cleanup kmemcg charging (was: "kmemcg: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG")
Subsystems (8)
v2 cover cleanup kmemcg charging (was: "kmemcg: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG")
Hi,
Currently we charge kmem to memcg in alloc_pages if __GFP_KMEMCG is passed. However, since there are only a few places where we actually want to charge kmem, we could call kmemcg charge function explicitly instead. That would remove all kmemcg-related stuff from the general allocation path and make all kmem charges easier to follow.
So let's charge kmem explicitly where we want it to be charged (slab, threadinfo) and remove __GFP_KMEMCG.
Changes in v2:
- use static key optimization in memcg_(un)charge_slab to avoid any overhead if kmemcg is not used;
- introduce helper functions, alloc/free_kmem_pages, which charge newly allocated pages to kmemcg, to avoid code duplication;
- do not remove accounting of kmalloc_large allocations (as discussed in the comments to v1).
v1 can be found at lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/26/228
Thanks,
Vladimir Davydov (2):
sl[au]b: charge slabs to kmemcg explicitly
mm: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG
include/linux/gfp.h | 10 ++++--- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 17 ++++-------- include/linux/slab.h | 11 -------- include/linux/thread_info.h | 2 -- include/trace/events/gfpflags.h | 1 - kernel/fork.c | 6 ++--- mm/memcontrol.c | 4 +-- mm/page_alloc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- mm/slab.c | 7 ++++- mm/slab.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++ mm/slab_common.c | 18 +++++++++---- mm/slub.c | 30 ++++++++++++++------- 12 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
Signature · 7 lines
1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH v2 1/2 sl[au]b: charge slabs to kmemcg explicitly
We have only a few places where we actually want to charge kmem so instead of intruding into the general page allocation path with __GFP_KMEMCG it's better to explictly charge kmem there. All kmem charges will be easier to follow that way.
This is a step towards removing __GFP_KMEMCG. It removes __GFP_KMEMCG from memcg caches' allocflags. Instead it makes slab allocation path call memcg_charge_kmem directly getting memcg to charge from the cache's memcg params.
This also eliminates any possibility of misaccounting an allocation going from one memcg's cache to another memcg, because now we always charge slabs against the memcg the cache belongs to. That's why this patch removes the big comment to memcg_kmem_get_cache.
--- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 15 ++++----------- mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++-- mm/slab.c | 7 ++++++- mm/slab.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/slab_common.c | 6 +----- mm/slub.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- 6 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
include/linux/memcontrol.h +4 -11
@@ -512,6 +512,9 @@ void memcg_update_array_size(int num_groups);struct kmem_cache *__memcg_kmem_get_cache (struct kmem_cache *cachep,gfp_t gfp); +int memcg_charge_kmem (struct mem_cgroup *memcg,gfp_t gfp,u64 size); +void memcg_uncharge_kmem (struct mem_cgroup *memcg,u64 size); +void mem_cgroup_destroy_cache (struct kmem_cache *cachep);int __kmem_cache_destroy_memcg_children (struct kmem_cache *s);
@@ -589,17 +592,7 @@ memcg_kmem_commit_charge(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int order)* @cachep: the original global kmem cache * @gfp: allocation flags. * -* This function assumes that the task allocating, which determines the memcg -* in the page allocator, belongs to the same cgroup throughout the whole -* process. Misacounting can happen if the task calls memcg_kmem_get_cache() -* while belonging to a cgroup, and later on changes. This is considered -* acceptable, and should only happen upon task migration. -* -* Before the cache is created by the memcg core, there is also a possible -* imbalance: the task belongs to a memcg, but the cache being allocated from -* is the global cache, since the child cache is not yet guaranteed to be -* ready. This case is also fine, since in this case the GFP_KMEMCG will not be -* passed and the page allocator will not attempt any cgroup accounting. +* All memory allocated from a per-memcg cache is charged to the owner memcg. */ static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *memcg_kmem_get_cache (struct kmem_cache *cachep,gfp_t gfp)
mm/memcontrol.c +2 -2
@@ -2944,7 +2944,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_slabinfo_read(struct seq_file *m, void *v) }#endif -static int memcg_charge_kmem (struct mem_cgroup *memcg,gfp_t gfp,u64 size) +int memcg_charge_kmem (struct mem_cgroup *memcg,gfp_t gfp,u64 size) {struct res_counter *fail_res;int ret =0 ;
@@ -2982,7 +2982,7 @@ static int memcg_charge_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp, u64 size)return ret; } -static void memcg_uncharge_kmem (struct mem_cgroup *memcg,u64 size) +void memcg_uncharge_kmem (struct mem_cgroup *memcg,u64 size) {res_counter_uncharge (&memcg->res, size);if (do_swap_account)
mm/slab.c +6 -1
@@ -1664,8 +1664,12 @@ static struct page *kmem_getpages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags,if (cachep->flags &SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT ) flags |= __GFP_RECLAIMABLE; +if (memcg_charge_slab (cachep, flags, cachep->gfporder)) +return NULL ; + page =alloc_pages_exact_node (nodeid, flags | __GFP_NOTRACK, cachep->gfporder);if (!page) { +memcg_uncharge_slab (cachep, cachep->gfporder);if (!(flags & __GFP_NOWARN) &&printk_ratelimit ())slab_out_of_memory (cachep, flags, nodeid);return NULL ;
@@ -1724,7 +1728,8 @@ static void kmem_freepages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct page *page)memcg_release_pages (cachep, cachep->gfporder);if (current->reclaim_state) current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += nr_freed; -__free_memcg_kmem_pages (page, cachep->gfporder); +__free_pages (page, cachep->gfporder); +memcg_uncharge_slab (cachep, cachep->gfporder); }static void kmem_rcu_free (struct rcu_head *head)
mm/slab.h +29 -0
@@ -191,6 +191,26 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache *memcg_root_cache(struct kmem_cache *s)return s;return s->memcg_params->root_cache; } + +static __always_inline int memcg_charge_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, +gfp_t gfp,int order) +{ +if (!memcg_kmem_enabled ()) +return 0 ; +if (is_root_cache (s)) +return 0 ; +return memcg_charge_kmem (s->memcg_params->memcg, gfp, +PAGE_SIZE << order); +} + +static __always_inline void memcg_uncharge_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, int order) +{ +if (!memcg_kmem_enabled ()) +return ; +if (is_root_cache (s)) +return ; +memcg_uncharge_kmem (s->memcg_params->memcg,PAGE_SIZE << order); +}#else static inline bool is_root_cache (struct kmem_cache *s) {
@@ -226,6 +246,15 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache *memcg_root_cache(struct kmem_cache *s) {return s; } + +static inline int memcg_charge_slab (struct kmem_cache *s,gfp_t gfp,int order) +{ +return 0 ; +} + +static inline void memcg_uncharge_slab (struct kmem_cache *s,int order) +{ +}#endif static inline struct kmem_cache *cache_from_obj (struct kmem_cache *s,void *x)
mm/slab_common.c +1 -5
