Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Marvell OpenRD-Ultimate machine support

PATCH In review Dmytro Milinevskyy 2 participants 3 messages Jun 8, 2010 – Jun 9, 2010

Subsystems (2)
Arm (32-bit) Arm sub-architectures
lore
Share & tools
lore

Dmytro Milinevskyy

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 Marvell OpenRD-Ultimate machine support

Hi!
This patch adds support for the OpenRD Ultimate machine(could be found at http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/list.php?id=2884)

Besides adding machine description this patch adds correction for PHY address for Ultimate version.

Differences from the previous attempt:
- Applied suggestion from Lennert Buytenhek to change PHY addresses in instances of mv643xx_eth_platform_data in case of ultimate version.

Regards,

-- Dmytro Milinevskyy

Signed-off-by Dmytro Milinevskyy <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/Kconfig        |    7 ++++++
 arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/openrd-setup.c |   34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/Kconfig +7 -0
index 29b2163..110a3b8 100644
@@ -75,6 +75,13 @@ config MACH_OPENRD_CLIENT
 	  Say 'Y' here if you want your kernel to support the
 	  Marvell OpenRD Client Board.
 
+config MACH_OPENRD_ULTIMATE
+	bool "Marvell OpenRD Ultimate Board"
+	select MACH_OPENRD
+	help
+	  Say 'Y' here if you want your kernel to support the
+	  Marvell OpenRD Ultimate Board.
+
 config MACH_NETSPACE_V2
 	bool "LaCie Network Space v2 NAS Board"
 	help
arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/openrd-setup.c +30 -4
index ad3f1ec..5d6797a 100644
@@ -47,6 +47,14 @@ static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data openrd_ge01_data = {
 	.phy_addr	= MV643XX_ETH_PHY_ADDR(24),
 };
 
+static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data openrd_ultimate_ge00_data = {
+	.phy_addr	= MV643XX_ETH_PHY_ADDR(0),
+};
+
+static struct mv643xx_eth_platform_data openrd_ultimate_ge01_data = {
+	.phy_addr	= MV643XX_ETH_PHY_ADDR(1),
+};
+
 static struct mv_sata_platform_data openrd_sata_data = {
 	.n_ports	= 2,
 };

@@ -73,9 +81,14 @@ static void __init openrd_init(void)
 
 	kirkwood_ehci_init();
 
-	kirkwood_ge00_init(&openrd_ge00_data);
-	if (machine_is_openrd_client())
-		kirkwood_ge01_init(&openrd_ge01_data);
+	if (machine_is_openrd_ultimate()) {
+		kirkwood_ge00_init(&openrd_ultimate_ge00_data);
+		kirkwood_ge01_init(&openrd_ultimate_ge01_data);
+	} else {
+		kirkwood_ge00_init(&openrd_ge00_data);
+		if (machine_is_openrd_client())
+			kirkwood_ge01_init(&openrd_ge01_data);
+	}
 	kirkwood_sata_init(&openrd_sata_data);
 	kirkwood_sdio_init(&openrd_mvsdio_data);
 

@@ -84,7 +97,7 @@ static void __init openrd_init(void)
 
 static int __init openrd_pci_init(void)
 {
-	if (machine_is_openrd_base() || machine_is_openrd_client())
+	if (machine_is_openrd_base() || machine_is_openrd_client() || machine_is_openrd_ultimate())
 		kirkwood_pcie_init();
 
 	return 0;

@@ -116,3 +129,16 @@ MACHINE_START(OPENRD_CLIENT, "Marvell OpenRD Client Board")
 	.timer		= &kirkwood_timer,
 MACHINE_END
 #endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_OPENRD_ULTIMATE
+MACHINE_START(OPENRD_ULTIMATE, "Marvell OpenRD Ultimate Board")
+	/* Maintainer: Dhaval Vasa <[email protected]> */
+	.phys_io	= KIRKWOOD_REGS_PHYS_BASE,
+	.io_pg_offst	= ((KIRKWOOD_REGS_VIRT_BASE) >> 18) & 0xfffc,
+	.boot_params	= 0x00000100,
+	.init_machine	= openrd_init,
+	.map_io		= kirkwood_map_io,
+	.init_irq	= kirkwood_init_irq,
+	.timer		= &kirkwood_timer,
+MACHINE_END
+#endif
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines · Dmytro Milinevskyy

Differences from the previous attempt:
- Applied suggestion from Lennert Buytenhek to change PHY addresses in instances of mv643xx_eth_platform_data in case of ultimate version.

The patch looks exactly like the old patch, though?

author
#2 lore raw

Oh, I've sent the old version.

My apologies. Will resend the updates version as soon as I get access to the box.

-- Dima

Quoted 7 lines · Lennert Buytenhek
Quoted 2 lines · Dmytro Milinevskyy

Differences from the previous attempt:
?- Applied suggestion from Lennert Buytenhek to change PHY addresses in instances of mv643xx_eth_platform_data in case of ultimate version.

The patch looks exactly like the old patch, though?