Skip to contentSkip to conversation

gpio-twl4030: add new device tree properties

PATCH New Florian Vaussard 5 participants 14 messages Sep 3, 2012 – Sep 6, 2012

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

cover gpio-twl4030: add new device tree properties

A number of platform data are missing when using twl4030/gpio from a device tree. This patchset adds the missing properties, updates existing device trees and updates the documentation of bindings. It mainly enables LEDA and LEDB outputs, as well as pullups / pulldowns on GPIOs.

The 1st patch changes the device driver.
The 2nd patch updates the device trees for BeagleBoard and omap3-evm. The 3rd patch updates the documentation of bindings.

Tested:
- Boot tested on Gumstix Overo for "ti,use-leds". Corresponding patch is not provided, as the device tree is not yet merged. The support can be found in the git tree [1], branch omap3-devel-dt-overo.
- Device trees for BeagleBoard and omap3-evm were compiled, but not tested on hardware.

Would someone be willing to test on BeagleBoard / omap3-evm?

Regards,
Florian

[1] https://github.com/vaussard/linux.git (not safe for merge)

Florian Vaussard (3):
gpio-twl4030: get platform data from device tree
gpio-twl4030: new dt properties for BeagleBoard and omap3-EVM
gpio-twl4030: updates the bindings for new dt properties

 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-twl4030.txt      |    6 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts                 |   20 +++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-evm.dts                    |   13 +++
 drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c                        |   86 +++++++++++++------
 4 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.5.4
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/3 gpio-twl4030: get platform data from device tree

Adds a number of missing properties to the device tree of twl4030/gpio:

- "ti,use-leds"  -> .use_leds
- "ti,debounce"  -> .debounce
- "ti,mmc-cd"    -> .mmc_cd
- "ti,pullups"   -> .pullups

- "ti,pulldowns" -> .pulldowns

---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c |   86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c +59 -27
index 94256fe..dabe76b 100644
@@ -395,6 +395,33 @@ static int __devinit gpio_twl4030_debounce(u32 debounce, u8 mmc_cd)
 
 static int gpio_twl4030_remove(struct platform_device *pdev);
 
+static struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data *of_gpio_twl4030(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data *omap_twl_info;
+	const char *of_use_leds;
+
+	omap_twl_info = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*omap_twl_info), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!omap_twl_info)
+		return NULL;
+
+	omap_twl_info->gpio_base = -1;
+
+	of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "ti,use-leds", &of_use_leds);
+	if (!strcmp(of_use_leds, "true"))
+		omap_twl_info->use_leds = true;
+
+	of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,debounce",
+				&omap_twl_info->debounce);
+	of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,mmc-cd",
+				(u32 *)&omap_twl_info->mmc_cd);
+	of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,pullups",
+				&omap_twl_info->pullups);
+	of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,pulldowns",
+				&omap_twl_info->pulldowns);
+
+	return omap_twl_info;
+}
+
 static int __devinit gpio_twl4030_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
@@ -423,39 +450,44 @@ static int __devinit gpio_twl4030_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	twl4030_gpio_irq_base = irq_base;
 
 no_irqs:
-	twl_gpiochip.base = -1;
 	twl_gpiochip.ngpio = TWL4030_GPIO_MAX;
 	twl_gpiochip.dev = &pdev->dev;
 
-	if (pdata) {
-		twl_gpiochip.base = pdata->gpio_base;
+	if (node)
+		pdata = of_gpio_twl4030(&pdev->dev);
 
-		/*
-		 * NOTE:  boards may waste power if they don't set pullups
-		 * and pulldowns correctly ... default for non-ULPI pins is
-		 * pulldown, and some other pins may have external pullups
-		 * or pulldowns.  Careful!
-		 */
-		ret = gpio_twl4030_pulls(pdata->pullups, pdata->pulldowns);
-		if (ret)
-			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "pullups %.05x %.05x --> %d\n",
-					pdata->pullups, pdata->pulldowns,
-					ret);
-
-		ret = gpio_twl4030_debounce(pdata->debounce, pdata->mmc_cd);
-		if (ret)
-			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "debounce %.03x %.01x --> %d\n",
-					pdata->debounce, pdata->mmc_cd,
-					ret);
-
-		/*
-		 * NOTE: we assume VIBRA_CTL.VIBRA_EN, in MODULE_AUDIO_VOICE,
-		 * is (still) clear if use_leds is set.
-		 */
-		if (pdata->use_leds)
-			twl_gpiochip.ngpio += 2;
+	if (pdata == NULL) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Platform data is missing\n");
+		return -ENXIO;
 	}
 
