bridge: flush br's address entry in fdb when remove the bridge dev
Subsystems (3)
PATCH RESEND 1/1 bridge: flush br's address entry in fdb when remove the bridge dev
When the following commands are executed:
brctl addbr br0
ifconfig br0 hw ether <addr>
rmmod bridge
The calltrace will occur:
[ 563.312114] device eth1 left promiscuous mode [ 563.312188] br0: port 1(eth1) entered disabled state [ 563.468190] kmem_cache_destroy bridge_fdb_cache: Slab cache still has objects [ 563.468197] CPU: 6 PID: 6982 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G O 3.12.0-0.7-default+ #9 [ 563.468199] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007 [ 563.468200] 0000000000000880 ffff88010f111e98 ffffffff814d1c92 ffff88010f111eb8 [ 563.468204] ffffffff81148efd ffff88010f111eb8 0000000000000000 ffff88010f111ec8 [ 563.468206] ffffffffa062a270 ffff88010f111ed8 ffffffffa063ac76 ffff88010f111f78 [ 563.468209] Call Trace: [ 563.468218] [<ffffffff814d1c92>] dump_stack+0x6a/0x78 [ 563.468234] [<ffffffff81148efd>] kmem_cache_destroy+0xfd/0x100 [ 563.468242] [<ffffffffa062a270>] br_fdb_fini+0x10/0x20 [bridge] [ 563.468247] [<ffffffffa063ac76>] br_deinit+0x4e/0x50 [bridge] [ 563.468254] [<ffffffff810c7dc9>] SyS_delete_module+0x199/0x2b0 [ 563.468259] [<ffffffff814e0922>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 570.377958] Bridge firewalling registered
------------------------------------------------
The reason is that when the bridge dev's address is changed, the br_fdb_change_mac_address() will add new address in fdb, but when the bridge was removed, the address entry in the fdb did not free, the bridge_fdb_cache still has objects when destroy the cache, Fix this by flushing the bridge address entry when removing the bridge.
--- net/bridge/br_if.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
net/bridge/br_if.c +4 -0
@@ -172,6 +172,10 @@ void br_dev_delete(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)del_nbp (p); } +spin_lock_bh (&br->hash_lock); +fdb_delete_by_addr (br, br->dev->dev_addr,0 ); +spin_unlock_bh (&br->hash_lock); +br_vlan_flush (br);del_timer_sync (&br->gc_timer);
Signature · 1 line
1.8.0
Quoted 43 lines · Ding Tianhong
When the following commands are executed:
brctl addbr br0
ifconfig br0 hw ether <addr>
rmmod bridgeThe calltrace will occur:
[ 563.312114] device eth1 left promiscuous mode [ 563.312188] br0: port 1(eth1) entered disabled state [ 563.468190] kmem_cache_destroy bridge_fdb_cache: Slab cache still has objects [ 563.468197] CPU: 6 PID: 6982 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G O 3.12.0-0.7-default+ #9 [ 563.468199] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007 [ 563.468200] 0000000000000880 ffff88010f111e98 ffffffff814d1c92 ffff88010f111eb8 [ 563.468204] ffffffff81148efd ffff88010f111eb8 0000000000000000 ffff88010f111ec8 [ 563.468206] ffffffffa062a270 ffff88010f111ed8 ffffffffa063ac76 ffff88010f111f78 [ 563.468209] Call Trace: [ 563.468218] [<ffffffff814d1c92>] dump_stack+0x6a/0x78 [ 563.468234] [<ffffffff81148efd>] kmem_cache_destroy+0xfd/0x100 [ 563.468242] [<ffffffffa062a270>] br_fdb_fini+0x10/0x20 [bridge] [ 563.468247] [<ffffffffa063ac76>] br_deinit+0x4e/0x50 [bridge] [ 563.468254] [<ffffffff810c7dc9>] SyS_delete_module+0x199/0x2b0 [ 563.468259] [<ffffffff814e0922>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 570.377958] Bridge firewalling registered------------------------------------------------
The reason is that when the bridge dev's address is changed, the
br_fdb_change_mac_address()will add new address in fdb, but when the bridge was removed, the address entry in the fdb did not free, thebridge_fdb_cachestill has objects when destroy the cache, Fix this by flushing the bridge address entry when removing the bridge.Signed-off-by Ding Tianhong <[email protected]>--- net/bridge/br_if.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)net/bridge/br_if.c +0
-0
net/bridge/br_if.c void br_dev_delete(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head) · line 177
Quoted 6 lines
net/bridge/br_if.c +3
-0@@ -172,6 +172,10 @@ void br_dev_delete(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)del_nbp (p); } +spin_lock_bh (&br->hash_lock); +fdb_delete_by_addr (br, br->dev->dev_addr,0 ); +spin_unlock_bh (&br->hash_lock);
You are not deleting entries with vid other than 0.