@@ -290,12 +290,8 @@ void kmem_cache_create_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *root_c root_cache->size, root_cache->align, root_cache->flags, root_cache->ctor, memcg, root_cache); -if (IS_ERR (s)) { +if (IS_ERR (s))kfree (cache_name); - goto out_unlock; - } - - s->allocflags |= __GFP_KMEMCG; out_unlock:mutex_unlock (&slab_mutex);
mm/slub.c +17 -7
@@ -1317,17 +1317,26 @@ static inline void slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x)/* * Slab allocation and freeing */ -static inline struct page *alloc_slab_page (gfp_t flags,int node, -struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo) +static inline struct page *alloc_slab_page (struct kmem_cache *s, +gfp_t flags,int node,struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo) { +struct page *page;int order =oo_order (oo); flags |= __GFP_NOTRACK; +if (memcg_charge_slab (s, flags, order)) +return NULL ; +if (node ==NUMA_NO_NODE ) -return alloc_pages (flags, order); + page =alloc_pages (flags, order);else -return alloc_pages_exact_node (node, flags, order); + page =alloc_pages_exact_node (node, flags, order); + +if (!page) +memcg_uncharge_slab (s, order); + +return page; }static struct page *allocate_slab (struct kmem_cache *s,gfp_t flags,int node)
@@ -1349,7 +1358,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)*/ alloc_gfp = (flags | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY) & ~__GFP_NOFAIL; - page =alloc_slab_page (alloc_gfp, node, oo); + page =alloc_slab_page (s, alloc_gfp, node, oo);if (unlikely (!page)) { oo = s->min; alloc_gfp = flags;
@@ -1357,7 +1366,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)* Allocation may have failed due to fragmentation. * Try a lower order alloc if possible */ - page =alloc_slab_page (alloc_gfp, node, oo); + page =alloc_slab_page (s, alloc_gfp, node, oo);if (page)stat (s,ORDER_FALLBACK );
@@ -1473,7 +1482,8 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)page_mapcount_reset (page);if (current->reclaim_state) current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += pages; -__free_memcg_kmem_pages (page, order); +__free_pages (page, order); +memcg_uncharge_slab (s, order); }#define need_reserve_slab_rcu \
Signature · 7 lines
1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/2] sl[au]b: charge slabs to kmemcg explicitly
Quoted 10 lines · Vladimir Davydov
We have only a few places where we actually want to charge kmem so instead of intruding into the general page allocation path with
__GFP_KMEMCGit's better to explictly charge kmem there. All kmem charges will be easier to follow that way.This is a step towards removing
__GFP_KMEMCG. It removes__GFP_KMEMCGfrom memcg caches' allocflags. Instead it makes slab allocation path callmemcg_charge_kmemdirectly getting memcg to charge from the cache's memcg params.
Quoted 6 lines
This also eliminates any possibility of misaccounting an allocation going from one memcg's cache to another memcg, because now we always charge slabs against the memcg the cache belongs to. That's why this patch removes the big comment to
memcg_kmem_get_cache.Signed-off-by Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH v2 2/2 mm: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG
In reply to Vladimir DavydovCurrently to allocate a page that should be charged to kmemcg (e.g. threadinfo), we pass __GFP_KMEMCG flag to the page allocator. The page allocated is then to be freed by free_memcg_kmem_pages. Apart from looking asymmetrical, this also requires intrusion to the general allocation path. So let's introduce separate functions that will alloc/free pages charged to kmemcg.
The new functions are called alloc_kmem_pages and free_kmem_pages. They should be used when the caller actually would like to use kmalloc, but has to fall back to the page allocator for the allocation is large. They only differ from alloc_pages and free_pages in that besides allocating or freeing pages they also charge them to the kmem resource counter of the current memory cgroup.
--- include/linux/gfp.h | 10 ++++--- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 +- include/linux/slab.h | 11 -------- include/linux/thread_info.h | 2 -- include/trace/events/gfpflags.h | 1 - kernel/fork.c | 6 ++--- mm/page_alloc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- mm/slab_common.c | 12 +++++++++ mm/slub.c | 6 ++--- 9 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
include/linux/gfp.h +6 -4
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ struct vm_area_struct;#define ___GFP_HARDWALL 0x20000u#define ___GFP_THISNODE 0x40000u#define ___GFP_RECLAIMABLE 0x80000u -#define ___GFP_KMEMCG 0x100000u#define ___GFP_NOTRACK 0x200000u#define ___GFP_NO_KSWAPD 0x400000u#define ___GFP_OTHER_NODE 0x800000u
@@ -91,7 +90,6 @@ struct vm_area_struct;#define __GFP_NO_KSWAPD ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_NO_KSWAPD)#define __GFP_OTHER_NODE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_OTHER_NODE)/* On behalf of other node */ -#define __GFP_KMEMCG ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_KMEMCG)/* Allocation comes from a memcg-accounted resource */ #define __GFP_WRITE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_WRITE)/* Allocator intends to dirty page */ /*
@@ -353,6 +351,10 @@ extern struct page *alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,#define alloc_page_vma_node (gfp_mask, vma, addr, node) \ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_mask, 0, vma, addr, node) +extern struct page *alloc_kmem_pages (gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order); +extern struct page *alloc_kmem_pages_node (int nid,gfp_t gfp_mask, +unsigned int order); +extern unsigned long __get_free_pages (gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order);extern unsigned long get_zeroed_page (gfp_t gfp_mask);
@@ -372,8 +374,8 @@ extern void free_pages(unsigned long addr, unsigned int order);extern void free_hot_cold_page (struct page *page,int cold);extern void free_hot_cold_page_list (struct list_head *list,int cold); -extern void __free_memcg_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order); -extern void free_memcg_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order); +extern void __free_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order); +extern void free_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order);#define __free_page (page) __free_pages((page), 0)#define free_page (addr) free_pages((addr), 0)
include/linux/memcontrol.h +1 -1
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup **memcg, int order)* res_counter_charge_nofail, but we hope those allocations are rare, * and won't be worth the trouble. */ -if (!(gfp & __GFP_KMEMCG) || (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL)) +if (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL)return true;if (in_interrupt () || (!current->mm) || (current->flags &PF_KTHREAD ))return true;
include/linux/slab.h +0 -11
@@ -358,17 +358,6 @@ kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s,#include <linux/slub_def.h> #endif -static __always_inline void * -kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) -{ -void *ret; - - flags |= (__GFP_COMP | __GFP_KMEMCG); - ret = (void *)__get_free_pages (flags, order); -kmemleak_alloc (ret, size,1 , flags); -return ret; -} -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING extern void *kmalloc_order_trace (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order);#else
include/linux/thread_info.h +0 -2