+	twl_gpiochip.base = pdata->gpio_base;
+
+	/*
+	 * NOTE:  boards may waste power if they don't set pullups
+	 * and pulldowns correctly ... default for non-ULPI pins is
+	 * pulldown, and some other pins may have external pullups
+	 * or pulldowns.  Careful!
+	 */
+	ret = gpio_twl4030_pulls(pdata->pullups, pdata->pulldowns);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "pullups %.05x %.05x --> %d\n",
+				pdata->pullups, pdata->pulldowns,
+				ret);
+
+	ret = gpio_twl4030_debounce(pdata->debounce, pdata->mmc_cd);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "debounce %.03x %.01x --> %d\n",
+				pdata->debounce, pdata->mmc_cd,
+				ret);
+
+	/*
+	 * NOTE: we assume VIBRA_CTL.VIBRA_EN, in MODULE_AUDIO_VOICE,
+	 * is (still) clear if use_leds is set.
+	 */
+	if (pdata->use_leds)
+		twl_gpiochip.ngpio += 2;
+
 	ret = gpiochip_add(&twl_gpiochip);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not register gpiochip, %d\n", ret);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.5.4
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/3 gpio-twl4030: get platform data from device tree

Quoted 26 lines · Florian Vaussard

Adds a number of missing properties to the device tree of twl4030/gpio:

- "ti,use-leds"  -> .use_leds
- "ti,debounce"  -> .debounce
- "ti,mmc-cd"    -> .mmc_cd
- "ti,pullups"   -> .pullups

- "ti,pulldowns" -> .pulldowns

---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c |   86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c +5 -0
index 94256fe..dabe76b 100644
@@ -395,6 +395,33 @@ static int __devinit gpio_twl4030_debounce(u32 debounce, u8 mmc_cd)
 
 static int gpio_twl4030_remove(struct platform_device *pdev);
 
+static struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data *of_gpio_twl4030(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data *omap_twl_info;
+	const char *of_use_leds;
+

drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c static int __devinit gpio_twl4030_debounce(u32 debounce, u8 mmc_cd) · line 412

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c +10 -0
+	omap_twl_info = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*omap_twl_info), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!omap_twl_info)
+		return NULL;
+
+	omap_twl_info->gpio_base = -1;
+
+	of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "ti,use-leds", &of_use_leds);
+	if (!strcmp(of_use_leds, "true"))
+		omap_twl_info->use_leds = true;
+

You can replace this with

omap_twl_info->use_leds = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "ti,use-leds");

Otherwise looks OK to me, also I have tested it on OMAP3EVM.

Tested-&-Acked-By: Vaibhav Hiremath <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Vaibhav

Quoted 88 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c +44 -27
+	of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,debounce",
+				&omap_twl_info->debounce);
+	of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,mmc-cd",
+				(u32 *)&omap_twl_info->mmc_cd);
+	of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,pullups",
+				&omap_twl_info->pullups);
+	of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,pulldowns",
+				&omap_twl_info->pulldowns);
+
+	return omap_twl_info;
+}
+
 static int __devinit gpio_twl4030_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
@@ -423,39 +450,44 @@ static int __devinit gpio_twl4030_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	twl4030_gpio_irq_base = irq_base;
 
 no_irqs:
-	twl_gpiochip.base = -1;
 	twl_gpiochip.ngpio = TWL4030_GPIO_MAX;
 	twl_gpiochip.dev = &pdev->dev;
 
-	if (pdata) {
-		twl_gpiochip.base = pdata->gpio_base;
+	if (node)
+		pdata = of_gpio_twl4030(&pdev->dev);
 
