mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3
Subsystems (4)
v7 cover mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3
v7:
0002:
use undefined local value in suspend/resume
v6:
0002:
Jaehoon pointed HIGHSPEED cap can be omitted if supports-highspeed is defined. Seungwon mentioned clk operation should be called after suspend. Remove k3_dwmmc_caps
V5:
0002:
Follow advice from Arnd,
Update dt descirption and use of_property_for_each_u32 to get table number.
v4:
Follow Arnd's suggestion abstracting specific tuning to clock,
also because new version ip use different method and not use same tuning registers.
0001 acked by Jaehoon
v3:
0001:
Put set/clear_bit DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT in dw_mci_get_cd, Since dw_mci_request will check DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT before sending cmd
0002:
Follow suggestion from Chris, Kumar and Seungwon
Sync to latest mmc-next, which is 3.12-rc2
Remove enum dw_mci_k3_type etc
v2:
Follow Jaehoon's suggestion
Use slot-gpio.c handle cd pin
Move table out to dts
other suggestion
Zhangfei Gao (3):
mmc: dw_mmc: use slot-gpio to handle cd pin
mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3 for k3 platform
clk: hisilicon: add hi3620_mmc_clks
.../bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt | 14 ++ .../devicetree/bindings/clock/hi3620-clock.txt | 1 + .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/k3-dw-mshc.txt | 60 +++++ drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3620.c | 262 ++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 10 + drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c | 126 ++++++++++ drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 48 +++- include/dt-bindings/clock/hi3620-clock.h | 5 + 9 files changed, 514 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/k3-dw-mshc.txt create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH v7 1/3 mmc: dw_mmc: use slot-gpio to handle cd pin
Suggested by Jaehoon: Use slot-gpio to handle cd-gpio Add function dw_mci_of_get_cd_gpio to check "cd-gpios" from dts. mmc_gpio_request_cd and mmc_gpio_get_cd are used to handle cd pin
--- drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +35 -13
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@#include <linux/workqueue.h> #include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/of_gpio.h> +#include <linux/mmc/slot-gpio.h> #include "dw_mmc.h"
@@ -1032,20 +1033,26 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)int present;struct dw_mci_slot *slot =mmc_priv (mmc);struct dw_mci_board *brd = slot->host->pdata; +int gpio_cd = !mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc);/* Use platform get_cd function, else try onboard card detect */ if (brd->quirks &DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION ) present =1 ;else if (brd->get_cd) present = !brd->get_cd (slot->id); +else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE (gpio_cd)) + present = !!gpio_cd;else present = (mci_readl (slot->host,CDETECT ) & (1 << slot->id)) ==0 ?1 :0 ; -if (present) +if (present) { +set_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags);dev_dbg (&mmc->class_dev,"card is present\n" ); -else + }else { +clear_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags);dev_dbg (&mmc->class_dev,"card is not present\n" ); + }return present; }
@@ -1926,10 +1933,6 @@ static void dw_mci_work_routine_card(struct work_struct *work)/* Card change detected */ slot->last_detect_state = present; -/* Mark card as present if applicable */ -if (present !=0 ) -set_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags); -/* Clean up queue if present */ mrq = slot->mrq;if (mrq) {
@@ -1977,8 +1980,6 @@ static void dw_mci_work_routine_card(struct work_struct *work)/* Power down slot */ if (present ==0 ) { -clear_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags); -/* Clear down the FIFO */ dw_mci_fifo_reset (host);#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_DW_IDMAC
@@ -2079,6 +2080,26 @@ static int dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot) return gpio; } + +/* find the cd gpio for a given slot; or -1 if none specified */ +static void dw_mci_of_get_cd_gpio (struct device *dev,u8 slot, +struct mmc_host *mmc) +{ +struct device_node *np =dw_mci_of_find_slot_node (dev, slot); +int gpio; + +if (!np) +return ; + + gpio =of_get_named_gpio (np,"cd-gpios" ,0 ); + +/* Having a missing entry is valid; return silently */ +if (!gpio_is_valid (gpio)) +return ; + +if (mmc_gpio_request_cd (mmc, gpio,0 )) +dev_warn (dev,"gpio [%d] request failed\n" , gpio); +}#else /* CONFIG_OF */ static int dw_mci_of_get_slot_quirks (struct device *dev,u8 slot) {
@@ -2096,6 +2117,11 @@ static int dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot) {return -EINVAL ; } +static void dw_mci_of_get_cd_gpio (struct device *dev,u8 slot, +struct mmc_host *mmc) +{ +return ; +}#endif /* CONFIG_OF */ static int dw_mci_init_slot (struct dw_mci *host,unsigned int id)
@@ -2197,12 +2223,8 @@ static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)#endif /* CONFIG_MMC_DW_IDMAC */ } -if (dw_mci_get_cd (mmc)) -set_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags); -else -clear_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags); - slot->wp_gpio =dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio (host->dev, slot->id); +dw_mci_of_get_cd_gpio (host->dev, slot->id, mmc); ret =mmc_add_host (mmc);if (ret)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 1/3 mmc: dw_mmc: use slot-gpio to handle cd pin
Quoted 9 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Suggested by Jaehoon: Use slot-gpio to handle cd-gpio Add function
dw_mci_of_get_cd_gpioto check "cd-gpios" from dts.mmc_gpio_request_cdandmmc_gpio_get_cdare used to handle cd pinSigned-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Acked-by Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>--- drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
PATCH 1/3 mmc: dw_mmc: use slot-gpio to handle cd pin
In reply to Zhangfei GaoQuoted 6 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Suggested by Jaehoon: Use slot-gpio to handle cd-gpio Add function
dw_mci_of_get_cd_gpioto check "cd-gpios" from dts.mmc_gpio_request_cdandmmc_gpio_get_cdare used to handle cd pinSigned-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Acked-by Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>
The Samsung Arndale board started failing boot from MMC root tests starting with next-20140113 and I bisected it down to this patch. Reverting this patch on top of next-20140114 gets Arndale booting again from MMC. Is there some supporting DT data that's missing for Arndale?
Kevin
PATCH 1/3 mmc: dw_mmc: use slot-gpio to handle cd pin
Quoted 5 lines · Kevin Hilman
Quoted 4 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Suggested by Jaehoon: Use slot-gpio to handle cd-gpio Add function
dw_mci_of_get_cd_gpioto check "cd-gpios" from dts.mmc_gpio_request_cdandmmc_gpio_get_cdare used to handle cd pin
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Acked-by Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>The Samsung Arndale board started failing boot from MMC root tests starting with next-20140113 and I bisected it down to this patch. Reverting this patch on top of next-20140114 gets Arndale booting again from MMC. Is there some supporting DT data that's missing for Arndale?
Rather, it looks like this patch changes behaviour and no longer uses dw_mci_get_cd() to find out if there's a card attached -- it switches to rely only on GPIO (see the last chunk in the patch). That seems broken?
-Olof
PATCH v7 1/3 mmc: dw_mmc: use slot-gpio to handle cd pin
Quoted 15 lines · Olof Johansson
Quoted 5 lines · Kevin Hilman
Quoted 4 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Suggested by Jaehoon: Use slot-gpio to handle cd-gpio Add function
dw_mci_of_get_cd_gpioto check "cd-gpios" from dts.mmc_gpio_request_cdandmmc_gpio_get_cdare used to handle cd pinQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Acked-by Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>The Samsung Arndale board started failing boot from MMC root tests starting with next-20140113 and I bisected it down to this patch. Reverting this patch on top of next-20140114 gets Arndale booting again from MMC. Is there some supporting DT data that's missing for Arndale?
Quoted 5 lines
Rather, it looks like this patch changes behaviour and no longer uses
dw_mci_get_cd()to find out if there's a card attached -- it switches to rely only on GPIO (see the last chunk in the patch). That seems broken?
Oops,
Change using dw_mci_get_cd set flag DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT. And dw_mci_get_cd is called from mmc_rescan, a litter later than dw_mci_probe.
Is that too late?
Thanks
PATCH v7 1/3 mmc: dw_mmc: use slot-gpio to handle cd pin
Dear Kevin
Quoted 24 lines · zhangfei
Quoted 16 lines · Olof Johansson
Quoted 6 lines · Kevin Hilman
Quoted 4 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Suggested by Jaehoon: Use slot-gpio to handle cd-gpio Add function
dw_mci_of_get_cd_gpioto check "cd-gpios" from dts.mmc_gpio_request_cdandmmc_gpio_get_cdare used to handle cd pinQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Acked-by Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>The Samsung Arndale board started failing boot from MMC root tests starting with next-20140113 and I bisected it down to this patch. Reverting this patch on top of next-20140114 gets Arndale booting again from MMC. Is there some supporting DT data that's missing for Arndale?
