spi: spi-ep93xx: remove bits_per_word() helper
PATCH 4/8 spi: spi-ep93xx: remove bits_per_word() helper
This inline helper function is only used to determine the bus width of the current transfer (8 or 16 bit). Add a bool flag to the private structure and set it appropriately for each transfer.
--- drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 16 +++++----------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c +5 -11
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {unsigned long min_rate;unsigned long max_rate;bool running; +bool word_xfer;struct workqueue_struct *wq;struct work_struct msg_work;struct completion wait;
@@ -407,17 +408,9 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,writew (cr0, espi->regs_base +SSPCR0 ); } -static inline int bits_per_word (const struct ep93xx_spi *espi) -{ -struct spi_message *msg = espi->current_msg; -struct spi_transfer *t = msg->state; - -return t->bits_per_word; -} -static void ep93xx_do_write (struct ep93xx_spi *espi,struct spi_transfer *t) { -if (bits_per_word (espi) >8 ) { +if (espi->word_xfer) {u16 tx_val =0 ;if (t->tx_buf)
@@ -436,7 +429,7 @@ static void ep93xx_do_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)static void ep93xx_do_read (struct ep93xx_spi *espi,struct spi_transfer *t) { -if (bits_per_word (espi) >8 ) { +if (espi->word_xfer) {u16 rx_val; rx_val =readw (espi->regs_base +SSPDR );
@@ -522,7 +515,7 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)size_t len = t->len;int i, ret, nents; -if (bits_per_word (espi) >8 ) +if (espi->word_xfer) buswidth =DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES ;else buswidth =DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE ;
@@ -699,6 +692,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,ep93xx_spi_chip_setup (espi, chip); + espi->word_xfer = (t->bits_per_word >8 ) ? true : false; espi->rx =0 ; espi->tx =0 ;
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.4
Quoted 18 lines · H Hartley Sweeten
This inline helper function is only used to determine the bus width of the current transfer (8 or 16 bit). Add a bool flag to the private structure and set it appropriately for each transfer.
Signed-off-by H Hartley Sweeten <[email protected]>Cc Ryan Mallon <[email protected]>Cc Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>Cc Mark Brown <[email protected]>Cc Grant Likely <[email protected]>--- drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 16 +++++----------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c +0
-0
drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c struct ep93xx_spi { · line 119
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c +1
-0@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {unsigned long min_rate;unsigned long max_rate;bool running; +bool word_xfer;
I think this is a slightly confusing name. Maybe something like is_16bit_xfer would be better?
Quoted 41 lines
drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c +3
-11struct workqueue_struct *wq;struct work_struct msg_work;struct completion wait;@@ -407,17 +408,9 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,writew (cr0, espi->regs_base +SSPCR0 ); } -static inline int bits_per_word (const struct ep93xx_spi *espi) -{ -struct spi_message *msg = espi->current_msg; -struct spi_transfer *t = msg->state; - -return t->bits_per_word; -} -static void ep93xx_do_write (struct ep93xx_spi *espi,struct spi_transfer *t) { -if (bits_per_word (espi) >8 ) { +if (espi->word_xfer) {u16 tx_val =0 ;if (t->tx_buf)@@ -436,7 +429,7 @@ static void ep93xx_do_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)static void ep93xx_do_read (struct ep93xx_spi *espi,struct spi_transfer *t) { -if (bits_per_word (espi) >8 ) { +if (espi->word_xfer) {u16 rx_val; rx_val =readw (espi->regs_base +SSPDR );@@ -522,7 +515,7 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)size_t len = t->len;int i, ret, nents; -if (bits_per_word (espi) >8 ) +if (espi->word_xfer) buswidth =DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES ;else buswidth =DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE ;
drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, · line 695
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c +1
-0@@ -699,6 +692,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,ep93xx_spi_chip_setup (espi, chip); + espi->word_xfer = (t->bits_per_word >8 ) ? true : false;
espi->word_xfer = (t->bits_per_word > 8);
This patch is fine, but not sure it is entirely worth it. The information is already stored in t->bits_per_word and the cost of retrieving it is pretty minimal.
~Ryan
Quoted 71 lines · Ryan Mallon
Quoted 18 lines · H Hartley Sweeten
This inline helper function is only used to determine the bus width of the current transfer (8 or 16 bit). Add a bool flag to the private structure and set it appropriately for each transfer.
Signed-off-by H Hartley Sweeten <[email protected]>Cc Ryan Mallon <[email protected]>Cc Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>Cc Mark Brown <[email protected]>Cc Grant Likely <[email protected]>--- drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 16 +++++----------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c +0
-0drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c struct ep93xx_spi { · line 119
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c +1
-0@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {unsigned long min_rate;unsigned long max_rate;bool running; +bool word_xfer;I think this is a slightly confusing name. Maybe something like
is_16bit_xferwould be better?Quoted 42 lines
drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c +3
-11struct workqueue_struct *wq;struct work_struct msg_work;struct completion wait;@@ -407,17 +408,9 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,writew (cr0, espi->regs_base +SSPCR0 ); } -static inline int bits_per_word (const struct ep93xx_spi *espi) -{ -struct spi_message *msg = espi->current_msg; -struct spi_transfer *t = msg->state; - -return t->bits_per_word; -} -static void ep93xx_do_write (struct ep93xx_spi *espi,struct spi_transfer *t) { -if (bits_per_word (espi) >8 ) { +if (espi->word_xfer) {u16 tx_val =0 ;if (t->tx_buf)@@ -436,7 +429,7 @@ static void ep93xx_do_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)static void ep93xx_do_read (struct ep93xx_spi *espi,struct spi_transfer *t) { -if (bits_per_word (espi) >8 ) { +if (espi->word_xfer) {u16 rx_val; rx_val =readw (espi->regs_base +SSPDR );@@ -522,7 +515,7 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)size_t len = t->len;int i, ret, nents; -if (bits_per_word (espi) >8 ) +if (espi->word_xfer) buswidth =DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES ;else buswidth =DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE ;@@ -699,6 +692,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, · line 695
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c +1
-0ep93xx_spi_chip_setup (espi, chip); + espi->word_xfer = (t->bits_per_word >8 ) ? true : false;espi->word_xfer = (t->bits_per_word > 8);
Or even
espi->word_xfer = t->bits_per_word > 8;
Quoted 3 lines
This patch is fine, but not sure it is entirely worth it. The information is already stored in
t->bits_per_wordand the cost of retrieving it is pretty minimal.
I agree.