at91sam9x5 rtc causes damage
PATCH 1/1 at91sam9x5 rtc causes damage
This one probably needs more sign-offs but some folks seem to be away. It is pretty simple and fixed in the current lk 3.11.0-rc series. So it just impacts the lk 3.10 series including lk 3.10.5 .
ChangeLog:
- without this patch members of the at91sam9x5 family (e.g. at91sam9g25) that use the RTC will receive an unhandled interrupt whenever they try to write to the RTC. In the case of 9x5 SoCs that is the SYS interrupt shared with several other things such as the debug port. Thereafter the debug port becomes useless (for input), the RTC doesn't work ...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sam9x5_rtc310a.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 408 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130807/ecd0d8e6/attachment.bin>
PATCH 1/1 at91sam9x5 rtc causes damage
Quoted 13 lines · Douglas Gilbert
This one probably needs more sign-offs but some folks seem to be away. It is pretty simple and fixed in the current lk 3.11.0-rc series. So it just impacts the lk 3.10 series including lk 3.10.5 .
ChangeLog:
- without this patch members of the at91sam9x5 family (e.g. at91sam9g25) that use the RTC will receive an unhandled interrupt whenever they try to write to the RTC. In the case of 9x5 SoCs that is the SYS interrupt shared with several other things such as the debug port. Thereafter the debug port becomes useless (for input), the RTC doesn't work ...
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Douglas Gilbert <[email protected]>
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
PATCH 1/1 at91sam9x5 rtc causes damage
Quoted 16 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 13 lines · Douglas Gilbert
This one probably needs more sign-offs but some folks seem to be away. It is pretty simple and fixed in the current lk 3.11.0-rc series. So it just impacts the lk 3.10 series including lk 3.10.5 .
ChangeLog:
- without this patch members of the at91sam9x5 family (e.g. at91sam9g25) that use the RTC will receive an unhandled interrupt whenever they try to write to the RTC. In the case of 9x5 SoCs that is the SYS interrupt shared with several other things such as the debug port. Thereafter the debug port becomes useless (for input), the RTC doesn't work ...Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Douglas Gilbert <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txtfor how to do this properly.</formletter>
Fine. I'll leave it.
Doug Gilbert
PATCH 1/1 at91sam9x5 rtc causes damage
Quoted 19 lines · Douglas Gilbert
Quoted 18 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 13 lines · Douglas Gilbert
This one probably needs more sign-offs but some folks seem to be away. It is pretty simple and fixed in the current lk 3.11.0-rc series. So it just impacts the lk 3.10 series including lk 3.10.5 .
ChangeLog:
- without this patch members of the at91sam9x5 family (e.g. at91sam9g25) that use the RTC will receive an unhandled interrupt whenever they try to write to the RTC. In the case of 9x5 SoCs that is the SYS interrupt shared with several other things such as the debug port. Thereafter the debug port becomes useless (for input), the RTC doesn't work ...Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Douglas Gilbert <[email protected]><formletter>
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txtfor how to do this properly.</formletter>
Fine. I'll leave it.
Leave what? Did you read the above file that shows how to get a patch into the stable tree? Follow that and all should be fine.
thanks,
greg k-h