Quoted 5 lines
Rather, it looks like this patch changes behaviour and no longer uses
dw_mci_get_cd()to find out if there's a card attached -- it switches to rely only on GPIO (see the last chunk in the patch). That seems broken?
Quoted 5 lines
Oops,
Change usingdw_mci_get_cdset flagDW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT. Anddw_mci_get_cdis called frommmc_rescan, a litter later thandw_mci_probe.
Is that too late?
Should have found the issue, CDETECT is ignored since IS_ERR_VALUE does not workable to !mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc), which used for adding debounce. Sorry for that.
However, with this change the debounce seems not stable as before. In the test of plug-in-out, sometimes sd detect will return timeout although present indicates as 1, while next time it can be detected again. Still want to check more.
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +2 -2
@@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)int present;struct dw_mci_slot *slot =mmc_priv (mmc);struct dw_mci_board *brd = slot->host->pdata; -int gpio_cd = !mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc); +int gpio_cd =mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc);/* Use platform get_cd function, else try onboard card detect */ if (brd->quirks &DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION )
@@ -1041,7 +1041,7 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)else if (brd->get_cd) present = !brd->get_cd (slot->id);else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE (gpio_cd)) - present = !!gpio_cd; + present = !gpio_cd;else present = (mci_readl(slot->host, CDETECT) & (1 <<
slot->id))
== 0 ? 1 : 0;
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
In reply to Kevin HilmanIntrodeced from commit b7db86adfa58b
CDETECT is ingored since IS_ERR_VALUE(!mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc)) does not work Add spin_lock_bh(&host->lock) for atomic accessing DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT
--- drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +6 -3
@@ -1033,7 +1033,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)int present;struct dw_mci_slot *slot =mmc_priv (mmc);struct dw_mci_board *brd = slot->host->pdata; -int gpio_cd = !mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc); +struct dw_mci *host = slot->host; +int gpio_cd =mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc);/* Use platform get_cd function, else try onboard card detect */ if (brd->quirks &DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION )
@@ -1041,11 +1042,12 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)else if (brd->get_cd) present = !brd->get_cd (slot->id);else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE (gpio_cd)) - present = !!gpio_cd; + present = !gpio_cd;else present = (mci_readl (slot->host,CDETECT ) & (1 << slot->id)) ==0 ?1 :0 ; +spin_lock_bh (&host->lock);if (present) {set_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags);dev_dbg (&mmc->class_dev,"card is present\n" );
@@ -1053,6 +1055,7 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)clear_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags);dev_dbg (&mmc->class_dev,"card is not present\n" ); } +spin_unlock_bh (&host->lock);return present; }
@@ -2081,7 +2084,7 @@ static int dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot)return gpio; } -/* find the cd gpio for a given slot; or -1 if none specified */ +/* find the cd gpio for a given slot */ static void dw_mci_of_get_cd_gpio (struct device *dev,u8 slot,struct mmc_host *mmc) {
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Hi Kevin
Would you mind check whehter this patch solve the issue of "The Samsung Arndale board started failing boot from MMC".
I am sorry about that.
Quoted 1 line · Zhangfei Gao
Introdeced from commit
b7db86adfa58b
commit should be bf626e5550f24aec24975a0e85ad8e572ca76a6b, from mmc-next
Quoted 8 lines
CDETECT is ingored since IS_ERR_VALUE(!mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc)) does not work Add
spin_lock_bh(&host->lock)for atomic accessingDW_MMC_CARD_PRESENTSigned-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Reported-by Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>--- drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
In reply to Zhangfei GaoIntroduced from commit bf626e5550f24aec24975a0e85ad8e572ca76a6b CDETECT is ignored since negated return value of mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc) can not be checked by IS_ERR_VALUE.
Add spin_lock_bh(&host->lock) for atomic accessing DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, otherwise sd detect may occasionally fail.
--- drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +6 -3
@@ -1033,7 +1033,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)int present;struct dw_mci_slot *slot =mmc_priv (mmc);struct dw_mci_board *brd = slot->host->pdata; -int gpio_cd = !mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc); +struct dw_mci *host = slot->host; +int gpio_cd =mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc);/* Use platform get_cd function, else try onboard card detect */ if (brd->quirks &DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION )
@@ -1041,11 +1042,12 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)else if (brd->get_cd) present = !brd->get_cd (slot->id);else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE (gpio_cd)) - present = !!gpio_cd; + present = !gpio_cd;else present = (mci_readl (slot->host,CDETECT ) & (1 << slot->id)) ==0 ?1 :0 ; +spin_lock_bh (&host->lock);if (present) {set_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags);dev_dbg (&mmc->class_dev,"card is present\n" );
@@ -1053,6 +1055,7 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)clear_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags);dev_dbg (&mmc->class_dev,"card is not present\n" ); } +spin_unlock_bh (&host->lock);return present; }
@@ -2081,7 +2084,7 @@ static int dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot)return gpio; } -/* find the cd gpio for a given slot; or -1 if none specified */ +/* find the cd gpio for a given slot */ static void dw_mci_of_get_cd_gpio (struct device *dev,u8 slot,struct mmc_host *mmc) {
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Quoted 29 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Introduced from commit
bf626e5550f24aec24975a0e85ad8e572ca76a6bCDETECT is ignored since negated return value ofmmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc)can not be checked byIS_ERR_VALUE.
Addspin_lock_bh(&host->lock)for atomic accessingDW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, otherwise sd detect may occasionally fail.Signed-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Reported-by Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Sachin Kamat <[email protected]>Tested-by Sachin Kamat <[email protected]>--- drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +2
-1@@ -1033,7 +1033,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)int present;struct dw_mci_slot *slot =mmc_priv (mmc);struct dw_mci_board *brd = slot->host->pdata; -int gpio_cd = !mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc); +struct dw_mci *host = slot->host; +int gpio_cd =mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc);/* Use platform get_cd function, else try onboard card detect */ if (brd->quirks &DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION )
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc) · line 1045
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +1
-1@@ -1041,11 +1042,12 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)else if (brd->get_cd) present = !brd->get_cd (slot->id);else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE (gpio_cd)) - present = !!gpio_cd; + present = !gpio_cd;
!!gpio_cd or gpio_cd is correct, isn't it?
Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 32 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +3
-2else present = (mci_readl (slot->host,CDETECT ) & (1 << slot->id)) ==0 ?1 :0 ; +spin_lock_bh (&host->lock);if (present) {set_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags);dev_dbg (&mmc->class_dev,"card is present\n" );@@ -1053,6 +1055,7 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)clear_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags);dev_dbg (&mmc->class_dev,"card is not present\n" ); } +spin_unlock_bh (&host->lock);return present; }@@ -2081,7 +2084,7 @@ static int dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot)return gpio; } -/* find the cd gpio for a given slot; or -1 if none specified */ +/* find the cd gpio for a given slot */ static void dw_mci_of_get_cd_gpio (struct device *dev,u8 slot,struct mmc_host *mmc) { --1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Quoted 27 lines · Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 26 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Introduced from commit
bf626e5550f24aec24975a0e85ad8e572ca76a6bCDETECT is ignored since negated return value ofmmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc)can not be checked byIS_ERR_VALUE.
Addspin_lock_bh(&host->lock)for atomic accessingDW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, otherwise sd detect may occasionally fail.Signed-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Reported-by Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Sachin Kamat <[email protected]>Tested-by Sachin Kamat <[email protected]>--- drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +2
-1@@ -1033,7 +1033,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)int present;struct dw_mci_slot *slot =mmc_priv (mmc);struct dw_mci_board *brd = slot->host->pdata; -int gpio_cd = !mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc); +struct dw_mci *host = slot->host; +int gpio_cd =mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc);
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc) · line 1045
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +1
-1/* Use platform get_cd function, else try onboard card detect */ if (brd->quirks &DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION )@@ -1041,11 +1042,12 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)else if (brd->get_cd) present = !brd->get_cd (slot->id);else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE (gpio_cd)) - present = !!gpio_cd; + present = !gpio_cd;!!gpio_cd or
gpio_cdis correct, isn't it?
No, mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc) has to revert.
!!gpio_cd is used before since gpio_cd = !mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc) is used before.
Thanks
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Quoted 39 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Quoted 27 lines · Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 26 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Introduced from commit
bf626e5550f24aec24975a0e85ad8e572ca76a6bCDETECT is ignored since negated return value ofmmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc)can not be checked byIS_ERR_VALUE.
