i2c-mv64xxx: Fixes and new feature for controlers embedded in Aramda XP
Subsystems (3)
v3 cover i2c-mv64xxx: Fixes and new feature for controlers embedded in Aramda XP
Hello,
this patch set adds support for the I2C Transaction Generator which offloads CPU from managing I2C transfer step by step. This feature is currently only available on the I2C controller IP embedded in the Armada XP SoC.
This series also contains a real fix for the I2C controller of the Armada XP SoC and a patch closer to an improvement than a fix.
The first three patches modify the driver itself and should go through i2c subsystem.
The last patch updates the device tree to be able to use this new feature and should go through mvebu subsystem.
Due to the recent changes in i2c-mv64xxx.c file, I based these patches on the for-next branch of the i2c git repository.
Thanks,
Change log:
v2->v3:
- Introduces a new compatible string mv78230-i2c which will be used for the fix and for the offload feature which are only present on the Armada XP SoCs
- Removes the unneeded spin_lock_irqsave pointed by Russell King
- The offload mechanism is now port of the fsm and handle the multiple messages.
- The flag bridge-enabled is renamed to offload_enabled, but the register name stills contains the BRIDGE word to match the datasheet.
- Uses writel_relaxed on the place pointed by Russell King
- Uses the bool type for the flag (pointed by Thomas Petazzoni)
- Removes useless code (pointed by Thomas Petazzoni)
- Updates the bindings documentation
v1->v2:
- Move the flag for the timing issue from global scope to per device scope
- Assignment is no more done in if condition
Gregory CLEMENT (4):
i2c-mv64xxx: Set bus frequency to 100kHz if clock-frequency is not
provided
i2c-mv64xxx: Add I2C Transaction Generator support
i2c-mv64xxx: Fix timing issue on Armada XP (errata FE-8471889)
ARM: dts: mvebu: Introduce a new compatible string for mv64xxx-i2c
.../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt | 19 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi | 2 - arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi | 8 + arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp.dtsi | 10 + drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++- 5 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.2
PATCH v3 1/4 i2c-mv64xxx: Set bus frequency to 100kHz if clock-frequency is not provided
This commit adds checking whether clock-frequency property acquisition has succeeded. If not, the frequency is set to 100kHz by default.
The Device Tree binding documentation is updated accordingly.
Based on the intials patches from Zbigniew Bodek
--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt | 6 +++++- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +5 -1
@@ -6,7 +6,11 @@ Required properties : - reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device - compatible : Should be "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" - interrupts : The interrupt number - - clock-frequency : Desired I2C bus clock frequency in Hz. + +Optional properties : + + - clock-frequency : Desired I2C bus clock frequency in Hz. If not set the +default frequency is 100kHz Examples:
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c +5 -1
@@ -578,7 +578,11 @@ mv64xxx_of_config(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data, goto out; } tclk =clk_get_rate (drv_data->clk); -of_property_read_u32 (np,"clock-frequency" , &bus_freq); + + rc =of_property_read_u32 (np,"clock-frequency" , &bus_freq); +if (rc) + bus_freq =100000 ;/* 100kHz by default */ +if (!mv64xxx_find_baud_factors (bus_freq, tclk, &drv_data->freq_n, &drv_data->freq_m)) { rc = -EINVAL ;
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.2
Wolfram Sang
AppliedPATCH v3 1/4 i2c-mv64xxx: Set bus frequency to 100kHz if clock-frequency is not provided
Quoted 9 lines · Gregory CLEMENT
This commit adds checking whether clock-frequency property acquisition has succeeded. If not, the frequency is set to 100kHz by default.
The Device Tree binding documentation is updated accordingly.
Based on the intials patches from Zbigniew Bodek
Signed-off-by Gregory CLEMENT <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Zbigniew Bodek <[email protected]>
Applied to for-next, thanks! Rest of the series is 3.12 material.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130625/707c68b3/attachment.sig>
PATCH v3 1/4 i2c-mv64xxx: Set bus frequency to 100kHz if clock-frequency is not provided
Quoted 11 lines · Wolfram Sang
Quoted 7 lines · Gregory CLEMENT
This commit adds checking whether clock-frequency property acquisition has succeeded. If not, the frequency is set to 100kHz by default.
The Device Tree binding documentation is updated accordingly.
Based on the intials patches from Zbigniew Bodek
Applied to for-next, thanks! Rest of the series is 3.12 material.
