Which companies contribute to Btrfs?
Howdy,
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
What I came up with (sorted alphabetically)
Couchbase (CouchDB)
Facebook
Fujitsu
Fusion-IO
Oracle
SGI
Suse
Are there other companies I missed?
Thanks,
Marc
Signature · 4 lines
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
Oh while we're at it, are there companies that can say they are using btrfs in production?
Marc
Signature · 4 lines
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
Quoted 5 lines · Marc MERLIN
Oh while we're at it, are there companies that can say they are using btrfs in production?
Marc
On the Gluster Listsrv a few brave souls have used it on as a distributive filesystem[1]. Here at UCI's HPC Cluster we *might* use it on a scratch filesystem ... if we upgrade to a newer kernel....
[1]: http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2014-April/039896.html
Signature · 1 line
Adam Brenner <[email protected]>
Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
In reply to Marc MERLINQuoted 5 lines · Marc MERLIN
Oh while we're at it, are there companies that can say they are using btrfs in production?
Marc
Ohio Gravure Technologies is currently preparing to use it on our next generation of production systems.
Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
In reply to Marc MERLINQuoted 2 lines · Marc MERLIN
Oh while we're at it, are there companies that can say they are using btrfs in production?
Jolla is selling smartphones with btrfs.
Signature · 2 lines
Tomasz Torcz There exists no separation between gods and men: xmpp: [email protected] one blends softly casual into the other.
Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
In reply to Marc MERLINQuoted 4 lines · Marc MERLIN
Oh while we're at it, are there companies that can say they are using btrfs in production?
Marc
Netgear uses BTRFS as the filesystem in their refreshed ReadyNAS line. They apparently use Oracle's linux distro so I assume they're relying on them to do most of the heavy lifting as far as support BTRFS and backporting goes since they're still on 3.0! They also have raid5/6 support so they are probably running BTRFS on top of md.
http://www.netgear.com/images/BTRFS%20on%20ReadyNAS%20OS%206_9May1318-76105.pdf
Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
Quoted 4 lines · Daniel Lee
Quoted 3 lines · Marc MERLIN
Oh while we're at it, are there companies that can say they are using btrfs in production?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Marc
Netgear uses BTRFS as the filesystem in their refreshed ReadyNAS line. They apparently use Oracle's linux distro so I assume they're relying on them to do most of the heavy lifting as far as support BTRFS and backporting goes since they're still on 3.0! They also have raid5/6 support so they are probably running BTRFS on top of md.
http://www.netgear.com/images/BTRFS%20on%20ReadyNAS%20OS%206_9May1318-76105.pdf
Thanks for those pointers.
I've created a page where we can add these:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Production_Users
Marc
Signature · 4 lines
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
In reply to Daniel LeeQuoted 11 lines · Daniel Lee
Quoted 4 lines · Marc MERLIN
Oh while we're at it, are there companies that can say they are using btrfs in production?
Marc
Netgear uses BTRFS as the filesystem in their refreshed ReadyNAS line. They apparently use Oracle's linux distro so I assume they're relying on them to do most of the heavy lifting as far as support BTRFS and backporting goes since they're still on 3.0! They also have raid5/6 support so they are probably running BTRFS on top of md.
Yes, and any contributions you see coming from me so far, come from NETGEAR. I've been using my gmail account because I can't make our corporate email server leave off the nasty confidentiality legal disclaimer.
We don't use Oracle's distro. Our OS is a Debian derivative, but we have pulled in lots of changes from Oracle UEK and the SUSE SLE11-SP3 kernel tree. And we do indeed run atop MD.
-Justin
Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
Quoted 13 lines · Justin Maggard
Quoted 11 lines · Daniel Lee
Quoted 4 lines · Marc MERLIN
Oh while we're at it, are there companies that can say they are using btrfs in production?
Marc
Netgear uses BTRFS as the filesystem in their refreshed ReadyNAS line. They apparently use Oracle's linux distro so I assume they're relying on them to do most of the heavy lifting as far as support BTRFS and backporting goes since they're still on 3.0! They also have raid5/6 support so they are probably running BTRFS on top of md.
