MMC: DWMMC: Fix FIFO_DEPTH calculation
PATCH v2 1/1 MMC: DWMMC: Fix FIFO_DEPTH calculation
Current DWMMC driver used to give FIFO underrun/overrun error every 3rd time for mmc rescan command.
In current code FIFO_DEPTH is getting calculated after reading the default FIFOTH register and extracting the RX_WMARK bits from it i.e (RX_WMARK = FIFO_DEPTH/2 -1). Instead of storing the correct value, we were recalculating the FIFO_DEPT each time which is not correct.
Based on "[PATCH V9 3/9] DWMMC: Initialise dwmci and resolve EMMC read write issues"
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/160247
---
Changes in V2:
- remove fifoth_val local variable
- Rebased on top of "[PATCH V9 3/9] DWMMC: Initialise dwmci and resolve EMMC read write issues".
drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c +6 -8
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static void dwmci_set_ios(struct mmc *mmc)static int dwmci_init (struct mmc *mmc) {struct dwmci_host *host = (struct dwmci_host *)mmc->priv; -u32 fifo_size, fifoth_val; +u32 fifo_size;dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_PWREN ,1 );
@@ -332,15 +332,13 @@ static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc)dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_IDINTEN ,0 );dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_BMOD ,1 ); - fifo_size =dwmci_readl (host,DWMCI_FIFOTH ); - fifo_size = ((fifo_size &RX_WMARK_MASK ) >>RX_WMARK_SHIFT ) +1 ; -if (host->fifoth_val) { - fifoth_val = host->fifoth_val; - }else { - fifoth_val =MSIZE (0x2 ) |RX_WMARK (fifo_size /2 -1 ) | +if (!host->fifoth_val) { + fifo_size =dwmci_readl (host,DWMCI_FIFOTH ); + fifo_size = ((fifo_size &RX_WMARK_MASK ) >>RX_WMARK_SHIFT ) +1 ; + host->fifoth_val =MSIZE (0x2 ) |RX_WMARK (fifo_size /2 -1 ) |TX_WMARK (fifo_size /2 ); } -dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_FIFOTH , fifoth_val); +dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_FIFOTH , host->fifoth_val);dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_CLKENA ,0 );dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_CLKSRC ,0 );
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.4
PATCH v2 1/1 MMC: DWMMC: Fix FIFO_DEPTH calculation
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Rajeshwari Shinde <[email protected]
Quoted 12 lines
wrote:
Current DWMMC driver used to give FIFO underrun/overrun error every 3rd time
for mmc rescan command.
In current codeFIFO_DEPTHis getting calculated after reading the default FIFOTH
register and extracting theRX_WMARKbits from it i.e (RX_WMARK= FIFO_DEPTH/2 -1).
Instead of storing the correct value, we were recalculating theFIFO_DEPTeach
DEPTH
Quoted 9 lines
time which is not correct.
Based on "[PATCH V9 3/9] DWMMC: Initialise dwmci and resolve EMMC read write issues"
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/160247Signed-off-by Hatim Ali <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Rajeshwari Shinde <[email protected]>
Tested on pit using 'mmc rescan' and saw no problems now.
Quoted 49 lines
---
Changes in V2:
- removefifoth_vallocal variable
- Rebased on top of "[PATCH V9 3/9] DWMMC: Initialise dwmci and
resolve
EMMC read write issues".drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c +5
-7@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static void dwmci_set_ios(struct mmc *mmc)static int dwmci_init (struct mmc *mmc) {struct dwmci_host *host = (struct dwmci_host *)mmc->priv; -u32 fifo_size, fifoth_val; +u32 fifo_size;dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_PWREN ,1 );@@ -332,15 +332,13 @@ static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc)dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_IDINTEN ,0 );dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_BMOD ,1 ); - fifo_size =dwmci_readl (host,DWMCI_FIFOTH ); - fifo_size = ((fifo_size &RX_WMARK_MASK ) >>RX_WMARK_SHIFT ) +1 ; -if (host->fifoth_val) { - fifoth_val = host->fifoth_val; - }else { - fifoth_val =MSIZE (0x2 ) |RX_WMARK (fifo_size /2 -1 ) | +if (!host->fifoth_val) { + fifo_size =dwmci_readl (host,DWMCI_FIFOTH ); + fifo_size = ((fifo_size &RX_WMARK_MASK ) >>RX_WMARK_SHIFT ) +1 ; + host->fifoth_val = MSIZE(0x2) | RX_WMARK(fifo_size / 2 -1) |
TX_WMARK(fifo_size / 2); }drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c +1
-2-dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_FIFOTH , fifoth_val); +dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_FIFOTH , host->fifoth_val);dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_CLKENA ,0 );dwmci_writel (host,DWMCI_CLKSRC ,0 ); --1.7.4.4
PATCH v2 1/1 MMC: DWMMC: Fix FIFO_DEPTH calculation
Thanks,
Jaehoon Chung
Quoted 74 lines · Simon Glass
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Rajeshwari Shinde <rajeshwari.s at samsung.com <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Current DWMMC driver used to give FIFO underrun/overrun error every 3rd time for mmc rescan command.
