Skip to contentSkip to conversation

package/libmicrohttpd: minor fixes and additions

PATCH New Carsten Schoenert 2 participants 4 messages Jun 25, 2013 – Jun 26, 2013

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 package/libmicrohttpd: minor fixes and additions

From: Carsten Schoenert <[email protected]>

Correcting the indentation inside Config.in. Also adding the missed license information.

Note: libmicrohttpd is partialy dual licensed, if you don't need or want to use the HTTPS option you can choose between LPGLv2.1 and the eCos license (http://ecos.sourceware.org/license-overview.html).
If you use the HTTPS option you have to agree to the LGPLv2.1!

---
 package/libmicrohttpd/Config.in        |   14 +++++++-------
 package/libmicrohttpd/libmicrohttpd.mk |    5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
package/libmicrohttpd/Config.in +7 -7
index 2e4de0f..5c20ba6 100644
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBMICROHTTPD
 	  http://www.gnu.org/software/libmicrohttpd/
 
 config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBMICROHTTPD_SSL
-       bool "https support"
-       depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LIBMICROHTTPD
-       depends on BR2_USE_WCHAR
-       select BR2_PACKAGE_GNUTLS
-       select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGCRYPT
-       help
-         Enable HTTPS (SSL) support.
+	bool "https support"
+	depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LIBMICROHTTPD
+	depends on BR2_USE_WCHAR
+	select BR2_PACKAGE_GNUTLS
+	select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGCRYPT
+	help
+	  Enable HTTPS (SSL) support.
 
 comment "libmicrohttpd needs a toolchain with thread support"
 	depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS
package/libmicrohttpd/libmicrohttpd.mk +4 -1
index 697cbf5..40ef197 100644
@@ -6,12 +6,15 @@
 
 LIBMICROHTTPD_VERSION = 0.9.27
 LIBMICROHTTPD_SITE = $(BR2_GNU_MIRROR)/libmicrohttpd
+LIBMICROHTTPD_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 eCos
+LIBMICROHTTPD_LICENSE_FILE = COPYING
 LIBMICROHTTPD_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
 
 ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_LIBMICROHTTPD_SSL),y)
 LIBMICROHTTPD_DEPENDENCIES += gnutls libgcrypt
 LIBMICROHTTPD_CONF_OPT += --enable-https --with-gnutls=$(STAGING_DIR)/usr \
-			  --with-libgcrypt-prefix=$(STAGING_DIR)/usr
+						  --with-libgcrypt-prefix=$(STAGING_DIR)/usr
+LIBMICROHTTPD_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1
 else
 LIBMICROHTTPD_CONF_OPT += --disable-https
 endif
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 package/libmicrohttpd: minor fixes and additions

Quoted 46 lines · Carsten Schoenert

From: Carsten Schoenert <[email protected]>

Correcting the indentation inside Config.in. Also adding the missed license information.

Note: libmicrohttpd is partialy dual licensed, if you don't need or want to use the HTTPS option you can choose between LPGLv2.1 and the eCos license (http://ecos.sourceware.org/license-overview.html).
If you use the HTTPS option you have to agree to the LGPLv2.1!

---
  package/libmicrohttpd/Config.in        |   14 +++++++-------
  package/libmicrohttpd/libmicrohttpd.mk |    5 ++++-
  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
package/libmicrohttpd/Config.in +7 -7
index 2e4de0f..5c20ba6 100644
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBMICROHTTPD
  	  http://www.gnu.org/software/libmicrohttpd/
 
  config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBMICROHTTPD_SSL
-       bool "https support"
-       depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LIBMICROHTTPD
-       depends on BR2_USE_WCHAR
-       select BR2_PACKAGE_GNUTLS
-       select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGCRYPT
-       help
-         Enable HTTPS (SSL) support.
+	bool "https support"
+	depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LIBMICROHTTPD
+	depends on BR2_USE_WCHAR
+	select BR2_PACKAGE_GNUTLS
+	select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGCRYPT
+	help
+	  Enable HTTPS (SSL) support.
 