Thanks!
For the rest of the series, does it mean that you agree with it, or that you didn't review it yet?
Signature · 4 lines
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com
PATCH v3 1/4 i2c-mv64xxx: Set bus frequency to 100kHz if clock-frequency is not provided
Quoted 3 lines
For the rest of the series, does it mean that you agree with it, or that you didn't review it yet?
Didn't review. So, other people can still join in ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130626/19840cf2/attachment-0001.sig>
PATCH v3 2/4 i2c-mv64xxx: Add I2C Transaction Generator support
In reply to Gregory CLEMENTThe I2C Transaction Generator offloads CPU from managing I2C transfer step by step.
This feature is currently only available on Armada XP, so usage of this mechanism is activated through device tree.
Based on the work of Piotr Ziecik and rewrote to use the new way of handling multiples i2c messages.
--- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 196 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c +196 -11
@@ -55,6 +55,32 @@#define MV64XXX_I2C_STATUS_MAST_RD_ADDR_2_NO_ACK 0xe8#define MV64XXX_I2C_STATUS_NO_STATUS 0xf8 +/* Register defines (I2C bridge) */ +#define MV64XXX_I2C_REG_TX_DATA_LO 0xc0 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_REG_TX_DATA_HI 0xc4 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_REG_RX_DATA_LO 0xc8 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_REG_RX_DATA_HI 0xcc +#define MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_CONTROL 0xd0 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_STATUS 0xd4 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_INTR_CAUSE 0xd8 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_INTR_MASK 0xdC +#define MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_TIMING 0xe0 + +/* Bridge Control values */ +#define MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_WR 0x00000001 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_RD 0x00000002 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_ADDR_SHIFT 2 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_ADDR_EXT 0x00001000 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_TX_SIZE_SHIFT 13 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_RX_SIZE_SHIFT 16 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_ENABLE 0x00080000 + +/* Bridge Status values */ +#define MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_STATUS_ERROR 0x00000001 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_STATUS_OFFLOAD_ERROR 0xf0000001 +#define MV64XXX_I2C_STATUS_OFFLOAD_OK 0xf0000000 + +/* Driver states */ enum {MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_INVALID ,
@@ -71,14 +97,17 @@ enum {enum {MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_INVALID ,MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_CONTINUE , +MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_START ,MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START ,MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_RESTART , +MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_RESTART ,MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_ADDR_1 ,MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_ADDR_2 ,MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_DATA ,MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_RCV_DATA ,MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_RCV_DATA_STOP ,MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_STOP , +MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_STOP , };struct mv64xxx_i2c_regs {
@@ -117,6 +146,7 @@ struct mv64xxx_i2c_data {spinlock_t lock;struct i2c_msg *msg;struct i2c_adapter adapter; +bool offload_enabled; };static struct mv64xxx_i2c_regs mv64xxx_i2c_regs_mv64xxx = {
@@ -165,6 +195,79 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data, } } +static int mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg (struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data) +{ +unsigned long data_reg_hi =0 ; +unsigned long data_reg_lo =0 ; +unsigned long ctrl_reg; +unsigned int i; +struct i2c_msg *msg = drv_data->msgs; + + drv_data->msg = msg; + drv_data->byte_posn =0 ; + drv_data->bytes_left = msg->len; + drv_data->aborting =0 ; + drv_data->rc =0 ; +/* Only regular transactions can be offloaded */ +if ((msg->flags & ~(I2C_M_TEN |I2C_M_RD )) !=0 ) +return 1 ; + +/* Only 1-8 byte transfers can be offloaded */ +if (msg->len <1 || msg->len >8 ) +return 1 ; + +/* Build transaction */ + ctrl_reg =MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_ENABLE | + (msg->addr <<MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_ADDR_SHIFT ); + +if ((msg->flags &I2C_M_TEN ) !