@@ -61,8 +61,6 @@ extern long do_no_restart_syscall(struct restart_block *parm);# define THREADINFO_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK)#endif -#define THREADINFO_GFP_ACCOUNTED (THREADINFO_GFP | __GFP_KMEMCG) -/* * flag set/clear/test wrappers * - pass TIF_xxxx constants to these functions
include/trace/events/gfpflags.h +0 -1
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ {(unsigned long)__GFP_HARDWALL, "GFP_HARDWALL"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_THISNODE, "GFP_THISNODE"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_RECLAIMABLE, "GFP_RECLAIMABLE"}, \ - {(unsigned long)__GFP_KMEMCG, "GFP_KMEMCG"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_MOVABLE, "GFP_MOVABLE"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_NOTRACK, "GFP_NOTRACK"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_NO_KSWAPD, "GFP_NO_KSWAPD"}, \
kernel/fork.c +3 -3
@@ -150,15 +150,15 @@ void __weak arch_release_thread_info(struct thread_info *ti)static struct thread_info *alloc_thread_info_node (struct task_struct *tsk,int node) { -struct page *page =alloc_pages_node (node,THREADINFO_GFP_ACCOUNTED , -THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ); +struct page *page =alloc_kmem_pages_node (node,THREADINFO_GFP , +THREAD_SIZE_ORDER );return page ?page_address (page) :NULL ; }static inline void free_thread_info (struct thread_info *ti) { -free_memcg_kmem_pages ((unsigned long )ti,THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ); +free_kmem_pages ((unsigned long )ti,THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ); }# else static struct kmem_cache *thread_info_cache;
mm/page_alloc.c +35 -21
90 lines not on this page · raw message
mm/slab_common.c +12 -0
@@ -573,6 +573,18 @@ void __init create_kmalloc_caches(unsigned long flags) }#endif /* !CONFIG_SLOB */ +void *kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) +{ +void *ret; +struct page *page; + + flags |= __GFP_COMP; + page =alloc_kmem_pages (flags, order); + ret = page ?page_address (page) :NULL ; +kmemleak_alloc (ret, size,1 , flags); +return ret; +} +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING void *kmalloc_order_trace (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) {
mm/slub.c +3 -3
@@ -3335,8 +3335,8 @@ static void *kmalloc_large_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)struct page *page;void *ptr =NULL ; - flags |= __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOTRACK | __GFP_KMEMCG; - page =alloc_pages_node (node, flags,get_order (size)); + flags |= __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOTRACK; + page =alloc_kmem_pages_node (node, flags,get_order (size));if (page) ptr =page_address (page);
@@ -3405,7 +3405,7 @@ void kfree(const void *x)if (unlikely (!PageSlab (page))) {BUG_ON (!PageCompound (page));kfree_hook (x); -__free_memcg_kmem_pages (page,compound_order (page)); +__free_kmem_pages (page,compound_order (page));return ; }slab_free (page->slab_cache, page, object, _RET_IP_);
Signature · 7 lines
1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 2/2] mm: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG
Quoted 91 lines · Vladimir Davydov
Currently to allocate a page that should be charged to kmemcg (e.g. threadinfo), we pass
__GFP_KMEMCGflag to the page allocator. The page allocated is then to be freed byfree_memcg_kmem_pages. Apart from looking asymmetrical, this also requires intrusion to the general allocation path. So let's introduce separate functions that will alloc/free pages charged to kmemcg.The new functions are called
alloc_kmem_pagesandfree_kmem_pages. They should be used when the caller actually would like to use kmalloc, but has to fall back to the page allocator for the allocation is large. They only differ fromalloc_pagesandfree_pagesin that besides allocating or freeing pages they also charge them to the kmem resource counter of the current memory cgroup.Signed-off-by Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]>--- include/linux/gfp.h | 10 ++++--- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 +- include/linux/slab.h | 11 -------- include/linux/thread_info.h | 2 -- include/trace/events/gfpflags.h | 1 - kernel/fork.c | 6 ++--- mm/page_alloc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- mm/slab_common.c | 12 +++++++++ mm/slub.c | 6 ++--- 9 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)include/linux/gfp.h +6
-4@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ struct vm_area_struct;#define ___GFP_HARDWALL 0x20000u#define ___GFP_THISNODE 0x40000u#define ___GFP_RECLAIMABLE 0x80000u -#define ___GFP_KMEMCG 0x100000u#define ___GFP_NOTRACK 0x200000u#define ___GFP_NO_KSWAPD 0x400000u#define ___GFP_OTHER_NODE 0x800000u@@ -91,7 +90,6 @@ struct vm_area_struct;#define __GFP_NO_KSWAPD ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_NO_KSWAPD)#define __GFP_OTHER_NODE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_OTHER_NODE)/* On behalf of other node */ -#define __GFP_KMEMCG ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_KMEMCG)/* Allocation comes from a memcg-accounted resource */ #define __GFP_WRITE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_WRITE)/* Allocator intends to dirty page */ /* @@ -353,6 +351,10 @@ extern struct page *alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,#define alloc_page_vma_node (gfp_mask, vma, addr, node) \ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_mask, 0, vma, addr, node) +extern struct page *alloc_kmem_pages (gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order); +extern struct page *alloc_kmem_pages_node (int nid,gfp_t gfp_mask, +unsigned int order); +extern unsigned long __get_free_pages (gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order);extern unsigned long get_zeroed_page (gfp_t gfp_mask);@@ -372,8 +374,8 @@ extern void free_pages(unsigned long addr, unsigned int order);extern void free_hot_cold_page (struct page *page,int cold);extern void free_hot_cold_page_list (struct list_head *list,int cold); -extern void __free_memcg_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order); -extern void free_memcg_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order); +extern void __free_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order); +extern void free_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order);#define __free_page (page) __free_pages((page), 0)#define free_page (addr) free_pages((addr), 0)include/linux/memcontrol.h +1
-1@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup **memcg, int order)* res_counter_charge_nofail, but we hope those allocations are rare, * and won't be worth the trouble. */ -if (!(gfp & __GFP_KMEMCG) || (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL)) +if (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL)return true;if (in_interrupt () || (!current->mm) || (current->flags &PF_KTHREAD ))return true;include/linux/slab.h +0
-1@@ -358,17 +358,6 @@ kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s,#include <linux/slub_def.h> #endif -static __always_inline void *
include/linux/slab.h kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, · line 371
Quoted 10 lines
include/linux/slab.h +0
-10-kmalloc_order(size_t size, gfp_t flags, unsigned int order) -{ - void *ret; - - flags |= (__GFP_COMP | __GFP_KMEMCG); - ret = (void *)__get_free_pages (flags, order); -kmemleak_alloc (ret, size,1 , flags); -return ret; -} -
Removing this from the header file breaks builds withoutCONFIG_TRACING.
