Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mm/sparse: use N_MEMORY instead of N_HIGH_MEMORY

PATCH In review Jianguo Wu 1 participant 1 message Aug 30, 2013

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Jianguo Wu

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 2/5 mm/sparse: use N_MEMORY instead of N_HIGH_MEMORY

Since commit 8219fc48a(mm: node_states: introduce N_MEMORY),
we introduced N_MEMORY, now N_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has any memory, and N_HIGH_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has normal or high memory.

The code here need to handle with the nodes which have memory, we should use N_MEMORY instead.

---
 mm/sparse.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
mm/sparse.c +1 -1
index 308d503..8519d6a 100644
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static struct mem_section noinline __init_refok *sparse_index_alloc(int nid)
 				   sizeof(struct mem_section);
 
 	if (slab_is_available()) {
-		if (node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY))
+		if (node_state(nid, N_MEMORY))
 			section = kzalloc_node(array_size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
 		else
 			section = kzalloc(array_size, GFP_KERNEL);
Signature · 8 lines
1.7.1


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>