If we have added some vid, there might be fdb entries with that vid whose dst is NULL, which also should be cleaned up.
How about deleting all fdb entries whose dst is NULL? br_fdb_delete_by_port() looks able to be called with p == NULL as well.
Thanks,
Toshiaki Makita
Quoted 4 lines
net/bridge/br_if.c +1
-0+br_vlan_flush (br);del_timer_sync (&br->gc_timer);
Quoted 55 lines · Toshiaki Makita
Quoted 43 lines · Ding Tianhong
When the following commands are executed:
brctl addbr br0
ifconfig br0 hw ether <addr>
rmmod bridgeThe calltrace will occur:
[ 563.312114] device eth1 left promiscuous mode [ 563.312188] br0: port 1(eth1) entered disabled state [ 563.468190] kmem_cache_destroy bridge_fdb_cache: Slab cache still has objects [ 563.468197] CPU: 6 PID: 6982 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G O 3.12.0-0.7-default+ #9 [ 563.468199] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007 [ 563.468200] 0000000000000880 ffff88010f111e98 ffffffff814d1c92 ffff88010f111eb8 [ 563.468204] ffffffff81148efd ffff88010f111eb8 0000000000000000 ffff88010f111ec8 [ 563.468206] ffffffffa062a270 ffff88010f111ed8 ffffffffa063ac76 ffff88010f111f78 [ 563.468209] Call Trace: [ 563.468218] [<ffffffff814d1c92>] dump_stack+0x6a/0x78 [ 563.468234] [<ffffffff81148efd>] kmem_cache_destroy+0xfd/0x100 [ 563.468242] [<ffffffffa062a270>] br_fdb_fini+0x10/0x20 [bridge] [ 563.468247] [<ffffffffa063ac76>] br_deinit+0x4e/0x50 [bridge] [ 563.468254] [<ffffffff810c7dc9>] SyS_delete_module+0x199/0x2b0 [ 563.468259] [<ffffffff814e0922>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 570.377958] Bridge firewalling registered------------------------------------------------
The reason is that when the bridge dev's address is changed, the
br_fdb_change_mac_address()will add new address in fdb, but when the bridge was removed, the address entry in the fdb did not free, thebridge_fdb_cachestill has objects when destroy the cache, Fix this by flushing the bridge address entry when removing the bridge.Signed-off-by Ding Tianhong <[email protected]>--- net/bridge/br_if.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)net/bridge/br_if.c +0
-0net/bridge/br_if.c void br_dev_delete(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head) · line 177
Quoted 6 lines
net/bridge/br_if.c +3
-0@@ -172,6 +172,10 @@ void br_dev_delete(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)del_nbp (p); } +spin_lock_bh (&br->hash_lock); +fdb_delete_by_addr (br, br->dev->dev_addr,0 ); +spin_unlock_bh (&br->hash_lock);You are not deleting entries with vid other than 0.
If we have added some vid, there might be fdb entries with that vid whose dst is NULL, which also should be cleaned up.
Quoted 6 lines
How about deleting all fdb entries whose dst is NULL?
br_fdb_delete_by_port()looks able to be called with p == NULL as well.Thanks,
Toshiaki Makita
agree, I miss the vid problem, I should deleteing all entries about this br.
Regards
Ding
Quoted 13 lines
net/bridge/br_if.c void br_dev_delete(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head) · line 181
Quoted 4 lines
net/bridge/br_if.c +1
-0+br_vlan_flush (br);del_timer_sync (&br->gc_timer);--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html.