Example:
% make allnoconfig && make -j4 mm/
[...]
include/linux/slab.h: In function a??kmalloc_order_tracea??:
include/linux/slab.h:367:2: error: implicit declaration of function a??kmalloc_ordera?? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Quoted 188 lines
include/linux/slab.h +0
-0#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING extern void *kmalloc_order_trace (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order);#else include/linux/thread_info.h +0
-2@@ -61,8 +61,6 @@ extern long do_no_restart_syscall(struct restart_block *parm);# define THREADINFO_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK)#endif -#define THREADINFO_GFP_ACCOUNTED (THREADINFO_GFP | __GFP_KMEMCG) -/* * flag set/clear/test wrappers * - pass TIF_xxxx constants to these functions include/trace/events/gfpflags.h +0
-1@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ {(unsigned long)__GFP_HARDWALL, "GFP_HARDWALL"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_THISNODE, "GFP_THISNODE"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_RECLAIMABLE, "GFP_RECLAIMABLE"}, \ - {(unsigned long)__GFP_KMEMCG, "GFP_KMEMCG"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_MOVABLE, "GFP_MOVABLE"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_NOTRACK, "GFP_NOTRACK"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_NO_KSWAPD, "GFP_NO_KSWAPD"}, \kernel/fork.c +3
-3@@ -150,15 +150,15 @@ void __weak arch_release_thread_info(struct thread_info *ti)static struct thread_info *alloc_thread_info_node (struct task_struct *tsk,int node) { -struct page *page =alloc_pages_node (node,THREADINFO_GFP_ACCOUNTED , -THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ); +struct page *page =alloc_kmem_pages_node (node,THREADINFO_GFP , +THREAD_SIZE_ORDER );return page ?page_address (page) :NULL ; }static inline void free_thread_info (struct thread_info *ti) { -free_memcg_kmem_pages ((unsigned long )ti,THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ); +free_kmem_pages ((unsigned long )ti,THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ); }# else static struct kmem_cache *thread_info_cache;mm/page_alloc.c +35
-21@@ -2723,7 +2723,6 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,int migratetype =allocflags_to_migratetype (gfp_mask);unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;int alloc_flags =ALLOC_WMARK_LOW |ALLOC_CPUSET |ALLOC_FAIR ; -struct mem_cgroup *memcg =NULL ; gfp_mask &= gfp_allowed_mask;@@ -2742,13 +2741,6 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,if (unlikely (!zonelist->_zonerefs->zone))return NULL ; -/* -* Will only have any effect when __GFP_KMEMCG is set. This is -* verified in the (always inline) callee -*/ -if (!memcg_kmem_newpage_charge (gfp_mask, &memcg, order)) -return NULL ; - retry_cpuset: cpuset_mems_cookie =read_mems_allowed_begin ();@@ -2810,8 +2802,6 @@ out:if (unlikely (!page &&read_mems_allowed_retry (cpuset_mems_cookie))) goto retry_cpuset; -memcg_kmem_commit_charge (page, memcg, order); -if (page)set_page_owner (page, order, gfp_mask);@@ -2868,27 +2858,51 @@ void free_pages(unsigned long addr, unsigned int order)EXPORT_SYMBOL (free_pages);/* -* __free_memcg_kmem_pages and free_memcg_kmem_pages will free -* pages allocated with __GFP_KMEMCG. +* alloc_kmem_pages charges newly allocated pages to the kmem resource counter +* of the current memory cgroup. * -* Those pages are accounted to a particular memcg, embedded in the -* corresponding page_cgroup. To avoid adding a hit in the allocator to search -* for that information only to find out that it is NULL for users who have no -* interest in that whatsoever, we provide these functions. -* -* The caller knows better which flags it relies on. +* It should be used when the caller would like to use kmalloc, but since the +* allocation is large, it has to fall back to the page allocator. +*/ +struct page *alloc_kmem_pages (gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order) +{ +struct page *page; +struct mem_cgroup *memcg =NULL ; + +if (!memcg_kmem_newpage_charge (gfp_mask, &memcg, order)) +return NULL ; + page =alloc_pages (gfp_mask, order); +memcg_kmem_commit_charge (page, memcg, order); +return page; +} + +struct page *alloc_kmem_pages_node (int nid,gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order) +{ +struct page *page; +struct mem_cgroup *memcg =NULL ; + +if (!memcg_kmem_newpage_charge (gfp_mask, &memcg, order)) +return NULL ; + page =alloc_pages_node (nid, gfp_mask, order); +memcg_kmem_commit_charge (page, memcg, order); +return page; +} + +/* +* __free_kmem_pages and free_kmem_pages will free pages allocated with +* alloc_kmem_pages. */ -void __free_memcg_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order) +void __free_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order) {memcg_kmem_uncharge_pages (page, order);__free_pages (page, order); } -void free_memcg_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order) +void free_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order) {if (addr !=0 ) {VM_BUG_ON (!virt_addr_valid ((void *)addr)); -__free_memcg_kmem_pages (virt_to_page ((void *)addr), order); +__free_kmem_pages (virt_to_page ((void *)addr), order); } }mm/slab_common.c +12
-0@@ -573,6 +573,18 @@ void __init create_kmalloc_caches(unsigned long flags) }#endif /* !CONFIG_SLOB */ +void *kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) +{ +void *ret; +struct page *page; + + flags |= __GFP_COMP; + page =alloc_kmem_pages (flags, order); + ret = page ?page_address (page) :NULL ; +kmemleak_alloc (ret, size,1 , flags); +return ret; +} +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING void *kmalloc_order_trace (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) {mm/slub.c +2
-2@@ -3335,8 +3335,8 @@ static void *kmalloc_large_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)struct page *page;void *ptr =NULL ; - flags |= __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOTRACK | __GFP_KMEMCG; - page =alloc_pages_node (node, flags,get_order (size)); + flags |= __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOTRACK; + page =alloc_kmem_pages_node (node, flags,get_order (size));if (page) ptr =page_address (page);
mm/slub.c void kfree(const void *x) · line 3411
Quoted 8 lines
mm/slub.c +1
-1@@ -3405,7 +3405,7 @@ void kfree(const void *x)if (unlikely (!PageSlab (page))) {BUG_ON (!PageCompound (page));kfree_hook (x); -__free_memcg_kmem_pages (page,compound_order (page)); +__free_kmem_pages (page,compound_order (page));return ; }slab_free (page->slab_cache, page, object, _RET_IP_);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH -mm v2 2/2] mm: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG
Quoted 19 lines · Greg Thelen
include/linux/slab.h +0
-11@@ -358,17 +358,6 @@ kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s,#include <linux/slub_def.h> #endif -static __always_inline void * -kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) -{ -void *ret; - - flags |= (__GFP_COMP | __GFP_KMEMCG); - ret = (void *)__get_free_pages (flags, order); -kmemleak_alloc (ret, size,1 , flags); -return ret; -} -
Quoted 7 lines
Removing this from the header file breaks builds without
CONFIG_TRACING.
Example:
% make allnoconfig && make -j4mm/
[...]
include/linux/slab.h: In function ‘kmalloc_order_trace’:
include/linux/slab.h:367:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kmalloc_order’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Oh, my bad - forgot to add the function declaration :-(
The fixed version is on its way. Thank you for catching this!
PATCH 1/1 mm: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG
In reply to Vladimir DavydovCurrently to allocate a page that should be charged to kmemcg (e.g. threadinfo), we pass __GFP_KMEMCG flag to the page allocator. The page allocated is then to be freed by free_memcg_kmem_pages. Apart from looking asymmetrical, this also requires intrusion to the general allocation path. So let's introduce separate functions that will alloc/free pages charged to kmemcg.
The new functions are called alloc_kmem_pages and free_kmem_pages. They should be used when the caller actually would like to use kmalloc, but has to fall back to the page allocator for the allocation is large. They only differ from alloc_pages and free_pages in that besides allocating or freeing pages they also charge them to the kmem resource counter of the current memory cgroup.