=0 ) + ctrl_reg |=MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_ADDR_EXT ; + +if ((msg->flags &I2C_M_RD ) ==0 ) { +for (i =0 ; i <4 && i < msg->len; i++) + data_reg_lo = data_reg_lo | + (msg->buf[i] << ((i &0x3 ) *8 )); + +for (i =4 ; i <8 && i < msg->len; i++) + data_reg_hi = data_reg_hi | + (msg->buf[i] << ((i &0x3 ) *8 )); + + ctrl_reg |=MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_WR | + (msg->len -1 ) <<MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_TX_SIZE_SHIFT ; + }else { + ctrl_reg |=MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_RD | + (msg->len -1 ) <<MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_CONTROL_RX_SIZE_SHIFT ; + } + +/* Execute transaction */ +writel_relaxed (data_reg_lo, + drv_data->reg_base +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_TX_DATA_LO ); +writel_relaxed (data_reg_hi, + drv_data->reg_base +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_TX_DATA_HI ); +writel (ctrl_reg, drv_data->reg_base +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_CONTROL ); + +return 0 ; +} + +static void +mv64xxx_i2c_update_offload_data (struct i2c_msg *msg,unsigned long data_reg_hi, +unsigned long data_reg_lo) +{ +int i; + +if ((msg->flags &I2C_M_RD ) !=0 ) { +for (i =0 ; i <4 && i < msg->len; i++) { + msg->buf[i] = data_reg_lo &0xFF ; + data_reg_lo >>=8 ; + } + +for (i =4 ; i <8 && i < msg->len; i++) { + msg->buf[i] = data_reg_hi &0xFF ; + data_reg_hi >>=8 ; + } + } + +}/* ***************************************************************************** *
@@ -177,6 +280,15 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data,static void mv64xxx_i2c_hw_init (struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data) { +if (drv_data->offload_enabled) { +writel (0 , drv_data->reg_base +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_CONTROL ); +writel (0 , drv_data->reg_base +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_TIMING ); +writel (0 , drv_data->reg_base + +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_INTR_CAUSE ); +writel (0 , drv_data->reg_base + +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_INTR_MASK ); + } +writel (0 , drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.soft_reset);writel (MV64XXX_I2C_BAUD_DIV_M (drv_data->freq_m) |MV64XXX_I2C_BAUD_DIV_N (drv_data->freq_n), drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.clock);
@@ -283,6 +395,16 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_fsm(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data, u32 status) drv_data->rc = -ENODEV ;break ; +case MV64XXX_I2C_STATUS_OFFLOAD_OK : +if (drv_data->send_stop || drv_data->aborting) { + drv_data->action =MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_STOP ; + drv_data->state =MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_IDLE ; + }else { + drv_data->action =MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_RESTART ; + drv_data->state =MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_RESTART ; + } +break ; +default :dev_err (&drv_data->adapter.dev, "mv64xxx_i2c_fsm: Ctlr Error -- state: 0x%x, "
@@ -298,21 +420,36 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_fsm(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data, u32 status)static void mv64xxx_i2c_do_action (struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data) { +unsigned long data_reg_hi =0 ; +unsigned long data_reg_lo =0 ; +switch (drv_data->action) { +case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_RESTART : + data_reg_lo =readl (drv_data->reg_base + +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_RX_DATA_LO ); + data_reg_hi =readl (drv_data->reg_base + +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_RX_DATA_HI ); +mv64xxx_i2c_update_offload_data (drv_data->msg, data_reg_hi, + data_reg_lo); +writel (0 , drv_data->reg_base +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_CONTROL ); +writel (0 , drv_data->reg_base + +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_INTR_CAUSE ); +/* FALLTHRU */ case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_RESTART :/* We should only get here if we have further messages */ BUG_ON (drv_data->num_msgs ==0 ); - drv_data->cntl_bits |=MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START ; -writel (drv_data->cntl_bits, - drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control); - drv_data->msgs++; drv_data->num_msgs--; +if (!(drv_data->offload_enabled && +mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg (drv_data))) { + drv_data->cntl_bits |=MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START ; +writel (drv_data->cntl_bits, + drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control); -/* Setup for the next message */ -mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io (drv_data, drv_data->msgs); - +/* Setup for the next message */ +mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io (drv_data, drv_data->msgs); + }/* * We're never at the start of the message here, and by this * time it's already too late to do any protocol mangling.
