Skip to contentSkip to conversation

firewire-lib: add support for AV/C deferred transaction

RFC PATCH In review Takashi Sakamoto 2 participants 3 messages Mar 14, 2014 – Mar 15, 2014

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Takashi Sakamoto

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

RFC PATCH 1/1 firewire-lib: add support for AV/C deferred transaction

Clemens and Stefan,

Can I request your comments about attached patch?

This is for adding support of deferred transaction into snd-firewire-lib. I confirm some BeBoB devices use this type of transaction. If you have no negative comments, I'll add this patch for my series.

For 'undefined interval' between INTERIM and final response, I want to use 'FCP_TIMEOUT_MS' (=125msec) again. In specifications which I can read, there is no limit for this interval. But I need to promise to finish this function for callers.

According to AV/C general specification, targets can send INTERIM response one time. But this patch allows to accept several ITERIM responses for device quirks. I don't have devices which have such quirks, but there may be such devices and I want to make codes simpler.

Regards

Takashi Sakamoto
[email protected]

Quoted 1 line

From 87b73cc7f5aa389101b362f21ddeb0f1a4cbe984 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Takashi Sakamoto <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:17:43 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] firewire-lib: Add support for deferred transaction

Some devices based on BeBoB use this type of transaction.

'Deferred Transaction' is defined in 'AV/C Digital Interface Command Set General Specification' and is used by targets to make a response deferred during processing it.

If a target may not be able to complete a command within 100msec since receiving the command, then the target shall return INTERIM response, to which final response will follow later. CONTROL/NOTIFY commands are allowed for deferred transaction.

There is an issue. In the specification, the interval between INTERIM response and final response is 'Unspecified interval'. The specification depends on each subunit specification for this interval.

But we promise to finish this function for caller. In this reason, I use FCP_TIMEOUT_MS for this interval. Currently it's 125msec.

---
 sound/firewire/fcp.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
sound/firewire/fcp.c +30 -8
index 860c080..56d03fc 100644
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ enum fcp_state {
 	STATE_PENDING,
 	STATE_BUS_RESET,
 	STATE_COMPLETE,
+	STATE_DEFERRED,
 };
 
 struct fcp_transaction {
@@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ struct fcp_transaction {
 	unsigned int response_match_bytes;
 	enum fcp_state state;
 	wait_queue_head_t wait;
+	bool deferrable;
 };
 
 /**
@@ -81,6 +83,9 @@ int fcp_avc_transaction(struct fw_unit *unit,
 	t.state = STATE_PENDING;
 	init_waitqueue_head(&t.wait);
 
+	if (*(const u8 *)command == 0x00 || *(const u8 *)command == 0x03)
+		t.deferrable = true;
+
 	spin_lock_irq(&transactions_lock);
 	list_add_tail(&t.list, &transactions);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&transactions_lock);
@@ -93,17 +98,28 @@ int fcp_avc_transaction(struct fw_unit *unit,
 					 (void *)command, command_size, 0);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			break;
-
+deferred:
 		wait_event_timeout(t.wait, t.state != STATE_PENDING,
 				   msecs_to_jiffies(FCP_TIMEOUT_MS));
 
-		if (t.state == STATE_COMPLETE) {
+		if (t.state == STATE_DEFERRED) {
+			/*
+			 * 'AV/C General Specification' define no time limit
+			 * on command completion once an INTERIM response has
+			 * been sent. but we promise to finish this function
+			 * for a caller. Here we use FCP_TIMEOUT_MS for next
+			 * interval. This is not in the specification.
+			 */
+			t.state = STATE_PENDING;
+			goto deferred;
+		} else if (t.state == STATE_COMPLETE) {
 			ret = t.response_size;
 			break;
 		} else if (t.state == STATE_BUS_RESET) {
 			msleep(ERROR_DELAY_MS);
 		} else if (++tries >= ERROR_RETRIES) {
-			dev_err(&t.unit->device, "FCP command timed out\n");
+			dev_err(&t.unit->device,
+				"FCP command timed out\n");
 			ret = -EIO;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -132,7 +148,8 @@ void fcp_bus_reset(struct fw_unit *unit)
 	spin_lock_irq(&transactions_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(t, &transactions, list) {
 		if (t->unit == unit &&
-		    t->state == STATE_PENDING) {
+		    (t->state == STATE_PENDING ||
+		     t->state == STATE_DEFERRED)) {
 			t->state = STATE_BUS_RESET;
 			wake_up(&t->wait);
 		}
@@ -186,10 +203,15 @@ static void fcp_response(struct fw_card *card, struct fw_request *request,
 
 		if (t->state == STATE_PENDING &&
 		    is_matching_response(t, data, length)) {
-			t->state = STATE_COMPLETE;
-			t->response_size = min((unsigned int)length,
-					       t->response_size);
-			memcpy(t->response_buffer, data, t->response_size);
+			if (t->deferrable && *(const u8 *)data == 0x0f) {
+				t->state = STATE_DEFERRED;
+			} else {
+				t->state = STATE_COMPLETE;
+				t->response_size = min((unsigned int)length,
+						       t->response_size);
+				memcpy(t->response_buffer, data,
+				       t->response_size);
+			}
 			wake_up(&t->wait);
 		}
 	}
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.2

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech

maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Takashi Sakamoto

Can I request your comments about attached patch?

This is for adding support of deferred transaction into snd-firewire-lib. I confirm some BeBoB devices use this type of transaction. If you have no negative comments, I'll add this patch for my series.

Looks OK.

Quoted 4 lines

For 'undefined interval' between INTERIM and final response, I want to use 'FCP_TIMEOUT_MS' (=125msec) again. In specifications which I can read, there is no limit for this interval. But I need to promise to finish this function for callers.

In theory, a device that uses INTERIM is likely to need a larger timeout than the FCP default, but as long as 125 ms works for those BeBoB devices, increasing the timeout is not necessary.

Regards,
Clemens

author maintainer
#2 lore raw

Hi Clemens,

Quoted 1 line · Clemens Ladisch

Looks OK.

Thanks for your quick review.

Quoted 3 lines

In theory, a device that uses INTERIM is likely to need a larger timeout than the FCP default, but as long as 125 ms works for those BeBoB devices, increasing the timeout is not necessary.

With this value and BeBoB devices which I own, I have experienced no retry/timeout.

As long as I know, BeBoB based devices need much time to complete immediate/deferred transaction for changing sampling rate during streaming. In this case, immediate transactions need 150 msec or more and deferred transactions need 40/240msec or more to complete. But BeBoB driver must not change sampling rate in this case because sampling rate should not be changed during streaming. The driver should stop streaming once then change sampling rate.

I suggest that we will change this value when finding devices which need more timeout.

Thanks

Takashi Sakamoto
[email protected]