Addspin_lock_bh(&host->lock)for atomic accessingDW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, otherwise sd detect may occasionally fail.Signed-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Reported-by Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Sachin Kamat <[email protected]>Tested-by Sachin Kamat <[email protected]>--- drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +2
-1@@ -1033,7 +1033,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)int present;struct dw_mci_slot *slot =mmc_priv (mmc);struct dw_mci_board *brd = slot->host->pdata; -int gpio_cd = !mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc); +struct dw_mci *host = slot->host; +int gpio_cd =mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc);Quoted 10 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc) · line 1045
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +1
-1/* Use platform get_cd function, else try onboard card detect */ if (brd->quirks &DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION )@@ -1041,11 +1042,12 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)else if (brd->get_cd) present = !brd->get_cd (slot->id);else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE (gpio_cd)) - present = !!gpio_cd; + present = !gpio_cd;!!gpio_cd or
gpio_cdis correct, isn't it?
Quoted 1 line
No,
mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc)has to revert.
I'm missing something?
If card is detected, mmc_gpio_get_cd() returns non-zero, right? I guess gpio_cd should be kept.
Quoted 8 lines
!!gpio_cd is used before since
gpio_cd= !mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc) is used before.Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Quoted 19 lines · Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 11 lines
(quoted diff) +2
-1@@ -1033,7 +1033,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc) int present; struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc); struct dw_mci_board *brd = slot->host->pdata; - int gpio_cd = !mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc); + struct dw_mci *host = slot->host; + int gpio_cd = mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc); /* Use platform get_cd function, else try onboard card detect */ if (brd->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)Review static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc) · line 1045
Quoted 5 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-1@@ -1041,11 +1042,12 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc) else if (brd->get_cd) present = !brd->get_cd(slot->id); else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(gpio_cd)) - present = !!gpio_cd; + present = !gpio_cd;!!gpio_cd or
gpio_cdis correct, isn't it?
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
No,
mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc)has to revert.I'm missing something?
If card is detected,mmc_gpio_get_cd()returns non-zero, right? I guessgpio_cdshould be kept.
Hmm, looks you are right.
Though not see clearly mmc_gpio_get_cd declaratoin, other drivers directly set get_cd as mmc_gpio_get_cd.
.get_cd = mmc_gpio_get_cd
However, in our board cd =0 when card is deteced while cd=1 when card is removed.
In order to mmc_gpio_get_cd return 1, MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH has to be set, as well as new property "caps2-mmc-cd-active-low".
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/synopsys-dw-mshc.txt +2 -0
@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ Optional properties: +* caps2-mmc-cd-active-low: cd pin is low when card active +
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +0 -0
+ if (of_find_property(np, "caps2-mmc-cd-active-low", NULL))
+ pdata->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH;
+
But it looks strange "cd-active-low" describing "CD_ACTIVE_HIGH" flag. When card active, cd = 0, and ACTIVE_HIGH is required to make mmc_gpio_get_cd return 1.
int mmc_gpio_get_cd(struct mmc_host *host)
{
return !gpio_get_value_cansleep(ctx->cd_gpio) ^
!!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH);
}Thanks
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Quoted 12 lines · On Wednesday 15 January 2014 21:56:26 zhangfei wrote:
However, in our board cd =0 when card is deteced while cd=1 when card is removed.
In order tommc_gpio_get_cdreturn 1,MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHhas to be set, as well as new property "caps2-mmc-cd-active-low".Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/synopsys-dw-mshc.txt +2
-0@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ Optional properties: +* caps2-mmc-cd-active-low: cd pin is low when card active +
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +3
-0+if (of_find_property (np,"caps2-mmc-cd-active-low" ,NULL )) + pdata->caps2 |=MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH ; +
The MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH flag should only be required for legacy platforms. With DT parsing, you can normally specify the polarity of the GPIO line in the GPIO specifier in DT.
Arnd
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Quoted 12 lines · On Wednesday 15 January 2014 14:59:59 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Quoted 11 lines · On Wednesday 15 January 2014 21:56:26 zhangfei wrote:
However, in our board cd =0 when card is deteced while cd=1 when card is removed.
In order tommc_gpio_get_cdreturn 1,MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHhas to be set, as well as new property "caps2-mmc-cd-active-low".Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/synopsys-dw-mshc.txt +2
-0@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ Optional properties: +* caps2-mmc-cd-active-low: cd pin is low when card active +
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +3
-0+if (of_find_property (np,"caps2-mmc-cd-active-low" ,NULL )) + pdata->caps2 |=MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH ; +The
MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHflag should only be required for legacy platforms. With DT parsing, you can normally specify the polarity of the GPIO line in the GPIO specifier in DT.
I missed the fact that we already have a "cd-inverted" property as specified in bindings/mmc/mmc.txt. If your GPIO controller does not handle polarity, you can use that.
Arnd
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Quoted 22 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 12 lines · On Wednesday 15 January 2014 14:59:59 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Quoted 11 lines · On Wednesday 15 January 2014 21:56:26 zhangfei wrote:
However, in our board cd =0 when card is deteced while cd=1 when card is removed.
In order tommc_gpio_get_cdreturn 1,MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHhas to be set, as well as new property "caps2-mmc-cd-active-low".Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/synopsys-dw-mshc.txt +2
-0@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ Optional properties: +* caps2-mmc-cd-active-low: cd pin is low when card active +Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +3
-0+if (of_find_property (np,"caps2-mmc-cd-active-low" ,NULL )) + pdata->caps2 |=MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH ; +The
MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHflag should only be required for legacy platforms. With DT parsing, you can normally specify the polarity of the GPIO line in the GPIO specifier in DT.
Quoted 4 lines
I missed the fact that we already have a "cd-inverted" property as specified in
bindings/mmc/mmc.txt. If your GPIO controller does not handle polarity, you can use that.
Thanks Arnd
GPIO controller drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c still not handle polarity, so use "cd-inverted" instead.
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
In reply to Arnd BergmannQuoted 12 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 11 lines · On Wednesday 15 January 2014 21:56:26 zhangfei wrote:
However, in our board cd =0 when card is deteced while cd=1 when card is removed.
In order tommc_gpio_get_cdreturn 1,MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHhas to be set, as well as new property "caps2-mmc-cd-active-low".Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/synopsys-dw-mshc.txt +2
-0@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ Optional properties: +* caps2-mmc-cd-active-low: cd pin is low when card active +
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +3
-0+if (of_find_property (np,"caps2-mmc-cd-active-low" ,NULL )) + pdata->caps2 |=MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH ; +The
MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHflag should only be required for legacy platforms. With DT parsing, you can normally specify the polarity of the GPIO line in the GPIO specifier in DT.
Since when?
Signature · 3 lines
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad. Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Quoted 22 lines · On Wednesday 15 January 2014 16:01:46 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Quoted 12 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 11 lines · On Wednesday 15 January 2014 21:56:26 zhangfei wrote:
However, in our board cd =0 when card is deteced while cd=1 when card is removed.
In order tommc_gpio_get_cdreturn 1,MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHhas to be set, as well as new property "caps2-mmc-cd-active-low".Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/synopsys-dw-mshc.txt +2
-0@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ Optional properties: +* caps2-mmc-cd-active-low: cd pin is low when card active +Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +3
-0+if (of_find_property (np,"caps2-mmc-cd-active-low" ,NULL )) + pdata->caps2 |=MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH ; +The
MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHflag should only be required for legacy platforms. With DT parsing, you can normally specify the polarity of the GPIO line in the GPIO specifier in DT.
Quoted 1 line
Since when?
I just looked through the bindings and found that about half of them allow passing polarity in the gpio specifier. I thought it was more than that and IIRC the outcome of a previous discussion was that when the gpio controller allows passing polarity, you should use that rather than a separate flag.
Not a problem though, since we can use the cd-inverted and wp-inverted properties.
Arnd
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Quoted 25 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 22 lines · On Wednesday 15 January 2014 16:01:46 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Quoted 12 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 11 lines · On Wednesday 15 January 2014 21:56:26 zhangfei wrote:
However, in our board cd =0 when card is deteced while cd=1 when card is removed.
In order tommc_gpio_get_cdreturn 1,MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHhas to be set, as well as new property "caps2-mmc-cd-active-low".Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/synopsys-dw-mshc.txt +2
-0@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ Optional properties: +* caps2-mmc-cd-active-low: cd pin is low when card active +Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +3
-0+if (of_find_property (np,"caps2-mmc-cd-active-low" ,NULL )) + pdata->caps2 |=MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH ; +The
MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHflag should only be required for legacy platforms. With DT parsing, you can normally specify the polarity of the GPIO line in the GPIO specifier in DT.Quoted 1 line
Since when?
