Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Slow TCP performance from Win2k8R2 guests under Linux KVM

DISCUSSION Gordon Messmer 2 participants 4 messages Jul 15, 2013 – Jul 23, 2013 KVM

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Would anyone be so kind as to test the performance of TCP streams on Windows 2k8R2 guests of KVM virt servers?

Red Hat's virtio-win-1.6.3 package was published to address a problem described as "low performance" on Win2k8 guests. Actual performance was not recorded in the bug report.

On my KVM servers, Windows 2k8R2 guests are able to send data at less than 4Mbps. I test this by using netcat on Windows and piping a file to its input. The receiving end of the transfer is an un-virtualized CentOS system. Transfer rate is measured by selecting the stream in iptraf while it is active.

UDP transfers, such as by CIFS, will send data at around 400Mbps.

TCP transfers from Windows 2012 or Windows 8 are not similarly affected.

The same driver for Win2k8 was published by Red Hat in virtio-win 1.6.3, 1.6.4, and 1.6.5.

Does anyone see TCP transfer rates from Win2k8R2 that don't look ridiculously slow?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859882
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0441.html
http://joncraton.org/blog/46/netcat-for-windows

#1 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Gordon Messmer

Would anyone be so kind as to test the performance of TCP streams on Windows 2k8R2 guests of KVM virt servers?

Red Hat's virtio-win-1.6.3 package was published to address a problem described as "low performance" on Win2k8 guests. Actual performance was not recorded in the bug report.

On my KVM servers, Windows 2k8R2 guests are able to send data at less than 4Mbps. I test this by using netcat on Windows and piping a file to its input. The receiving end of the transfer is an un-virtualized CentOS system. Transfer rate is measured by selecting the stream in iptraf while it is active.

Can you provide results with iperf or netperf?

Thanks,
Yan.

Quoted 16 lines

UDP transfers, such as by CIFS, will send data at around 400Mbps.

TCP transfers from Windows 2012 or Windows 8 are not similarly affected.

The same driver for Win2k8 was published by Red Hat in virtio-win 1.6.3, 1.6.4, and 1.6.5.

Does anyone see TCP transfer rates from Win2k8R2 that don't look ridiculously slow?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859882
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0441.html
http://joncraton.org/blog/46/netcat-for-windows

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

#2 lore raw
Quoted 1 line · Yan Vugenfirer

Can you provide results with iperf or netperf?

Actually, iperf seems to operate at expected speeds, while some other applications don't. I'm working on getting a list of some of the affected programs. I believe my users first reported the problem with ftp. I'll follow up as soon as possible.

Thanks for the suggestion.

#3 lore raw

Can you try the latest drivers: http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/virtio-win/latest/images/

Best regards,
Yan.

Quoted 11 lines · Gordon Messmer
Quoted 1 line · Yan Vugenfirer

Can you provide results with iperf or netperf?

Actually, iperf seems to operate at expected speeds, while some other applications don't. I'm working on getting a list of some of the affected programs. I believe my users first reported the problem with ftp. I'll follow up as soon as possible.

Thanks for the suggestion.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html