-		/*
-		 * NOTE:  boards may waste power if they don't set pullups
-		 * and pulldowns correctly ... default for non-ULPI pins is
-		 * pulldown, and some other pins may have external pullups
-		 * or pulldowns.  Careful!
-		 */
-		ret = gpio_twl4030_pulls(pdata->pullups, pdata->pulldowns);
-		if (ret)
-			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "pullups %.05x %.05x --> %d\n",
-					pdata->pullups, pdata->pulldowns,
-					ret);
-
-		ret = gpio_twl4030_debounce(pdata->debounce, pdata->mmc_cd);
-		if (ret)
-			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "debounce %.03x %.01x --> %d\n",
-					pdata->debounce, pdata->mmc_cd,
-					ret);
-
-		/*
-		 * NOTE: we assume VIBRA_CTL.VIBRA_EN, in MODULE_AUDIO_VOICE,
-		 * is (still) clear if use_leds is set.
-		 */
-		if (pdata->use_leds)
-			twl_gpiochip.ngpio += 2;
+	if (pdata == NULL) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Platform data is missing\n");
+		return -ENXIO;
 	}
 
+	twl_gpiochip.base = pdata->gpio_base;
+
+	/*
+	 * NOTE:  boards may waste power if they don't set pullups
+	 * and pulldowns correctly ... default for non-ULPI pins is
+	 * pulldown, and some other pins may have external pullups
+	 * or pulldowns.  Careful!
+	 */
+	ret = gpio_twl4030_pulls(pdata->pullups, pdata->pulldowns);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "pullups %.05x %.05x --> %d\n",
+				pdata->pullups, pdata->pulldowns,
+				ret);
+
+	ret = gpio_twl4030_debounce(pdata->debounce, pdata->mmc_cd);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "debounce %.03x %.01x --> %d\n",
+				pdata->debounce, pdata->mmc_cd,
+				ret);
+
+	/*
+	 * NOTE: we assume VIBRA_CTL.VIBRA_EN, in MODULE_AUDIO_VOICE,
+	 * is (still) clear if use_leds is set.
+	 */
+	if (pdata->use_leds)
+		twl_gpiochip.ngpio += 2;
+
 	ret = gpiochip_add(&twl_gpiochip);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not register gpiochip, %d\n", ret);
#3 lore raw

PATCH 1/3 gpio-twl4030: get platform data from device tree

Quoted 42 lines · Florian Vaussard
Quoted 26 lines

Adds a number of missing properties to the device tree of twl4030/gpio:

- "ti,use-leds"  -> .use_leds
- "ti,debounce"  -> .debounce
- "ti,mmc-cd"    -> .mmc_cd
- "ti,pullups"   -> .pullups

- "ti,pulldowns" -> .pulldowns

---
  drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c |   86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
  1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c +5 -0
index 94256fe..dabe76b 100644
@@ -395,6 +395,33 @@ static int __devinit gpio_twl4030_debounce(u32 debounce, u8 mmc_cd)
 
  static int gpio_twl4030_remove(struct platform_device *pdev);
 
+static struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data *of_gpio_twl4030(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data *omap_twl_info;
+	const char *of_use_leds;
+

drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c static int __devinit gpio_twl4030_debounce(u32 debounce, u8 mmc_cd) · line 412

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c +10 -0
+	omap_twl_info = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*omap_twl_info), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!omap_twl_info)
+		return NULL;
+
+	omap_twl_info->gpio_base = -1;
+
+	of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "ti,use-leds", &of_use_leds);
+	if (!strcmp(of_use_leds, "true"))
+		omap_twl_info->use_leds = true;
+

You can replace this with

Quoted 6 lines

omap_twl_info->use_leds = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "ti,use-leds");

Otherwise looks OK to me, also I have tested it on OMAP3EVM.

Tested-&-Acked-By: Vaibhav Hiremath <[email protected]>

Thank you Vaibhav for your review. I will send a v2 today.

