mmc: card: Skip secure option for MoviNAND.
PATCH v6 1/1 mmc: card: Skip secure option for MoviNAND.
For several MoviNAND, there are some known issue with secure option. For these specific MoviNAND device, we skip secure option.
You could refer this discussion in XDA developers.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1644364
https://plus.google.com/111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB#111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB
--- drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/mmc/card.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
drivers/mmc/card/block.c +23 -1
@@ -1411,7 +1411,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)/* complete ongoing async transfer before issuing discard */ if (card->host->areq)mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq (mq,NULL ); -if (req->cmd_flags &REQ_SECURE ) +if (req->cmd_flags &REQ_SECURE && + !(card->quirks &MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN )) ret =mmc_blk_issue_secdiscard_rq (mq, req);else ret =mmc_blk_issue_discard_rq (mq, req);
@@ -1716,6 +1717,7 @@ force_ro_fail:#define CID_MANFID_SANDISK 0x2#define CID_MANFID_TOSHIBA 0x11#define CID_MANFID_MICRON 0x13 +#define CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG 0x15static const struct mmc_fixup blk_fixups[] = {
@@ -1752,6 +1754,26 @@ static const struct mmc_fixup blk_fixups[] =MMC_FIXUP (CID_NAME_ANY ,CID_MANFID_MICRON ,0x200 , add_quirk_mmc,MMC_QUIRK_LONG_READ_TIME ), +/* +* Some issue about secure erase/secure trim for Samsung MoviNAND +*/ +MMC_FIXUP ("M8G2FA" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("MAG4FA" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("MBG8FA" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("MCGAFA" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("VAL00M" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("VYL00M" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("KYL00M" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("VZL00M" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +END_FIXUP };
include/linux/mmc/card.h +1 -0
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ struct mmc_card {#define MMC_QUIRK_BLK_NO_CMD23 (1<<7)/* Avoid CMD23 for regular multiblock */ #define MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_BYTE_MODE_512 (1<<8)/* Avoid sending 512 bytes in */ #define MMC_QUIRK_LONG_READ_TIME (1<<9)/* Data read time > CSD says */ +#define MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN (1<<10)/* Skip secure for erase/trim */ /* byte mode */ unsigned int poweroff_notify_state;/* eMMC4.5 notify feature */ #define MMC_NO_POWER_NOTIFICATION 0
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
Hi Chris,
Could you merge this patch?
We want to prevent this problem at mainline kernel.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
Quoted 78 lines · IAN CHEN
For several MoviNAND, there are some known issue with secure option. For these specific MoviNAND device, we skip secure option.
You could refer this discussion in XDA developers.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1644364
https://plus.google.com/111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB#111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkBSigned-off-by Ian Chen <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>Acked-by Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Linus Walleij <[email protected]>--- drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/mmc/card.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)drivers/mmc/card/block.c +23
-1@@ -1411,7 +1411,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)/* complete ongoing async transfer before issuing discard */ if (card->host->areq)mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq (mq,NULL ); -if (req->cmd_flags &REQ_SECURE ) +if (req->cmd_flags &REQ_SECURE && + !(card->quirks &MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN )) ret =mmc_blk_issue_secdiscard_rq (mq, req);else ret =mmc_blk_issue_discard_rq (mq, req);@@ -1716,6 +1717,7 @@ force_ro_fail:#define CID_MANFID_SANDISK 0x2#define CID_MANFID_TOSHIBA 0x11#define CID_MANFID_MICRON 0x13 +#define CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG 0x15static const struct mmc_fixup blk_fixups[] = {@@ -1752,6 +1754,26 @@ static const struct mmc_fixup blk_fixups[] =MMC_FIXUP (CID_NAME_ANY ,CID_MANFID_MICRON ,0x200 , add_quirk_mmc,MMC_QUIRK_LONG_READ_TIME ), +/* +* Some issue about secure erase/secure trim for Samsung MoviNAND +*/ +MMC_FIXUP ("M8G2FA" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("MAG4FA" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("MBG8FA" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("MCGAFA" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("VAL00M" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("VYL00M" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("KYL00M" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +MMC_FIXUP ("VZL00M" ,CID_MANFID_SAMSUNG ,CID_OEMID_ANY , add_quirk_mmc, +MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN ), +END_FIXUP };include/linux/mmc/card.h +1
-0@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ struct mmc_card {#define MMC_QUIRK_BLK_NO_CMD23 (1<<7)/* Avoid CMD23 for regular multiblock */ #define MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_BYTE_MODE_512 (1<<8)/* Avoid sending 512 bytes in */ #define MMC_QUIRK_LONG_READ_TIME (1<<9)/* Data read time > CSD says */ +#define MMC_QUIRK_SEC_ERASE_TRIM_BROKEN (1<<10)/* Skip secure for erase/trim */ /* byte mode */ unsigned int poweroff_notify_state;/* eMMC4.5 notify feature */ #define MMC_NO_POWER_NOTIFICATION 0
Hi,
Quoted 11 lines · IAN CHEN
For several MoviNAND, there are some known issue with secure option. For these specific MoviNAND device, we skip secure option.