@@ -326,6 +463,12 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data) drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);break ; +case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_START : +if (mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg (drv_data) <=0 ) +break ; +else + drv_data->action =MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START ; +/* FALLTHRU */ case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START :writel (drv_data->cntl_bits |MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START , drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
@@ -375,6 +518,7 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data)"mv64xxx_i2c_do_action: Invalid action: %d\n" , drv_data->action); drv_data->rc = -EIO ; +/* FALLTHRU */ case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_STOP : drv_data->cntl_bits &= ~MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_INTEN ;
@@ -383,6 +527,20 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data) drv_data->block =0 ;wake_up (&drv_data->waitq);break ; + +case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_STOP : + data_reg_lo =readl (drv_data->reg_base + +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_RX_DATA_LO ); + data_reg_hi =readl (drv_data->reg_base + +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_RX_DATA_HI ); +mv64xxx_i2c_update_offload_data (drv_data->msg, data_reg_hi, + data_reg_lo); +writel (0 , drv_data->reg_base +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_CONTROL ); +writel (0 , drv_data->reg_base + +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_INTR_CAUSE ); + drv_data->block =0 ; +wake_up (&drv_data->waitq); +break ; } }
@@ -395,6 +553,21 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_intr(int irq, void *dev_id)irqreturn_t rc =IRQ_NONE ;spin_lock_irqsave (&drv_data->lock, flags); + +if (drv_data->offload_enabled) { +while (readl (drv_data->reg_base + +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_INTR_CAUSE )) { +int reg_status =readl (drv_data->reg_base + +MV64XXX_I2C_REG_BRIDGE_STATUS ); +if (reg_status &MV64XXX_I2C_BRIDGE_STATUS_ERROR ) + status =MV64XXX_I2C_STATUS_OFFLOAD_ERROR ; +else + status =MV64XXX_I2C_STATUS_OFFLOAD_OK ; +mv64xxx_i2c_fsm (drv_data, status); +mv64xxx_i2c_do_action (drv_data); + rc =IRQ_HANDLED ; + } + }while (readl (drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control) &MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_IFLG ) { status =readl (drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.status);
@@ -459,11 +632,15 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_execute_msg(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data, struct i2c_msg *msg,unsigned long flags;spin_lock_irqsave (&drv_data->lock, flags); -mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io (drv_data, msg); - - drv_data->action =MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START ; - drv_data->state =MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND ; +if (drv_data->offload_enabled) { + drv_data->action =MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_START ; + drv_data->state =MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND ; + }else { +mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io (drv_data, msg); + drv_data->action =MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START ; + drv_data->state =MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND ; + } drv_data->send_stop = is_last; drv_data->block =1 ;mv64xxx_i2c_do_action (drv_data);
@@ -601,6 +778,13 @@ mv64xxx_of_config(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data,memcpy (&drv_data->reg_offsets, device->data,sizeof (drv_data->reg_offsets)); +/* +* For controllers embedded in new SoCs activate the +* Transaction Generator support. +*/ +if (of_device_is_compatible (np,"marvell,mv78230-i2c" )) + drv_data->offload_enabled = true; + out:return rc;#endif
@@ -654,6 +838,7 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pd) drv_data->freq_n = pdata->freq_n; drv_data->irq =platform_get_irq (pd,0 ); drv_data->adapter.timeout =msecs_to_jiffies (pdata->timeout); + drv_data->offload_enabled =0 ;memcpy (&drv_data->reg_offsets, &mv64xxx_i2c_regs_mv64xxx,sizeof (drv_data->reg_offsets)); }else if (pd->dev.of_node) { rc =mv64xxx_of_config (drv_data, &pd->dev);
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.2
PATCH v3 3/4 i2c-mv64xxx: Fix timing issue on Armada XP (errata FE-8471889)
In reply to Gregory CLEMENTAll the Armada XP (mv78230, mv78260 and mv78460) have a silicon issue in the I2C controller which violate the i2c repeated start timing. The I2C standard requires a minimum of 4.7us for the repeated start condition whereas the I2C controller of the Armada XP this time is 2.9us.
So this patch adds a 5us delay for the start case only if the the compatible i2c-mv78230 is set.
Based on the initals patches from Zbigniew Bodek
--- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c +13 -2
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@#include <linux/of_i2c.h> #include <linux/clk.h> #include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> #define MV64XXX_I2C_ADDR_ADDR (val) ((val & 0x7f) << 1)#define MV64XXX_I2C_BAUD_DIV_N (val) (val & 0x7)
@@ -147,6 +148,8 @@ struct mv64xxx_i2c_data {struct i2c_msg *msg;struct i2c_adapter adapter;bool offload_enabled; +/* 5us delay in order to avoid repeated start timing violation */ +bool errata_delay; };static struct mv64xxx_i2c_regs mv64xxx_i2c_regs_mv64xxx = {
@@ -450,6 +453,9 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data)/* Setup for the next message */ mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io (drv_data, drv_data->msgs); } +if (drv_data->errata_delay) +udelay (5 ); +/* * We're never at the start of the message here, and by this * time it's already too late to do any protocol mangling.