Regards,
Florian

#4 lore raw

PATCH 1/3 gpio-twl4030: get platform data from device tree

In reply to Florian Vaussard
Quoted 9 lines · Florian Vaussard

Adds a number of missing properties to the device tree of twl4030/gpio:

- "ti,use-leds"  -> .use_leds
- "ti,debounce"  -> .debounce
- "ti,mmc-cd"    -> .mmc_cd
- "ti,pullups"   -> .pullups

- "ti,pulldowns" -> .pulldowns

Tony will you carry this in the OMAP tree?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

#5 lore raw

PATCH 1/3 gpio-twl4030: get platform data from device tree

Quoted 11 lines · Linus Walleij
Quoted 8 lines · Florian Vaussard

Adds a number of missing properties to the device tree of twl4030/gpio:

- "ti,use-leds"  -> .use_leds
- "ti,debounce"  -> .debounce
- "ti,mmc-cd"    -> .mmc_cd
- "ti,pullups"   -> .pullups

- "ti,pulldowns" -> .pulldowns

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line

Tony will you carry this in the OMAP tree?

Yes thanks I can queue this once the acks are there, I guess Benoit is planning to test the series first.

Regards,

Tony

#6 lore raw

PATCH 2/3 gpio-twl4030: new dt properties for BeagleBoard and omap3-EVM

In reply to Florian Vaussard

Add device tree properties for twl4030/gpio, according to the platform data of corresponding boards. This enables the led connected to LEDB output for both boards, as well as pullups/pulldowns on GPIO for the BeagleBoard.

---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-evm.dts    |   13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts +20 -0
index cdcb98c..16bff8b 100644
@@ -17,6 +17,14 @@
 		device_type = "memory";
 		reg = <0x80000000 0x20000000>; /* 512 MB */
 	};
+
+	leds {
+		compatible = "gpio-leds";
+		pmu_stat {
+			label = "beagleboard::pmu_stat";
+			gpios = <&twl_gpio 19 0>; /* LEDB */
+		};
+	};
 };
 
 &i2c1 {
@@ -67,3 +75,15 @@
 &mmc3 {
 	status = "disabled";
 };
+
+&twl_gpio {
+	ti,use-leds = "true";
+	/* pullups: BIT(1) */
+	ti,pullups = <2>;
+	/*
+	 * pulldowns:
+	 * BIT(2), BIT(6), BIT(7), BIT(8), BIT(13)
+	 * BIT(15), BIT(16), BIT(17)
+	 */
+	ti,pulldowns = <238020>;
+};
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-evm.dts +13 -0
index f349ee9..f1e18fe 100644
@@ -17,6 +17,15 @@
 		device_type = "memory";
 		reg = <0x80000000 0x10000000>; /* 256 MB */
 	};
+
+	leds {
+		compatible = "gpio-leds";
+		ledb {
+			label = "omap3evm::ledb";
+			gpios = <&twl_gpio 19 0>; /* LEDB */
+			linux,default-trigger = "default-on";
+		};
+	};
 };
 
 &i2c1 {
@@ -46,3 +55,7 @@
 		reg = <0x5c>;
 	};
 };
+
+&twl_gpio {
+	ti,use-leds = "true";
+};
Signature · 1 line
1.7.5.4
#7 lore raw

PATCH 2/3 gpio-twl4030: new dt properties for BeagleBoard and omap3-EVM

Quoted 35 lines · Florian Vaussard

Add device tree properties for twl4030/gpio, according to the platform data of corresponding boards. This enables the led connected to LEDB output for both boards, as well as pullups/pulldowns on GPIO for the BeagleBoard.

---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-evm.dts    |   13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts +9 -0
index cdcb98c..16bff8b 100644
@@ -17,6 +17,14 @@
 		device_type = "memory";
 		reg = <0x80000000 0x20000000>; /* 512 MB */
 	};
+
+	leds {
+		compatible = "gpio-leds";
+		pmu_stat {
+			label = "beagleboard::pmu_stat";
+			gpios = <&twl_gpio 19 0>; /* LEDB */
+		};
+	};
 };
 
 &i2c1 {
@@ -67,3 +75,15 @@
 &mmc3 {
 	status = "disabled";
 };
+

arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts line 88

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts +10 -0
+&twl_gpio {
+	ti,use-leds = "true";
+	/* pullups: BIT(1) */
+	ti,pullups = <2>;
+	/*
+	 * pulldowns:
+	 * BIT(2), BIT(6), BIT(7), BIT(8), BIT(13)
+	 * BIT(15), BIT(16), BIT(17)
+	 */
+	ti,pulldowns = <238020>;

Consider changing above value to hex presentation. Otherwise looks ok to me, also I have tested it on OMAP3EVM.