---
Changes in v2.1:
- add missing kmalloc_order forward declaration; lacking it caused compilation breakage with CONFIG_TRACING=n
include/linux/gfp.h | 10 ++++--- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 +- include/linux/slab.h | 11 +------- include/linux/thread_info.h | 2 -- include/trace/events/gfpflags.h | 1 - kernel/fork.c | 6 ++--- mm/page_alloc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- mm/slab_common.c | 12 +++++++++ mm/slub.c | 6 ++--- 9 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
include/linux/gfp.h +6 -4
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ struct vm_area_struct;#define ___GFP_HARDWALL 0x20000u#define ___GFP_THISNODE 0x40000u#define ___GFP_RECLAIMABLE 0x80000u -#define ___GFP_KMEMCG 0x100000u#define ___GFP_NOTRACK 0x200000u#define ___GFP_NO_KSWAPD 0x400000u#define ___GFP_OTHER_NODE 0x800000u
@@ -91,7 +90,6 @@ struct vm_area_struct;#define __GFP_NO_KSWAPD ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_NO_KSWAPD)#define __GFP_OTHER_NODE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_OTHER_NODE)/* On behalf of other node */ -#define __GFP_KMEMCG ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_KMEMCG)/* Allocation comes from a memcg-accounted resource */ #define __GFP_WRITE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_WRITE)/* Allocator intends to dirty page */ /*
@@ -353,6 +351,10 @@ extern struct page *alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,#define alloc_page_vma_node (gfp_mask, vma, addr, node) \ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_mask, 0, vma, addr, node) +extern struct page *alloc_kmem_pages (gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order); +extern struct page *alloc_kmem_pages_node (int nid,gfp_t gfp_mask, +unsigned int order); +extern unsigned long __get_free_pages (gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order);extern unsigned long get_zeroed_page (gfp_t gfp_mask);
@@ -372,8 +374,8 @@ extern void free_pages(unsigned long addr, unsigned int order);extern void free_hot_cold_page (struct page *page,int cold);extern void free_hot_cold_page_list (struct list_head *list,int cold); -extern void __free_memcg_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order); -extern void free_memcg_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order); +extern void __free_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order); +extern void free_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order);#define __free_page (page) __free_pages((page), 0)#define free_page (addr) free_pages((addr), 0)
include/linux/memcontrol.h +1 -1
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup **memcg, int order)* res_counter_charge_nofail, but we hope those allocations are rare, * and won't be worth the trouble. */ -if (!(gfp & __GFP_KMEMCG) || (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL)) +if (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL)return true;if (in_interrupt () || (!current->mm) || (current->flags &PF_KTHREAD ))return true;
include/linux/slab.h +1 -10
@@ -358,16 +358,7 @@ kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s,#include <linux/slub_def.h> #endif -static __always_inline void * -kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) -{ -void *ret; - - flags |= (__GFP_COMP | __GFP_KMEMCG); - ret = (void *)__get_free_pages (flags, order); -kmemleak_alloc (ret, size,1 , flags); -return ret; -} +extern void *kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order);#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING extern void *kmalloc_order_trace (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order);
include/linux/thread_info.h +0 -2
@@ -61,8 +61,6 @@ extern long do_no_restart_syscall(struct restart_block *parm);# define THREADINFO_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK)#endif -#define THREADINFO_GFP_ACCOUNTED (THREADINFO_GFP | __GFP_KMEMCG) -/* * flag set/clear/test wrappers * - pass TIF_xxxx constants to these functions
include/trace/events/gfpflags.h +0 -1
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ {(unsigned long)__GFP_HARDWALL, "GFP_HARDWALL"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_THISNODE, "GFP_THISNODE"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_RECLAIMABLE, "GFP_RECLAIMABLE"}, \ - {(unsigned long)__GFP_KMEMCG, "GFP_KMEMCG"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_MOVABLE, "GFP_MOVABLE"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_NOTRACK, "GFP_NOTRACK"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_NO_KSWAPD, "GFP_NO_KSWAPD"}, \
kernel/fork.c +3 -3
@@ -150,15 +150,15 @@ void __weak arch_release_thread_info(struct thread_info *ti)static struct thread_info *alloc_thread_info_node (struct task_struct *tsk,int node) { -struct page *page =alloc_pages_node (node,THREADINFO_GFP_ACCOUNTED , -THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ); +struct page *page =alloc_kmem_pages_node (node,THREADINFO_GFP , +THREAD_SIZE_ORDER );return page ?page_address (page) :NULL ; }static inline void free_thread_info (struct thread_info *ti) { -free_memcg_kmem_pages ((unsigned long )ti,THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ); +free_kmem_pages ((unsigned long )ti,THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ); }# else static struct kmem_cache *thread_info_cache;
mm/page_alloc.c +35 -21
90 lines not on this page · raw message
mm/slab_common.c +12 -0
@@ -573,6 +573,18 @@ void __init create_kmalloc_caches(unsigned long flags) }#endif /* !CONFIG_SLOB */ +void *kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) +{ +void *ret; +struct page *page; + + flags |= __GFP_COMP; + page =alloc_kmem_pages (flags, order); + ret = page ?page_address (page) :NULL ; +kmemleak_alloc (ret, size,1 , flags); +return ret; +} +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING void *kmalloc_order_trace (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) {
mm/slub.c +3 -3
@@ -3335,8 +3335,8 @@ static void *kmalloc_large_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)struct page *page;void *ptr =NULL ; - flags |= __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOTRACK | __GFP_KMEMCG; - page =alloc_pages_node (node, flags,get_order (size)); + flags |= __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOTRACK; + page =alloc_kmem_pages_node (node, flags,get_order (size));if (page) ptr =page_address (page);
@@ -3405,7 +3405,7 @@ void kfree(const void *x)if (unlikely (!PageSlab (page))) {BUG_ON (!PageCompound (page));kfree_hook (x); -__free_memcg_kmem_pages (page,compound_order (page)); +__free_kmem_pages (page,compound_order (page));return ; }slab_free (page->slab_cache, page, object, _RET_IP_);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
Re: [PATCH -mm v2.1] mm: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG
Quoted 7 lines · Vladimir Davydov
Currently to allocate a page that should be charged to kmemcg (e.g. threadinfo), we pass
__GFP_KMEMCGflag to the page allocator. The page allocated is then to be freed byfree_memcg_kmem_pages. Apart from looking asymmetrical, this also requires intrusion to the general allocation path. So let's introduce separate functions that will alloc/free pages charged to kmemcg.
Quoted 8 lines
The new functions are called
alloc_kmem_pagesandfree_kmem_pages. They should be used when the caller actually would like to use kmalloc, but has to fall back to the page allocator for the allocation is large. They only differ fromalloc_pagesandfree_pagesin that besides allocating or freeing pages they also charge them to the kmem resource counter of the current memory cgroup.Signed-off-by Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]>
One comment nit below, otherwise looks good to me.