Quoted 8 lines
I just looked through the bindings and found that about half of them allow passing polarity in the gpio specifier. I thought it was more than that and IIRC the outcome of a previous discussion was that when the gpio controller allows passing polarity, you should use that rather than a separate flag.
Not a problem though, since we can use the cd-inverted and wp-inverted properties.
Well, having this in the gpio level as well as in subsystems like MMC is going to create confusion - and from the results of this patch _IS_ causing confusion. You've just encouraged one implementation to have things setup such that mmc_gpio_get_cd() returns false when a card is inserted, rather than it correctly returning true.
The issue here is that we'll potentially now end up with _three_ inversions. One in the GPIO layers. One in mmc_gpio_get_cd(), and another in every driver which uses the GPIO layer inversion. This is hardly the right approach as it leads to multiple points where confusion about the inverted status can occur.
Signature · 3 lines
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad. Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Quoted 6 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux
Well, having this in the gpio level as well as in subsystems like MMC is going to create confusion - and from the results of this patch _IS_ causing confusion. You've just encouraged one implementation to have things setup such that
mmc_gpio_get_cd()returns false when a card is inserted, rather than it correctly returning true.
Quoted 6 lines
The issue here is that we'll potentially now end up with _three_ inversions. One in the GPIO layers. One in
mmc_gpio_get_cd(), and another in every driver which uses the GPIO layer inversion. This is hardly the right approach as it leads to multiple points where confusion about the inverted status can occur.
Thanks Russell, make sense.
Double checked with the hardware guy, cd pin is high when card inserted on the board.
The cd pin is originally connected to vout via a resister, and internally short to gound, which is broken when card inserted.
Then Optional properties "caps2-mmc-cd-active-high" has to be added.
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/synopsys-dw-mshc.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/synopsys-dw-mshc.txt
+* caps2-mmc-cd-active-high: cd pin is high when card present
@@ -2411,6 +2414,9 @@ static struct dw_mci_board *dw_mci_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
if (of_find_property(np, "caps2-mmc-hs200-1_2v", NULL))
pdata->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR;+ if (of_find_property(np, "caps2-mmc-cd-active-high", NULL))
+ pdata->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH;
+
Thanks
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
In reply to Russell King - ARM LinuxQuoted 5 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux
The issue here is that we'll potentially now end up with three inversions. One in the GPIO layers. One in
mmc_gpio_get_cd(), and another in every driver which uses the GPIO layer inversion. This is hardly the right approach as it leads to multiple points where confusion about the inverted status can occur.
I did not mean to suggest adding a third inversion. We already have to deal with the one in the GPIO layer and the one in mmc_gpio_get_cd(), which I absolutely agree is unfortunate. As was pointed out already, the gpio driver used in this system does not support the inversion in the DT binding, so the only proper solution is to use the inversion from mmc_gpio_get_cd if MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH is set in host->caps2. This flag gets set from mmc_of_parse based on the presence of the "cd-inverted" flag, in the absence of the gpio flags. The dw_mmc driver does not use mmc_of_parse() at the moment, and while it probably should use that in the future, it should definitely read the same DT properties with the same semantics already and not introduce new properties.
Arnd
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Quoted 7 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 5 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux
The issue here is that we'll potentially now end up with three inversions. One in the GPIO layers. One in
mmc_gpio_get_cd(), and another in every driver which uses the GPIO layer inversion. This is hardly the right approach as it leads to multiple points where confusion about the inverted status can occur.
Quoted 12 lines
I did not mean to suggest adding a third inversion. We already have to deal with the one in the GPIO layer and the one in
mmc_gpio_get_cd(), which I absolutely agree is unfortunate. As was pointed out already, the gpio driver used in this system does not support the inversion in the DT binding, so the only proper solution is to use the inversion frommmc_gpio_get_cdifMMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHis set inhost->caps2. This flag gets set frommmc_of_parsebased on the presence of the "cd-inverted" flag, in the absence of the gpio flags. Thedw_mmcdriver does not usemmc_of_parse()at the moment, and while it probably should use that in the future, it should definitely read the same DT properties with the same semantics already and not introduce new properties.
Arnd,
The issue I'm pointing out is that _if_ you use the GPIO layer to do the inversion, then you end up with _three_ inversions of the signal, which is excessive and confusing - and makes the sense of mmc_gpio_get_cd() completely indeterminant without reading the DT files and the code.
Signature · 3 lines
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad. Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
In reply to zhangfeiQuoted 32 lines · Zhangfei
Quoted 19 lines · Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 11 lines
(quoted diff) +2
-1@@ -1033,7 +1033,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc) int present; struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc); struct dw_mci_board *brd = slot->host->pdata; - int gpio_cd = !mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc); + struct dw_mci *host = slot->host; + int gpio_cd = mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc); /* Use platform get_cd function, else try onboard card detect */ if (brd->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)Review static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc) · line 1045
Quoted 5 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-1@@ -1041,11 +1042,12 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc) else if (brd->get_cd) present = !brd->get_cd(slot->id); else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(gpio_cd)) - present = !!gpio_cd; + present = !gpio_cd;!!gpio_cd or
gpio_cdis correct, isn't it?Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
No,
mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc)has to revert.I'm missing something?
If card is detected,mmc_gpio_get_cd()returns non-zero, right? I guessgpio_cdshould be kept.Hmm, looks you are right.
Though not see clearlymmc_gpio_get_cddeclaratoin, other drivers directly setget_cdasmmc_gpio_get_cd.
.get_cd =mmc_gpio_get_cd
Quoted 4 lines
However, in our board cd =0 when card is deteced while cd=1 when card is removed.
In order tommc_gpio_get_cdreturn 1,MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHhas to be set, as well as new property "caps2-mmc-cd-active-low".
Ok, you could do more.mmc_gpio_get_cd() is expected to return non-zero if card is detection.
Quoted 12 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/synopsys-dw-mshc.txt +2
-0@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ Optional properties: +* caps2-mmc-cd-active-low: cd pin is low when card active +drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +3
-0+if (of_find_property (np,"caps2-mmc-cd-active-low" ,NULL )) + pdata->caps2 |=MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH ; +
Quoted 3 lines
But it looks strange "cd-active-low" describing "
CD_ACTIVE_HIGH" flag. When card active, cd = 0, andACTIVE_HIGHis required to makemmc_gpio_get_cdreturn 1.
I think your board seems not to use pull-up on GPIO line for card detection. So, MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH would be needed.
Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 11 lines
int
mmc_gpio_get_cd(struct mmc_host *host){ return !gpio_get_value_cansleep(ctx->cd_gpio) ^ !!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH); }Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Quoted 10 lines · Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 9 lines
Hmm, looks you are right.
Though not see clearlymmc_gpio_get_cddeclaratoin, other drivers directly setget_cdasmmc_gpio_get_cd.
.get_cd =mmc_gpio_get_cdHowever, in our board cd =0 when card is deteced while cd=1 when card is removed.
In order tommc_gpio_get_cdreturn 1,MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHhas to be set, as well as new property "caps2-mmc-cd-active-low".
Quoted 5 lines
Ok, you could do more.
mmc_gpio_get_cd()is expected to return non-zero if card is detection.I think your board seems not to use pull-up on GPIO line for card detection. So,
MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHwould be needed.
Unfortunately, the specific cd pin can not be configured. Suspect on our board the cd =1 when card is inserted, can not measure as no clear resister and need check with hardware guy tomorrow.
"cd-inverted" may be required as mentioned by Arnd. Will update the patch as following if no problem.
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +1 -1
@@ -1042,7 +1042,7 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)else if (brd->get_cd) present = !brd->get_cd (slot->id);else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE (gpio_cd)) - present = !gpio_cd; + present = gpio_cd ^ brd->cd_inverted;else present = (mci_readl (slot->host,CDETECT ) & (1 << slot->id)) ==0 ?1 :0 ;
@@ -2414,6 +2414,9 @@ static struct dw_mci_board *dw_mci_parse_dt(struct
dw_mci *host)
if (of_find_property(np, "caps2-mmc-hs200-1_2v", NULL))
pdata->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR;+ if (of_get_property(np, "cd-inverted", NULL))
+ pdata->cd_inverted = 1;
+
return pdata;
}
include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h +1 -0
@@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ struct dw_mci_board {u32 caps;/* Capabilities */ u32 caps2;/* More capabilities */ u32 pm_caps;/* PM capabilities */ +u8 cd_inverted;
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Introduced from commit bf626e5550f24aec24975a0e85ad8e572ca76a6b CDETECT is ignored since negated return value of mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc) can not be checked by IS_ERR_VALUE.
