Warning about possible recursive locking detected in IPoIB
Hi Or,
I saw below warning when enable CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
Quoted 46 lines
1893 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.738725] =============================================
1894 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.738782] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 1895 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.738841] 3.9.0-rc7-pserver #4 Tainted: G O 1896 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.738896] --------------------------------------------- 1897 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.738953] kworker/u:5/238 is trying to acquire lock: 1898 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.739008] (&priv->vlan_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa073f36c>] __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x3c/0x230 [ib_ipoib] 1899 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.739218] 1900 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.739218] but task is already holding lock: 1901 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.739328] (&priv->vlan_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa073f36c>] __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x3c/0x230 [ib_ipoib] 1902 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.739537] 1903 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.739537] other info that might help us debug this: 1904 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.739613] Possible unsafe locking scenario: 1905 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.739613] 1906 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.739688] CPU0 1907 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.739741] ---- 1908 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.739791] lock(&priv->vlan_mutex); 1909 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.739902] lock(&priv->vlan_mutex); 1910 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.740014] 1911 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.740014] *** DEADLOCK *** 1912 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.740014] 1913 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.740103] May be due to missing lock nesting notation 1914 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.740103] 1915 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.740213] 3 locks held by kworker/u:5/238: 1916 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.740266] #0: (ipoib){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81067755>] process_one_work+0x165/0x560 1917 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.740495] #1: ((&priv->flush_heavy)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81067755>] process_one_work+0x165/0x560 1918 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.740725] #2: (&priv->vlan_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa073f36c>] __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x3c/0x230 [ib_ipoib] 1919 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.740961] 1920 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.740961] stack backtrace: 1921 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741035] Pid: 238, comm: kworker/u:5 Tainted: G O 3.9.0-rc7-pserver #4 1922 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741111] Call Trace: 1923 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741170] [<ffffffff81046430>] ? vprintk_emit+0x280/0x520 1924 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741233] [<ffffffff810ac473>] __lock_acquire+0x6c3/0x17c0 1925 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741295] [<ffffffff810aca3c>] ? __lock_acquire+0xc8c/0x17c0 1926 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741357] [<ffffffff810047a7>] ? dump_trace+0x177/0x2f0 1927 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741418] [<ffffffff810ad612>] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x180 1928 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741483] [<ffffffffa073f36c>] ? __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x3c/0x230 [ib_ipoib] 1929 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741563] [<ffffffff8101090f>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2f/0x50 1930 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741626] [<ffffffff817bb0cb>] __mutex_lock_common+0x5b/0x3e0 1931 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741693] [<ffffffffa073f36c>] ? __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x3c/0x230 [ib_ipoib] 1932 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741777] [<ffffffffa073f36c>] ? __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x3c/0x230 [ib_ipoib] 1933 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741855] [<ffffffff817bb585>] mutex_lock_nested+0x45/0x50 1934 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741922] [<ffffffffa073f36c>] __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x3c/0x230 [ib_ipoib] 1935 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.741991] [<ffffffffa073f38a>] __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x5a/0x230 [ib_ipoib] 1936 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.742060] [<ffffffffa073f57a>] ipoib_ib_dev_flush_heavy+0x1a/0x20 [ib_ipoib] 1937 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.742138] [<ffffffff810677c6>] process_one_work+0x1d6/0x560 1938 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.742199] [<ffffffff81067755>] ? process_one_work+0x165/0x560
Quoted 8 lines
1939 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.742262] [<ffffffff81068e29>] worker_thread+0x119/0x370 1940 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.742324] [<ffffffff81068d10>] ? manage_workers+0x340/0x340 1941 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.742388] [<ffffffff8106e846>] kthread+0xe6/0xf0 1942 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.742450] [<ffffffff8106e760>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70 1943 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.742513] [<ffffffff817c842c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 1944 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.742575] [<ffffffff8106e760>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70 1945 May 21 08:56:32 ib2 kernel: [ 44.744467] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ib1: link becomes ready 1946 May 21 08:56:45 ib2 kernel: [ 57.700823] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ib0: link becomes ready
And I found attached patch you submitted long time ago, I tried that patch, it fixed the warning, I wonder why the patch was not accepted, anything wrong?
Regards,
Jack
do nested flushing only if the device isn't a child
----
setting CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES I see the below warning, however, for some reason, I didn't manage to trigger it without my other patch that adds the clones, I don't see how that patch could be the reason for the warning, as the code always goes nested, I've instrumented the flush code to dump its caller/stack and indeed, you can see that the flushing code is called recursively and should have that warning, but it doesn't...