@@ -509,6 +515,9 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data)writel (drv_data->cntl_bits |MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_STOP , drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control); drv_data->block =0 ; +if (drv_data->errata_delay) +udelay (5 ); +wake_up (&drv_data->waitq);break ;
@@ -780,10 +789,12 @@ mv64xxx_of_config(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data,/* * For controllers embedded in new SoCs activate the -* Transaction Generator support. +* Transaction Generator support and the errata fix. */ -if (of_device_is_compatible (np,"marvell,mv78230-i2c" )) +if (of_device_is_compatible (np,"marvell,mv78230-i2c" )) { drv_data->offload_enabled = true; + drv_data->errata_delay = true; + } out:return rc;
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.2
PATCH v3 4/4 ARM: dts: mvebu: Introduce a new compatible string for mv64xxx-i2c
In reply to Gregory CLEMENTThe mv64xxx-i2c embedded in the Armada XP have a new feature to offload i2c transaction. This new version of the IP come also with some errata. This lead to the introduction to a another compatible string.
This commit split the i2c information into armada-370.dtsi and armada-xp.dtsi. Most of the data remains the same and stay in the common file Armada-370-xp.dtsi. With this new feature the size of the registers are bigger for Armada XP and the new compatible string is used.
The Device Tree binding documentation is updated accordingly.
--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt | 13 ++++++++++++- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi | 2 -- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +12 -1
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ Required properties : - reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device - - compatible : Should be "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" + - compatible : Should be "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" and "marvell,mv7230-i2c" +for controller which support the I2C Transaction Generator - interrupts : The interrupt number Optional properties :
@@ -20,3 +21,13 @@ Examples: interrupts = <29>; clock-frequency = <100000>; }; + +For a controller which support the I2C Transaction Generator: + + i2c at 11000 { + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c", "marvell,mv78230-i2c"; + reg = <0x11000 0x100>; + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c"; + interrupts = <29>; + clock-frequency = <100000>; + };
arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi +0 -2
@@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ i2c0: i2c at 11000 { compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c"; - reg = <0x11000 0x20>; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; interrupts = <31>;
@@ -123,7 +122,6 @@ i2c1: i2c at 11100 { compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c"; - reg = <0x11100 0x20>; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; interrupts = <32>;
arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi +8 -0
@@ -155,6 +155,14 @@ }; }; + i2c0: i2c at 11000 { + reg = <0x11000 0x20>; + }; + + i2c1: i2c at 11100 { + reg = <0x11100 0x20>; + }; + usb at 50000 { clocks = <&coreclk 0>; };
arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp.dtsi +10 -0
@@ -134,6 +134,16 @@ }; }; + i2c0: i2c at 11000 { + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c", "marvell,mv78230-i2c"; + reg = <0x11000 0x100>; + }; + + i2c1: i2c at 11100 { + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c", "marvell,mv78230-i2c"; + reg = <0x11100 0x100>; + }; + usb at 50000 { clocks = <&gateclk 18>; };
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.2
PATCH v3 4/4 ARM: dts: mvebu: Introduce a new compatible string for mv64xxx-i2c
Quoted 36 lines · Gregory CLEMENT
The mv64xxx-i2c embedded in the Armada XP have a new feature to offload i2c transaction. This new version of the IP come also with some errata. This lead to the introduction to a another compatible string.
This commit split the i2c information into
armada-370.dtsiandarmada-xp.dtsi. Most of the data remains the same and stay in the common fileArmada-370-xp.dtsi. With this new feature the size of the registers are bigger for Armada XP and the new compatible string is used.The Device Tree binding documentation is updated accordingly.
Signed-off-by Gregory CLEMENT <[email protected]>--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt | 13 ++++++++++++- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi | 2 -- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +2
-1@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ Required properties : - reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device - - compatible : Should be "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" + - compatible : Should be "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" and "marvell,mv7230-i2c" +for controller which support the I2C Transaction Generator - interrupts : The interrupt number Optional properties :
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt Examples: · line 30
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +7
-0@@ -20,3 +21,13 @@ Examples: interrupts = <29>; clock-frequency = <100000>; }; + +For a controller which support the I2C Transaction Generator: + + i2c at 11000 { + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c", "marvell,mv78230-i2c"; + reg = <0x11000 0x100>; + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c";
extra compatible line. If there's nothing else, I'll fix this up when I pull it in.
thx,
Jason.