Add spin_lock_bh(&host->lock) for atomic accessing DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, otherwise sd detect may occasionally fail.
--- drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 12 +++++++++--- include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +9 -3
@@ -1033,7 +1033,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)int present;struct dw_mci_slot *slot =mmc_priv (mmc);struct dw_mci_board *brd = slot->host->pdata; -int gpio_cd = !mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc); +struct dw_mci *host = slot->host; +int gpio_cd =mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc);/* Use platform get_cd function, else try onboard card detect */ if (brd->quirks &DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION )
@@ -1041,11 +1042,12 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)else if (brd->get_cd) present = !brd->get_cd (slot->id);else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE (gpio_cd)) - present = !!gpio_cd; + present = gpio_cd ^ brd->cd_inverted;else present = (mci_readl (slot->host,CDETECT ) & (1 << slot->id)) ==0 ?1 :0 ; +spin_lock_bh (&host->lock);if (present) {set_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags);dev_dbg (&mmc->class_dev,"card is present\n" );
@@ -1053,6 +1055,7 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)clear_bit (DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT , &slot->flags);dev_dbg (&mmc->class_dev,"card is not present\n" ); } +spin_unlock_bh (&host->lock);return present; }
@@ -2081,7 +2084,7 @@ static int dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot)return gpio; } -/* find the cd gpio for a given slot; or -1 if none specified */ +/* find the cd gpio for a given slot */ static void dw_mci_of_get_cd_gpio (struct device *dev,u8 slot,struct mmc_host *mmc) {
@@ -2411,6 +2414,9 @@ static struct dw_mci_board *dw_mci_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)if (of_find_property (np,"caps2-mmc-hs200-1_2v" ,NULL )) pdata->caps2 |=MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR ; +if (of_get_property (np,"cd-inverted" ,NULL )) + pdata->cd_inverted =1 ; +return pdata; }
include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h +1 -0
@@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ struct dw_mci_board {u32 caps;/* Capabilities */ u32 caps2;/* More capabilities */ u32 pm_caps;/* PM capabilities */ +u8 cd_inverted;/* * Override fifo depth. If 0, autodetect it from the FIFOTH register, * but note that this may not be reliable after a bootloader has used
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
Quoted 30 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Introduced from commit
bf626e5550f24aec24975a0e85ad8e572ca76a6bCDETECT is ignored since negated return value ofmmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc)can not be checked byIS_ERR_VALUE.
Addspin_lock_bh(&host->lock)for atomic accessingDW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, otherwise sd detect may occasionally fail.Signed-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Reported-by Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Sachin Kamat <[email protected]>Tested-by Sachin Kamat <[email protected]>--- drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 12 +++++++++--- include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +2
-1@@ -1033,7 +1033,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)int present;struct dw_mci_slot *slot =mmc_priv (mmc);struct dw_mci_board *brd = slot->host->pdata; -int gpio_cd = !mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc); +struct dw_mci *host = slot->host; +int gpio_cd =mmc_gpio_get_cd (mmc);/* Use platform get_cd function, else try onboard card detect */ if (brd->quirks &DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION )
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc) · line 1045
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c +1
-1@@ -1041,11 +1042,12 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)else if (brd->get_cd) present = !brd->get_cd (slot->id);else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE (gpio_cd)) - present = !!gpio_cd; + present = gpio_cd ^ brd->cd_inverted;
I assume you haven't read the contents of mmc_gpio_get_cd()?
int mmc_gpio_get_cd(struct mmc_host *host)
{
struct mmc_gpio *ctx = host->slot.handler_priv;
if (!ctx || !gpio_is_valid(ctx->cd_gpio))
return -ENOSYS;
return !gpio_get_value_cansleep(ctx->cd_gpio) ^
!!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH);
}EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_gpio_get_cd);
What facility does host->caps2 give you here? Yes, you don't need your own cd_inverted stuff. You should check that you're interpreting this correctly. When this returns true, there is a card present.
When MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH is set, gpio_get_value_cansleep() must return non-zero when a card is inserted. When it isn't set, gpio_get_value_cansleep must return zero when a card is inserted.
Signature · 3 lines
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad. Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
PATCH 1/1 mmc: dw_mmc: fix dw_mci_get_cd
In reply to zhangfeiQuoted 18 lines · zhangfei
Quoted 10 lines · Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 9 lines
Hmm, looks you are right.
Though not see clearlymmc_gpio_get_cddeclaratoin, other drivers directly setget_cdasmmc_gpio_get_cd.
.get_cd =mmc_gpio_get_cdHowever, in our board cd =0 when card is deteced while cd=1 when card is removed.
In order tommc_gpio_get_cdreturn 1,MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHhas to be set, as well as new property "caps2-mmc-cd-active-low".Quoted 5 lines
Ok, you could do more.
mmc_gpio_get_cd()is expected to return non-zero if card is detection.I think your board seems not to use pull-up on GPIO line for card detection. So,
MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGHwould be needed.
Quoted 6 lines
Unfortunately, the specific cd pin can not be configured. Suspect on our board the cd =1 when card is inserted, can not measure as no clear resister and need check with hardware guy tomorrow.
"cd-inverted" may be required as mentioned by Arnd. Will update the patch as following if no problem.
The patch looks right, but I wonder if a better longer-term solution would be to just the common mmc_of_parse() function rather than duplicating it in dw_mmc.
Arnd
PATCH v7 2/3 mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3 for k3 platform
In reply to Zhangfei GaoAdd dw_mmc-k3.c for k3v2, support sd/emmc
--- .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/k3-dw-mshc.txt | 60 +++++++++ drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 10 ++ drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 203 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/k3-dw-mshc.txt create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/k3-dw-mshc.txt new file +60 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +* Hisilicon specific extensions to the Synopsys Designware Mobile + Storage Host Controller + +Read synopsys-dw-mshc.txt for more details + +The Synopsys designware mobile storage host controller is used to interface +a SoC with storage medium such as eMMC or SD/MMC cards. This file documents +differences between the core Synopsys dw mshc controller properties described +by synopsys-dw-mshc.txt and the properties used by the Hisilicon specific +extensions to the Synopsys Designware Mobile Storage Host Controller. + +Required Properties: + +* compatible: should be one of the following. + - "hisilicon,hi4511-dw-mshc": for controllers with hi4511 specific extentions. + +* clock-freq-table: should be the frequency (in Hz) array of the ciu clock + in each supported mode. + 0. CIU clock rate in Hz for DS mode + 1. CIU clock rate in Hz for MMC HS mode + 2. CIU clock rate in Hz for SD HS mode + 3. CIU clock rate in Hz for SDR12 mode + 4. CIU clock rate in Hz for SDR25 mode + 5. CIU clock rate in Hz for SDR50 mode + 6. CIU clock rate in Hz for SDR104 mode + 7. CIU clock rate in Hz for DDR50 mode + 8. CIU clock rate in Hz for HS200 mode + +Example: + + /* for Hi3620 */ + + /* SoC portion */ + dwmmc_0: dwmmc0 at fcd03000 { + compatible = "hisilicon,hi4511-dw-mshc"; + reg = <0xfcd03000 0x1000>; + interrupts = <0 16 4>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + clocks = <&mmc_clock HI3620_SD_CIUCLK>, <&clock HI3620_DDRC_PER_CLK>; + clock-names = "ciu", "biu"; + clock-freq-table = + <25000000 0 50000000 25000000 50000000 100000000 0 50000000>; + }; + + /* Board portion */ + dwmmc0 at fcd03000 { + num-slots = <1>; + vmmc-supply = <&ldo12>; + fifo-depth = <0x100>; + supports-highspeed; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&sd_pmx_pins &sd_cfg_func1 &sd_cfg_func2>; + slot at 0 { + reg = <0>; + bus-width = <4>; + disable-wp; + cd-gpios = <&gpio10 3 0>; + }; + };
drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig +10 -0
@@ -575,6 +575,16 @@ config MMC_DW_SOCFPGA This selects support for Altera SoCFPGA specific extensions to the Synopsys DesignWare Memory Card Interface driver. +config MMC_DW_K3 + tristate "K3 specific extensions for Synopsys DW Memory Card Interface" + depends on MMC_DW + select MMC_DW_PLTFM + select MMC_DW_IDMAC + help + This selects support for Hisilicon K3 SoC specific extensions to the + Synopsys DesignWare Memory Card Interface driver. Select this option + for platforms based on Hisilicon K3 SoC's. + config MMC_DW_PCI tristate "Synopsys Designware MCI support on PCI bus" depends on MMC_DW && PCI
drivers/mmc/host/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_DW) += dw_mmc.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_DW_PLTFM) += dw_mmc-pltfm.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_DW_EXYNOS) += dw_mmc-exynos.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_DW_SOCFPGA) += dw_mmc-socfpga.o +obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_DW_K3) += dw_mmc-k3.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_DW_PCI) += dw_mmc-pci.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SH_MMCIF) += sh_mmcif.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_JZ4740) += jz4740_mmc.o
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c new file +132 -0
132 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 2/3 mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3 for k3 platform
Quoted 4 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Add
dw_mmc-k3.cfor k3v2, support sd/emmcSigned-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Zhigang Wang <[email protected]>
This looks basically, sorry for taking so long for the review. I thought there were a couple of tricky bugs in there, but discussing them on IRC showed that I was wrong about all of them.