ib0.8001: downing ib_dev
ib0: downing ib_dev
ib0: ipoib_ib_dev_flush_light called
ib0: __ipoib_ib_dev_flush pid 29251
Pid: 29251, comm: kworker/u:1 Not tainted 3.2.0-06106-g75f0703-dirty #16
Call Trace: [<ffffffffa02b5e1e>] __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x57/0x204 [ib_ipoib] [<ffffffffa02b6057>] ? ipoib_ib_dev_flush_normal+0x46/0x46 [ib_ipoib] [<ffffffffa02b6096>] ipoib_ib_dev_flush_light+0x3f/0x43 [ib_ipoib] [<ffffffff81041ee6>] process_one_work+0x2bd/0x4a6 [<ffffffff81041e39>] ? process_one_work+0x210/0x4a6 [<ffffffff810424e6>] worker_thread+0x1d6/0x350 [<ffffffff81042310>] ? rescuer_thread+0x241/0x241 [<ffffffff81045d5a>] kthread+0x84/0x8c [<ffffffff81366ee4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [<ffffffff810514d1>] ? finish_task_switch+0x154/0x156 [<ffffffff8135f243>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x40 [<ffffffff8135f59d>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [<ffffffff81045cd6>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x56/0x56 [<ffffffff81366ee0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb ib0.8001: __ipoib_ib_dev_flush pid 29251 Pid: 29251, comm: kworker/u:1 Not tainted 3.2.0-06106-g75f0703-dirty #16 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa02b5e1e>] __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x57/0x204 [ib_ipoib] [<ffffffffa02b5e4e>] __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x87/0x204 [ib_ipoib] [<ffffffffa02b6057>] ? ipoib_ib_dev_flush_normal+0x46/0x46 [ib_ipoib] [<ffffffffa02b6096>] ipoib_ib_dev_flush_light+0x3f/0x43 [ib_ipoib] [<ffffffff81041ee6>] process_one_work+0x2bd/0x4a6 [<ffffffff81041e39>] ? process_one_work+0x210/0x4a6 [<ffffffff810424e6>] worker_thread+0x1d6/0x350 [<ffffffff81042310>] ? rescuer_thread+0x241/0x241 [<ffffffff81045d5a>] kthread+0x84/0x8c [<ffffffff81366ee4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [<ffffffff810514d1>] ? finish_task_switch+0x154/0x156 [<ffffffff8135f243>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x40 [<ffffffff8135f59d>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [<ffffffff81045cd6>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x56/0x56 [<ffffffff81366ee0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
---
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 3.2.0-06106-g75f0703-dirty #16 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
kworker/u:2/1578 is trying to acquire lock:
(&priv->vlan_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa021ae9f>]__ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x2c/0x1cf [ib_ipoib]
but task is already holding lock:
(&priv->vlan_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa021ae9f>]__ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x2c/0x1cf [ib_ipoib]
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
---- lock(&priv->vlan_mutex);
lock(&priv->vlan_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by kworker/u:2/1578:
#0: (ipoib){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81041e39>] process_one_work+0x210/0x4a6 #1: ((&priv->flush_heavy)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81041e39>]
process_one_work+0x210/0x4a6
#2: (&priv->vlan_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa021ae9f>]
__ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x2c/0x1cf [ib_ipoib]
stack backtrace:
Pid: 1578, comm: kworker/u:2 Not tainted 3.2.0-06106-g75f0703-dirty #16
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81029a02>] ? console_unlock+0x10c/0x207
[<ffffffff810668a6>] __lock_acquire+0x16b5/0x174e
[<ffffffff8100ca22>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2a/0x47
[<ffffffff81066a2f>] lock_acquire+0xf0/0x116
[<ffffffffa021ae9f>] ? __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x2c/0x1cf [ib_ipoib]
[<ffffffff8135cbb9>] mutex_lock_nested+0x64/0x2e6
[<ffffffffa021ae9f>] ? __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x2c/0x1cf [ib_ipoib]
[<ffffffff81063bad>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x11e/0x155
[<ffffffffa021ae9f>] __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x2c/0x1cf [ib_ipoib]
[<ffffffffa021aec5>] __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x52/0x1cf [ib_ipoib]
[<ffffffff81063bad>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x11e/0x155
[<ffffffffa021b042>] ? __ipoib_ib_dev_flush+0x1cf/0x1cf [ib_ipoib]
[<ffffffffa021b057>] ipoib_ib_dev_flush_heavy+0x15/0x17 [ib_ipoib]
[<ffffffff81041ee6>] process_one_work+0x2bd/0x4a6
[<ffffffff81041e39>] ? process_one_work+0x210/0x4a6
[<ffffffff8135f243>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x40
[<ffffffff810424e6>] worker_thread+0x1d6/0x350
[<ffffffff81042310>] ? rescuer_thread+0x241/0x241
[<ffffffff81045d5a>] kthread+0x84/0x8c
[<ffffffff81366ee4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[<ffffffff8135f59d>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
[<ffffffff81045cd6>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x56/0x56
[<ffffffff81366ee0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xbADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ib0.8001: link becomes ready ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ib0: link becomes ready
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
(quoted diff) +0 -0
b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c
index 5c1bc99..cac2b71 100644
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c +0 -0
@@ -934,16 +934,18 @@ static void __ipoib_ib_dev_flush(struct ipoib_dev_priv
*priv,
struct net_device *dev = priv->dev;
u16 new_index;- mutex_lock(&priv->vlan_mutex);
+ if (!priv->parent) {
+ mutex_lock(&priv->vlan_mutex);
- /*
- * Flush any child interfaces too -- they might be up even if - * the parent is down. - */ - list_for_each_entry(cpriv, &priv->child_intfs, list) - __ipoib_ib_dev_flush(cpriv, level); + /* + * Flush any child interfaces too -- they might be up even if + * the parent is down. + */
+ list_for_each_entry(cpriv, &priv->child_intfs, list)
+ __ipoib_ib_dev_flush(cpriv, level);
- mutex_unlock(&priv->vlan_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&priv->vlan_mutex);
+ }
if (!test_bit(IPOIB_FLAG_INITIALIZED, &priv->flags)) {
ipoib_dbg(priv, "Not flushing - IPOIB_FLAG_INITIALIZED not
set.\n");