wireless-regdb updated, please check!
Quoted 9 lines · John W. Linville
I've been sitting on some wireless-regdb patches for some time. Mostly this is because I wasn't sure what to do with some/most of them. I even still have a few more like that...
Anyway, I wanted to at least get the 60GHz bits out, and I pushed a few other changes as well. Please take a look, and let me know if I merged anything wrong or if there is still something missing.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-regdb.git
Did you forget CC:[email protected] ?
How about these?
CEPT rules to ES:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000073.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000074.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000075.html
Quoted 6 lines · Xose Vazquez Perez
Quoted 4 lines · John W. Linville
I've been sitting on some wireless-regdb patches for some time. Mostly this is because I wasn't sure what to do with some/most of them. I even still have a few more like that...
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Anyway, I wanted to at least get the 60GHz bits out, and I pushed a few other changes as well. Please take a look, and let me know if I merged anything wrong or if there is still something missing.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-regdb.gitDid you forget CC:[email protected] ?
Well, sorta...but I'm not sure that you can prove that anyone actually reads that list anyway... :-(
Quoted 6 lines
How about these?
CEPT rules to ES:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000073.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000074.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000075.html
Yeah, those are probably fine. I'll try to pick those up in a few days...
John
Signature · 2 lines
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you [email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.
Quoted 10 lines · John W. Linville
Quoted 6 lines · Xose Vazquez Perez
How about these?
CEPT rules to ES:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000073.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000074.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000075.htmlYeah, those are probably fine. I'll try to pick those up in a few days...
Someone should review all others CEPT countries, because those rules also apply to all of them.
Quoted 6 lines · John W. Linville
Quoted 1 line · Xose Vazquez Perez
Did you forget CC:[email protected] ?
Well, sorta...but I'm not sure that you can prove that anyone actually reads that list anyway... :-(
40 people:
14 gmail.com
3 qca.qualcomm.com
3 atheros.com
1 ya.ru
1 yahoo.com
1 wirelessfabric.com
1 watchguard.com
1 virscient.com
1 tuxdriver.com
1 tranzeo.com
1 slowthinkers.net
1 sipsolutions.net
1 samsung.com
1 posedge.com
1 parker.iz34.com
1 msn.com
1 motorola.com
1 mork.no
1 l2devices.com
1 iopen.net
1 intel.com
1 broadcom.com
1 axis.comQuoted 7 lines · Xose Vazquez Perez
Quoted 4 lines · John W. Linville
Quoted 4 lines · Xose Vazquez Perez
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Did you forget CC:[email protected] ?
Well, sorta...but I'm not sure that you can prove that anyone actually reads that list anyway... :-(
40 people:
I would put my money on it that most of those are also keeping taps on the linux-wireless list. I know I do.
Gr. AvS
_______________________________________________
wireless-regdb mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb
Quoted 5 lines · Arend van Spriel
Quoted 3 lines · Xose Vazquez Perez
Quoted 1 line · John W. Linville
Quoted 1 line · Xose Vazquez Perez
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Did you forget CC:wireless-regdb at lists.infradead.org ?
Well, sorta...but I'm not sure that you can prove that anyone actually reads that list anyway... :-(
40 people:
I would put my money on it that most of those are also keeping taps on the linux-wireless list. I know I do.
If people believe wireless-regdb ml is superfluous, should it be removed ?
Quoted 11 lines · Xose Vazquez Perez
Quoted 9 lines · Arend van Spriel
Quoted 7 lines · Xose Vazquez Perez
Quoted 5 lines · John W. Linville
Quoted 5 lines · Xose Vazquez Perez
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Did you forget CC:wireless-regdb at lists.infradead.org ?
Well, sorta...but I'm not sure that you can prove that anyone actually reads that list anyway... :-(
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
40 people:
I would put my money on it that most of those are also keeping taps on the linux-wireless list. I know I do.
If people believe wireless-regdb ml is superfluous, should it be removed ?
Not entirely what I said, but maybe John implied it. The added value of it would be that regulatory patches are archived separately. I can see that announcements are a gray area as you may want to reach a bigger crowd.
Gr. AvS