PATCH 2/3 mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3 for k3 platform
In reply to Zhangfei GaoHi Zhangfei,
Quoted 138 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Add
dw_mmc-k3.cfor k3v2, support sd/emmcSigned-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Zhigang Wang <[email protected]>--- .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/k3-dw-mshc.txt | 60 +++++++++ drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 10 ++ drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 203 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/k3-dw-mshc.txt create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.cDocumentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/k3-dw-mshc.txt new file +60
-0@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +* Hisilicon specific extensions to the Synopsys Designware Mobile + Storage Host Controller + +Read synopsys-dw-mshc.txt for more details + +The Synopsys designware mobile storage host controller is used to interface +a SoC with storage medium such as eMMC or SD/MMC cards. This file documents +differences between the core Synopsys dw mshc controller properties described +by synopsys-dw-mshc.txt and the properties used by the Hisilicon specific +extensions to the Synopsys Designware Mobile Storage Host Controller. + +Required Properties: + +* compatible: should be one of the following. + - "hisilicon,hi4511-dw-mshc": for controllers with hi4511 specific extentions. + +* clock-freq-table: should be the frequency (in Hz) array of the ciu clock + in each supported mode. + 0. CIU clock rate in Hz for DS mode + 1. CIU clock rate in Hz for MMC HS mode + 2. CIU clock rate in Hz for SD HS mode + 3. CIU clock rate in Hz for SDR12 mode + 4. CIU clock rate in Hz for SDR25 mode + 5. CIU clock rate in Hz for SDR50 mode + 6. CIU clock rate in Hz for SDR104 mode + 7. CIU clock rate in Hz for DDR50 mode + 8. CIU clock rate in Hz for HS200 mode + +Example: + + /* for Hi3620 */ + + /* SoC portion */ + dwmmc_0: dwmmc0 at fcd03000 { + compatible = "hisilicon,hi4511-dw-mshc"; + reg = <0xfcd03000 0x1000>; + interrupts = <0 16 4>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + clocks = <&mmc_clock HI3620_SD_CIUCLK>, <&clock HI3620_DDRC_PER_CLK>; + clock-names = "ciu", "biu"; + clock-freq-table = + <25000000 0 50000000 25000000 50000000 100000000 0 50000000>; + }; + + /* Board portion */ + dwmmc0 at fcd03000 { + num-slots = <1>; + vmmc-supply = <&ldo12>; + fifo-depth = <0x100>; + supports-highspeed; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&sd_pmx_pins &sd_cfg_func1 &sd_cfg_func2>; + slot at 0 { + reg = <0>; + bus-width = <4>; + disable-wp; + cd-gpios = <&gpio10 3 0>; + }; + };drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig +10
-0@@ -575,6 +575,16 @@ config MMC_DW_SOCFPGA This selects support for Altera SoCFPGA specific extensions to the Synopsys DesignWare Memory Card Interface driver. +config MMC_DW_K3 + tristate "K3 specific extensions for Synopsys DW Memory Card Interface" + depends on MMC_DW + select MMC_DW_PLTFM + select MMC_DW_IDMAC + help + This selects support for Hisilicon K3 SoC specific extensions to the + Synopsys DesignWare Memory Card Interface driver. Select this option + for platforms based on Hisilicon K3 SoC's. + config MMC_DW_PCI tristate "Synopsys Designware MCI support on PCI bus" depends on MMC_DW && PCIdrivers/mmc/host/Makefile +1
-0@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_DW) += dw_mmc.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_DW_PLTFM) += dw_mmc-pltfm.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_DW_EXYNOS) += dw_mmc-exynos.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_DW_SOCFPGA) += dw_mmc-socfpga.o +obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_DW_K3) += dw_mmc-k3.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_DW_PCI) += dw_mmc-pci.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SH_MMCIF) += sh_mmcif.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_JZ4740) += jz4740_mmc.odrivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c new file +19
-0@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +/* +* Copyright (c) 2013 Linaro Ltd. +* Copyright (c) 2013 Hisilicon Limited. +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or +* (at your option) any later version. +*/ + +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/mmc/host.h> +#include <linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> + +#include "dw_mmc.h" +#include "dw_mmc-pltfm.h"
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c line 29
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c new file +10
-0+ +#define MAX_NUMS 10 +struct dw_mci_k3_priv_data { +u32 clk_table[MAX_NUMS ]; +}; + +static void dw_mci_k3_set_ios (struct dw_mci *host,struct mmc_ios *ios) +{ +struct dw_mci_k3_priv_data *priv = host->priv; +u32 rate = priv->clk_table[ios->timing];
First, sorry for quick review even though your effort.
But I still worry about this change.
Currently k3 host's clock table depends on value number of SD/MMC mode value.
It seems close to identifier for eachg mode. I think it's not good way to use as table's index. Can you modify to mmc_clk_determine_rate() in your another patch-set?
I guess required actual target rate could be determined depending on ios->clock.
Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 110 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c new file +103
-1+int ret; + +if (!rate) { +dev_warn (host->dev, +"no specified rate in timing %u\n" , ios->timing); +return ; + } + + ret =clk_set_rate (host->ciu_clk, rate); +if (ret) +dev_warn (host->dev,"failed to set clock rate %uHz\n" , rate); + + host->bus_hz =clk_get_rate (host->ciu_clk); +} + +static int dw_mci_k3_parse_dt (struct dw_mci *host) +{ +struct dw_mci_k3_priv_data *priv; +struct device_node *node = host->dev->of_node; +struct property *prop; +const __be32 *cur; +u32 val, num =0 ; + + priv =devm_kzalloc (host->dev,sizeof (*priv),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!priv) { +dev_err (host->dev,"mem alloc failed for private data\n" ); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + host->priv = priv; + +of_property_for_each_u32 (node,"clock-freq-table" , prop, cur, val) { +if (num >=MAX_NUMS ) +break ; + priv->clk_table[num++] = val; + } +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct dw_mci_drv_data k3_drv_data = { + .set_ios = dw_mci_k3_set_ios, + .parse_dt = dw_mci_k3_parse_dt, +}; + +static const struct of_device_id dw_mci_k3_match[] = { + { .compatible ="hisilicon,hi4511-dw-mshc" , .data = &k3_drv_data, }, + {}, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, dw_mci_k3_match); + +static int dw_mci_k3_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +const struct dw_mci_drv_data *drv_data; +const struct of_device_id *match; + + match =of_match_node (dw_mci_k3_match, pdev->dev.of_node); + drv_data = match->data; + +return dw_mci_pltfm_register (pdev, drv_data); +} + +static int dw_mci_k3_suspend (struct device *dev) +{ +struct dw_mci *host =dev_get_drvdata (dev); +int ret; + + ret =dw_mci_suspend (host); +if (!ret) +clk_disable_unprepare (host->ciu_clk); + +return ret; +} + +static int dw_mci_k3_resume (struct device *dev) +{ +struct dw_mci *host =dev_get_drvdata (dev); +int ret; + + ret =clk_prepare_enable (host->ciu_clk); +if (ret) { +dev_err (host->dev,"failed to enable ciu clock\n" ); +return ret; + } + +return dw_mci_resume (host); +} + +SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS (dw_mci_k3_pmops, dw_mci_k3_suspend, dw_mci_k3_resume); + +static struct platform_driver dw_mci_k3_pltfm_driver = { + .probe = dw_mci_k3_probe, + .remove = dw_mci_pltfm_remove, + .driver = { + .name ="dwmmc_k3" , + .of_match_table = dw_mci_k3_match, + .pm = &dw_mci_k3_pmops, + }, +}; + +module_platform_driver (dw_mci_k3_pltfm_driver); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("K3 Specific DW-MSHC Driver Extension" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL v2" ); +MODULE_ALIAS ("platform:dwmmc-k3" ); --1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
PATCH v7 2/3 mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3 for k3 platform
Quoted 12 lines · Seungwon Jeon
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c line 29
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c new file +4
-0+static void dw_mci_k3_set_ios (struct dw_mci *host,struct mmc_ios *ios) +{ +struct dw_mci_k3_priv_data *priv = host->priv; +u32 rate = priv->clk_table[ios->timing];First, sorry for quick review even though your effort.