Quoted 68 lines
Cc Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>Cc Michal Hocko <[email protected]>Cc Glauber Costa <[email protected]>Cc Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>Cc Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>---
Changes in v2.1:
- add missingkmalloc_orderforward declaration; lacking it caused compilation breakage withCONFIG_TRACING=ninclude/linux/gfp.h | 10 ++++--- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 +- include/linux/slab.h | 11 +------- include/linux/thread_info.h | 2 -- include/trace/events/gfpflags.h | 1 - kernel/fork.c | 6 ++--- mm/page_alloc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- mm/slab_common.c | 12 +++++++++ mm/slub.c | 6 ++--- 9 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)include/linux/gfp.h +6
-4@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ struct vm_area_struct;#define ___GFP_HARDWALL 0x20000u#define ___GFP_THISNODE 0x40000u#define ___GFP_RECLAIMABLE 0x80000u -#define ___GFP_KMEMCG 0x100000u#define ___GFP_NOTRACK 0x200000u#define ___GFP_NO_KSWAPD 0x400000u#define ___GFP_OTHER_NODE 0x800000u@@ -91,7 +90,6 @@ struct vm_area_struct;#define __GFP_NO_KSWAPD ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_NO_KSWAPD)#define __GFP_OTHER_NODE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_OTHER_NODE)/* On behalf of other node */ -#define __GFP_KMEMCG ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_KMEMCG)/* Allocation comes from a memcg-accounted resource */ #define __GFP_WRITE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_WRITE)/* Allocator intends to dirty page */ /* @@ -353,6 +351,10 @@ extern struct page *alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,#define alloc_page_vma_node (gfp_mask, vma, addr, node) \ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_mask, 0, vma, addr, node) +extern struct page *alloc_kmem_pages (gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order); +extern struct page *alloc_kmem_pages_node (int nid,gfp_t gfp_mask, +unsigned int order); +extern unsigned long __get_free_pages (gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order);extern unsigned long get_zeroed_page (gfp_t gfp_mask);@@ -372,8 +374,8 @@ extern void free_pages(unsigned long addr, unsigned int order);extern void free_hot_cold_page (struct page *page,int cold);extern void free_hot_cold_page_list (struct list_head *list,int cold); -extern void __free_memcg_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order); -extern void free_memcg_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order); +extern void __free_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order); +extern void free_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order);#define __free_page (page) __free_pages((page), 0)#define free_page (addr) free_pages((addr), 0)include/linux/memcontrol.h +0
-0
include/linux/memcontrol.h memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup **memcg, int order) · line 545
Quoted 3 lines
include/linux/memcontrol.h +0
-0@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup **memcg, int order)* res_counter_charge_nofail, but we hope those allocations are rare, * and won't be worth the trouble. */
Just a few lines higher in first memcg_kmem_newpage_charge() comment, there is a leftover reference to GFP_KMEMCG which should be removed.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH -mm v2.1] mm: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG
Quoted 82 lines · Greg Thelen
Quoted 7 lines · Vladimir Davydov
Currently to allocate a page that should be charged to kmemcg (e.g. threadinfo), we pass
__GFP_KMEMCGflag to the page allocator. The page allocated is then to be freed byfree_memcg_kmem_pages. Apart from looking asymmetrical, this also requires intrusion to the general allocation path. So let's introduce separate functions that will alloc/free pages charged to kmemcg.Quoted 8 lines
The new functions are called
alloc_kmem_pagesandfree_kmem_pages. They should be used when the caller actually would like to use kmalloc, but has to fall back to the page allocator for the allocation is large. They only differ fromalloc_pagesandfree_pagesin that besides allocating or freeing pages they also charge them to the kmem resource counter of the current memory cgroup.Signed-off-by Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]>One comment nit below, otherwise looks good to me.
Acked-by Greg Thelen <[email protected]>Quoted 61 lines
Cc Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>Cc Michal Hocko <[email protected]>Cc Glauber Costa <[email protected]>Cc Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>Cc Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>---
Changes in v2.1:
- add missingkmalloc_orderforward declaration; lacking it caused compilation breakage withCONFIG_TRACING=ninclude/linux/gfp.h | 10 ++++--- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 +- include/linux/slab.h | 11 +------- include/linux/thread_info.h | 2 -- include/trace/events/gfpflags.h | 1 - kernel/fork.c | 6 ++--- mm/page_alloc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- mm/slab_common.c | 12 +++++++++ mm/slub.c | 6 ++--- 9 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)include/linux/gfp.h +6
-4@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ struct vm_area_struct;#define ___GFP_HARDWALL 0x20000u#define ___GFP_THISNODE 0x40000u#define ___GFP_RECLAIMABLE 0x80000u -#define ___GFP_KMEMCG 0x100000u#define ___GFP_NOTRACK 0x200000u#define ___GFP_NO_KSWAPD 0x400000u#define ___GFP_OTHER_NODE 0x800000u@@ -91,7 +90,6 @@ struct vm_area_struct;#define __GFP_NO_KSWAPD ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_NO_KSWAPD)#define __GFP_OTHER_NODE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_OTHER_NODE)/* On behalf of other node */ -#define __GFP_KMEMCG ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_KMEMCG)/* Allocation comes from a memcg-accounted resource */ #define __GFP_WRITE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_WRITE)/* Allocator intends to dirty page */ /* @@ -353,6 +351,10 @@ extern struct page *alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,#define alloc_page_vma_node (gfp_mask, vma, addr, node) \ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_mask, 0, vma, addr, node) +extern struct page *alloc_kmem_pages (gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order); +extern struct page *alloc_kmem_pages_node (int nid,gfp_t gfp_mask, +unsigned int order); +extern unsigned long __get_free_pages (gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order);extern unsigned long get_zeroed_page (gfp_t gfp_mask);@@ -372,8 +374,8 @@ extern void free_pages(unsigned long addr, unsigned int order);extern void free_hot_cold_page (struct page *page,int cold);extern void free_hot_cold_page_list (struct list_head *list,int cold); -extern void __free_memcg_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order); -extern void free_memcg_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order); +extern void __free_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order); +extern void free_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order);
Quoted 12 lines
include/linux/memcontrol.h memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup **memcg, int order) · line 545
Quoted 10 lines
include/linux/gfp.h +0
-0#define __free_page (page) __free_pages((page), 0)#define free_page (addr) free_pages((addr), 0)include/linux/memcontrol.h +0
-0@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup **memcg, int order)* res_counter_charge_nofail, but we hope those allocations are rare, * and won't be worth the trouble. */ Just a few lines higher in first
memcg_kmem_newpage_charge()comment, there is a leftover reference toGFP_KMEMCGwhich should be removed.
Good catch, will resend.
Thank you for the review!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH 1/1 mm: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG
In reply to Vladimir DavydovCurrently to allocate a page that should be charged to kmemcg (e.g. threadinfo), we pass __GFP_KMEMCG flag to the page allocator. The page allocated is then to be freed by free_memcg_kmem_pages. Apart from looking asymmetrical, this also requires intrusion to the general allocation path. So let's introduce separate functions that will alloc/free pages charged to kmemcg.