Quoted 2 lines
Yes, and any contributions you see coming from me so far, come from NETGEAR. I've been using my gmail account because I can't make our
Thanks.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Contributors
Updated :)
and you were already on
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Production_Users
Marc
Signature · 4 lines
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
Quoted 7 lines · Marc MERLIN
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Netgear uses BTRFS as the filesystem in their refreshed ReadyNAS line. They apparently use Oracle's linux distro so I assume they're relying on them to do most of the heavy lifting as far as support BTRFS and backporting goes since they're still on 3.0! They also have raid5/6 support so they are probably running BTRFS on top of md.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Yes, and any contributions you see coming from me so far, come from NETGEAR. I've been using my gmail account because I can't make our
Thanks.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Contributors
Updated :)
There are lots of contributors with the same small amout of patches contributed and are not listed there. This is first time I hear about Netgear being a contributor and it looks strange to see that name among the major contributors.
If there's demand to list all the minor contributors, then let's add a separate section, otherwise I'm going to remove the entry.
This is a sensitive PR topic that I'm normally avoiding, but in this case I don't see the amount of contributions that would qualify to the "hall of fame".
Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
Quoted 20 lines · David Sterba
Quoted 7 lines · Marc MERLIN
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Netgear uses BTRFS as the filesystem in their refreshed ReadyNAS line. They apparently use Oracle's linux distro so I assume they're relying on them to do most of the heavy lifting as far as support BTRFS and backporting goes since they're still on 3.0! They also have raid5/6 support so they are probably running BTRFS on top of md.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Yes, and any contributions you see coming from me so far, come from NETGEAR. I've been using my gmail account because I can't make our
Thanks.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Contributors
Updated :)There are lots of contributors with the same small amout of patches contributed and are not listed there. This is first time I hear about Netgear being a contributor and it looks strange to see that name among the major contributors.
Quoted 7 lines
If there's demand to list all the minor contributors, then let's add a separate section, otherwise I'm going to remove the entry.
This is a sensitive PR topic that I'm normally avoiding, but in this case I don't see the amount of contributions that would qualify to the "hall of fame".
I'm always amazed when I count up the number of people and companies sending code in. There really are too many to list, but every talk I give includes a slide trying to give credit the community.
I'd be happy to see people add themselves to a "we're contributors" section if they have been part of progs or kernel releases for a year.
Code review, patch submission, and helping users on the list/irc all count.
-chris
Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
In reply to David SterbaQuoted 15 lines · David Sterba
Quoted 7 lines · Marc MERLIN
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Netgear uses BTRFS as the filesystem in their refreshed ReadyNAS line. They apparently use Oracle's linux distro so I assume they're relying on them to do most of the heavy lifting as far as support BTRFS and backporting goes since they're still on 3.0! They also have raid5/6 support so they are probably running BTRFS on top of md.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Yes, and any contributions you see coming from me so far, come from NETGEAR. I've been using my gmail account because I can't make our
Thanks.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Contributors
Updated :)
Quoted 7 lines
There are lots of contributors with the same small amout of patches contributed and are not listed there. This is first time I hear about Netgear being a contributor and it looks strange to see that name among the major contributors.
If there's demand to list all the minor contributors, then let's add a separate section, otherwise I'm going to remove the entry.
Mmmh. So I'm not Jon Corbet who has all those fancy honed scripts + non trivial time he spends doing this by hand.
That said, my goal was not to say which company gave the most contributions and try and rank them.
Honestly, right now any company that is using btrfs and contributing to it is a great thing in my book.
I'm not even a fan of counting number of lines or frequency of patches. How do you compare someone sending easy cleanup patches vs someone who spent a month tracking down a file corruption problem no one could find nor fix, and sends a 3 line patch to fix it in the end?
But eh, I'm just one guy and and it's just my opinion :)
How about we leave that decision with Chris Mason?
