Skip to contentSkip to conversation

recvfrom01: fix test for invalid message flags

LTP Chuck Ebbert 3 participants 5 messages Oct 1, 2014 – Jan 8, 2015

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

The recv tests were making invalid assumptions about how flags are checked by the kernel. (It makes no explicit tests for invalid flags or combinations of flags.) [1] So the current method of setting every possible flag and checking for a specific error is not valid.

Before kernel 3.17 we were effectively just testing having the MSG_OOB flag set with no out-of-band data available. With 3.17 and later we were testing having MSG_ERRQUEUE set with no error data available, which returns a different error (and causes the existing test to fail).

Replace the bogus test for invalid flags with two new tests that check return codes for invalid MSG_OOB and MSG_ERRQUEUE flags.

Note that this introduces a failure on kernels before 3.17, which has a bug fix for MSG_ERRQUEUE flag handling. This failure is a legitimate bug on these older kernels. (They should not be returning success with no data available.)

[1] http://marc.info/?t=141148149900006&r=1&w=2

---

Additional test cases for invalid flags could be added after these two. And the recv01 and recvmsg01 tests need still need to be fixed, assuming this is the right solution.

testcases/kernel/syscalls/recvfrom/recvfrom01.c +7 -2
@@ -115,9 +115,14 @@
 		    -1, EFAULT, setup1, cleanup1, "invalid recv buffer"},
 /* 6 */
 	{
-	PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0, (void *)buf, sizeof(buf), -1,
+	PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0, (void *)buf, sizeof(buf), MSG_OOB,
 		    (struct sockaddr *)&from, &fromlen,
-		    -1, EINVAL, setup1, cleanup1, "invalid flags set"},};
+		    -1, EINVAL, setup1, cleanup1, "invalid MSG_OOB flag set"},
+/* 7 */
+	{
+	PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0, (void *)buf, sizeof(buf), MSG_ERRQUEUE,
+		    (struct sockaddr *)&from, &fromlen,
+		    -1, EAGAIN, setup1, cleanup1, "invalid MSG_ERRQUEUE flag set"},};
 
 int TST_TOTAL = sizeof(tdat) / sizeof(tdat[0]);
 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

#1 lore raw

Hi!

Quoted 10 lines

The recv tests were making invalid assumptions about how flags are checked by the kernel. (It makes no explicit tests for invalid flags or combinations of flags.) [1] So the current method of setting every possible flag and checking for a specific error is not valid.

Before kernel 3.17 we were effectively just testing having the MSG_OOB flag set with no out-of-band data available. With 3.17 and later we were testing having MSG_ERRQUEUE set with no error data available, which returns a different error (and causes the existing test to fail).

Quoted 7 lines

Replace the bogus test for invalid flags with two new tests that check return codes for invalid MSG_OOB and MSG_ERRQUEUE flags.

Note that this introduces a failure on kernels before 3.17, which has a bug fix for MSG_ERRQUEUE flag handling. This failure is a legitimate bug on these older kernels. (They should not be returning success with no data available.)

Sorry for the delay, acked, tested and pushed, thanks.

Will you also send similar patches for the rest of the recv testcases?

Signature · 8 lines
Cyril Hrubis
[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
#2 lore raw

Hi!

Quoted 3 lines

Sorry for the delay, acked, tested and pushed, thanks.

Will you also send similar patches for the rest of the recv testcases?

FYI: I've fixex recvmsg01 and recv01 as well. Again, sorry for the delay.

Signature · 13 lines
Cyril Hrubis
[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
#3 lore raw
In reply to Chuck Ebbert

----- Original Message -----

Quoted 11 lines

From: "Chuck Ebbert" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, 2 October, 2014 12:10:32 AM
Subject: [LTP] recvfrom01: fix test for invalid message flags

Note that this introduces a failure on kernels before 3.17, which has a bug fix for MSG_ERRQUEUE flag handling. This failure is a legitimate bug on these older kernels. (They should not be returning success with no data available.)

I hit a failure in this testcase while trying latest LTP before release. Are you sure this is a bug?

Looking at commit history and man-pages, this looks more like new feature to me, flag that has not been supported before and now it is.

"MSG_ERRQUEUE is illegal on SOCK_STREAM sockets." [1]
"TCP timestamping introduced MSG_ERRQUEUE handling for TCP sockets." [2][3]

Until commit [3], tcp_recvmsg() has ignored this flag and it was also documented that way. So, I don't see why TFAIL is valid result on <3.17 for MSG_ERRQUEUE test:

socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(59273), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, 16) = 0
select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, {2, 0}) = 1 (in [3], left {1, 999998})
recvfrom(3, "hoser\n", 1024, MSG_ERRQUEUE, NULL, NULL) = 6

Regards,
Jan

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/18/182
[2] f4713a3dfad045d46afcb9c2a7d0bba288920ed4
[3] 4ed2d765dfaccff5ebdac68e2064b59125033a3b

Quoted 31 lines

[1] http://marc.info/?t=141148149900006&r=1&w=2

---

Additional test cases for invalid flags could be added after these two. And the recv01 and recvmsg01 tests need still need to be fixed, assuming this is the right solution.

testcases/kernel/syscalls/recvfrom/recvfrom01.c +7 -3
@@ -115,9 +115,14 @@
 		    -1, EFAULT, setup1, cleanup1, "invalid recv buffer"},
 /* 6 */
 	{
-	PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0, (void *)buf, sizeof(buf), -1,
+	PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0, (void *)buf, sizeof(buf), MSG_OOB,
 		    (struct sockaddr *)&from, &fromlen,
-		    -1, EINVAL, setup1, cleanup1, "invalid flags set"},};
+		    -1, EINVAL, setup1, cleanup1, "invalid MSG_OOB flag set"},
+/* 7 */
+	{
+	PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0, (void *)buf, sizeof(buf), MSG_ERRQUEUE,
+		    (struct sockaddr *)&from, &fromlen,
+		    -1, EAGAIN, setup1, cleanup1, "invalid MSG_ERRQUEUE flag set"},};
 
 int TST_TOTAL = sizeof(tdat) / sizeof(tdat[0]);
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer

Quoted 9 lines

Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

#4 lore raw

Hi!

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Note that this introduces a failure on kernels before 3.17, which has a bug fix for MSG_ERRQUEUE flag handling. This failure is a legitimate bug on these older kernels. (They should not be returning success with no data available.)

I hit a failure in this testcase while trying latest LTP before release. Are you sure this is a bug?

Quoted 8 lines

Looking at commit history and man-pages, this looks more like new feature to me, flag that has not been supported before and now it is.

"MSG_ERRQUEUE is illegal on SOCK_STREAM sockets." [1]
"TCP timestamping introduced MSG_ERRQUEUE handling for TCP sockets." [2][3]

Until commit [3], tcp_recvmsg() has ignored this flag and it was also documented that way. So, I don't see why TFAIL is valid result on <3.17 for MSG_ERRQUEUE test:

I think that there is no harm in disabling that case for kernels prior 3.17.

Signature · 13 lines
Cyril Hrubis
[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list