The new functions are called alloc_kmem_pages and free_kmem_pages. They should be used when the caller actually would like to use kmalloc, but has to fall back to the page allocator for the allocation is large. They only differ from alloc_pages and free_pages in that besides allocating or freeing pages they also charge them to the kmem resource counter of the current memory cgroup.
---
Changes in v2.2:
- remove mentioning of GFP_KMEMCG in the comment to __memcg_kmem_newpage_charge
Changes in v2.1:
- add missing kmalloc_order forward declaration; lacking it caused compilation breakage with CONFIG_TRACING=n
include/linux/gfp.h | 10 ++++--- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 +- include/linux/slab.h | 11 +------- include/linux/thread_info.h | 2 -- include/trace/events/gfpflags.h | 1 - kernel/fork.c | 6 ++--- mm/memcontrol.c | 11 ++++---- mm/page_alloc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- mm/slab_common.c | 12 +++++++++ mm/slub.c | 6 ++--- 10 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
include/linux/gfp.h +6 -4
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ struct vm_area_struct;#define ___GFP_HARDWALL 0x20000u#define ___GFP_THISNODE 0x40000u#define ___GFP_RECLAIMABLE 0x80000u -#define ___GFP_KMEMCG 0x100000u#define ___GFP_NOTRACK 0x200000u#define ___GFP_NO_KSWAPD 0x400000u#define ___GFP_OTHER_NODE 0x800000u
@@ -91,7 +90,6 @@ struct vm_area_struct;#define __GFP_NO_KSWAPD ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_NO_KSWAPD)#define __GFP_OTHER_NODE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_OTHER_NODE)/* On behalf of other node */ -#define __GFP_KMEMCG ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_KMEMCG)/* Allocation comes from a memcg-accounted resource */ #define __GFP_WRITE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_WRITE)/* Allocator intends to dirty page */ /*
@@ -353,6 +351,10 @@ extern struct page *alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,#define alloc_page_vma_node (gfp_mask, vma, addr, node) \ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_mask, 0, vma, addr, node) +extern struct page *alloc_kmem_pages (gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order); +extern struct page *alloc_kmem_pages_node (int nid,gfp_t gfp_mask, +unsigned int order); +extern unsigned long __get_free_pages (gfp_t gfp_mask,unsigned int order);extern unsigned long get_zeroed_page (gfp_t gfp_mask);
@@ -372,8 +374,8 @@ extern void free_pages(unsigned long addr, unsigned int order);extern void free_hot_cold_page (struct page *page,int cold);extern void free_hot_cold_page_list (struct list_head *list,int cold); -extern void __free_memcg_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order); -extern void free_memcg_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order); +extern void __free_kmem_pages (struct page *page,unsigned int order); +extern void free_kmem_pages (unsigned long addr,unsigned int order);#define __free_page (page) __free_pages((page), 0)#define free_page (addr) free_pages((addr), 0)
include/linux/memcontrol.h +1 -1
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup **memcg, int order)* res_counter_charge_nofail, but we hope those allocations are rare, * and won't be worth the trouble. */ -if (!(gfp & __GFP_KMEMCG) || (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL)) +if (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL)return true;if (in_interrupt () || (!current->mm) || (current->flags &PF_KTHREAD ))return true;
include/linux/slab.h +1 -10
@@ -358,16 +358,7 @@ kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s,#include <linux/slub_def.h> #endif -static __always_inline void * -kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) -{ -void *ret; - - flags |= (__GFP_COMP | __GFP_KMEMCG); - ret = (void *)__get_free_pages (flags, order); -kmemleak_alloc (ret, size,1 , flags); -return ret; -} +extern void *kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order);#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING extern void *kmalloc_order_trace (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order);
include/linux/thread_info.h +0 -2
@@ -61,8 +61,6 @@ extern long do_no_restart_syscall(struct restart_block *parm);# define THREADINFO_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK)#endif -#define THREADINFO_GFP_ACCOUNTED (THREADINFO_GFP | __GFP_KMEMCG) -/* * flag set/clear/test wrappers * - pass TIF_xxxx constants to these functions
include/trace/events/gfpflags.h +0 -1
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ {(unsigned long)__GFP_HARDWALL, "GFP_HARDWALL"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_THISNODE, "GFP_THISNODE"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_RECLAIMABLE, "GFP_RECLAIMABLE"}, \ - {(unsigned long)__GFP_KMEMCG, "GFP_KMEMCG"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_MOVABLE, "GFP_MOVABLE"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_NOTRACK, "GFP_NOTRACK"}, \ {(unsigned long)__GFP_NO_KSWAPD, "GFP_NO_KSWAPD"}, \
kernel/fork.c +3 -3
@@ -150,15 +150,15 @@ void __weak arch_release_thread_info(struct thread_info *ti)static struct thread_info *alloc_thread_info_node (struct task_struct *tsk,int node) { -struct page *page =alloc_pages_node (node,THREADINFO_GFP_ACCOUNTED , -THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ); +struct page *page =alloc_kmem_pages_node (node,THREADINFO_GFP , +THREAD_SIZE_ORDER );return page ?page_address (page) :NULL ; }static inline void free_thread_info (struct thread_info *ti) { -free_memcg_kmem_pages ((unsigned long )ti,THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ); +free_kmem_pages ((unsigned long )ti,THREAD_SIZE_ORDER ); }# else static struct kmem_cache *thread_info_cache;
mm/memcontrol.c +6 -5
@@ -3531,11 +3531,12 @@ __memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup **_memcg, int order)/* * Disabling accounting is only relevant for some specific memcg * internal allocations. Therefore we would initially not have such -* check here, since direct calls to the page allocator that are marked -* with GFP_KMEMCG only happen outside memcg core. We are mostly -* concerned with cache allocations, and by having this test at -* memcg_kmem_get_cache, we are already able to relay the allocation to -* the root cache and bypass the memcg cache altogether. +* check here, since direct calls to the page allocator that are +* accounted to kmemcg (alloc_kmem_pages and friends) only happen +* outside memcg core. We are mostly concerned with cache allocations, +* and by having this test at memcg_kmem_get_cache, we are already able +* to relay the allocation to the root cache and bypass the memcg cache +* altogether. * * There is one exception, though: the SLUB allocator does not create * large order caches, but rather service large kmallocs directly from
mm/page_alloc.c +35 -21
90 lines not on this page · raw message
mm/slab_common.c +12 -0
@@ -573,6 +573,18 @@ void __init create_kmalloc_caches(unsigned long flags) }#endif /* !CONFIG_SLOB */ +void *kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) +{ +void *ret; +struct page *page; + + flags |= __GFP_COMP; + page =alloc_kmem_pages (flags, order); + ret = page ?page_address (page) :NULL ; +kmemleak_alloc (ret, size,1 , flags); +return ret; +} +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING void *kmalloc_order_trace (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) {
mm/slub.c +3 -3
@@ -3335,8 +3335,8 @@ static void *kmalloc_large_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)struct page *page;void *ptr =NULL ; - flags |= __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOTRACK | __GFP_KMEMCG; - page =alloc_pages_node (node, flags,get_order (size)); + flags |= __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOTRACK; + page =alloc_kmem_pages_node (node, flags,get_order (size));if (page) ptr =page_address (page);
@@ -3405,7 +3405,7 @@ void kfree(const void *x)if (unlikely (!PageSlab (page))) {BUG_ON (!PageCompound (page));kfree_hook (x); -__free_memcg_kmem_pages (page,compound_order (page)); +__free_kmem_pages (page,compound_order (page));return ; }slab_free (page->slab_cache, page, object, _RET_IP_);
Signature · 7 lines
1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Andrew Morton
maintainerRe: [PATCH -mm v2.2] mm: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG
Quoted 17 lines · On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 19:05:59 +0400 Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]>…
Currently to allocate a page that should be charged to kmemcg (e.g. threadinfo), we pass
__GFP_KMEMCGflag to the page allocator. The page allocated is then to be freed byfree_memcg_kmem_pages. Apart from looking asymmetrical, this also requires intrusion to the general allocation path. So let's introduce separate functions that will alloc/free pages charged to kmemcg.The new functions are called
alloc_kmem_pagesandfree_kmem_pages. They should be used when the caller actually would like to use kmalloc, but has to fall back to the page allocator for the allocation is large. They only differ fromalloc_pagesandfree_pagesin that besides allocating or freeing pages they also charge them to the kmem resource counter of the current memory cgroup....