Marc
Signature · 4 lines
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | PGP 1024R/763BE901Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
Quoted 27 lines · Marc MERLIN
Quoted 15 lines · David Sterba
Quoted 7 lines · Marc MERLIN
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Netgear uses BTRFS as the filesystem in their refreshed ReadyNAS line. They apparently use Oracle's linux distro so I assume they're relying on them to do most of the heavy lifting as far as support BTRFS and backporting goes since they're still on 3.0! They also have raid5/6 support so they are probably running BTRFS on top of md.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Yes, and any contributions you see coming from me so far, come from NETGEAR. I've been using my gmail account because I can't make our
Thanks.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Contributors
Updated :)Quoted 7 lines
There are lots of contributors with the same small amout of patches contributed and are not listed there. This is first time I hear about Netgear being a contributor and it looks strange to see that name among the major contributors.
If there's demand to list all the minor contributors, then let's add a separate section, otherwise I'm going to remove the entry.
Mmmh. So I'm not Jon Corbet who has all those fancy honed scripts + non trivial time he spends doing this by hand.
Quoted 9 lines
That said, my goal was not to say which company gave the most contributions and try and rank them.
Honestly, right now any company that is using btrfs and contributing to it is a great thing in my book.
I'm not even a fan of counting number of lines or frequency of patches. How do you compare someone sending easy cleanup patches vs someone who spent a month tracking down a file corruption problem no one could find nor fix, and sends a 3 line patch to fix it in the end?
+1
For such a small community I think it would be a mistake to have arbitrary quality or quantity
thresholds for "who deserves to be on the list".
I think you should list everyone. Even if they only sent a single patch to fix a typo in a comment.
If they sent a patch, then it means they care about the code base and then they should be on the list.
Quoted 1 line
But eh, I'm just one guy and and it's just my opinion :)
Me too.
Quoted 13 lines
How about we leave that decision with Chris Mason?
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | PGP 1024R/763BE901
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
In reply to Marc MERLINQuoted 8 lines · Marc MERLIN
Quoted 7 lines
There are lots of contributors with the same small amout of patches contributed and are not listed there. This is first time I hear about Netgear being a contributor and it looks strange to see that name among the major contributors.
If there's demand to list all the minor contributors, then let's add a separate section, otherwise I'm going to remove the entry.
Quoted 8 lines
That said, my goal was not to say which company gave the most contributions and try and rank them.
Honestly, right now any company that is using btrfs and contributing to it is a great thing in my book.
I'm not even a fan of counting number of lines or frequency of patches. How do you compare someone sending easy cleanup patches vs someone who spent a month tracking down a file corruption problem no one could find nor fix, and sends a 3 line patch to fix it in the end?
Patch count itself as a metric does not work, I'm roughly calculating amount of work spent on contribution in the area of patches, testing, bugreporting, documentation, community support. For all the companies listed there is a clear record of these activies, that's what they get the credit for.
The non-company/community deserve the entry on itself, but I was not discussing community contributions.
I really like to see random people sending patches and I try to help them to get patches merged by doing reviews or commenting.
Quoted 1 line
How about we leave that decision with Chris Mason?
He's been CCed for that purpose and made a statement which I don't have a slightest problem to agree with:
Quoted 3 lines
I'd be happy to see people add themselves to a "we're contributors" section if they have been part of progs or kernel releases for a year. Code review, patch submission, and helping users on the list/irc all count.
Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production?
In reply to Marc MERLINQuoted 27 lines · Marc MERLIN
Quoted 15 lines · David Sterba
Quoted 7 lines · Marc MERLIN
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Netgear uses BTRFS as the filesystem in their refreshed ReadyNAS line. They apparently use Oracle's linux distro so I assume they're relying on them to do most of the heavy lifting as far as support BTRFS and backporting goes since they're still on 3.0! They also have raid5/6 support so they are probably running BTRFS on top of md.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Yes, and any contributions you see coming from me so far, come from NETGEAR. I've been using my gmail account because I can't make our
Thanks.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Contributors
Updated :)Quoted 7 lines
There are lots of contributors with the same small amout of patches contributed and are not listed there. This is first time I hear about Netgear being a contributor and it looks strange to see that name among the major contributors.