But I still worry about this change.
Currently k3 host's clock table depends on value number of SD/MMC mode value.
It seems close to identifier for eachg mode. I think it's not good way to use as table's index. Can you modify tommc_clk_determine_rate()in your another patch-set?
I guess required actual target rate could be determined depending onios->clock.
No, it can not get input clock source rate simply from ios->clock, also requied info like which controller, which mode etc.
Here is setting clock source rate, not the working clock rate.
For example, emmc init clock source rate is 13M, while sd init clock source is 25M, it can not simply get such info from ios->clock. And for HS200, emmc may have to set clock source rate to 104M since the controller limitation and can not work stable as 208M.
Thanks
PATCH 2/3 mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3 for k3 platform
Quoted 14 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Quoted 12 lines · Seungwon Jeon
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c line 29
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c new file +4
-0+static void dw_mci_k3_set_ios (struct dw_mci *host,struct mmc_ios *ios) +{ +struct dw_mci_k3_priv_data *priv = host->priv; +u32 rate = priv->clk_table[ios->timing];First, sorry for quick review even though your effort.
But I still worry about this change.
Currently k3 host's clock table depends on value number of SD/MMC mode value.
It seems close to identifier for eachg mode. I think it's not good way to use as table's index. Can you modify tommc_clk_determine_rate()in your another patch-set?
I guess required actual target rate could be determined depending onios->clock.
Quoted 8 lines
No, it can not get input clock source rate simply from
ios->clock, also requied info like which controller, which mode etc.
Here is setting clock source rate, not the working clock rate.For example, emmc init clock source rate is 13M, while sd init clock source is 25M, it can not simply get such info from
ios->clock. And for HS200, emmc may have to set clock source rate to 104M since the controller limitation and can not work stable as 208M.
Yes, clock table is source clock rate, not actual working clock rate. I was not saying that 'ios->clock' would be used for source clock directly. I meant that you can adjust the source clock rate depending on 'ios->clock'. You've already done with clock table similarly in mmc_clk_determine_rate().
For example, in case of HS200, 'ios->clock' will be passed with 200MHz.
And then, mmc_clk_determine_rate() can set the 'rate & best' to 100000000 and 720000000 respectively. Also, 'ios->clock' with 400KHz or less may be passed for init clock.
If clock id is HI3620_SD_CIUCLK, 'rate & best' can be selected with 13000000 and 26000000. If not and it's case of MMC, 'rate & best' can be selected with 25000000 and 180000000. If it should be considered with other conditions, please let me know.
Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
PATCH v7 2/3 mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3 for k3 platform
Quoted 29 lines · Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 14 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Quoted 12 lines · Seungwon Jeon
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c line 29
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c new file +4
-0+static void dw_mci_k3_set_ios (struct dw_mci *host,struct mmc_ios *ios) +{ +struct dw_mci_k3_priv_data *priv = host->priv; +u32 rate = priv->clk_table[ios->timing];First, sorry for quick review even though your effort.
But I still worry about this change.
Currently k3 host's clock table depends on value number of SD/MMC mode value.
It seems close to identifier for eachg mode. I think it's not good way to use as table's index. Can you modify tommc_clk_determine_rate()in your another patch-set?
I guess required actual target rate could be determined depending onios->clock.Quoted 8 lines
No, it can not get input clock source rate simply from
ios->clock, also requied info like which controller, which mode etc.
Here is setting clock source rate, not the working clock rate.For example, emmc init clock source rate is 13M, while sd init clock source is 25M, it can not simply get such info from
ios->clock. And for HS200, emmc may have to set clock source rate to 104M since the controller limitation and can not work stable as 208M.Yes, clock table is source clock rate, not actual working clock rate. I was not saying that '
ios->clock' would be used for source clock directly. I meant that you can adjust the source clock rate depending on 'ios->clock'. You've already done with clock table similarly inmmc_clk_determine_rate().
Quoted 6 lines
For example, in case of HS200, '
ios->clock' will be passed with 200MHz.
And then,mmc_clk_determine_rate()can set the 'rate & best' to 100000000 and 720000000 respectively. Also, 'ios->clock' with 400KHz or less may be passed for init clock.
If clock id isHI3620_SD_CIUCLK, 'rate & best' can be selected with 13000000 and 26000000. If not and it's case of MMC, 'rate & best' can be selected with 25000000 and 180000000. If it should be considered with other conditions, please let me know.
However, I am afraid this will make things complicated rather than simplified.
The function mmc_clk_determine_rate() will need the info which controller it is, what's the init clock rate, what's the max clock rate, and what's the limitation, which may be different as different soc, and can not be hardcoded.
The limitation may in HS200 and SDR104 mode.
The plan is only input init rate and max rate instead of the table, while others directly use ios->clock, only if the the limitation resolved.
Thanks
PATCH 2/3 mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3 for k3 platform
Quoted 40 lines · zhangfei
Quoted 29 lines · Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 14 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Quoted 12 lines · Seungwon Jeon
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c line 29
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c new file +4
-0+static void dw_mci_k3_set_ios (struct dw_mci *host,struct mmc_ios *ios) +{ +struct dw_mci_k3_priv_data *priv = host->priv; +u32 rate = priv->clk_table[ios->timing];First, sorry for quick review even though your effort.
But I still worry about this change.
Currently k3 host's clock table depends on value number of SD/MMC mode value.
It seems close to identifier for eachg mode. I think it's not good way to use as table's index. Can you modify tommc_clk_determine_rate()in your another patch-set?
I guess required actual target rate could be determined depending onios->clock.Quoted 8 lines
No, it can not get input clock source rate simply from
ios->clock, also requied info like which controller, which mode etc.
Here is setting clock source rate, not the working clock rate.For example, emmc init clock source rate is 13M, while sd init clock source is 25M, it can not simply get such info from
ios->clock. And for HS200, emmc may have to set clock source rate to 104M since the controller limitation and can not work stable as 208M.Yes, clock table is source clock rate, not actual working clock rate. I was not saying that '
ios->clock' would be used for source clock directly. I meant that you can adjust the source clock rate depending on 'ios->clock'. You've already done with clock table similarly inmmc_clk_determine_rate().Quoted 6 lines
For example, in case of HS200, '
ios->clock' will be passed with 200MHz.
And then,mmc_clk_determine_rate()can set the 'rate & best' to 100000000 and 720000000 respectively. Also, 'ios->clock' with 400KHz or less may be passed for init clock.
If clock id isHI3620_SD_CIUCLK, 'rate & best' can be selected with 13000000 and 26000000. If not and it's case of MMC, 'rate & best' can be selected with 25000000 and 180000000. If it should be considered with other conditions, please let me know.However, I am afraid this will make things complicated rather than simplified.
Quoted 8 lines
The function
mmc_clk_determine_rate()will need the info which controller it is, what's the init clock rate, what's the max clock rate, and what's the limitation, which may be different as different soc, and can not be hardcoded.
The limitation may in HS200 and SDR104 mode.The plan is only input init rate and max rate instead of the table, while others directly use
ios->clock, only if the the limitation resolved.
Handling mmc clock for hi3620 is in drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3620.c, right?
Currently only hi3620 has been introduced.
If hi3620's host has a limitation, clk-hi3620.c can handle clock range(init, max) for source clock enough. I feel like clock table is redundant.
Ok. It's just my suggestion. But I still point dependency of mode index number.
K3's clock table refers and depends mode definition value from include/linux/mmc/host.h If new mode is added or modified, it should be considered and also may make complicated.
Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
PATCH v7 2/3 mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3 for k3 platform
Dear Seungwon
Quoted 16 lines · Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c line 29
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c new file +4
-0+static void dw_mci_k3_set_ios (struct dw_mci *host,struct mmc_ios *ios) +{ +struct dw_mci_k3_priv_data *priv = host->priv; +u32 rate = priv->clk_table[ios->timing];Quoted 8 lines
The function
mmc_clk_determine_rate()will need the info which controller it is, what's the init clock rate, what's the max clock rate, and what's the limitation, which may be different as different soc, and can not be hardcoded.
