Vector Buildroot Logo
I've been working on a vector Buildroot logo. You can see it here:
http://i.imgur.com/BP9K7.png . I have it in SVG format as well, but I'm not sure if the list allows image attachments. I went with one that was reasonably faithful to the original, then I progressively tried to make the logo more like a logo - abstract/symbolic instead of photorealistic. Nobody who didn't know would look at the bottom one and say it's a hardhat; I'm not sure if that's good or bad, but I definitely prefer the simpler one. Any feedback? Would the project maintainers be interested in using one of these instead of the current one?
Quoted 9 lines · Shawn J. Goff
I've been working on a vector Buildroot logo. You can see it here:
http://i.imgur.com/BP9K7.png . I have it in SVG format as well, but I'm not sure if the list allows image attachments. I went with one that was reasonably faithful to the original, then I progressively tried to make the logo more like a logo - abstract/symbolic instead of photorealistic. Nobody who didn't know would look at the bottom one and say it's a hardhat; I'm not sure if that's good or bad, but I definitely prefer the simpler one. Any feedback? Would the project maintainers be interested in using one of these instead of the current one?
I like it!
I'm more in favour of the third one. Only the left corner looks a bit
unnatural (but IANAGD - I am not a graphical designer :-)
I also prefer the bright yellow of the third one. Removing the shadow
and choosing a narrower typeface looks like a good idea. A sans monospace font would be nice. Oh, and I'd remove the capital R - we never capitalize it in reality.
Regards,
Arnout
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
Quoted 17 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Quoted 10 lines · Shawn J. Goff
I've been working on a vector Buildroot logo. You can see it here:
http://i.imgur.com/BP9K7.png . I have it in SVG format as well, but I'm not sure if the list allows image attachments. I went with one that was reasonably faithful to the original, then I progressively tried to make the logo more like a logo - abstract/symbolic instead of photorealistic. Nobody who didn't know would look at the bottom one and say it's a hardhat; I'm not sure if that's good or bad, but I definitely prefer the simpler one. Any feedback? Would the project maintainers be interested in
using one of these instead of the current one?I like it!
I'm more in favour of the third one. Only the left corner looks a bit
unnatural (but IANAGD - I am not a graphical designer :-)
Quoted 9 lines
I also prefer the bright yellow of the third one. Removing the shadow
and choosing a narrower typeface looks like a good idea. A sans monospace font would be nice. Oh, and I'd remove the capital R - we never capitalize it in reality.Regards,
Arnout
Here are some variations with your suggestions, but I had to include my favorite symbol, too :-). I started out with different fonts, then chose my favorite and tried different stroke and background color treatments. I quite think the dark grey/black either for the stroke or background make it look more constructioney. My favorite here is the thick dark stroke on the hat, but I don't like the thick stroke on the letters; pairing the thick dark stroke on the hat with a thin stroke on the letters didn't look good. The yellow letters on a light background don't work too well, so my favorite is the thick stroke on the hat, no stroke on the letters, dark background.
Quoted 17 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Quoted 10 lines · Shawn J. Goff
I've been working on a vector Buildroot logo. You can see it here:
http://i.imgur.com/BP9K7.png . I have it in SVG format as well, but I'm not sure if the list allows image attachments. I went with one that was reasonably faithful to the original, then I progressively tried to make the logo more like a logo - abstract/symbolic instead of photorealistic. Nobody who didn't know would look at the bottom one and say it's a hardhat; I'm not sure if that's good or bad, but I definitely prefer the simpler one. Any feedback? Would the project maintainers be interested in
using one of these instead of the current one?I like it!
I'm more in favour of the third one. Only the left corner looks a bit
unnatural (but IANAGD - I am not a graphical designer :-)
Quoted 9 lines
I also prefer the bright yellow of the third one. Removing the shadow
and choosing a narrower typeface looks like a good idea. A sans monospace font would be nice. Oh, and I'd remove the capital R - we never capitalize it in reality.Regards,
Arnout
I also forgot to mention, once it's all figured out, I'm giving the copyright of the artwork to the Buildroot project if that's possible, or if not, it will be licensed in whatever way you guys want it to so you can use it however you want. And if folks do settle on the dark background logo, it could require website rework, which I'd also be up for taking on if it's desirable.
I forgot to lower-case the R in the previous one, so here is a new one. I also realized the symbolic one could be given eyes and it becomes a mascot. I like that the abstract one is a hardhat to people who know and is just a symbol to others.