If there's demand to list all the minor contributors, then let's add a separate section, otherwise I'm going to remove the entry.
Mmmh. So I'm not Jon Corbet who has all those fancy honed scripts + non trivial time he spends doing this by hand.
Quoted 8 lines
That said, my goal was not to say which company gave the most contributions and try and rank them.
Honestly, right now any company that is using btrfs and contributing to it is a great thing in my book.
I'm not even a fan of counting number of lines or frequency of patches. How do you compare someone sending easy cleanup patches vs someone who spent a month tracking down a file corruption problem no one could find nor fix, and sends a 3 line patch to fix it in the end?
Just for the record, I certainly didn't mean that my git patch-counting example was the be-all and end-all of "contribution accounting" - it's just one metric of many; not meant to be inclusive, but might help to avoid missing people or companies who have contributed in this particular way.
-Eric
Quoted 14 lines · Marc MERLIN
Howdy,
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
What I came up with (sorted alphabetically)
Couchbase (CouchDB)
Fujitsu
Fusion-IO
Oracle
SGI
Suse
Quoted 5 lines
Are there other companies I missed?
Thanks,
Marc
git knows! (sorry for the bash horribleness, and I'm sure you can collapse i.e. jp.fujitsu.com and cn.fujitsu.com into "Fujitsu" somehow...
[root@host linux-2.6]# git log --format=%ae fs/btrfs/ | awk -F @ '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n <snip>
10 diku.dk
11 linux.intel.com
12 linux.vnet.ibm.com
13 linux-m68k.org
15 infradead.org
20 suse.de
24 intel.com
30 fb.com
35 googlemail.com
35 newdream.net
48 lst.de
50 gmx.net
55 21cn.com
55 jp.fujitsu.com
60 suse.com
76 zeniv.linux.org.uk
93 jan-o-sch.net
102 giantdisaster.de
109 suse.cz
176 linux-foundation.org
310 fusionio.com
324 gmail.com
388 redhat.com
552 cn.fujitsu.com1198 oracle.com
[root@host btrfs-progs]# git log --format=%ae | awk -F @ '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n <snip>
10 inwind.it
10 linux.vnet.ibm.com
10 suse.de
13 gentoo.org
15 21cn.com
15 jan-o-sch.net
34 giantdisaster.de
55 suse.cz
77 fusionio.com
104 gmail.com
171 cn.fujitsu.com
183 redhat.com
405 oracle.comQuoted 4 lines · Marc MERLIN
Howdy,
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
Also...
Quoted 7 lines
What I came up with (sorted alphabetically)
Couchbase (CouchDB)
Fujitsu
Fusion-IO
Oracle
SGI
^^^ uh, really?
-Eric
Quoted 7 lines
Suse
Are there other companies I missed?
Thanks,
Marc
Quoted 8 lines · Eric Sandeen
Quoted 4 lines · Marc MERLIN
Howdy,
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
Also...
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines
What I came up with (sorted alphabetically)
Couchbase (CouchDB)
Fujitsu
Fusion-IO
Oracle
SGI^^^ uh, really?
I may have picked up some changes related to xfs tests.
I can remove that if that was mistake (and thanks for your other list)
Marc
Signature · 4 lines
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ Quoted 17 lines · Marc MERLIN
Quoted 17 lines · Eric Sandeen
Quoted 5 lines · Marc MERLIN
Howdy,
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
Also...
Quoted 7 lines
What I came up with (sorted alphabetically)
Couchbase (CouchDB)
Fujitsu
Fusion-IO
Oracle
SGI
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
^^^ uh, really?
I may have picked up some changes related to xfs tests.
I can remove that if that was mistake (and thanks for your other list)
Yeah, sgi isn't working on btrfs.
