Skip to contentSkip to conversation

net: openvswitch: use this_cpu_ptr per-cpu helper

PATCH Applied Shan Wei 2 participants 3 messages Nov 13, 2012 – Nov 16, 2012

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Shan Wei

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH v4 4/9 net: openvswitch: use this_cpu_ptr per-cpu helper

From: Shan Wei <[email protected]>

just use more faster this_cpu_ptr instead of per_cpu_ptr(p, smp_processor_id());

---
no changes vs v3,v2.

---
 net/openvswitch/datapath.c |    4 ++--
 net/openvswitch/vport.c    |    5 ++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
net/openvswitch/datapath.c +2 -2
index 4c4b62c..77d16a5 100644
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ void ovs_dp_process_received_packet(struct vport *p, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	int error;
 	int key_len;
 
-	stats = per_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu, smp_processor_id());
+	stats = this_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu);
 
 	/* Extract flow from 'skb' into 'key'. */
 	error = ovs_flow_extract(skb, p->port_no, &key, &key_len);
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int ovs_dp_upcall(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return 0;
 
 err:
-	stats = per_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu, smp_processor_id());
+	stats = this_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu);
 
 	u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->sync);
 	stats->n_lost++;
net/openvswitch/vport.c +2 -3
index 03779e8..70af0be 100644
@@ -333,8 +333,7 @@ void ovs_vport_receive(struct vport *vport, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct vport_percpu_stats *stats;
 
-	stats = per_cpu_ptr(vport->percpu_stats, smp_processor_id());
-
+	stats = this_cpu_ptr(vport->percpu_stats);
 	u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->sync);
 	stats->rx_packets++;
 	stats->rx_bytes += skb->len;
@@ -359,7 +358,7 @@ int ovs_vport_send(struct vport *vport, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (likely(sent)) {
 		struct vport_percpu_stats *stats;
 
-		stats = per_cpu_ptr(vport->percpu_stats, smp_processor_id());
+		stats = this_cpu_ptr(vport->percpu_stats);
 
 		u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->sync);
 		stats->tx_packets++;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
author
#1 lore raw

Shan Wei said, at 2012/11/13 9:52:

Quoted 7 lines

From: Shan Wei <[email protected]>

just use more faster this_cpu_ptr instead of per_cpu_ptr(p, smp_processor_id());

Jesse Gross, would you like to pick it up to your tree?

Quoted 53 lines

---
no changes vs v3,v2.

---
 net/openvswitch/datapath.c |    4 ++--
 net/openvswitch/vport.c    |    5 ++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
net/openvswitch/datapath.c +2 -2
index 4c4b62c..77d16a5 100644
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ void ovs_dp_process_received_packet(struct vport *p, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	int error;
 	int key_len;
 
-	stats = per_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu, smp_processor_id());
+	stats = this_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu);
 
 	/* Extract flow from 'skb' into 'key'. */
 	error = ovs_flow_extract(skb, p->port_no, &key, &key_len);
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int ovs_dp_upcall(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return 0;
 
 err:
-	stats = per_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu, smp_processor_id());
+	stats = this_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu);
 
 	u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->sync);
 	stats->n_lost++;
net/openvswitch/vport.c +2 -3
index 03779e8..70af0be 100644
@@ -333,8 +333,7 @@ void ovs_vport_receive(struct vport *vport, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct vport_percpu_stats *stats;
 
-	stats = per_cpu_ptr(vport->percpu_stats, smp_processor_id());
-
+	stats = this_cpu_ptr(vport->percpu_stats);
 	u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->sync);
 	stats->rx_packets++;
 	stats->rx_bytes += skb->len;
@@ -359,7 +358,7 @@ int ovs_vport_send(struct vport *vport, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (likely(sent)) {
 		struct vport_percpu_stats *stats;
 
-		stats = per_cpu_ptr(vport->percpu_stats, smp_processor_id());
+		stats = this_cpu_ptr(vport->percpu_stats);
 
 		u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->sync);
 		stats->tx_packets++;