Quoted 44 lines · Ding Tianhong
When the following commands are executed:
brctl addbr br0
ifconfig br0 hw ether <addr>
rmmod bridgeThe calltrace will occur:
[ 563.312114] device eth1 left promiscuous mode [ 563.312188] br0: port 1(eth1) entered disabled state [ 563.468190] kmem_cache_destroy bridge_fdb_cache: Slab cache still has objects [ 563.468197] CPU: 6 PID: 6982 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G O 3.12.0-0.7-default+ #9 [ 563.468199] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007 [ 563.468200] 0000000000000880 ffff88010f111e98 ffffffff814d1c92 ffff88010f111eb8 [ 563.468204] ffffffff81148efd ffff88010f111eb8 0000000000000000 ffff88010f111ec8 [ 563.468206] ffffffffa062a270 ffff88010f111ed8 ffffffffa063ac76 ffff88010f111f78 [ 563.468209] Call Trace: [ 563.468218] [<ffffffff814d1c92>] dump_stack+0x6a/0x78 [ 563.468234] [<ffffffff81148efd>] kmem_cache_destroy+0xfd/0x100 [ 563.468242] [<ffffffffa062a270>] br_fdb_fini+0x10/0x20 [bridge] [ 563.468247] [<ffffffffa063ac76>] br_deinit+0x4e/0x50 [bridge] [ 563.468254] [<ffffffff810c7dc9>] SyS_delete_module+0x199/0x2b0 [ 563.468259] [<ffffffff814e0922>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 570.377958] Bridge firewalling registered------------------------------------------------
The reason is that when the bridge dev's address is changed, the
br_fdb_change_mac_address()will add new address in fdb, but when the bridge was removed, the address entry in the fdb did not free, thebridge_fdb_cachestill has objects when destroy the cache, Fix this by flushing the bridge address entry when removing the bridge.Signed-off-by Ding Tianhong <[email protected]>--- net/bridge/br_if.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)net/bridge/br_if.c +0
-0
net/bridge/br_if.c void br_dev_delete(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head) · line 181
Quoted 10 lines
net/bridge/br_if.c +4
-0@@ -172,6 +172,10 @@ void br_dev_delete(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)del_nbp (p); } +spin_lock_bh (&br->hash_lock); +fdb_delete_by_addr (br, br->dev->dev_addr,0 ); +spin_unlock_bh (&br->hash_lock); +br_vlan_flush (br);del_timer_sync (&br->gc_timer);
I think you need to use fdb_delete_by_port(br, NULL, 1); here.
The reason is that if the bridge had vlan filtering configured, when the bridge mac address was changed, an fdb would have been created for for ever vlan configured on the bridge. You delete only vlan0, so you would still have a leak.
-vlad
Quoted 58 lines · Vlad Yasevich
Quoted 44 lines · Ding Tianhong
When the following commands are executed:
brctl addbr br0
ifconfig br0 hw ether <addr>
rmmod bridgeThe calltrace will occur:
[ 563.312114] device eth1 left promiscuous mode [ 563.312188] br0: port 1(eth1) entered disabled state [ 563.468190] kmem_cache_destroy bridge_fdb_cache: Slab cache still has objects [ 563.468197] CPU: 6 PID: 6982 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G O 3.12.0-0.7-default+ #9 [ 563.468199] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007 [ 563.468200] 0000000000000880 ffff88010f111e98 ffffffff814d1c92 ffff88010f111eb8 [ 563.468204] ffffffff81148efd ffff88010f111eb8 0000000000000000 ffff88010f111ec8 [ 563.468206] ffffffffa062a270 ffff88010f111ed8 ffffffffa063ac76 ffff88010f111f78 [ 563.468209] Call Trace: [ 563.468218] [<ffffffff814d1c92>] dump_stack+0x6a/0x78 [ 563.468234] [<ffffffff81148efd>] kmem_cache_destroy+0xfd/0x100 [ 563.468242] [<ffffffffa062a270>] br_fdb_fini+0x10/0x20 [bridge] [ 563.468247] [<ffffffffa063ac76>] br_deinit+0x4e/0x50 [bridge] [ 563.468254] [<ffffffff810c7dc9>] SyS_delete_module+0x199/0x2b0 [ 563.468259] [<ffffffff814e0922>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 570.377958] Bridge firewalling registered------------------------------------------------
The reason is that when the bridge dev's address is changed, the
br_fdb_change_mac_address()will add new address in fdb, but when the bridge was removed, the address entry in the fdb did not free, thebridge_fdb_cachestill has objects when destroy the cache, Fix this by flushing the bridge address entry when removing the bridge.Signed-off-by Ding Tianhong <[email protected]>--- net/bridge/br_if.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)net/bridge/br_if.c +0
-0net/bridge/br_if.c void br_dev_delete(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head) · line 181
Quoted 10 lines
net/bridge/br_if.c +4
-0@@ -172,6 +172,10 @@ void br_dev_delete(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)del_nbp (p); } +spin_lock_bh (&br->hash_lock); +fdb_delete_by_addr (br, br->dev->dev_addr,0 ); +spin_unlock_bh (&br->hash_lock); +br_vlan_flush (br);del_timer_sync (&br->gc_timer);I think you need to use
fdb_delete_by_port(br, NULL, 1); here.
Quoted 6 lines
The reason is that if the bridge had vlan filtering configured, when the bridge mac address was changed, an fdb would have been created for for ever vlan configured on the bridge. You delete only vlan0, so you would still have a leak.
-vlad
agree, I miss the vid problem, I will fix it.
Regards
Ding
Quoted 7 lines
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html.