Tested-&-Acked-By: Vaibhav Hiremath <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Vaibhav

Quoted 30 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts +1 -0
+};
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-evm.dts +13 -0
index f349ee9..f1e18fe 100644
@@ -17,6 +17,15 @@
 		device_type = "memory";
 		reg = <0x80000000 0x10000000>; /* 256 MB */
 	};
+
+	leds {
+		compatible = "gpio-leds";
+		ledb {
+			label = "omap3evm::ledb";
+			gpios = <&twl_gpio 19 0>; /* LEDB */
+			linux,default-trigger = "default-on";
+		};
+	};
 };
 
 &i2c1 {
@@ -46,3 +55,7 @@
 		reg = <0x5c>;
 	};
 };
+
+&twl_gpio {
+	ti,use-leds = "true";
+};
#8 lore raw

PATCH 2/3 gpio-twl4030: new dt properties for BeagleBoard and omap3-EVM

In reply to Florian Vaussard
Quoted 6 lines · Florian Vaussard

Add device tree properties for twl4030/gpio, according to the platform data of corresponding boards. This enables the led connected to LEDB output for both boards, as well as pullups/pulldowns on GPIO for the BeagleBoard.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

#9 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 gpio-twl4030: updates the bindings for new dt properties

In reply to Florian Vaussard

Add the new properties to the documentation of bindings.

---
 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-twl4030.txt      |    6 ++++++
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-twl4030.txt +6 -0
index 16695d9..690a32e 100644
@@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ Required properties:
 - interrupt-controller: Mark the device node as an interrupt controller
   The first cell is the GPIO number.
   The second cell is not used.
+- ti,use-leds : Enables LEDA and LEDB outputs if set to "true"
+- ti,debounce : if n-th bit is set, debounces GPIO-n
+- ti,mmc-cd : if n-th bit is set, GPIO-n controls VMMC(n+1)
+- ti,pullups : if n-th bit is set, set a pullup on GPIO-n
+- ti,pulldowns : if n-th bit is set, set a pulldown on GPIO-n
 
 Example:
 
@@ -20,4 +25,5 @@ twl_gpio: gpio {
     gpio-controller;
     #interrupt-cells = <2>;
     interrupt-controller;
+    ti,use-leds = "true";
 };
Signature · 1 line
1.7.5.4
#11 lore raw

cover gpio-twl4030: add new device tree properties

In reply to Florian Vaussard

+ Vaibhav for the omap3-evm

Hi Florian,

Quoted 2 lines · Florian Vaussard

A number of platform data are missing when using twl4030/gpio from a device tree.

Yeah, I know, I was too lazy when I did the DT conversion at that time :-)

Many thanks for completing the work.

Quoted 8 lines

This patchset adds the missing properties, updates
existing device trees and updates the documentation of bindings. It mainly enables LEDA and LEDB outputs, as well as pullups / pulldowns on GPIOs.

The 1st patch changes the device driver.
The 2nd patch updates the device trees for BeagleBoard and omap3-evm. The 3rd patch updates the documentation of bindings.

OK, that's a nit, but in general, you'd better introduce the binding before using it.

The binding documentation could/should be updated along with the driver change that does introduce the binding. You could just merged patch #1 and #3.

Quoted 9 lines

Tested:
- Boot tested on Gumstix Overo for "ti,use-leds". Corresponding patch is not provided, as the device tree is not yet merged. The support can be found in the git tree [1], branch omap3-devel-dt-overo.
- Device trees for BeagleBoard and omap3-evm were compiled, but not tested on hardware.

Would someone be willing to test on BeagleBoard / omap3-evm?

I'll try to do it on Beagle. This is the least I can do since I did not do the job myself :-)

I added vaibhav as well since I do not have any omap3-evm board.