Quoted 66 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +3
-0+ interrupts = <29>; + clock-frequency = <100000>; + };arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi +0
-2@@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ i2c0: i2c at 11000 { compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c"; - reg = <0x11000 0x20>; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; interrupts = <31>;@@ -123,7 +122,6 @@ i2c1: i2c at 11100 { compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c"; - reg = <0x11100 0x20>; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; interrupts = <32>;arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi +8
-0@@ -155,6 +155,14 @@ }; }; + i2c0: i2c at 11000 { + reg = <0x11000 0x20>; + }; + + i2c1: i2c at 11100 { + reg = <0x11100 0x20>; + }; + usb at 50000 { clocks = <&coreclk 0>; };arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp.dtsi +10
-0@@ -134,6 +134,16 @@ }; }; + i2c0: i2c at 11000 { + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c", "marvell,mv78230-i2c"; + reg = <0x11000 0x100>; + }; + + i2c1: i2c at 11100 { + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c", "marvell,mv78230-i2c"; + reg = <0x11100 0x100>; + }; + usb at 50000 { clocks = <&gateclk 18>; };Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.2
PATCH v3 4/4 ARM: dts: mvebu: Introduce a new compatible string for mv64xxx-i2c
Quoted 29 lines · Jason Cooper
Quoted 28 lines · Gregory CLEMENT
The mv64xxx-i2c embedded in the Armada XP have a new feature to offload i2c transaction. This new version of the IP come also with some errata. This lead to the introduction to a another compatible string.
This commit split the i2c information into
armada-370.dtsiandarmada-xp.dtsi. Most of the data remains the same and stay in the common fileArmada-370-xp.dtsi. With this new feature the size of the registers are bigger for Armada XP and the new compatible string is used.The Device Tree binding documentation is updated accordingly.
Signed-off-by Gregory CLEMENT <[email protected]>--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt | 13 ++++++++++++- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi | 2 -- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +0
-0@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ Required properties :
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt line 8
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +2
-1- reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device - - compatible : Should be "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" + - compatible : Should be "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" and "marvell,mv7230-i2c" +for controller which support the I2C Transaction Generator
Jason, Gregory,
Also, s/mv7230/mv78230/
from a quick check of the patch set (which you forgot to send to LKML) I am wondering why you didn't update the of matches struct with the new compatible for "marvell,mv78230-i2c"? This will save you from still having "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" as additional compatible to match device and driver. With that the above should also be s/and/or/.
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +0
-0- interrupts : The interrupt number Optional properties :Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt Examples: · line 30
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +7
-0@@ -20,3 +21,13 @@ Examples: interrupts = <29>; clock-frequency = <100000>; }; + +For a controller which support the I2C Transaction Generator: + + i2c at 11000 { + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c", "marvell,mv78230-i2c"; + reg = <0x11000 0x100>; + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c";extra compatible line. If there's nothing else, I'll fix this up when I pull it in.
PATCH v3 4/4 ARM: dts: mvebu: Introduce a new compatible string for mv64xxx-i2c
Quoted 30 lines · Sebastian Hesselbarth
Quoted 29 lines · Jason Cooper
Quoted 28 lines · Gregory CLEMENT
The mv64xxx-i2c embedded in the Armada XP have a new feature to offload i2c transaction. This new version of the IP come also with some errata. This lead to the introduction to a another compatible string.
This commit split the i2c information into
armada-370.dtsiandarmada-xp.dtsi. Most of the data remains the same and stay in the common fileArmada-370-xp.dtsi. With this new feature the size of the registers are bigger for Armada XP and the new compatible string is used.The Device Tree binding documentation is updated accordingly.
Signed-off-by Gregory CLEMENT <[email protected]>--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt | 13 ++++++++++++- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi | 2 -- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +0
-0@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ Required properties :
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt line 8
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +2
-1- reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device - - compatible : Should be "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" + - compatible : Should be "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" and "marvell,mv7230-i2c" +for controller which support the I2C Transaction GeneratorJason, Gregory,
Also, s/mv7230/mv78230/
You are right, thanks for both of you to notice it.
