Skip to contentSkip to conversation

bnx2fc: reduce stack usage in __bnx2fc_enable

PATCH In review Arnd Bergmann 3 participants 3 messages Oct 7, 2015

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 bnx2fc: reduce stack usage in __bnx2fc_enable

When the bnx2fc driver was changed to read the npiv table from nvram, the stack of the __bnx2fc_enable function gained an additional 1028 byte structure that gcc rightfully warns about:

drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c: In function '__bnx2fc_enable':
drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c:2134:1: warning: the frame size of 1128 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]

In order to avoid a possible kernel stack overflow and to get rid of the warning, this changes the function to use a dynamic allocation of the structure using kzalloc.

Fixes 2971ff67bd3 ("bnx2fc: Read npiv table from nvram and create vports.")

---
The original patch was merged through netdev along with the respective ethernet driver changes, but this should probably go through the scsi tree, as no ethernet changes are involved.

drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c +9 -4
index d5cdc4776707..72ba0dfae3e0 100644
@@ -2092,7 +2092,7 @@ static int __bnx2fc_enable(struct fcoe_ctlr *ctlr)
 {
 	struct bnx2fc_interface *interface = fcoe_ctlr_priv(ctlr);
 	struct bnx2fc_hba *hba;
-	struct cnic_fc_npiv_tbl npiv_tbl;
+	struct cnic_fc_npiv_tbl *npiv_tbl;
 	struct fc_lport *lport;
 
 	if (interface->enabled == false) {
@@ -2124,11 +2124,16 @@ static int __bnx2fc_enable(struct fcoe_ctlr *ctlr)
 	if (!hba->cnic->get_fc_npiv_tbl)
 		goto done;
 
-	memset(&npiv_tbl, 0, sizeof(npiv_tbl));
-	if (hba->cnic->get_fc_npiv_tbl(hba->cnic, &npiv_tbl))
+	npiv_tbl = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cnic_fc_npiv_tbl), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!npiv_tbl)
 		goto done;
 
-	bnx2fc_npiv_create_vports(lport, &npiv_tbl);
+	if (hba->cnic->get_fc_npiv_tbl(hba->cnic, npiv_tbl))
+		goto done_free;
+
+	bnx2fc_npiv_create_vports(lport, npiv_tbl);
+done_free:
+	kfree(npiv_tbl);
 done:
 	return 0;
 }
#1 lore raw

Hi,

drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c static int __bnx2fc_enable(struct fcoe_ctlr *ctlr) · line 2129

Quoted 6 lines · Arnd Bergmann
drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c +2 -2
-	memset(&npiv_tbl, 0, sizeof(npiv_tbl));
-	if (hba->cnic->get_fc_npiv_tbl(hba->cnic, &npiv_tbl))
+	npiv_tbl = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cnic_fc_npiv_tbl), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!npiv_tbl)
 		goto done;

If kzalloc() fails perhaps the function should return -ENOMEM, not zero.

Regards,
Maurizio Lombardi

#2 lore raw
Quoted 12 lines · Maurizio Lombardi

Hi,

drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c static int __bnx2fc_enable(struct fcoe_ctlr *ctlr) · line 2129

Quoted 6 lines · Arnd Bergmann
drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c +2 -2
-	memset(&npiv_tbl, 0, sizeof(npiv_tbl));
-	if (hba->cnic->get_fc_npiv_tbl(hba->cnic, &npiv_tbl))
+	npiv_tbl = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cnic_fc_npiv_tbl), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!npiv_tbl)
 		goto done;

If kzalloc() fails perhaps the function should return -ENOMEM, not zero.

The enablement of the fcoe interface can still proceed if this particular allocation fails so returning 0 would be appropriate here.

This patch looks good to me.

Quoted 4 lines

Regards,
Maurizio Lombardi