  comment "libmicrohttpd needs a toolchain with thread support"
  	depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS
package/libmicrohttpd/libmicrohttpd.mk +0 -0
index 697cbf5..40ef197 100644

package/libmicrohttpd/libmicrohttpd.mk line 9

Quoted 4 lines
package/libmicrohttpd/libmicrohttpd.mk +1 -0
@@ -6,12 +6,15 @@
 
  LIBMICROHTTPD_VERSION = 0.9.27
  LIBMICROHTTPD_SITE = $(BR2_GNU_MIRROR)/libmicrohttpd
+LIBMICROHTTPD_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 eCos

Quick check tells me it's LGPLv2.1+

I would write "LGPLv2.1+ or eCos license" to make the choice more
explicit, else it looks as if both licenses apply.

package/libmicrohttpd/libmicrohttpd.mk line 17

Quoted 9 lines
package/libmicrohttpd/libmicrohttpd.mk +3 -1
+LIBMICROHTTPD_LICENSE_FILE = COPYING
  LIBMICROHTTPD_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
 
  ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_LIBMICROHTTPD_SSL),y)
  LIBMICROHTTPD_DEPENDENCIES += gnutls libgcrypt
  LIBMICROHTTPD_CONF_OPT += --enable-https --with-gnutls=$(STAGING_DIR)/usr \
-			  --with-libgcrypt-prefix=$(STAGING_DIR)/usr
+						  --with-libgcrypt-prefix=$(STAGING_DIR)/usr
+LIBMICROHTTPD_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1

We would typically put the LGPLv2.1 or eCos option in the else branch
of the condition, rather than overwriting it.

Regards,
Arnout

Quoted 4 lines
package/libmicrohttpd/libmicrohttpd.mk +0 -0
  else
  LIBMICROHTTPD_CONF_OPT += --disable-https
  endif
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 package/libmicrohttpd: minor fixes and additions

Hello Arnout,

Am 25.06.2013 23:25, schrieb Arnout Vandecappelle:

Quoted 1 line

Quick check tells me it's LGPLv2.1+

Ah, yes. I just looked into COPYING. Will correct.

Quoted 2 lines

I would write "LGPLv2.1+ or eCos license" to make the choice more
explicit, else it looks as if both licenses apply.

Also true. Agreed.

Quoted 2 lines

We would typically put the LGPLv2.1 or eCos option in the else branch
of the condition, rather than overwriting it.

I was thinking about that, but decided to the kind I made the patch. I prepare a new patch and will resend.

Regards
Carsten

#3 lore raw

[Buildroot] Update documentation [was] Re: [PATCH] package/libmicrohttpd: minor fixes and additions

In reply to Arnout Vandecappelle

Hello again,

Am 25.06.2013 23:25, schrieb Arnout Vandecappelle:

Quoted 2 lines

I would write "LGPLv2.1+ or eCos license" to make the choice more
explicit, else it looks as if both licenses apply.

I have a take a look into the documenation and this part is missing that kind of info. I have tried to wrote some informative, what do you think?

Quoted 19 lines
docs/manual/adding-packages-generic.txt +11 -0
index faf70b1..f31e069 100644
@@ -328,6 +328,24 @@ information is (assuming the package name is +libfoo+) :
   ambiguous names such as +BSD+ which actually name a family of licenses.
   This variable is optional. If it is not defined, +unknown+ will appear in
   the +license+ field of the manifest file for this package.
+  If the package is licensed with more than one license just write all
+  licenses into that line and make clear how the usage of the licenses are
+  interact.
+
+For example the package could licensed under LGPLv2.1+ or MIT:
+
+---------------------------------
+LIBFOO_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1+ or MIT
+---------------------------------
+
+Some packages may need two licenses at the same time, that would be the

docs/manual/adding-packages-generic.txt information is (assuming the package name is +libfoo+) : · line 351

Quoted 10 lines
docs/manual/adding-packages-generic.txt +7 -0
+opposite of the above example. Then you have to combine the two licenses
+(don't forget to check if there are two, or more, fields in
++LIBFOO_LICENSE_FILES+ needed):
+
+--------------------------------------
+LIBFOO_LICENSE = Special1 and Special2
+--------------------------------------
 
 * +LIBFOO_LICENSE_FILES+ is a space-separated list of files in the package
   tarball that contain the license(s) under which the package is released.

Regards
Carsten