Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Do we need acpiphp_sanitize_bus() in acpiphp?

DISCUSSION Yijing Wang 2 participants 3 messages Aug 15, 2012 PCI

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi all,
I have some confusion on acpiphp_sanitize_bus() functions.If I understand wrong about this, correct me,thanks your help. I think there are three problems in this function:
1、Use list_for_each_entry here is not safe, because pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device() will remove the device from bus. 2、If assign resources fail after hot-add a device, the resource will reset to zero, in reset_resource(), res->start = 0,

      res->end =0, res->end = 0.

3、I think leave the fail pci devices in the system is better rather than remove them, so we can see all pci devices
by lspci after hot-add, what about your opinion?

thanks!
Yijing.

/*
* Remove devices for which we could not assign resources, call
* arch specific code to fix-up the bus
*/
static void acpiphp_sanitize_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)

{
	struct pci_dev *dev;
	int i;
	unsigned long type_mask = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM;

	list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
		for (i=0; i<PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES; i++) {
			struct resource *res = &dev->resource[i];
			if ((res->flags & type_mask) && !res->start &&
					res->end) {
				/* Could not assign a required resources
				 * for this device, remove it */
				pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev);
				break;
			}
		}
	}
}
maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Yijing Wang

Hi all,
I have some confusion on acpiphp_sanitize_bus() functions.If I understand wrong about this, correct me,thanks your help. I think there are three problems in this function:
1、Use list_for_each_entry here is not safe, because pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device() will remove the device from bus. 2、If assign resources fail after hot-add a device, the resource will reset to zero, in reset_resource(), res->start = 0,

      res->end =0, res->end = 0.

3、I think leave the fail pci devices in the system is better rather than remove them, so we can see all pci devices
by lspci after hot-add, what about your opinion?

These sound like reasonable concerns. The best thing to do is to propose patches (separate ones for each logical issue). Then we can review a concrete change and apply it if appropriate.

Quoted 23 lines

/*
* Remove devices for which we could not assign resources, call
* arch specific code to fix-up the bus
*/
static void acpiphp_sanitize_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)

{
        struct pci_dev *dev;
        int i;
        unsigned long type_mask = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM;

        list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
                for (i=0; i<PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES; i++) {
                        struct resource *res = &dev->resource[i];
                        if ((res->flags & type_mask) && !res->start &&
                                        res->end) {
                                /* Could not assign a required resources
                                 * for this device, remove it */
                                pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev);
                                break;
                        }
                }
        }
}
#2 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Yijing Wang
Quoted 8 lines

Hi all,
I have some confusion on acpiphp_sanitize_bus() functions.If I understand wrong about this, correct me,thanks your help. I think there are three problems in this function:
1、Use list_for_each_entry here is not safe, because pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device() will remove the device from bus. 2、If assign resources fail after hot-add a device, the resource will reset to zero, in reset_resource(), res->start = 0,

      res->end =0, res->end = 0.

3、I think leave the fail pci devices in the system is better rather than remove them, so we can see all pci devices
by lspci after hot-add, what about your opinion?

Quoted 4 lines

These sound like reasonable concerns. The best thing to do is to propose patches (separate ones for each logical issue). Then we can review a concrete change and apply it if appropriate.

Hi Bjorn,
Thanks for your comments!
You are right, I will provide some patches as soon.