinks before checking the device contents to make
the output more informative:# ./mkfs.gfs2 -p lock_nolock /dev/vg/test This will destroy any data on /dev/vg/test. It appears to contain: GFS2 Filesystem (blocksize 4096, lockproto lock_nolock)Signed-off-by Andrew Price <[email protected]>--- gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)gfs2/mkfs/main_mkfs.c +8
-1@@ -531,6 +531,7 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])int error;int rgsize_specified =0 ;unsigned char uuid[16 ]; +char *absname;memset (sdp,0 ,sizeof (struct gfs2_sbd )); sdp->bsize =-1 ;@@ -560,11 +561,17 @@ void main_mkfs(int argc, char *argv[])exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); } + absname =canonicalize_file_name (sdp->device_name); +if (absname ==NULL ) { +perror (_ ("Could not find the absolute path of the device" )); +exit (EXIT_FAILURE ); + }if (!sdp->override) {printf (_ ("This will destroy any data on %s.\n" ), sdp->device_name); -check_dev_content (sdp->device_name); +check_dev_content (absname);are_you_sure (); } +free (absname);if (sdp->bsize ==-1 ) {if (S_ISREG(sdp->dinfo.stat.st_mode))