And you are welcome. :)
Eric
Quoted 6 lines
Marc
Signature · 4 lines
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
Quoted 7 lines · Marc MERLIN
Howdy,
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
What I came up with (sorted alphabetically)
Couchbase (CouchDB)
Hi Marc,
If you're listing Couchbase because you noticed I'm one of their employees, then you can remove it from the list (I've never seen any couchbase mail address or other employees contributing anything to btrfs).
All my contributions are done during my personal time and by my own initiative (that's why I only use my personal gmail address for all messages to this list and patches).
As an aside, CouchDB is an Apache Software Foundation project, completely unrelated to Couchbase. It's unfortunate the company uses the term Couch for its name/products too - it confuses a lot of people
- as one of the ex-founders was the CouchDB creator and it employs (and employed more in the past) CouchDB contributors (like me). Both databases are very different at several levels: features, goals, architecture, implementation, etc.
thanks
Quoted 20 lines
Fujitsu
Fusion-IO
Oracle
SGI
SuseAre there other companies I missed?
Thanks,
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 5 lines
Filipe David Manana, "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Quoted 11 lines · Filipe David Manana
Quoted 7 lines · Marc MERLIN
Howdy,
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
What I came up with (sorted alphabetically)
Couchbase (CouchDB)Hi Marc,
Quoted 7 lines
If you're listing Couchbase because you noticed I'm one of their employees, then you can remove it from the list (I've never seen any couchbase mail address or other employees contributing anything to btrfs).
All my contributions are done during my personal time and by my own initiative (that's why I only use my personal gmail address for all messages to this list and patches).
Understood, thanks for letting me know, and thanks for your contributions :)
Quoted 3 lines
As an aside, CouchDB is an Apache Software Foundation project, completely unrelated to Couchbase. It's unfortunate the company uses the term Couch for its name/products too - it confuses a lot of people
Argh, I indeed got confused, thanks for correcting that.
Marc
Quoted 37 lines
- as one of the ex-founders was the CouchDB creator and it employs (and employed more in the past) CouchDB contributors (like me). Both databases are very different at several levels: features, goals, architecture, implementation, etc.
thanks
Quoted 20 lines
Fujitsu
Fusion-IO
Oracle
SGI
SuseAre there other companies I missed?
Thanks,
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlSignature · 5 lines
Filipe David Manana, "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Signature · 4 lines
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | PGP 1024R/763BE901Quoted 2 lines · Marc MERLIN
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
"[...] Jointly developed at Oracle, Red Hat, Fujitsu, Intel, SUSE, STRATO [...]"
Quoted 1 line
Are there other companies I missed?
STRATO, the guys who wrote scrub, integrity checker, quotas, device stats, device-replace and portions of send/receive.
Quoted 9 lines · David Sterba
Quoted 2 lines · Marc MERLIN
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
"[...] Jointly developed at Oracle, Red Hat, Fujitsu, Intel, SUSE, STRATO [...]"
Quoted 1 line
Are there other companies I missed?
The page now says "... Jointly developed at Facebook, Oracle, Red Hat .... " :D
Signature · 1 line
Fajar
Quoted 5 lines · Fajar A. Nugraha
Quoted 4 lines · David Sterba
Quoted 2 lines · Marc MERLIN
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
"[...] Jointly developed at Oracle, Red Hat, Fujitsu, Intel, SUSE, STRATO [...]"
Quoted 1 line
Are there other companies I missed?