In current codeFIFO_DEPTHis getting calculated after reading the default FIFOTH register and extracting theRX_WMARKbits from it i.e (RX_WMARK= FIFO_DEPTH/2 -1). Instead of storing the correct value, we were recalculating theFIFO_DEPTeachDEPTH
time which is not correct.
Based on "[PATCH V9 3/9] DWMMC: Initialise dwmci and resolve EMMC read write issues"
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/160247Signed-off-by Hatim Ali <hatim.rv at samsung.com <mailto:[email protected]>>Signed-off-by Rajeshwari Shinde <rajeshwari.s at samsung.com <mailto:[email protected]>>Acked-by Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org <mailto:[email protected]>>Tested on pit using 'mmc rescan' and saw no problems now.
Tested-by Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org <mailto:[email protected]>>---
Changes in V2:
- removefifoth_vallocal variable
- Rebased on top of "[PATCH V9 3/9] DWMMC: Initialise dwmci and resolve EMMC read write issues".
drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c| 14 ++++++--------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git
a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.cb/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.cindex 1307b12..5da20ed 100644
---a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c
+++b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static voiddwmci_set_ios(struct mmc *mmc)
static intdwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc)
{
structdwmci_host*host = (structdwmci_host*)mmc->priv;
- u32fifo_size,fifoth_val;
+ u32fifo_size;
dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_PWREN, 1);@@ -332,15 +332,13 @@ static int
dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc)
dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_IDINTEN, 0);dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_BMOD, 1);-
fifo_size=dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH);
-fifo_size= ((fifo_size&RX_WMARK_MASK) >>RX_WMARK_SHIFT) + 1;
- if (host->fifoth_val) {
-fifoth_val=host->fifoth_val;
- } else {
-fifoth_val= MSIZE(0x2) |RX_WMARK(fifo_size / 2 - 1)|
+ if (!host->fifoth_val) {
+fifo_size=dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH);
+fifo_size= ((fifo_size&RX_WMARK_MASK) >>RX_WMARK_SHIFT) + 1;
+host->fifoth_val= MSIZE(0x2) |RX_WMARK(fifo_size / 2 - 1)|
TX_WMARK(fifo_size / 2);
}
-dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH, fifoth_val);
+dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH, host->fifoth_val);
dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_CLKENA, 0);
dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_CLKSRC, 0);
--
1.7.4.4
PATCH v2 1/1 MMC: DWMMC: Fix FIFO_DEPTH calculation
In reply to Rajeshwari ShindeQuoted 7 lines · Rajeshwari Shinde
Current DWMMC driver used to give FIFO underrun/overrun error every 3rd time for mmc rescan command.
In current codeFIFO_DEPTHis getting calculated after reading the default FIFOTH register and extracting theRX_WMARKbits from it i.e (RX_WMARK= FIFO_DEPTH/2 -1). Instead of storing the correct value, we were recalculating theFIFO_DEPTeach time which is not correct.
Quoted 8 lines
Based on "[PATCH V9 3/9] DWMMC: Initialise dwmci and resolve EMMC read write issues"
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/160247Signed-off-by Hatim Ali <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Rajeshwari Shinde <[email protected]>Acked-by Simon Glass <[email protected]>Tested-by Simon Glass <[email protected]>Acked-by Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>
Looks like the patch this is based on is already accepted, but not yet upstream, so I'm going to delegate the patch to Minkyu Kang
PATCH v2 1/1 MMC: DWMMC: Fix FIFO_DEPTH calculation
Quoted 17 lines · Andy Fleming
Quoted 7 lines · Rajeshwari Shinde
Current DWMMC driver used to give FIFO underrun/overrun error every 3rd time for mmc rescan command.
In current codeFIFO_DEPTHis getting calculated after reading the default FIFOTH register and extracting theRX_WMARKbits from it i.e (RX_WMARK= FIFO_DEPTH/2 -1). Instead of storing the correct value, we were recalculating theFIFO_DEPTeach time which is not correct.Quoted 8 lines
Based on "[PATCH V9 3/9] DWMMC: Initialise dwmci and resolve EMMC read write issues"
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/160247Signed-off-by Hatim Ali <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Rajeshwari Shinde <[email protected]>Acked-by Simon Glass <[email protected]>Tested-by Simon Glass <[email protected]>Acked-by Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines
Acked-by Andy Fleming <[email protected]>Looks like the patch this is based on is already accepted, but not yet upstream, so I'm going to delegate the patch to Minkyu Kang
applied to u-boot-samsung.
Thanks,
Minkyu Kang.