Quoted 8 lines
from a quick check of the patch set (which you forgot to send to LKML) I am wondering why you didn't update the of matches struct with the new compatible for "marvell,mv78230-i2c"? This will save you from still having "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" as additional compatible to match device and driver. With that the above should also be s/and/or/.
From my point of view it is more an extension than an other kind of controller like
the one embedded in the AllWinner SoCs. So I thought it was more in the spirit of the way you describe hardware in the device tree, but I am far for being an expert so I maybe wrong.
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +0
-0- interrupts : The interrupt number Optional properties :Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt Examples: · line 30
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +7
-0@@ -20,3 +21,13 @@ Examples: interrupts = <29>; clock-frequency = <100000>; }; + +For a controller which support the I2C Transaction Generator: + + i2c at 11000 { + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c", "marvell,mv78230-i2c"; + reg = <0x11000 0x100>; + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c";extra compatible line. If there's nothing else, I'll fix this up when I pull it in.
Signature · 4 lines
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com
PATCH v3 4/4 ARM: dts: mvebu: Introduce a new compatible string for mv64xxx-i2c
In reply to Sebastian HesselbarthQuoted 30 lines · Sebastian Hesselbarth
Quoted 29 lines · Jason Cooper
Quoted 28 lines · Gregory CLEMENT
The mv64xxx-i2c embedded in the Armada XP have a new feature to offload i2c transaction. This new version of the IP come also with some errata. This lead to the introduction to a another compatible string.
This commit split the i2c information into
armada-370.dtsiandarmada-xp.dtsi. Most of the data remains the same and stay in the common fileArmada-370-xp.dtsi. With this new feature the size of the registers are bigger for Armada XP and the new compatible string is used.The Device Tree binding documentation is updated accordingly.
Signed-off-by Gregory CLEMENT <[email protected]>--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt | 13 ++++++++++++- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi | 2 -- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +0
-0@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ Required properties :
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt line 8
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +2
-1- reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device - - compatible : Should be "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" + - compatible : Should be "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" and "marvell,mv7230-i2c" +for controller which support the I2C Transaction GeneratorJason, Gregory,
Also, s/mv7230/mv78230/
noted.
Quoted 5 lines
from a quick check of the patch set (which you forgot to send to LKML) I am wondering why you didn't update the of matches struct with the new compatible for "marvell,mv78230-i2c"? This will save you from still having "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" as additional compatible to match device and driver. With that the above should also be s/and/or/.
agreed, good point.
Gregory,
I'm sending the last PRs for mvebu today. I'll include this one with my suggestion and Sebastian's if you're ok with it. That means you'll have to respin the series for the i2c folks. Does that work for you?
thx,
Jason.
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +0
-0- interrupts : The interrupt number Optional properties :Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt Examples: · line 30
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt +7
-0@@ -20,3 +21,13 @@ Examples: interrupts = <29>; clock-frequency = <100000>; }; + +For a controller which support the I2C Transaction Generator: + + i2c at 11000 { + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c", "marvell,mv78230-i2c"; + reg = <0x11000 0x100>; + compatible = "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c";extra compatible line. If there's nothing else, I'll fix this up when I pull it in.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
PATCH v3 4/4 ARM: dts: mvebu: Introduce a new compatible string for mv64xxx-i2c
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
from a quick check of the patch set (which you forgot to send to LKML) I am wondering why you didn't update the of matches struct with the new compatible for "marvell,mv78230-i2c"? This will save you from still having "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" as additional compatible to match device and driver. With that the above should also be s/and/or/.
Quoted 7 lines
agreed, good point.
Gregory,
I'm sending the last PRs for mvebu today. I'll include this one with my suggestion and Sebastian's if you're ok with it. That means you'll have to respin the series for the i2c folks. Does that work for you?
No hurry, please. Most of the patches are 3.12 material anyhow, so we can as well just wait until the I2C patches are okay and then update the dts later.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130621/0fc4b799/attachment.sig>
PATCH v3 4/4 ARM: dts: mvebu: Introduce a new compatible string for mv64xxx-i2c
Quoted 11 lines · Wolfram Sang
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 6 lines
from a quick check of the patch set (which you forgot to send to LKML) I am wondering why you didn't update the of matches struct with the new compatible for "marvell,mv78230-i2c"? This will save you from still having "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" as additional compatible to match device and driver. With that the above should also be s/and/or/.
agreed, good point.
