cpuset: use rebuild_sched_domains() in cpuset_hotplug_workfn()
PATCH 1/2 cpuset: use rebuild_sched_domains() in cpuset_hotplug_workfn()
From: Li Zhong <[email protected]>
In cpuset_hotplug_workfn(), partition_sched_domains() is called without hotplug lock held, which is actually needed (stated in the function header of partition_sched_domains()).
This patch tries to use rebuild_sched_domains() to solve the above issue, and makes the code looks a little simpler.
--- kernel/cpuset.c | 13 ++----------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
kernel/cpuset.c +2 -11
@@ -2184,17 +2184,8 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *work)flush_workqueue (cpuset_propagate_hotplug_wq);/* rebuild sched domains if cpus_allowed has changed */ -if (cpus_updated) { -struct sched_domain_attr *attr; -cpumask_var_t *doms; -int ndoms; - -mutex_lock (&cpuset_mutex); - ndoms =generate_sched_domains (&doms, &attr); -mutex_unlock (&cpuset_mutex); - -partition_sched_domains (ndoms, doms, attr); - } +if (cpus_updated) +rebuild_sched_domains (); }void cpuset_update_active_cpus (bool cpu_online)
Signature · 1 line
1.8.0.2
PATCH 2/2 cpuset: fix cpu hotplug vs rebuild_sched_domains() race
rebuild_sched_domains() might pass doms with offlined cpu to partition_sched_domains(), which results in an oops:
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP ... RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81077a1e>] [<ffffffff81077a1e>] get_group+0x6e/0x90 ... Call Trace: [<ffffffff8107f07c>] build_sched_domains+0x70c/0xcb0 [<ffffffff8107f2a7>] ? build_sched_domains+0x937/0xcb0 [<ffffffff81173f64>] ? kfree+0xe4/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8107f6e0>] ? partition_sched_domains+0xc0/0x470 [<ffffffff8107f905>] partition_sched_domains+0x2e5/0x470 [<ffffffff8107f6e0>] ? partition_sched_domains+0xc0/0x470 [<ffffffff810c9007>] ? generate_sched_domains+0xc7/0x530 [<ffffffff810c94a8>] rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x38/0x70 [<ffffffff810cb4a4>] cpuset_write_resmask+0x1a4/0x500 [<ffffffff810c8700>] ? cpuset_mount+0xe0/0xe0 [<ffffffff810c7f50>] ? cpuset_read_u64+0x100/0x100 [<ffffffff810be890>] ? cgroup_iter_next+0x90/0x90 [<ffffffff810cb300>] ? cpuset_css_offline+0x70/0x70 [<ffffffff810c1a73>] cgroup_file_write+0x133/0x2e0 [<ffffffff8118995b>] vfs_write+0xcb/0x130 [<ffffffff8118a174>] sys_write+0x64/0xa0
--- kernel/cpuset.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/cpuset.c +9 -1
@@ -769,12 +769,20 @@ static void rebuild_sched_domains_locked(void)lockdep_assert_held (&cpuset_mutex);get_online_cpus (); +/* +* We have raced with CPU hotplug. Don't do anything to avoid +* passing doms with offlined cpu to partition_sched_domains(). +* Anyways, hotplug work item will rebuild sched domains. +*/ +if (!cpumask_equal (top_cpuset.cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask)) + goto out; +/* Generate domain masks and attrs */ ndoms =generate_sched_domains (&doms, &attr);/* Have scheduler rebuild the domains */ partition_sched_domains (ndoms, doms, attr); - +out: put_online_cpus(); }#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */
Signature · 1 line
1.8.0.2
Tejun Heo
maintainerRe: [PATCH 2/2] cpuset: fix cpu hotplug vs rebuild_sched_domains() race
Quoted 25 lines · Li Zefan
rebuild_sched_domains()might pass doms with offlined cpu topartition_sched_domains(), which results in an oops:general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP ... RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81077a1e>] [<ffffffff81077a1e>] get_group+0x6e/0x90 ... Call Trace: [<ffffffff8107f07c>] build_sched_domains+0x70c/0xcb0 [<ffffffff8107f2a7>] ? build_sched_domains+0x937/0xcb0 [<ffffffff81173f64>] ? kfree+0xe4/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8107f6e0>] ? partition_sched_domains+0xc0/0x470 [<ffffffff8107f905>] partition_sched_domains+0x2e5/0x470 [<ffffffff8107f6e0>] ? partition_sched_domains+0xc0/0x470 [<ffffffff810c9007>] ? generate_sched_domains+0xc7/0x530 [<ffffffff810c94a8>] rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x38/0x70 [<ffffffff810cb4a4>] cpuset_write_resmask+0x1a4/0x500 [<ffffffff810c8700>] ? cpuset_mount+0xe0/0xe0 [<ffffffff810c7f50>] ? cpuset_read_u64+0x100/0x100 [<ffffffff810be890>] ? cgroup_iter_next+0x90/0x90 [<ffffffff810cb300>] ? cpuset_css_offline+0x70/0x70 [<ffffffff810c1a73>] cgroup_file_write+0x133/0x2e0 [<ffffffff8118995b>] vfs_write+0xcb/0x130 [<ffffffff8118a174>] sys_write+0x64/0xa0
Quoted 2 lines
Reported-by Li Zhong <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Li Zefan <[email protected]>
Applied 1-2 to cgroup/for-3.10.
Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
tejun