Add packagegroup-core-buildessential
PATCH 1/1 Add packagegroup-core-buildessential
[Not heavily tested, but sent for discussion]
task-core-sdk is too big - for example, I simply don't want to ship tcl, ever =) Historically distcc caused a large dependency graph explosion because it has a utility which uses gtk+, although that was fixed.
packagegroup-core-sdk also includes coreutils, which is a bit confusing; conceptually things dependent on coreutils should pull it in explicitly, or possibly we just declare coreutils to be in the minimal build set.
So packagegroup-core-buildessential is intended to be similar to Debian's "build-essential" package. It's the stuff needed by say 80+% of components, not worth repeating over and over.
--- .../packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb | 17 +----------- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb
From 80a199a2fd34cca08324f228fc1272086a476e61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Colin Walters <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:46:01 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Add packagegroup-core-buildessential
task-core-sdk is too big - for example, I simply don't want to ship tcl, ever =) Historically distcc caused a large dependency graph explosion because it has a utility which uses gtk+, although that was fixed.
packagegroup-core-sdk also includes coreutils, which is a bit confusing; conceptually things dependent on coreutils should pull it in explicitly, or possibly we just declare coreutils to be in the minimal build set.
So packagegroup-core-buildessential is intended to be similar to Debian's "build-essential" package. It's the stuff needed by say 80+% of components, not worth repeating over and over.
--- .../packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb | 17 +----------- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb
meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb new file +30 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +# +# Copyright (C) 2007 OpenedHand Ltd. +# Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc. +# + +SUMMARY = "Essential build dependencies" +LICENSE = "MIT" +PR = "r0" + +inherit packagegroup + +RDEPENDS_packagegroup-core-buildessential = "\ + autoconf \ + automake \ + binutils \ + binutils-symlinks \ + cpp \ + cpp-symlinks \ + gcc \ + gcc-symlinks \ + g++ \ + g++-symlinks \ + gettext \ + make \ + libstdc++ \ + libstdc++-dev \ + libtool \ + pkgconfig \ + " +
meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb +1 -16
@@ -16,28 +16,13 @@ RREPLACES_packagegroup-core-sdk = "task-core-sdk" RCONFLICTS_packagegroup-core-sdk = "task-core-sdk" RDEPENDS_packagegroup-core-sdk = "\ - autoconf \ - automake \ - binutils \ - binutils-symlinks \ + packagegroup-core-buildessential \ coreutils \ - cpp \ - cpp-symlinks \ ccache \ diffutils \ - gcc \ - gcc-symlinks \ - g++ \ - g++-symlinks \ - gettext \ - make \ intltool \ - libstdc++ \ - libstdc++-dev \ - libtool \ perl-module-re \ perl-module-text-wrap \ - pkgconfig \ findutils \ quilt \ less \
Signature · 1 line
1.7.11.4
Quoted 3 lines · Colin Walters
So packagegroup-core-buildessential is intended to be similar to Debian's "build-essential" package. It's the stuff needed by say 80+% of components, not worth repeating over and over.
Makes sense to me.
Ross
Saul Wold
AppliedQuoted 15 lines · Colin Walters
[Not heavily tested, but sent for discussion]
task-core-sdk is too big - for example, I simply don't want to ship tcl, ever =) Historically distcc caused a large dependency graph explosion because it has a utility which uses gtk+, although that was fixed.
packagegroup-core-sdk also includes coreutils, which is a bit confusing; conceptually things dependent on coreutils should pull it in explicitly, or possibly we just declare coreutils to be in the minimal build set.
So packagegroup-core-buildessential is intended to be similar to Debian's "build-essential" package. It's the stuff needed by say 80+% of components, not worth repeating over and over.
Quoted 8 lines
Signed-off-by Colin Walters <[email protected]>--- .../packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb | 17 +----------- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb
Merged into OE-Core
Thanks
Sau!
Quoted 7 lines
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core