mm/slab_common.c +1
-0+void *kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order)
mm/slab_common.c void __init create_kmalloc_caches(unsigned long flags) · line 586
Quoted 10 lines
mm/slab_common.c +10
-0+{ +void *ret; +struct page *page; + + flags |= __GFP_COMP; + page =alloc_kmem_pages (flags, order); + ret = page ?page_address (page) :NULL ; +kmemleak_alloc (ret, size,1 , flags); +return ret; +}
While we're in there it wouldn't hurt to document this: why it exists, what it does, etc. And why it sets __GFP_COMP.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH 1/1 slab: document kmalloc_order
--- mm/slab_common.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
mm/slab_common.c +5 -0
@@ -573,6 +573,11 @@ void __init create_kmalloc_caches(unsigned long flags) }#endif /* !CONFIG_SLOB */ +/* +* To avoid unnecessary overhead, we pass through large allocation requests +* directly to the page allocator. We use __GFP_COMP, because we will need to +* know the allocation order to free the pages properly in kfree. +*/ void *kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) {void *ret;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
Re: [PATCH -mm] slab: document kmalloc_order
Quoted 7 lines · Vladimir Davydov
mm/slab_common.c +0
-0@@ -573,6 +573,11 @@ void __init create_kmalloc_caches(unsigned long flags) }
mm/slab_common.c void __init create_kmalloc_caches(unsigned long flags) · line 583
Quoted 10 lines
mm/slab_common.c +5
-0#endif /* !CONFIG_SLOB */ +/* +* To avoid unnecessary overhead, we pass through large allocation requests +* directly to the page allocator. We use __GFP_COMP, because we will need to +* know the allocation order to free the pages properly in kfree. +*/ void *kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) {void *ret;
??? kmalloc_order is defined in include/linux/slab.h
Re: [PATCH -mm] slab: document kmalloc_order
Quoted 10 lines · Christoph Lameter
Quoted 8 lines · Vladimir Davydov
mm/slab_common.c +0
-0@@ -573,6 +573,11 @@ void __init create_kmalloc_caches(unsigned long flags) }#endif /* !CONFIG_SLOB */
Quoted 10 lines
mm/slab_common.c void __init create_kmalloc_caches(unsigned long flags) · line 583
Quoted 9 lines
mm/slab_common.c +5
-0+/* +* To avoid unnecessary overhead, we pass through large allocation requests +* directly to the page allocator. We use __GFP_COMP, because we will need to +* know the allocation order to free the pages properly in kfree. +*/ void *kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) {void *ret;???
kmalloc_orderis defined ininclude/linux/slab.h
I moved it to slab_common.c in "[PATCH -mm v2.2] mm: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG"
Re: [PATCH -mm v2.2] mm: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG
In reply to Vladimir DavydovQuoted 7 lines · Vladimir Davydov
include/linux/slab.h +0
-1@@ -358,16 +358,7 @@ kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s,#include <linux/slub_def.h> #endif -static __always_inline void *
include/linux/slab.h kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, · line 361
Quoted 10 lines
include/linux/slab.h +1
-9-kmalloc_order(size_t size, gfp_t flags, unsigned int order) -{ - void *ret; - - flags |= (__GFP_COMP | __GFP_KMEMCG); - ret = (void *)__get_free_pages (flags, order); -kmemleak_alloc (ret, size,1 , flags); -return ret; -} +extern void *kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order);
Hmmm... This was intentional inlined to allow inline expansion for calls to kmalloc with large constants. The inline expansion directly converts these calls to page allocator calls avoiding slab overhead.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH -mm v2.2] mm: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG
Quoted 8 lines · Christoph Lameter
Quoted 6 lines · Vladimir Davydov
include/linux/slab.h +0
-0@@ -358,16 +358,7 @@ kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s,#include <linux/slub_def.h> #endif
Quoted 15 lines
include/linux/slab.h kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, · line 361
Quoted 11 lines
include/linux/slab.h +1
-10-static __always_inline void * -kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order) -{ -void *ret; - - flags |= (__GFP_COMP | __GFP_KMEMCG); - ret = (void *)__get_free_pages (flags, order); -kmemleak_alloc (ret, size,1 , flags); -return ret; -} +extern void *kmalloc_order (size_t size,gfp_t flags,unsigned int order);Hmmm... This was intentional inlined to allow inline expansion for calls to kmalloc with large constants. The inline expansion directly converts these calls to page allocator calls avoiding slab overhead.
I moved kmalloc_order() to slab_common.c, because I can't call alloc_kmem_pages() directly from the header (we don't have page_address() defined there, and including mm.h to slab.h wouldn't be good I think), and I don't want to introduce __get_free_kmem_pages(). Sorry that I didn't state this explicitly in the comment to the patch.
However, would it be any better if I introduced __get_free_kmem_pages() and called it from kmalloc_order(), which could be inlined then? I don't think so, because I would have to place __get_free_kmem_pages() in page_alloc.c just like __get_free_pages() (again, because including mm.h to gfp.h for page_address() isn't an option), and we would get exactly the same number of function calls.
I admit that this patch adds one extra function call to large kmallocs:
- before: __get_free_pages -> alloc_pages
- after: kmalloc_order -> alloc_kmem_pages -> alloc_pages
but that's not because I move kmalloc_order from the header, but rather because I introduce alloc_kmem_pages, which is not inline.
What can we do to eliminate it? We could place alloc_kmem_pages() definition to a header file, but since it needs memcontrol.h for kmemcg charging functions, that would lead to slab.h depending on memcontrol.h eventually, which is not good IMO.
Alternatively, we could
#ifndef MEMCG_KMEM
# define alloc_kmem_pages alloc_pages #endif
so that we would avoid any additional overhead if kmemcg is compiled out.
However, do we need to bother about one function call at all? My point is that one function call can be neglected in case of large kmem allocations, which are rather rare.
Any thoughts/objections?
Thanks.