Quoted 10 lines

Regards,
Florian

[1] https://github.com/vaussard/linux.git (not safe for merge)

Florian Vaussard (3):
gpio-twl4030: get platform data from device tree
gpio-twl4030: new dt properties for BeagleBoard and omap3-EVM

Nit #2: the DTS file does not belong to the gpio subsystem. So you should prefix them using the *convention* for ARM DTS patches:

arm/dts: omap3: Add gpio-twl4030 properties for BeagleBoard and omap3-EVM

Or maybe "ARM: dts: " because it looks like most people are using that nowadays.

The convention for the gpio directory is similar:
gpio/twl4030: get platform data from device tree

Quoted 7 lines

gpio-twl4030: updates the bindings for new dt properties

 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-twl4030.txt      |    6 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts                 |   20 +++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-evm.dts                    |   13 +++
 drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c                        |   86 +++++++++++++------
 4 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Thanks,
Benoit

#12 lore raw

cover gpio-twl4030: add new device tree properties

Hi Benoit,

Quoted 13 lines

Nit #2: the DTS file does not belong to the gpio subsystem. So you should prefix them using the *convention* for ARM DTS patches:

arm/dts: omap3: Add gpio-twl4030 properties for BeagleBoard and omap3-EVM

Or maybe "ARM: dts: " because it looks like most people are using that nowadays.

The convention for the gpio directory is similar:
gpio/twl4030: get platform data from device tree

Quoted 2 lines

gpio-twl4030: updates the bindings for new dt properties

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-twl4030.txt      |    6 ++
  arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts                 |   20 +++++
  arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-evm.dts                    |   13 +++
  drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c                        |   86 +++++++++++++------
  4 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Thanks,
Benoit

Thank you for your review, I will send a new version soon.

Regards,
Florian

#13 lore raw

cover gpio-twl4030: add new device tree properties

In reply to Benoit Cousson
Quoted 2 lines · Benoit

+ Vaibhav for the omap3-evm

Reviewing and testing it now...

Thanks,
Vaibhav

Quoted 75 lines

Hi Florian,

Quoted 2 lines · Florian Vaussard

A number of platform data are missing when using twl4030/gpio from a device tree.

Yeah, I know, I was too lazy when I did the DT conversion at that time :-)

Many thanks for completing the work.

Quoted 8 lines

This patchset adds the missing properties, updates
existing device trees and updates the documentation of bindings. It mainly enables LEDA and LEDB outputs, as well as pullups / pulldowns on GPIOs.

The 1st patch changes the device driver.
The 2nd patch updates the device trees for BeagleBoard and omap3-evm. The 3rd patch updates the documentation of bindings.

OK, that's a nit, but in general, you'd better introduce the binding before using it.

The binding documentation could/should be updated along with the driver change that does introduce the binding. You could just merged patch #1 and #3.

Quoted 9 lines

Tested:
- Boot tested on Gumstix Overo for "ti,use-leds". Corresponding patch is not provided, as the device tree is not yet merged. The support can be found in the git tree [1], branch omap3-devel-dt-overo.
- Device trees for BeagleBoard and omap3-evm were compiled, but not tested on hardware.

Would someone be willing to test on BeagleBoard / omap3-evm?

I'll try to do it on Beagle. This is the least I can do since I did not do the job myself :-)

I added vaibhav as well since I do not have any omap3-evm board.

Quoted 10 lines

Regards,
Florian

[1] https://github.com/vaussard/linux.git (not safe for merge)

Florian Vaussard (3):
gpio-twl4030: get platform data from device tree
gpio-twl4030: new dt properties for BeagleBoard and omap3-EVM

Nit #2: the DTS file does not belong to the gpio subsystem. So you should prefix them using the *convention* for ARM DTS patches:

arm/dts: omap3: Add gpio-twl4030 properties for BeagleBoard and omap3-EVM

Or maybe "ARM: dts: " because it looks like most people are using that nowadays.

The convention for the gpio directory is similar:
gpio/twl4030: get platform data from device tree

Quoted 7 lines

gpio-twl4030: updates the bindings for new dt properties

 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-twl4030.txt      |    6 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts                 |   20 +++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-evm.dts                    |   13 +++
 drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c                        |   86 +++++++++++++------
 4 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Thanks,
Benoit