ti-gfx: bump to version 5_01_01_01 if EABIhf is used
PATCH v2 1/1 ti-gfx: bump to version 5_01_01_01 if EABIhf is used
SDK 5_01_01_01 only support EABIhf so 5_01_00_01 is still used if EABIhf is not available.
---
Changes v1 -> v2:
- bump to 5_01_01_01 only if EABIhf is used as we still need to support softfp (Yann)
--- package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk +5 -3
@@ -4,15 +4,17 @@ # ################################################################################ -TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_00_01 -TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.10.2359475 - +# SDK 5_01_01_01 only support EABIhf so we downgrade to 5_01_00_01 if we can't +# use it. ifeq ($(BR2_ARM_EABIHF),y) +TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_01_01 TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_hardfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin else +TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_00_01 TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_softfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin endif +TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.10.2359475 TI_GFX_SITE = http://downloads.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_sb/targetcontent/gfxsdk/$(TI_GFX_VERSION)/exports/ TI_GFX_LICENSE = Technology / Software Publicly Available TI_GFX_LICENSE_FILES = TSPA.txt
Signature · 1 line
2.0.0
PATCH v2 1/1 ti-gfx: bump to version 5_01_01_01 if EABIhf is used
Dear Hadrien Boutteville,
package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk line 8
Quoted 2 lines · Hadrien Boutteville
package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk +2
-0+# SDK 5_01_01_01 only support EABIhf so we downgrade to 5_01_00_01 if we can't +# use it.
The wording is a bit confusing here: you say that "we downgrade to 5_01_00_01 if we can't use it", which to me doesn't make much sense, as we downgrade to something we can't use :-)
package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk line 17
Quoted 9 lines
ifeq ($(BR2_ARM_EABIHF),y)
package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk +3
-0+TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_01_01 TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_hardfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin else +TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_00_01 TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_softfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin endif +TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.10.2359475
Is the TI_GFX_SO_VERSION the same between both versions of ti-gfx?
Thanks!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH v2 1/1 ti-gfx: bump to version 5_01_01_01 if EABIhf is used
Thomas,
Quoted 8 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk line 8
Quoted 2 lines · Hadrien Boutteville
package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk +2
-0+# SDK 5_01_01_01 only support EABIhf so we downgrade to 5_01_00_01 if we can't +# use it.The wording is a bit confusing here: you say that "we downgrade to 5_01_00_01 if we can't use it", which to me doesn't make much sense, as we downgrade to something we can't use :-)
Erf, yes, in rereading this is actually not clear. I wanted to refer to EABIhf with "it". I have to fix that.
Quoted 11 lines
package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk line 17
Quoted 9 lines
ifeq ($(BR2_ARM_EABIHF),y)
package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk +3
-0+TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_01_01 TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_hardfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin else +TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_00_01 TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_softfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin endif +TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.10.2359475Is the
TI_GFX_SO_VERSIONthe same between both versions of ti-gfx?
Yes.
Thanks,
Hadrien