Gregory,
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I'm sending the last PRs for mvebu today. I'll include this one with my suggestion and Sebastian's if you're ok with it. That means you'll have to respin the series for the i2c folks. Does that work for you?
No hurry, please. Most of the patches are 3.12 material anyhow, so we can as well just wait until the I2C patches are okay and then update the dts later.
Ok, thanks for the heads up. I'll put this in my v3.12 stack.
thx,
Jason.
PATCH v3 4/4 ARM: dts: mvebu: Introduce a new compatible string for mv64xxx-i2c
In reply to Sebastian HesselbarthQuoted 5 lines · Sebastian Hesselbarth
from a quick check of the patch set (which you forgot to send to LKML) I am wondering why you didn't update the of matches struct with the new compatible for "marvell,mv78230-i2c"? This will save you from still having "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" as additional compatible to match device and driver. With that the above should also be s/and/or/.
Agree, I noticed the same things.
Alos, the compatible string should be:
compatible = "marvell,mv78230-i2c", "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c";
(note the order reversal, most specific is first)
and I think it is better to use the 'data' field of of_device_id than a of_is_compatible call. The former is sensitive to order of the compatible string, the latter is not.
Jason
PATCH v3 4/4 ARM: dts: mvebu: Introduce a new compatible string for mv64xxx-i2c
Quoted 7 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 5 lines · Sebastian Hesselbarth
from a quick check of the patch set (which you forgot to send to LKML) I am wondering why you didn't update the of matches struct with the new compatible for "marvell,mv78230-i2c"? This will save you from still having "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" as additional compatible to match device and driver. With that the above should also be s/and/or/.
Quoted 7 lines
Agree, I noticed the same things.
Alos, the compatible string should be:
compatible = "marvell,mv78230-i2c", "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c";(note the order reversal, most specific is first)
Actually, I suggest to use "marvell,mv78230-i2c" alone. With a new entry in the match table it will be sufficient for matching driver and device. BTW, is mv78230 sufficient to match all SoC variants having this feature? Maybe mv78xx0 but that could interfere with Discovery Innovation or even better armada-xp-i2c (or armada-370-i2c)?
Quoted 3 lines
and I think it is better to use the 'data' field of
of_device_idthan aof_is_compatiblecall. The former is sensitive to order of the compatible string, the latter is not.
IMHO as long as there is only one compatible and only a bool to set, using of_device_is_compatible without data pointer is fine here. IIRC sunxi i2c isn't using data pointer the different register offset struct, so we shouldn't for a simple bool. And casting a bool to (void *) looks awkward.
Sebastian
PATCH v3 4/4 ARM: dts: mvebu: Introduce a new compatible string for mv64xxx-i2c
Quoted 10 lines · Sebastian Hesselbarth
Quoted 9 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 5 lines · Sebastian Hesselbarth
from a quick check of the patch set (which you forgot to send to LKML) I am wondering why you didn't update the of matches struct with the new compatible for "marvell,mv78230-i2c"? This will save you from still having "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" as additional compatible to match device and driver. With that the above should also be s/and/or/.
Agree, I noticed the same things.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Alos, the compatible string should be:
compatible = "marvell,mv78230-i2c", "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c";(note the order reversal, most specific is first)
Actually, I suggest to use "marvell,mv78230-i2c" alone. With a new entry in the match table it will be sufficient for matching driver and
I would prefer using a specialization rather than a new entry, so I can just use the "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" entry for the data pointer .
Quoted 3 lines
device. BTW, is mv78230 sufficient to match all SoC variants having this feature? Maybe mv78xx0 but that could interfere with Discovery Innovation or even better armada-xp-i2c (or armada-370-i2c)?
I am pretty sure that the convention in the device tree is to always use specific product numbers, rather than wildcards. So, here, the choice of mv78230 was just that we can see the mv78260 and mv78460 as extension of the mv78230, so I chose the smallest common denominator.
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 4 lines
and I think it is better to use the 'data' field of
of_device_idthan aof_is_compatiblecall. The former is sensitive to order of the compatible string, the latter is not.IMHO as long as there is only one compatible and only a bool to set, using
of_device_is_compatiblewithout data pointer is fine here. IIRC sunxi i2c isn't using data pointer the different register offset struct, so we shouldn't for a simple bool. And casting a bool to (void *) looks awkward.Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 4 lines
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com