rebase -i: fix misleading error message after 'exec no-such' instruction
PATCH 1/1 rebase -i: fix misleading error message after 'exec no-such' instruction
From: Johannes Sixt <[email protected]>
When the todo sheet of interactive rebase instructs to run a non-existing command, the operation stops with the following error:
Execution failed: no-such
You can fix the problem, and then run
git rebase --continue
fatal: 'rebase' appears to be a git command, but we were not able to execute it. Maybe git-rebase is broken?
The reason is that the shell that attempted to run the command exits with code 127. rebase--interactive just forwards this code to the caller (the git wrapper). But our smart run-command infrastructure detects this special exit code and turns it into ENOENT, which in turn is interpreted by the git wrapper as if the external command that it just executed did not exist. This is finally translated to the misleading last two lines in error message cited above.
Fix it by translating the error code before it is forwarded.
---
An alternative fix would be to just ignore the shell's status code. I decided that it is worth keeping it: better safe than sorry.
BTW, the problem existed since day 1 of the 'exec' feature.
git-rebase--interactive.sh | 4 ++++ t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
git-rebase--interactive.sh +4 -0
@@ -544,6 +544,10 @@ do_next () { warn warn " git rebase --continue" warn + if test $status -eq 127 # command not found + then + status=1 + fi exit "$status" elif test "$dirty" = t then
t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh +11 -0
@@ -118,6 +118,17 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase -i with the exec command checks tree cleanness' ' git rebase --continue ' +test_expect_success 'rebase -i with exec of inexistent command' ' + git checkout master && + test_when_finished "git rebase --abort" && + ( + FAKE_LINES="exec_this-command-does-not-exist 1" && + export FAKE_LINES && + test_must_fail git rebase -i HEAD^ >actual 2>&1 + ) && + ! grep "Maybe git-rebase is broken" actual +' + test_expect_success 'no changes are a nop' ' git checkout branch2 && git rebase -i F &&
Signature · 1 line
1.7.12.1720.gb55457a.dirty
Quoted 13 lines · Johannes Sixt
From: Johannes Sixt <[email protected]>
When the todo sheet of interactive rebase instructs to run a non-existing command, the operation stops with the following error:
Execution failed: no-such
You can fix the problem, and then rungit rebase --continuefatal: 'rebase' appears to be a git command, but we were not able to execute it. Maybe git-rebase is broken?
Quoted 6 lines
The reason is that the shell that attempted to run the command exits with code 127. rebase--interactive just forwards this code to the caller (the git wrapper). But our smart run-command infrastructure detects this special exit code and turns it into ENOENT, which in turn is interpreted by the git wrapper as if the external command that it just executed did not exist.
That's a funny one ;-)
Will queue. Thanks.
Quoted 5 lines · Johannes Sixt
From: Johannes Sixt <[email protected]>
When the todo sheet of interactive rebase instructs to run a non-existing command, the operation stops with the following error:
Quoted 7 lines
Execution failed: no-such
You can fix the problem, and then rungit rebase --continuefatal: 'rebase' appears to be a git command, but we were not able to execute it. Maybe git-rebase is broken?
While you're there, maybe you want to turn the first line into
Execution failed: no-such (command not found)
In any case, the patch sounds good, thanks.
Signature · 2 lines
Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
Am 9/18/2012 13:20, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines · Johannes Sixt
From: Johannes Sixt <[email protected]>
When the todo sheet of interactive rebase instructs to run a non-existing command, the operation stops with the following error:
Execution failed: no-such
You can fix the problem, and then run
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
git rebase --continuefatal: 'rebase' appears to be a git command, but we were not able to execute it. Maybe git-rebase is broken?
While you're there, maybe you want to turn the first line into
Execution failed: no-such (command not found)
No, I don't want to: Neither do we have errno here, nor can we be specific enough because the whole shell script the user gave after 'exec' is repeated here.
I would rather remove the line so that it does not distract from the more specific error message that the shell gave. On top of that, the command is already dumped before it is executed; we don't need to repeat it.
-- Hannes
Quoted 20 lines · Johannes Sixt
Am 9/18/2012 13:20, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines · Johannes Sixt
From: Johannes Sixt <[email protected]>
When the todo sheet of interactive rebase instructs to run a non-existing command, the operation stops with the following error:
Execution failed: no-such
You can fix the problem, and then runQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
git rebase --continuefatal: 'rebase' appears to be a git command, but we were not able to execute it. Maybe git-rebase is broken?
While you're there, maybe you want to turn the first line into
Execution failed: no-such (command not found)
Quoted 7 lines
No, I don't want to: Neither do we have errno here, nor can we be specific enough because the whole shell script the user gave after 'exec' is repeated here.
I would rather remove the line so that it does not distract from the more specific error message that the shell gave. On top of that, the command is already dumped before it is executed; we don't need to repeat it.
Not sure what you mean: remove the line in case $status = 127, or remove it anyway.
If you mean only when $status = 127, then that is indeed a good idea, as the full error message looks like
Executing: nosuchcommand
zsh:1: command not found: nosuchcommand
Execution failed: nosuchcommand
You can fix the problem, and then run [...]
So, yes, the shell's error message is enough and more precise than we could do in git rebase.
If you mean remove it in any case, I disagree: repeating the command is usually not very useful, but may help when the command itself produced a lot of output (e.g. "exec make test" oftens fills-in your terminal's buffer). And the information that the command fails can be important if the command failed silently, e.g. with "exec false":
Executing: false
Execution failed: false
You can fix the problem, and then run [...]
Signature · 2 lines
Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/