You could refer this discussion in XDA developers.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1644364
https://plus.google.com/111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB#111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkBSigned-off-by Ian Chen <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>Acked-by Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Thanks. We should explain the nature of the bug in the commit message, so that users and the stable@ maintainers know how bad the problem is by reading the patch. (This should go to stable@, right? Do you know which kernel versions are affected?)
I'll add something like this, unless you have a better proposal:
==
For several MoviNAND, there are some known issues with secure option. For these specific MoviNAND device, we skip secure option.
Specifically, there is a bug in the eMMC firmware that causes unrecoverable corruption when the MMC is erased with MMC_CAP_ERASE enabled.
You could refer this discussion in XDA developers.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1644364
https://plus.google.com/111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB#111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB
==
- Chris.
Signature · 2 lines
Chris Ball <[email protected]> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child
Hi,
Thanks for your help.
The effected kernel will be all the version with MMC_CAP_ERASE & SECURE option enabled.
As commit content mentioned, the problem is unrecoverable corruption after SECURE ERASE or SECURE TRIM.
For devices using defective eMMC with kernel supporting MMC_CAP_ERASE & SECURE option, this issue might cause damage.
Therefore, we skip secure for these known devices.
Regards,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Ball [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:27 PM
Hi,
Quoted 6 lines · IAN CHEN
For several MoviNAND, there are some known issue with secure option. For these specific MoviNAND device, we skip secure option.
You could refer this discussion in XDA developers.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1644364
https://plus.google.com/111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB#111398485184
813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB
Quoted 5 lines
Signed-off-by Ian Chen <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>Acked-by Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Thanks. We should explain the nature of the bug in the commit message, so that users and the stable@ maintainers know how bad the problem is by reading the patch. (This should go to stable@, right? Do you know which kernel versions are affected?)
I'll add something like this, unless you have a better proposal:
==
For several MoviNAND, there are some known issues with secure option. For these specific MoviNAND device, we skip secure option.
Specifically, there is a bug in the eMMC firmware that causes unrecoverable corruption when the MMC is erased with MMC_CAP_ERASE enabled.
You could refer this discussion in XDA developers.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1644364
https://plus.google.com/111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB#111398485184
813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB
==
- Chris.
Signature · 2 lines
Chris Ball <[email protected]> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child
Hi,
Quoted 8 lines · IAN CHEN
Thanks for your help.
The effected kernel will be all the version withMMC_CAP_ERASE& SECURE option enabled.
As commit content mentioned, the problem is unrecoverable corruption after SECURE ERASE or SECURE TRIM.
For devices using defective eMMC with kernel supportingMMC_CAP_ERASE& SECURE option, this issue might cause damage.
Therefore, we skip secure for these known devices.
Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.6 with a stable@ tag.
- Chris.
Signature · 2 lines
Chris Ball <[email protected]> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child