The limitation may in HS200 and SDR104 mode.The plan is only input init rate and max rate instead of the table, while others directly use
ios->clock, only if the the limitation resolved.
Quoted 8 lines
Handling mmc clock for hi3620 is in
drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3620.c, right?
Currently only hi3620 has been introduced.
If hi3620's host has a limitation,clk-hi3620.ccan handle clockrange(init, max)for source clock enough. I feel like clock table is redundant.
Ok. It's just my suggestion. But I still point dependency of mode index number.
K3's clock table refers and depends mode definition value frominclude/linux/mmc/host.hIf new mode is added or modified, it should be considered and also may make complicated.
Looks like you dislike the clk_table very much :)
Double checked with the silicon guy, currently it is said the limitation in HS200 and SDR104 can be replaced by the max_rate, so clk_table can be replaced with ios->clock directly, though they have concern it is not so convinent when removing clk_table in case limitation rate is not equal to max_rate again in future.
Will update accordingly, thanks for the suggestion.
Thanks
PATCH 2/3 mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3 for k3 platform
Quoted 22 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Dear Seungwon
Quoted 13 lines · Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Review
Quoted 4 lines
(quoted diff) +4
-0+static void dw_mci_k3_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios) +{ + struct dw_mci_k3_priv_data *priv = host->priv; + u32 rate = priv->clk_table[ios->timing];The function
mmc_clk_determine_rate()will need the info which controller it is, what's the init clock rate, what's the max clock rate, and what's the limitation, which may be different as different soc, and can not be hardcoded.
The limitation may in HS200 and SDR104 mode.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
The plan is only input init rate and max rate instead of the table, while others directly use
ios->clock, only if the the limitation resolved.Handling mmc clock for hi3620 is in
drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3620.c, right? Currently only hi3620 has been introduced.
If hi3620's host has a limitation,clk-hi3620.ccan handle clockrange(init, max)for source clock
Quoted 8 lines
enough.
Quoted 5 lines
I feel like clock table is redundant.
Ok. It's just my suggestion. But I still point dependency of mode index number. K3's clock table refers and depends mode definition value frominclude/linux/mmc/host.hIf new mode is added or modified, it should be considered and also may make complicated.Looks like you dislike the
clk_tablevery much :)
Oh, I just want to remove dependency as I mentioned.
Quoted 6 lines
Double checked with the silicon guy, currently it is said the limitation in HS200 and SDR104 can be replaced by the
max_rate, soclk_tablecan be replaced withios->clockdirectly, though they have concern it is not so convinent when removingclk_tablein case limitation rate is not equal tomax_rateagain in future.
I guess specific clock handling(clk-hi3620.c) can adjust required source clock rate.
Quoted 2 lines
Will update accordingly, thanks for the suggestion.
Thank you for consideration.
Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
PATCH v7 2/3 mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3 for k3 platform
Dear Seungwon
Quoted 11 lines · Seungwon Jeon
Quoted 1 line
Looks like you dislike the
clk_tablevery much :)Oh, I just want to remove dependency as I mentioned.
Quoted 6 lines
Double checked with the silicon guy, currently it is said the limitation in HS200 and SDR104 can be replaced by the
max_rate, soclk_tablecan be replaced withios->clockdirectly, though they have concern it is not so convinent when removingclk_tablein case limitation rate is not equal tomax_rateagain in future.I guess specific clock handling(clk-hi3620.c) can adjust required source clock rate.
It is doable now since the soc has been updated with the limitation, which can reuse max_rate now.
The patch "mmc: dw_mmc: k3 remove clk_table" has been updated, and have modified clk-hi3620.c accordingly.
Thanks
PATCH v7 3/3 clk: hisilicon: add hi3620_mmc_clks
In reply to Zhangfei GaoSuggest by Arnd: abstract mmc tuning as clock behavior, also because different soc have different tuning method and registers. hi3620_mmc_clks is added to handle mmc clock specifically on hi3620.
--- .../bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt | 14 ++ .../devicetree/bindings/clock/hi3620-clock.txt | 1 + drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3620.c | 262 ++++++++++++++++++++ include/dt-bindings/clock/hi3620-clock.h | 5 + 4 files changed, 282 insertions(+)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt +14 -0
@@ -30,3 +30,17 @@ Example: resume-offset = <0x308>; reboot-offset = <0x4>; }; + +PCTRL: Peripheral misc control register + +Required Properties: +- compatible: "hisilicon,pctrl" +- reg: Address and size of pctrl. + +Example: + + /* for Hi3620 */ + pctrl: pctrl at fca09000 { + compatible = "hisilicon,pctrl"; + reg = <0xfca09000 0x1000>; + };
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/hi3620-clock.txt +1 -0
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ Required Properties: - compatible: should be one of the following. - "hisilicon,hi3620-clock" - controller compatible with Hi3620 SoC. + - "hisilicon,hi3620-mmc-clock" - controller specific for Hi3620 mmc. - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped region.
drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3620.c +262 -0
265 lines not on this page · raw message
include/dt-bindings/clock/hi3620-clock.h +5 -0
@@ -147,6 +147,11 @@#define HI3620_MMC_CLK3 217#define HI3620_MCU_CLK 218 +#define HI3620_SD_CIUCLK 0 +#define HI3620_MMC_CIUCLK1 1 +#define HI3620_MMC_CIUCLK2 2 +#define HI3620_MMC_CIUCLK3 3 +#define HI3620_NR_CLKS 219#endif /* __DTS_HI3620_CLOCK_H */
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 3/3 clk: hisilicon: add hi3620_mmc_clks
Quoted 5 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Suggest by Arnd: abstract mmc tuning as clock behavior, also because different soc have different tuning method and registers.
hi3620_mmc_clksis added to handle mmc clock specifically on hi3620.Signed-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>
Jaehoon Chung
maintainerv7 cover mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3
In reply to Zhangfei GaoThis patchset looks good to me.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
Quoted 56 lines · Zhangfei Gao
v7:
0002:
use undefined local value in suspend/resumev6:
0002:
Jaehoon pointed HIGHSPEED cap can be omitted if supports-highspeed is defined. Seungwon mentioned clk operation should be called after suspend. Removek3_dwmmc_capsV5:
0002:
Follow advice from Arnd,
Update dt descirption and useof_property_for_each_u32to get table number.v4:
Follow Arnd's suggestion abstracting specific tuning to clock,
also because new version ip use different method and not use same tuning registers.0001 acked by Jaehoon
v3:
0001:
Put set/clear_bitDW_MMC_CARD_PRESENTindw_mci_get_cd, Sincedw_mci_requestwill checkDW_MMC_CARD_PRESENTbefore sending cmd0002:
Follow suggestion from Chris, Kumar and Seungwon
Sync to latest mmc-next, which is 3.12-rc2
Remove enumdw_mci_k3_typeetcv2:
Follow Jaehoon's suggestion
Useslot-gpio.chandle cd pin
Move table out to dts
other suggestionZhangfei Gao (3):
mmc:dw_mmc: use slot-gpio to handle cd pin
mmc:dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3 for k3 platform
clk: hisilicon: addhi3620_mmc_clks.../bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt | 14 ++ .../devicetree/bindings/clock/hi3620-clock.txt | 1 + .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/k3-dw-mshc.txt | 60 +++++ drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3620.c | 262 ++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 10 + drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c | 126 ++++++++++ drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 48 +++- include/dt-bindings/clock/hi3620-clock.h | 5 + 9 files changed, 514 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/k3-dw-mshc.txt create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c
v7 cover mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3
In reply to Zhangfei GaoHi,
I've pushed patches 1 and 2 to mmc-next for 3.14, with Arnd and Jaehoon's ACK -- since patch 3 depends on files that aren't in my tree, please can you push that one through arm-soc?
Thanks,
- Chris.
Signature · 1 line
Chris Ball <[email protected]> <http://printf.net/>
v7 cover mmc: dw_mmc: add dw_mmc-k3
Quoted 5 lines · Chris Ball
Hi,
I've pushed patches 1 and 2 to mmc-next for 3.14, with Arnd and Jaehoon's ACK -- since patch 3 depends on files that aren't in my tree, please can you push that one through arm-soc?
Great, thanks Chris.
The 3rd patch may need go to Mike's tree, will search Mike's help.
Thanks.