The page now says "... Jointly developed at Facebook, Oracle, Red Hat .... " :D
I went a step further and made a web page to list contributors here:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Contributors
Thanks,
Marc
Signature · 4 lines
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ Quoted 2 lines · On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:18:34 -0700 Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> wrote:
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
So I just ran into this now. I did a quick gitdm run over the entire btrfs history in the kernel and came up with this:
Top changeset contributors by employer
Oracle 1249 (33.2%)
Fujitsu 613 (16.3%)
Red Hat 483 (12.8%)
Fusion-IO 296 (7.9%)
(None) 288 (7.6%)
Novell 203 (5.4%)
STRATO AG 152 (4.0%)
Couchbase 106 (2.8%)
(Consultant) 62 (1.6%)
(Unknown) 54 (1.4%)
Intel 48 (1.3%)
New Dream Network 36 (1.0%)
Facebook 31 (0.8%)
IBM 20 (0.5%)
FOSS Outreach Program for Women 12 (0.3%)
Google 12 (0.3%)
(Academia) 11 (0.3%)
Parallels 11 (0.3%)
HP 10 (0.3%)
Datera Inc. 5 (0.1%)
I would expect the rankings to change a bit in the near future, if those slackers at Facebook ever get it in gear...:)
jon
Quoted 31 lines · Jonathan Corbet
Quoted 2 lines · On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:18:34 -0700 Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> wrote:
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
So I just ran into this now. I did a quick gitdm run over the entire btrfs history in the kernel and came up with this:
Top changeset contributors by employer
Oracle 1249 (33.2%)
Fujitsu 613 (16.3%)
Red Hat 483 (12.8%)
Fusion-IO 296 (7.9%)
(None) 288 (7.6%)
Novell 203 (5.4%)
STRATO AG 152 (4.0%)
Couchbase 106 (2.8%)
(Consultant) 62 (1.6%)
(Unknown) 54 (1.4%)
Intel 48 (1.3%)
New Dream Network 36 (1.0%)
Facebook 31 (0.8%)
IBM 20 (0.5%)
FOSS Outreach Program for Women 12 (0.3%)
Google 12 (0.3%)
(Academia) 11 (0.3%)
Parallels 11 (0.3%)
HP 10 (0.3%)
Datera Inc. 5 (0.1%)
Quoted 2 lines
I would expect the rankings to change a bit in the near future, if those slackers at Facebook ever get it in gear...:)
Grin, Josef has taken a few weeks off to look after the newly released Josefv3.
We've got the pool of web servers on btrfs at 800 now, and soon I'm sure it'll start kicking out some fun bugs.
Once we get the btrfs tier up to 1000, I'll have a second slice of 1000 machines running 3.14 as well (or whatever the current linus rev is).
Those will be btrfs too, I expect the crash recovery code will get quite a bit of testing.
-chris
Quoted 11 lines · Jonathan Corbet
Quoted 2 lines · On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:18:34 -0700 Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> wrote:
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
So I just ran into this now. I did a quick gitdm run over the entire btrfs history in the kernel and came up with this:
Top changeset contributors by employer
Oracle 1249 (33.2%)
...
Quoted 1 line
Fusion-IO 296 (7.9%)
...
Quoted 1 line
Facebook 31 (0.8%)
I wonder how much of this is actually due to Chris Mason changing his email address.
Quoted 12 lines · Chester
Quoted 11 lines · Jonathan Corbet
Quoted 2 lines · On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:18:34 -0700 Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> wrote:
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
So I just ran into this now. I did a quick gitdm run over the entire btrfs history in the kernel and came up with this:
Top changeset contributors by employer
Oracle 1249 (33.2%)
Quoted 7 lines
...
Quoted 1 line
Fusion-IO 296 (7.9%)...
Quoted 1 line
Facebook 31 (0.8%)
I wonder how much of this is actually due to Chris Mason changing his email address.
You can buy domain names on the open market.
You can also buy developer Emails and you get a free developer along with the Email you just bought ;-)
Marc
Signature · 4 lines
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ Quoted 12 lines · Chester
Quoted 11 lines · Jonathan Corbet
Quoted 2 lines · On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:18:34 -0700 Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> wrote:
I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
So I just ran into this now. I did a quick gitdm run over the entire btrfs history in the kernel and came up with this:
Top changeset contributors by employer
Oracle 1249 (33.2%)
Quoted 7 lines
...
Quoted 1 line
Fusion-IO 296 (7.9%)...
Quoted 1 line
Facebook 31 (0.8%)
I wonder how much of this is actually due to Chris Mason changing his email address.
Most of those are really Josef, but it's the right idea.
-chris